`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`EPIC GAMES, INC.,
`
`Case No.: 4:20-CV-05640-YGR
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`ORDER REGARDING PAGE LIMITS AND
`BRIEFING SCHEDULE
`
`10
`
`TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD:
`
`11
`
`The Court is in receipt of three requests from non-parties for leave to file amicus curiae briefs
`
`12
`
`in support of plaintiff Epic Games, Inc.’s motion to enforce the injunction. (See Dkt. Nos. 904, 906 &
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`908.) The Court understands defendant Apple, Inc. intends to oppose the requests.
`
`For efficiency and to keep the scheduled hearing date on Epic’s motion, the Court ORDERS
`
`that defendant shall file their oppositions to the pending motions for leave by no later than 12:00 p.m.
`
`Pacific Time on April 3, 2024. Plaintiff shall file their replies by no later than 12:00 p.m. Pacific
`
`17
`
`Time on April 5, 2024.
`
`Northern District of California
`
`United States District Court
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Pursuant to the parties’ joint stipulation and good cause showing, the Court further ORDERS as
`
`follows: First, Apple’s consolidated response to Epic’s motion, as well as any amicus briefs allowed
`
`to be filed, shall be due on April 12, 2024. Second, Epic’s reply in support of their motion to enforce
`
`the injunction shall be due ten calendar days later on April 22, 2024. Third, if this Court permits any
`
`non-parties to file amicus briefs in connection with Epic’s motion, Apple’s consolidated response
`
`shall not exceed 35 pages.
`
`This terminates Dkt. No. 910.
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`Date:
`
`March 28, 2024
`
`_______________________________________
`YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
