throbber
DOCKET NO: DBDCV176021528S
`
`SUPERIOR COURT
`
`ORDER 435709
`
`BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC
` V.
`ZANE, CYNTHIA J., A/K/A CYNTHIA
`ZANE Et Al
`
`JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY
` AT DANBURY
`
`10/2/2018
`
`ORDER
`
`ORDER REGARDING:
`04/03/2018 115.00 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
`
`The foregoing, having been considered by the Court, is hereby:
`
`ORDER: GRANTED
`
`In this matter, the plaintiff has filed a motion for summary judgment, as to liability only, against Cynthia
`Zane ("Zane"). In support of its motion, the plaintiff has filed a memorandum of law, along with an
`affidavit.
`
`The plaintiff's complaint, dated December 15, 2016, alleges that Zane executed a note in the amount of
`$207,740.00 from Bank of America N.A. on June 27, 2008. The complaint alleges that Zane, in order to
`secure the note, executed and recorded an open-end mortgage deed with respect to her property. The
`complaint further alleges that the last payment received by plaintiff was for the November 1, 2013
`payment and that the outstanding principal balance due on the note is $204,768.03. In support of
`plaintiff's memorandum of law is the affidavit of Keli Smith ("Smith"), a document coordinator with
`Bayview Loan Servicing. Smith avers that she has personal knowledge of the records in connection with
`the Zane matter. According to Smith, Bayview Loan Servicing is the holder of the note that Zane
`executed in exchange for $207,740.00 on June 27, 2008. Smith further states that on that same date,
`Zane executed and recorded an open end mortgage deed to secure the note. Both a copy of the note and
`a copy of the mortgage were incorporated by reference in Smith's affidavit, and were attached and
`subsequently examined by the court. In addition, and also incorporated by reference in Smith's affidavit,
`all assignments that resulted in the standing that Bayview Loan Servicing now asserts, were attached and
`subsequently examined by the court. Smith also swears that there had been a default in the note and
`mortgage, with the last installment of principal and interest received was for the payment due November
`1, 2013. Finally, Smith states that Zane was provided with all mandatory notices and letters as required
`by state and federal law, and has attached and incorporated by reference those items, which the court has
`also examined.
`
`Although Zane has submitted an answer, there are no special defenses contained within that answer (any
`special defense previously filed were stricken as a matter of law).
`
`A close examination of the complaint, motion for summary judgment, supporting memorandum of law,
`affidavit and attachments thereto reveals that there are no genuine issues of material fact as to liability
`and the plaintiff is therefore entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The plaintiff's motion is,
`accordingly, granted.
`
`Copy of order mailed to all parties.
`
`DBDCV176021528S 10/2/2018
`
`Page 1 of 2
`
`

`

`435709
`
`Judge: KEVIN S RUSSO
`
`DBDCV176021528S 10/2/2018
`
`Page 2 of 2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket