throbber
Case 4:20-cv-05640-YGR Document 801 Filed 06/25/21 Page 1 of 8
`
`BETSY C. MANIFOLD (182450)
`RACHELE R. BYRD (190634)
`BRITTANY N. DEJONG (258766)
`WOLF HALDENSTEIN ADLER
` FREEMAN & HERZ LLP
`750 B Street, Suite 1820
`San Diego, CA 92101
`Telephone: 619/239-4599
`Facsimile: 619/234-4599
`manifold@whafh.com
`byrd@whafh.com
`dejong@whafh.com
`Interim Class Counsel for the
`Consumer Plaintiffs
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`OAKLAND DIVISION
`
`Case No. 4:11-cv-06714-YGR
`
`ORDER GRANTING [PROPOSED]
`SUPPLEMENTAL PROTECTIVE
`ORDER GOVERNING DISCOVERY
`FROM ZYNGA, INC.
`
`Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers
`
`Case No. 4:19-cv-03074-YGR
`
`Case No. 4:20-cv-05640-YGR
`
`IN RE APPLE iPHONE ANTITRUST
`LITIGATION
`
`DONALD R. CAMERON, et al.,
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`APPLE INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`)))))))))
`
`EPIC GAMES, INC., et al.,
` Plaintiff, Counter-defendant,
`
`v.
`APPLE INC.,
`Defendant, Counterclaimant.
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`))))))
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`[PROPOSED] SUPPLEMENTAL PROTECTIVE ORDER
`GOVERNING DISCOVERY FROM ZYNGA, INC.
`Case Nos. 4:11-cv-06714-YGR, 4:19-cv-03074-YGR, 4:20-cv-05640-YGR
`
`

`

`Case 4:20-cv-05640-YGR Document 801 Filed 06/25/21 Page 2 of 8
`
`
`
`
`
`Having considered Consumer Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion for Entry of Supplemental
`Protective Orders and any opposition(s) filed in response thereto, and good cause appearing, the
`Court hereby grants the motion and enters the following order:
`A.
`GENERAL PROVISIONS
`1.
`The definitions, terms and provisions contained in the Stipulated Amended
`Protective Order on January 21, 2021 (Case No. 4:11-cv-06714-YGR, Dkt. No. 381; Case No.
`4:19-cv-03074-YGR, Dkt. No. 252) (the “Protective Order”) shall be incorporated herein by
`reference as though fully set forth herein; provided, however, that in the event of a conflict
`between any definition, term or provision of this Supplemental Protective Order and any
`definition, term or provision of the Protective Order, this Supplemental Protective Order will
`control with respect to such conflict.
`2.
`The definitions, terms and provisions contained in this Supplemental Protective
`Order shall apply only to those Discovery Materials produced by Zynga1, and nothing herein shall
`provide any rights or protections to the Parties to the Litigations2 beyond those set forth in the
`Protective Order.
`B.
`ADDITIONAL DEFINITIONS
`1.
`Business Consultant: a consultant advising on or involved in competitive decision-
`making.
`Party: A named Plaintiff or Defendant in the Litigations; but not any other
`2.
`individuals or entities listed on the docket, including those variously listed as “Interested Party”
`“Respondent” or “Miscellaneous”.
`3.
`Party Expert: with respect to “ZYNGA HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE
`COUNSEL EYES ONLY”, a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter
`
`____________________________
`1
`The term “Zynga” shall include any entity that responds to subpoenas served on Zynga Inc.
`in the Litigations. References to “competitors” within this Supplemental Protective Order shall be
`interpreted to mean competitors of Zynga Inc. and its parents and subsidiaries.
`2
`Litigations shall mean In re Apple iPhone Antitrust Litigation, Case No. 4:11-cv-06714-
`YGR; Cameron v. Apple Inc., Case No. 4:19-cv-03074-YGR; and Epic Games, Inc. v. Apple Inc.,
`Case No. 4:20-cv-05640.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE OF DEPOSITION OF SCOTT FORSTALL
`Case Nos. 4:11-cv-06714-YGR, 4:19-cv-03074-YGR, 4:20-cv-05640-YGR
`
`

