throbber
Case 1:17-cv-02097-RBJ Document 308-13 Filed 08/13/21 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 3
`Case 1:17-cv-02097-RBJ Document 308-13 Filed 08/13/21 USDC Colorado Page 1 of3
`
` EXHIBIT 11
`EXHIBIT 11
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-02097-RBJ Document 308-13 Filed 08/13/21 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 3
`
`Caitlin Dean
`From:
`Sent:
`To:
`Cc:
`
`Subject:
`
`Philip Wang <pwang@raklaw.com>
`Friday, July 30, 2021 12:56 PM
`Jackson Chambers; Daniel A. Tishman
`rak_realtimedata@raklaw.com; Service-Dish_Colorado; Brian Livedalen; Ruffin Cordell;
`Adam Shartzer; Gottschalk, Hugh (gottschalk@wtotrial.com)
`Re: Realtime v. DISH/Sling, 1:17-cv-02097-RBJ - Bench Trial Briefing; Asserted Claims
`
`[This email originated outside of F&R.]

`Dear Judge Jackson Chambers, 

`Defendants’ first issue is, regrettably, an inaccurate and incomplete version of the facts. Realtime has made several 
`proposals to narrow this case for trial. In the evening after the pretrial conference, Realtime offered to limit to five 
`claims if Defendants would limit its invalidity defenses and prior art references, consistent with the discussion at the 
`hearing. Hr. Tr. at 16:22‐17:1 (“plaintiff may be willing to limit the number of asserted claims to five or less given a 
`corresponding limit in prior references or possible defenses from defendants”). 

`Defendants declined our offer, as well as a subsequent compromise offer involving no reduction in Defendants’ other 
`invalidity defenses. 

`Late Wednesday evening, Defendants made a new proposal for mutual narrowing. Realtime has been discussing this 
`latest proposal internally and expects to respond today. Realtime believes the parties may be able to reach agreement, 
`so this issue is not ripe for Court intervention. 

`Thank you, 

`Philip Wang 
`Russ August & Kabat 
`12424 Wilshire Boulevard, 12th Floor 
`Los Angeles, CA 90025 
`310 826‐7474 
`pwang@raklaw.com  


`
`On Jul 30, 2021, at 8:10 AM, Daniel A. Tishman <tishman@fr.com> wrote: 

`
`
`Dear Chambers of Judge Jackson: 
`

`Defendants in the above-captioned case seek the Court’s guidance on two issues ahead of the
`upcoming August 6, 2021 bench trial: 
`  
`
` Asserted Claims: Despite multiple meet and confers, Plaintiff has not reduced the
`asserted patent claims as it promised at the pre-trial conference on July 16. In an attempt
`to induce Plaintiff to be reasonable, Defendants agreed to narrow their prior art case to no
`more than 2 prior art combinations per asserted claim (having already reduced the prior
`art references by approximately 80%), once Plaintiff makes its claim election. Despite
`1
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-02097-RBJ Document 308-13 Filed 08/13/21 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 3
`
`this commitment, Plaintiff still has not narrowed the case in any way. We are now ten
`business days before trial. Plaintiff certainly knows which patent claim it intends to
`present to the jury. Only Defendants and the Court is still in the dark. Plaintiff’s refusal
`to be forthcoming results in wasteful expense of judicial and party resources as
`Defendants and the Court are forced by the Plaintiff to prepare for claims that will not be
`presented. We ask for the Court’s guidance on this issue.  
`  
` Briefing and Logistics: If acceptable to the Court, the parties have agreed to file briefs
`related to the bench trial on August 2 (Defendants) and August 4 (Plaintiff), with a
`potential reply brief by Defendants if warranted. Defendants continue to coordinate with
`their witnesses regarding the bench trial; however, due to an illness of a close family
`member, at least one of our witnesses may need to attend by electronic video conference,
`if the Court is amenable.  
`
`

`Thank you for your time and attention to this matter. 
`

`Respectfully submitted, 
`

`Daniel Tishman 
`

`Daniel A. Tishman :: Fish & Richardson P.C. :: +1-202-626-7725 
`  
`
`
`**************************************************************************************
`**************************************
`This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
`confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized use or disclosure is
`prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply
`email and destroy all copies of the original message.
`**************************************************************************************
`**************************************
`
`
`
`2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket