`
`SUPERIOR COURT
`
`ORDER 410631
`
`SOUIH, HASNA Et Al
`
` V.
`PIERRE-ROSA, MARY ELLEN Et Al
`
`JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA/
`MILFORD
` AT MILFORD
`
`7/23/2019
`
`ORDER
`
`The following order is entered in the above matter:
`
`ORDER:
`
`REVISED SCHEDULING ORDER
`
`Pursuant to a pretrial conference held before Judge Stevens on July 23, 2019, the court issues the
`following orders. Failure to comply with these orders may result in sanction, which may include fine,
`exclusion of evidence at trial, dismissal, default or non-suit.
`
`1. All discovery and all issues regarding discovery shall be completed by at least 30 days before the trial
`date. The court may decline to entertain any issues regarding discovery after this date.
`
`2. Jury selection is rescheduled to commence on April 23, 2019. A final judicial pretrial conference shall
`be scheduled by Caseflow at least four weeks before the trial date. Any party may request an earlier
`judicial pretrial through the clerk's office by filing a Caseflow Request Form.
`
`3. No dispositive motions may be filed absent leave of court.
`
`This Scheduling Order Cannot Be Modified by Agreement of Counsel and Can Only Be Modified Upon
`Motion and Order of the Court. Absent Modification of this Scheduling Order, Any Disclosures Not
`Made or Discovery Not Completed Within the Times Specified May Be Deemed Waived and
`Abandoned. Thus the Parties Are Required to Bring Any Problems with the Scheduling or the
`Completion of Discovery to the Court’s Attention Promptly Through Appropriate Motion or Conference
`Request. Motions for Modification Shall Be Liberally Granted, Except That Motions to Continue a Trial
`Date Must Be Supported by Good Cause Because Any Rescheduled Date May Substantially Delay the
`Trial.
`
`The Parties Shall Make Good Faith Efforts to Resolve Discovery Disputes Before Filing Any Motions or
`Objections Regarding Same. No Objections Regarding Interrogatories or Requests for Production Shall
`Be Placed on the Short Calendar List Unless an Affidavit Is Filed Certifying That Bona Fide Efforts
`Have Been Made to Resolve the Dispute in Accordance with Practice Book § 13-8 (c) and § 13-10 (i).
`
`The Parties Are Ordered to Resolve All Discovery Disputes Through Motions or Objections Available
`under Chapter 13 of the Practice Book Before the Date for Completion of Discovery. Motions in
`Limine` and Motions to Preclude Filed at the Time of Trial May Not Be Entertained by the Court When
`Directed at Discovery Issues That Could Have Been Addressed and Resolved Through Pre-trial
`Remedies Available under Chapter 13 of the Practice Book.
`
`Judicial Notice (JDNO) was sent regarding this order.
`
`AANCV176024809S 7/23/2019
`
`Page 1 of 2
`
`
`
`410631
`
`Judge: BARRY STEVENS
`
`This document may be signed or verified electronically and has the same validity and status as a document with a physical
`(pen-to-paper) signature. For more information, see Section I.E. of the State of Connecticut Superior Court E-Services
`Procedures and Technical Standards (https://jud.ct.gov/external/super/E-Services/e-standards.pdf), section 51-193c of the
`Connecticut General Statutes and Connecticut Practice Book Section 4-4.
`
`AANCV176024809S 7/23/2019
`
`Page 2 of 2
`
`