throbber
DOCKET NO: FBTCV186072602S
`
`SUPERIOR COURT
`
`ORDER 410631
`
`SANTOS FOUNDATIONS, INC.
`
` V.
`PUSTOLA & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS/
`CONSTRUCTORS, LLC
`
`JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD
` AT BRIDGEPORT
`
`7/8/2020
`
`ORDER
`
`The following order is entered in the above matter:
`
`ORDER:
`
`REVISED SCHEDULING ORDER
`
`Pursuant to a pretrial conference held in these consolidated cases on July 8, 2020 before Judge Stevens,
`the court issues the following scheduling order. Failure to comply with this order may result in sanction,
`which may include fine, exclusion of evidence at trial, dismissal, default or non-suit.
`
`1. No further interrogatories or requests for production may be served absent leave of court. Any
`amended pleadings shall be file by September 1, 2020.
`
`2. Depositions of parties and fact witnesses shall be completed by November 6, 2020.
`
`3. In accordance with Practice Book §13-4, the plaintiffs (and counter-claimants) shall disclose expert
`witnesses by December 18, 2020; any depositions of these experts shall be completed by March 5, 2021.
`Absent leave of court, no experts may be disclosed by these parties after this date.
`
`4. The defendants (and counterclaim defendants) shall disclose expert witnesses by April 16, 2021; the
`depositions of these experts shall be completed by July 2, 2021. Absent leave of court, no experts may
`be disclosed by these parties after this date.
`
`5. All depositions, all discovery and all issues regarding discovery shall be completed by July 2, 2021.
`If the parties are unable to agree on deposition dates, the party seeking the deposition shall file a timely
`motion for the court to address the dispute before the applicable deposition deadline date.
`
`6. Motions for summary judgment shall be filed by January 15, 2021; any written objection to any
`motion for summary judgment shall be filed within 45 days after the filing of the motion; any reply by
`the movant shall be filed within two weeks thereafter. Any motion for summary judgment shall be heard
`on the oral argument short calendar on or before March 29, 2021.
`
`7. The parties shall discuss engaging in private or judicial mediation, and if they decide to participate in
`mediation, the mediation shall be completed by August 6, 2021. . By June 4, 2021, plaintiff's counsel,
`Attorney McCoy, shall file a caseflow request form indicating that the parties have decided to pursue
`mediation and providing the name of the mediator and the date of the mediation; if the parties decide not
`to pursue mediation than the caseflow request for shall request an immediate status conference.
`
`8. Caseflow is directed to schedule a trial management/judicial settlement conference (with a judge other
`than the trial judge) and the commencement of a three day bench trial after September 10, 2021. Any
`party may request an earlier judicial pretrial through the clerk's office by filing a Caseflow Request
`Form.
`
`FBTCV186072602S 7/8/2020
`
`Page 1 of 2
`
`

`

`This Scheduling Order Can Be Modified Only Upon Motion and By Order of the Court. Absent
`Modification of this Scheduling Order, Any Disclosures Not Made or Discovery Not Completed Within
`the Times Specified May Be Deemed Waived and Abandoned. Thus the Parties Are Required to Bring
`Any Problems with the Scheduling or the Completion of Discovery to the Court’s Attention Promptly
`Through Appropriate Motion or Conference Request. Motions for Modification Shall Be Liberally
`Granted, Except That Motions to Continue a Trial Date Must Be Supported by Good Cause Because Any
`Rescheduled Date May Substantially Delay the Trial.
`
`The Parties Shall Make Good Faith Efforts to Resolve Discovery Disputes Before Filing Any Motions or
`Objections Regarding Same. No Objections Regarding Interrogatories or Requests for Production Shall
`Be Placed on the Short Calendar List Unless an Affidavit Is Filed Certifying That Bona Fide Efforts
`Have Been Made to Resolve the Dispute in Accordance with Practice Book Practice Book § 13-8 (c) and
`§ 13-10 (i).
`
`The Parties Are Ordered to Resolve All Discovery Disputes Through Motions or Objections Available
`under Chapter 13 of the Practice Book Before the Date for Completion of Discovery. Motions in
`Limine` and Motions to Preclude Filed at the Time of Trial May Not Be Entertained by the Court When
`Directed at Discovery Issues That Could Have Been Addressed and Resolved Through Pre-trial
`Remedies Available under Chapter 13 of the Practice Book.
`
`Mailed to all appearing parties.
`
`410631
`
`Judge: BARRY STEVENS
`
`This document may be signed or verified electronically and has the same validity and status as a document with a physical
`(pen-to-paper) signature. For more information, see Section I.E. of the State of Connecticut Superior Court E-Services
`Procedures and Technical Standards (https://jud.ct.gov/external/super/E-Services/e-standards.pdf), section 51-193c of the
`Connecticut General Statutes and Connecticut Practice Book Section 4-4.
`
`FBTCV186072602S 7/8/2020
`
`Page 2 of 2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket