throbber
DOCKET NO: FBTCV186075645S
`
`SUPERIOR COURT
`
`ORDER 410631
`
`THEES, ELLEN MARIE
`
` V.
`KROBOT, DAVID J.
`
`JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD
` AT BRIDGEPORT
`
`9/23/2020
`
`ORDER
`
`The following order is entered in the above matter:
`
`ORDER:
`
`REVISED SCHEDULING ORDER
`
`In light of the interruption of jury trials due to the pandemic suspensions, the October 7, 2020 pretrial
`conference and the October 28, 2020 trial dates are marked off and the court issues the revised
`scheduling orders. Failure to comply with these orders may result in sanction, which may include fine,
`exclusion of evidence at trial, dismissal, default or non-suit.
`
`1. All discovery and all issues regarding discovery shall be completed at least 30 days before the trial
`date. The court may decline to entertain any issues regarding discovery after this date.
`FURTHER CONTINUANCES OF THE TRIAL DATE MAY NOT BE ENTERTAINED BASED ON
`INCOMPLETE DISCOVERY.
`
`2. Caseflow is directed to reschedule jury selection on the next available date on the trial docket and
`schedule a trial management/judicial settlement conference at least three weeks before the trial date. Any
`party may request an earlier judicial pretrial through the clerk's office by filing a Caseflow Request
`Form.
`
`Caseflow is also directed to schedule a judicial settlement conference before Judge Jacobs after January
`15, 2020. The parties are ORDERED to confer regarding their settlement positions before the
`conference and the parties and adjusters, as applicable, are ORDERED to be immediately available
`during the conference.
`
`3. No dispositive motions may be filed absent leave of court.
`
`This scheduling order can be modified ONLY with leave of court. Because rescheduling may
`substantially delay trial, motions to continue trial must be timely filed and supported by good cause. Any
`problems regarding completing discovery must be brought to the court's attention promptly through
`appropriate motion or conference request.
`
`The parties shall make good faith efforts to resolve discovery disputes before filing any motions or
`objections regarding same. Affidavits must be filed in compliance with P.B. §13-8(c) and § 13-10(i), for
`objections to interrogatories or requests for production to be placed on the short calendar.
`
`All discovery disputes should be resolved through motions or objections available under Chapter 13 of
`the Practice Book before the date for completion of discovery. Motions in limine or to preclude filed at
`the time of trial may not be considered when directed to discovery issues that could have been addressed
`through pretrial remedies available under Chapter 13.
`
`PRESIDING JUDGE, CIVIL
`FBTCV186075645S 9/23/2020
`
`Page 1 of 2
`
`

`

`Mailed to all appearing parties.
`
`410631
`
`Judge: BARRY STEVENS
`
`This document may be signed or verified electronically and has the same validity and status as a document with a physical
`(pen-to-paper) signature. For more information, see Section I.E. of the State of Connecticut Superior Court E-Services
`Procedures and Technical Standards (https://jud.ct.gov/external/super/E-Services/e-standards.pdf), section 51-193c of the
`Connecticut General Statutes and Connecticut Practice Book Section 4-4.
`
`FBTCV186075645S 9/23/2020
`
`Page 2 of 2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket