throbber
DUANE M. GECK (State BarNo. 114823)
`dmg@severson cqm
`DONALD H. CRAM (State Bar No. 160004)
`thc@severson.com
`ELEANORM. ROMAN (State Bar No. 178736)
`emr@severson com
`SEVERSON & WERSON
`AProfessional Corporation
`One Embarcadero Center, Sulte 2600
`San Francisco, California 941 11
`Telephone: (415) 398-3344
`Facsimile: (415) 956-0439
`Attorneys for Ally Financial Inc. and Ally Bank
`
`I
`
`.
`
`.
`
`F I L E D
`SAN MATFO CQuNTV
`fiAPR l 6, 2mg
`4wW%__u___
`
`, 3mm“- 01025
`0mg,
`1773395
`
`'
`
`l
`
`||||IH|||||||||i|llllllllmlll‘l
`
`SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
`COUNTY OF SAN MATEO
`
`ALLY FINANCIAL INC. and ALLY BANK,
`Plaintiffs,
`
`vs.
`CEVERA AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, LLC, a
`California limited liability company; ROBERT
`V. BRANZUELA, an individual; and DOES 1
`through 50 inclusive,
`
`Defendants.
`
`Case No. 18CIV01025
`{-PRQPOSEB] ORDER CONTINUING
`TRIAL AND MANDATORY
`‘ SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE DATES
`AND ALL PRE-TRIAL DEADLINES
`
`..
`
`.
`
`'
`
`’
`
`l
`
`3
`
`'
`
`;‘
`
`g
`
`On April 16, 2019, the Ex Parte Application of Plaintiffs’ Ally Financial Inc. and Ally
`- Bank (“Plaintiffs”) based upon their stipulation with defendants Cevera Automotive Group, LLC ,
`a California limited liability company (“Cevera”); and Robert V. Branzuela (“Branzuela”),
`collectively, “Defendants” came on for hearing in the San Mateo County Superior Court, the Hon.
`Jonathan E. Karesh, Presiding. By their Ex Parte Application, Plaintiffs seek a continuance of the
`‘May 13, 2019 trial date until March 23, 2020 or as soofi thereafter as the Court has available for
`trial, and to continue the April 26, 2019 mandatory settlement conference date in accordance with
`the new trial date. The Ex Parte Application also requests that all deadlines shall be recalculated
`iin accordance with and shall run from the new trial date, including but not limited to all discovery
`19001.0074/19833758. l
`[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL AND MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE DATES} AND
`ALL PRE-TRIAL DEADLINES
`
`AWN
`
`“\lO\UI
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`20
`
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`23
`
`

`

`deadlines.
`Evelina Manukyan, Esq. appeared for Plaintiffs. No appearance was made on behalf of
`Defendants.
`Based upon the Ex Parte Application and all pleadings and evidence filed in support
`thereof, including the Stipulation of Plaintiffs with Defendants, and Good Cause appearing, it is
`hereby ordered that:
`The May 13, 2019 trial date is continued to March 23, 2020 fe¢
`.—._————-———']_
`The April 26,, 2019 Mandatory Settlement Conference dated is continued to
`2.
`
`1.
`
`-Mzowwm a0?
`m
`
`l'
`
`\OOONQU'I-PUJNH
`
`.
`
`A11 pre-trial deadlines, including but not limited to discovery deadlines are
`3.
`continued and shall be calculated in accordance with and shall run from the new trial date.
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`i
`
`DATED: April LE, 2019
`
`Wu €.(<cJ\
`
`Pic}. Jonathan E. Karesh, Presiding Edge
`
`p—an—ar—np—AHu—As—nv—Ar—t
`
`OOQONMbWNh-‘O
`
`H ‘9.
`
`NNNNNNNNN
`
`OOflngri—to
`
`'
`
`,
`
`g
`
`.
`
`19001.0074/14833758.l
`
`2
`"[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL AND MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE DATES}, AND
`ALL PRE-TRIAL DEADLINES l
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket