Case 5:15-cv-02008-EJD Document 77 Filed 03/03/16 Page 1 of 4
`
`
`
`Robert F. McCauley (SBN 162056)
`robert.mccauley@finnegan.com
`Jacob A. Schroeder (SBN 264717)
`jacob.schroeder@finnegan.com
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
` GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`3300 Hillview Avenue
`Palo Alto, CA 94304-1203
`Telephone: (650) 849-6600
`Facsimile:
`(650) 849-6666
`
`Gerald F. Ivey (pro hac vice)
`Smith R. Brittingham IV (pro hac vice)
`Elizabeth A. Niemeyer (pro hac vice)
`John M. Williamson (pro hac vice)
`Rajeev Gupta (pro hac vice)
`Aidan C. Skoyles (pro hac vice)
`Cecilia Sanabria (pro hac vice)
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
` GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`901 New York Avenue, NW
`Washington, DC 20001-4413
`Telephone: (202) 408-4000
`Facsimile: (202) 408-4400
`
`Stephen E. Kabakoff (pro hac vice)
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
` GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`3500 SunTrust Plaza
`303 Peachtree Street, N.E.
`Atlanta, GA 30308-3263
`Telephone: (404) 653- 6400
`Facsimile:
`(404) 653-6444
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiffs
`OpenTV, Inc., Nagravision S.A., and Nagra France S.A.S.
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SAN JOSE DIVISION
`OPENTV, INC., NAGRAVISION S.A.,
` CASE NO. 5:15-cv-02008-EJD (NMC)
`and NAGRA FRANCE S.A.S.
`
`PLAINTIFFS’ ANSWER TO
`DEFENDANT APPLE INC.’S
`
`
`
`Plaintiffs,
`COUNTERCLAIMS
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PLAINTIFFS’ ANSWER TO DEFENDANT
`APPLE INC.’S COUNTERCLAIMS
`Case No. 5:15-cv-02008-EJD (NMC)
`
`
`

`
`Case 5:15-cv-02008-EJD Document 77 Filed 03/03/16 Page 2 of 4
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`Plaintiffs OpenTV, Inc. (“OpenTV”) and Nagravision, S.A. (“Nagravision”)
`answer Defendant Apple Inc.’s (“Apple”) Counterclaims. This Answer is based on
`OpenTV’s and Nagravision’s knowledge as to its own activities and upon information
`and belief as to the activities of others. OpenTV and Nagravision deny the allegations
`and characterizations in Apple’s Counterclaims unless expressly admitted in the
`following paragraphs. The numbered paragraphs herein correspond to the like-
`numbered paragraphs of Apple’s Counterclaims.
`NATURE AND BASIS OF THE ACTION
`109. OpenTV and Nagravision admit the allegations in this paragraph.
`JURISDICTION AND PARTIES
`110. OpenTV and Nagravision admit that the Court has subject matter
`jurisdiction over this controversy, and that OpenTV, Nagravision, and Nagra France
`S.A.S. have asserted and are asserting infringement of the Asserted Patents by Apple,
`and that Apple has denied those allegations in its pleadings (although Plaintiffs
`disagree with Apple’s denials). Except as expressly admitted herein, OpenTV and
`Nagravision deny each remaining allegation set forth in this paragraph.
`111. OpenTV and Nagravision admit the allegations in this paragraph.
`112. OpenTV and Nagravision admit the allegations in this paragraph.
`113. OpenTV and Nagravision admit the allegations in this paragraph.
`114. OpenTV and Nagravision admit that they consent to personal jurisdiction
`of this Court for purposes of this action, including Apple’s counterclaims. Except as
`expressly admitted herein, OpenTV and Nagravision deny each remaining allegation
`set forth in this paragraph.
`115. OpenTV and Nagravision admit that they filed their Complaint here and
`that venue for Apple’s counterclaims is proper here. Except as expressly admitted
`herein, OpenTV and Nagravision deny each remaining allegation set forth in this
`paragraph.
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`PLAINTIFFS’ ANSWER TO DEFENDANT
` APPLE INC.’S COUNTERCLAIMS
`Case No. 5:15-cv-02008-EJD (NMC)
`
`
`

