throbber
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA - COUNTY OF FRESNO
`Civil Limited - Non-Limifed
`
`TITLE OF CASE:
`Victor Acevedo vs. Raymond Melendez
`
`EmygAEc‘mm
`Minute arderAuachmem
`600757
`
`CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE MlNUTES/ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
`n
`R' smflh
`K' Doves
`
`l' Herrera
`
`.
`
`court Clerk'
`
`.
`
`.
`
`Case Number:
`17CECG03884
`Hearing Date:
`Monday, November 19, 2018
`Department
`Conference Room 305
`
`Appearing Parties:
`Plaintiff:
`Defendant:
`
`l
`
`‘ 2'1 ’19
`[\{Confinuedfo
`[ ]Service on all defendon’rs.
`[ ]Ploin’riff/Cross—ploinfiff s’ro’res he/she will dismiss
`[ ]O’rher
`
`Counsel: V. F&a/
`
`Counsel:
`
`[ ]Appeoring
`[ ]Appeoring
`of 22 20 o.m./@1.in Room fgéf
`for:
`[ ]Nofice of Se’r’rlemen’r To be filed.
`
`MAppeoring
`[ ]Appeoring
`
`forthwith.
`
`[ Designated Gs Uninsured Motorist case.
`rsonol Injury case. Limifed Civil only.
`[ ]Par’ries present stipulate fhof case will Toke [ ]12—1 8 [ ]18—24 mom‘hs To dispose.
`[ ]Jury Trial requested by [ ]Ploinfiff [ ]Defendon’r.
`[ ]Cour’r Triol: appearing por’ries waive Their rights To o jury Trial. Non-oppearing porfies ore deemed To have
`waived Their rights to a jury trial and fo hove consented to fhe dafe seT for Trial.
`[ ]Courf Repor’rer fees mus’r be paid To The Clerk's office prior To commencement of Trio].
`[ ]Es’rimo’red Time for Trial is
`doys.
`o.m./D.m in Departmen’r
`[ ]Triol is set for
`o.m./p.m in Department
`[ ]Tri0| Readiness is se’r for
`0T
`c1.m./p.m in Room 575.
`[ ]Mondo’rory Settlement Conference is se’r for
`GT
`[ ]The Sefilemenf Conference Statement is due 10 days prior To The SeHIemen’r Conference.
`[ ]Service of wrih‘en no’rice of The orders mode herein is waived by:
`[ ]AII parties
`[ ]The court orders all pon‘ies ’ro engage in some form of Alternative Dispute Resolution, such Gs mediation.
`This Alfemofive Dispute Resolu’rion mus’r be completed by
`(wi’rhin 180 days offer The
`Case Monogemen’r Conference, or prior To ’rhe Mandatory Se’rflemem Conference, whichever is earlier).
`Failure ’ro do so may resul’r in The court imposing sanctions, unless excused by The coun‘ Upon 0 Timely
`showing of good cause by wrifien decloro’rion.
`
`0T
`
`[
`
`]
`
`>
`
`‘
`
`If you hove any questions you moy confocf The ADR Department 0T 457—1 909. A IisT of ’rhe mediators 0nd
`sfipulc’rion forms ore available on The Court's website:
`hf’rp://www.fresno.courts.co.qov/oh‘emofive dispute resolution/
`
`Gwab “04°
`AAnnrlrfinn/ Fnrm
`
`CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE MINUTES/ORDER To 5How CAUSE
`
`CW" C°de°f Procedure 63'
`IOCGI Rule 3
`
`

`

`TITLE OF CASE:
`Victor Acevedo vs. Raymond Melendez
`
`CASE NUMBER:
`17CECGO3884
`
`TO:
`
`V524
`
`Order To Show Cause
`
`You ore hereby ordered To appear in person on
`o.m./p.m. In Deportmenf 404
`of
`of The above cour’r located o’r 1 130 'O' STreeT, Fresno, California, ’ro show cause why you should not be
`sanctioned for:
`[ ]f0ilure To appear CIT The Cose Monogemenf Conference by [ ]Pl<:1infiff
`[ ]Defendon’r [ ]Bofh
`[ ]foilure To serve oil defendonfls) wi’rhin 60 days. Ploin’riff is required To diligently ofiempf service of oll
`defendonfis). Failure To serve oll defendonfis) by The order ’ro show cause hearing do’re will resul'r in
`additional sonc’rions unless diligent effort To serve OII defendoms is shown.
`
`[ ]foilure To request entry of defoul’r/judgmen’t.
`
`If defendonfls) answer 0nd The case is GT issue prior To The Order To Show Cause Hearing, plaintiff mus’r
`immediately confoc’r ’rhe clerk's office QT (559) 457—1 900 To reschedule The Case Monogemem‘ Conference
`and vacate The Order To Show Cause Hearing.
`[ ]foilure ’ro file cm ADR S’ripulofion 0T least 10 days prior To The Case Management Conference.
`[ ]f0ilure ’ro file on ADR Report GT Ieos’r 1O doys prior To The Mandatory Settlement Conference.
`[ ]foilure To serve all defendants wi’rh The Notice of Case Management Conference.
`[ ]o’rher
`
`Do’re:
`
`Judge of ’rhe Superior Cour’r
`
`Your personal appearance is required at the Order to Show Cause Hearing.
`Special appearances on your behalf are not allowed. Telephonic appearances are noi allowed.
`
`CV-18b R1040
`Mandatory Form
`
`CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE MINUTES/ORDER To $How CAUSE
`
`CW“We 0f Procedure 63‘
`
`Local Rule 3
`
`

`

`SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA - COUNTY OF FRESNO
`Civil Department, Central Division
`1130 "O" Street
`Fresno,California 93724-0002
`(559) 457-2000
`
`TITLE OF CASE:
`\fictor Acevedo vs. Raymond Melendez
`
`FOR COURTUSE ONL Y
`
`CLERK'S CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
`l certify that | am not a party to this cause and that a true copy of the:
`[Enter Document Type]
`was placed in a sealed envelope and placed for collection and mailing o'n the date and at the place shown below
`I am readily familiar with this court’s practice for collecting and processing
`following our ordinary business practice.
`correspondence for mailing. On the same day that correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited
`in
`the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service with postage fully prepaid.
`
`CASE NUMBER:
`17CECG03884
`
`Place of mailing: Fresno, California 93724-0002
`On Date:
`11/26/2018
`Clerk, by
`
`R. Smith
`
`. Deputy
`
`Don J. Pool
`Wild, Carter & Tipton
`246 W. Shaw Avenue
`Fresno, CA 93704
`
`D Clerk's Certificate of Mailing Additional Address Page Attached
`CLERK'S CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
`
`TGN-06b R08-06
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket