DOCKET NO: AANCV186030427S
`
`SUPERIOR COURT
`
`ORDER 410631
`
`MONTANO, DONALD
`
` V.
`NIEVES, ISIAH LUCAS Et Al
`
`JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA/
`MILFORD
` AT MILFORD
`
`2/26/2019
`
`ORDER
`
`ORDER REGARDING:
`02/25/2019 115.00 SCHEDULING ORDER BY AGREEMENT C50,T02,T03,T11,T12,T61,V01,V04,
`V09 CASES
`
`The foregoing, having been considered by the Court, is hereby:
`
`ORDER:
`
`THE PARTIES SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING TRIAL MANAGEMENT ORDER.
`FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER MAY RESULT IN SANCTIONS, WHICH MAY
`INCLUDE EXCLUSION OF EXHIBITS OR WITNESSES, NON-SUIT OR DEFAULT.
`
`1) ON OR BEFORE THE FIRST DAY OF JURY SELECTION, OR IF A BENCH TRIAL, ON THE
`DAY PRIOR TO THE FIRST DAY OF TRIAL, EACH PARTY SHALL SUBMIT A TRIAL
`MANAGEMENT STATEMENT PROVIDING:
`A. A LIST OF ISSUES THAT THE PARTY MAINTAINS ARE NOT IN DISPUTE.
`B. A LIST OF WITNESSES IN THE ORDER IN WHICH THEY ARE PLANNED TO BE CALLED.
`C. A LIST OF EXHIBITS TO BE OFFERED, INDEXED BY NUMBER FOR PLAINTIFF AND BY
`LETTER FOR DEFENDANT. (IF THERE ARE MULTIPLE PARTIES, COUNSEL SHALL CONFER
`AND AGREE UPON THE MARKING DESIGNATIONS.) THIS LIST MAY CONTAIN A BRIEF
`DESCRIPTION OF EACH EXHIBIT.
`
`2) COUNSEL SHALL EXCHANGE COPIES OF ALL EXHIBITS PRIOR TO TRIAL. COUNSEL
`SHALL RETAIN POSSESSION OF THE EXHIBITS (AND NOT GIVE THEM TO THE CLERK)
`UNTIL THEY ARE OFFERED DURING THE TRIAL.
`
`3) COUNSEL SHALL COMMUNICATE WITH EACH OTHER ABOUT WHETHER OBJECTIONS
`EXIST AS TO THE ADMISSABILITY OF ANY EXHIBITS. COUNSEL SHALL ENDEAVOR TO
`AGREE ON ALL REDACTIONS PRIOR TO THE START OF EVIDENCE. AGREEMENTS TO
`MARK DOCUMENTS AS FULL EXHIBITS MUST BE STATED ON THE RECORD IN ORDER TO
`BE PRESERVED. NO DOCUMENT WILL BE FORMALLY MARKED FOR INDENTIFICATION
`OR AS A FULL EXHIBIT BY THE CLERK ABSENT DIRECTION FROM THE COURT ON THE
`RECORD.
`
`4) IF THE CASE IS BEING TRIED TO A JURY, THE COURT SHALL ADDRESS THE FILING OF
`PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS AND VERDICT FORMS ON THE FIRST DAY OF JURY
`SELECTION.
`
`5) THE PARTIES ARE ADVISED THAT DISCOVERY ISSUES SHOULD BE ADDRESSED PRIOR
`TO TRIAL. MOTIONS IN LIMINE AND MOTIONS TO PRECLUDE FILED AT THE TIME OF
`TRIAL ARE DISFAVORED WHEN DIRECTED AT DISCOVERY ISSUES THAT COULD HAVE
`BEEN ADDRESSED AND RESOLVED THROUGH PRETRIAL MOTIONS AVAILABLE UNDER
`CHAPTER 13 OF THE PRACTICE BOOK.
`AANCV186030427S 2/26/2019
`
`Page 1 of 2
`
`

`

`6) MOTIONS TO POSTPONE TRIAL, MOTIONS TO PRECLUDE AND MOTIONS IN LIMINE
`MUST BE TIMELY FILED. MOTIONS TO POSTPONE THE TRIAL MUST BE SUPPORTED BY
`GOOD CAUSE. ANY MOTION TO PRECLUDE OR ANY MOTION IN LIMINE SHALL BE FILED
`AT LEAST THREE WEEKS BEFORE THE START OF JURY SELECTION (OR THE START OF
`EVIDENCE, IF A BENCH TRIAL). ANY OBJECTION, RESPONSE, OR REPLY TO A MOTION TO
`PRECLUDE OR MOTION IN LIMINE SHALL BE FILED WITHIN SEVEN DAYS AFTER THE
`FILING OF THE MOTION. THE MOVING PARTY SHALL FILE A CASEFLOW REQUEST FORM
`(JD-CV-116) IN ORDER TO SCHEDULE ANY MOTIONS TO PRECLUDE, OR IN LIMINE, AND
`ANY OBJECTION(S), ON THE SHORT CALENDAR PRIOR TO THE DATE FOR JURY
`SELECTION OR EVIDENCE (IF A BENCH TRIAL).
`
`IF AN INTERPRETER IS REQUIRED, KINDLY FILE A CASEFLOW REQUEST INDICATING THE
`EVENT(S), DATE(S), AND LANGUAGE FOR WHICH INTERPRETER SERVICES IS NEEDED AT
`LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE REQUESTED EVENT.
`
`Judicial Notice (JDNO) was sent regarding this order.
`
`410631
`
`Judge: BARRY STEVENS
`Processed by: Charlotte Russell
`
`This document may be signed or verified electronically and has the same validity and status as a document with a physical
`(pen-to-paper) signature. For more information, see Section I.E. of the State of Connecticut Superior Court E-Services
`Procedures and Technical Standards (https://jud.ct.gov/external/super/E-Services/e-standards.pdf), section 51-193c of the
`Connecticut General Statutes and Connecticut Practice Book Section 4-4.
`
`AANCV186030427S 2/26/2019
`
`Page 2 of 2
`
`