Case 3:22-cv-00412-RSH-DDL Document 85 Filed 12/12/24 PageID.1570 Page 1
`of 1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`
`
`SAMESURF, INC.,
`
`v.
`
`INTUIT, INC.,
`
` Case No.: 22-cv-412-RSH-DDL
`
`FURTHER ORDER REGARDING
`INTUIT’S MOTION TO COMPEL
`
`[Dkt. No. 81]
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendant.
`
`Pursuant to the Court’s December 4, 2024 Order [Dkt. No. 84], Plaintiff has lodged
`
`a litigation funding agreement for the Court’s in camera review. Having reviewed the
`
`agreement, the Court determines it contains no information concerning the value of the
`
`patent at issue in this case. Accordingly, and for the reasons explained in the Court’s
`
`December 4 Order, the Court finds the agreement is not relevant, and DENIES Defendant’s
`
`motion to compel its production. See Taction Tech., Inc. v. Apple Inc., 2022 WL 18781396,
`
`at *4 (S.D. Cal. Mar. 16, 2022).
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`Dated: December 12, 2024
`
`
`
`Hon. David D. Leshner
`United States Magistrate Judge
`
`
`
`1
`
`22-cv-412-RSH-DDL
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.

We are unable to display this document.

PTO Denying Access

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket