DOCKET NO: AANCV196034794S
`
`SUPERIOR COURT
`
`ORDER 422677
`
`D'AGOSTINO, MELISSA
`
` V.
`ALLSTATE FIRE AND CASUALTY
`INSURANCE COMPANY
`
`JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA/
`MILFORD
` AT MILFORD
`
`12/2/2019
`
`ORDER
`
`ORDER REGARDING:
`11/26/2019 105.00 SCHEDULING ORDER BY AGREEMENT C50,T02,T03,T11,T12,T61,V01,V04,
`V09 CASES
`
`The foregoing, having been considered by the Court, is hereby:
`
`ORDER:
`
`SCHEDULING ORDER
`
`The parties’ proposed scheduling order is hereby approved and adopted as follows. Failure to comply
`with these orders may result in sanction, which may include fine, exclusion of evidence at trial,
`dismissal, default or non-suit.
`
`It is hereby ordered that by the agreed dates: all dispositive motions shall be filed, a certificate of closed
`pleadings shall be filed, and all discovery shall be completed. The court may decline to entertain any
`issues regarding discovery after the discovery cut off date.
`
`Caseflow is directed to schedule trial based on the proposed dates and the availability of the proposed
`dates on the court's trial docket. Caseflow is also directed to schedule a final trial management/
`settlement conference at least two weeks before the trial date. All counsel and self-represented parties
`shall appear at the conference and be prepared to engage in settlement negotiations. All clients (and
`insurance adjusters as applicable) shall also appear or be immediately available by telephone. Any party
`may request an earlier judicial pretrial through the clerk's office by filing a caseflow request form.
`
`The Court Also Issues the Following Additional Orders.
`
`The Dates for Filing of Dispositive Motions, for Completing Discovery, and for Commencement of Trial
`CANNOT Be Modified Absent Court Order, UNLESS the modification of those dates do not affect the
`scheduled trial date(s). Motions to Continue a Trial Date Must Be Supported by Good Cause Because
`Any Rescheduled Date May Substantially Delay the Trial. Thus, the Parties Are Required to Bring Any
`Problems with the Scheduling or the Completion of Discovery to the Court's Attention Promptly
`Through Appropriate Motion or Conference Request.
`
`The Parties Shall Make Good Faith Efforts to Resolve Discovery Disputes Before Filing Any Motions or
`Objections Regarding Same. In Accordance with P.B. Sec. 13-8(b) and Sec. 13-10(c), No Objections
`Regarding Interrogatories or Requests for Production Shall Be Placed on the Short Calendar List Unless
`an Affidavit Is Filed Certifying That Bona Fide Efforts Have Been Made to Resolve the Dispute.
`
`AANCV196034794S 12/2/2019
`
`Page 1 of 2
`
`

`

`The Parties Are Ordered to Resolve All Discovery Disputes Through Motions or Objections Available
`under Chapter 13 of the Practice Book Before the Date for Completion of Discovery. Motions in Limine,
`and Motions to Preclude Filed at the Time of Trial May Not Be Entertained by the Court When Directed
`at Discovery Issues That Could Have Been Addressed and Resolved Through Pretrial Remedies
`Available under Chapter 13 of the Practice Book.
`
`Judicial Notice (JDNO) was sent regarding this order.
`
`422677
`
`Judge: THEODORE R TYMA
`
`This document may be signed or verified electronically and has the same validity and status as a document with a physical
`(pen-to-paper) signature. For more information, see Section I.E. of the State of Connecticut Superior Court E-Services
`Procedures and Technical Standards (https://jud.ct.gov/external/super/E-Services/e-standards.pdf), section 51-193c of the
`Connecticut General Statutes and Connecticut Practice Book Section 4-4.
`
`AANCV196034794S 12/2/2019
`
`Page 2 of 2
`
`