`
`Case 5:15-cv-02008-EJD Document 77 Filed 03/03/16 Page 3 of 4
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`FIRST COUNTERCLAIM
`ALLEGED NON-INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 6,233,736
`116. OpenTV and Nagravision incorporate their responses to paragraphs 109-
`115 as if fully set forth here.
`117. OpenTV and Nagravision admit the allegations in this paragraph.
`118. OpenTV and Nagravision admit the allegations in this paragraph with
`respect to the ’736 patent but deny any allegations as to a “’7369 Patent.”
`119. OpenTV and Nagravision deny the allegations in this paragraph.
`SECOND COUNTERCLAIM
`ALLEGED NON-INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,055,169
`120. OpenTV and Nagravision incorporate their responses to paragraphs 109-
`115 as if fully set forth here.
`121. OpenTV and Nagravision admit the allegations in this paragraph.
`122. OpenTV and Nagravision admit the allegations in this paragraph.
`123. OpenTV and Nagravision deny the allegations in this paragraph.
`THIRD COUNTERCLAIM
`ALLEGED NON-INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,725,740
`124. OpenTV and Nagravision incorporate their responses to paragraphs 109-
`115 as if fully set forth here.
`125. OpenTV and Nagravision admit the allegations in this paragraph.
`126. OpenTV and Nagravision admit the allegations in this paragraph.
`127. OpenTV and Nagravision deny the allegations in this paragraph.
`REQUEST FOR JURY TRIAL
`128. No response is required.
`PRAYER FOR RELIEF
`Paragraphs (a) through (f) set forth the statement of relief requested by Apple to
`which no response is required. Plaintiffs deny that Apple is entitled to any of the
`requested relief, and Plaintiffs’ deny Apple’s allegations in its Prayer for Relief.
`PLAINTIFFS’ ANSWER TO DEFENDANT
`APPLE INC.’S COUNTERCLAIMS
`Case No. 5:15-cv-02008-EJD (NMC)
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`

`
`Case 5:15-cv-02008-EJD Document 77 Filed 03/03/16 Page 4 of 4
`
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
` GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By: /s/ Robert F. McCauley
`
`Robert F. McCauley (SBN 162056)
`robert.mccauley@finnegan.com
`Jacob A. Schroeder (SBN 264717)
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
` GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`3300 Hillview Avenue
`Palo Alto, CA 94304-1203
`Telephone: (650) 849-6600
`Facsimile:
`(650) 849-6666
`
`Gerald F. Ivey (pro hac vice)
`Smith R. Brittingham IV (pro hac vice)
`Elizabeth A. Niemeyer (pro hac vice)
`John M. Williamson (pro hac vice)
`Rajeev Gupta (pro hac vice)
`Aidan C. Skoyles (pro hac vice)
`Cecilia Sanabria (pro hac vice)
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
` GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`901 New York Avenue, NW
`Washington, DC 20001-4413
`Telephone: (202) 408-4000
`Facsimile: (202) 408-4400
`
`Stephen E. Kabakoff (pro hac vice)
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
` GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`3500 SunTrust Plaza
`303 Peachtree Street, N.E.
`Atlanta, GA 30308-3263
`Telephone: (404) 653- 6400
`Facsimile:
`(404) 653-6444
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiffs
`OpenTV, Inc., Nagravision S.A., and Nagra
`France S.A.S.
`
`
`
`Dated: March 3, 2016
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`PLAINTIFFS’ ANSWER TO DEFENDANT
`APPLE INC.’S COUNTERCLAIMS
`Case No. 5:15-cv-02008-EJD (NMC)