`

`Case 4:20-cv-05640-YGR Document 801 Filed 06/25/21 Page 3 of 8
`
`
`
`
`pertinent to the Litigations who: (1) has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an
`
`expert witness or as a consultant in this action; (2) is not a current employee or current Business
`Consultant of a Party, Zynga, or of any Zynga competitor, or otherwise currently involved in
`competitive decision-making for a Party, Zynga, or for any Zynga competitor; (3) has not been a
`past employee or Business Consultant of a Party, Zynga, or Zynga’s competitor, or otherwise been
`involved in competitive decision-making for a Party, Zynga, or Zynga’s competitor; and (4) at the
`time of retention, is not anticipated to become an employee or Business Consultant of a Party,
`Zynga, or of any Zynga competitor, or to be otherwise involved in competitive decision-making
`for a Party, Zynga, or for any Zynga competitor. If, while this action is pending, a Party learns
`that any of its retained experts or consultants as defined herein is anticipating to become, or has
`become, an employee or Business Consultant of a Party, Zynga, or any Zynga competitor, or
`otherwise involved in competitive decision-making for a Party, Zynga, or any Zynga competitor,
`the Party learning such information shall promptly disclose the information to Zynga.
`3.
`“ZYNGA HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES ONLY”
`Information or Items: “Confidential Information or Items” produced by Zynga, that contains the
`following types of extremely sensitive information—algorithms and source code; non-public,
`commercially sensitive customer lists or communications; non-public financial, marketing, or
`strategic business planning information; non-public information regarding prices, costs, margins,
`or other financial metrics; information relating to research, development, maintenance,
`improvement, testing of, or plans for existing or proposed future products; non-public information
`concerning Zynga’s data protection practices or security protocols; evaluation of the strengths or
`vulnerabilities of Zynga’s product offerings, including non-public pricing and cost information;
`confidential contractual terms, proposed contractual terms, or negotiating positions (including
`internal deliberations about negotiating positions) taken with respect to Zynga, Zynga’s partners
`and affiliates, or competitors to Zynga; information relating to pending or abandoned patent
`applications that have not been made available to the public; confidential submissions to
`governmental entities describing Zynga’s legal positions or theories; personnel files; sensitive
`personally identifiable information; commercially sensitive information about advertising
`
`- 3 -
`[PROPOSED] SUPPLEMENTAL PROTECTIVE ORDER
`GOVERNING DISCOVERY FROM ZYNGA, INC.
`Case Nos. 4:11-cv-06714-YGR, 4:19-cv-03074-YGR, 4:20-cv-05640-YGR
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 4:20-cv-05640-YGR Document 801 Filed 06/25/21 Page 4 of 8
`
`
`
`
`including financial metrics, contracts, platforms use, performance, methodology, strategy, or
`
`otherwise commercially sensitive advertising information; commercially sensitive information
`about cloud computing resources provided either by Zynga or a third-party provider, including
`historical or forward-looking analyses and projections, pricing structures or financial metrics,
`usage metrics, infrastructure, or contracts; commercially sensitive information about licensing,
`royalties, and fees to acquire content or intellectual property; and communications that disclose
`any such information.
`C.
`ADDITIONAL PROTECTIONS FOR ACCESS TO AND USE OF ZYNGA
`PROTECTED MATERIALS
`1.
`Manner of Designating “ZYNGA HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE
`COUNSEL EYES ONLY” Information or Items. Designation in conformity with this
`Supplemental Protective Order requires:
`a.
`for information in documentary form (e.g., paper or electronic documents,
`but excluding transcripts of depositions or other pretrial or trial proceedings), that Zynga affix the
`legend “ZYNGA HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES ONLY” to each
`page of any document for which Zynga seeks protection under this Supplemental Protective Order.
`If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, Zynga also must
`clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).
`If Zynga makes original documents or materials available for inspection, it need not
`designate them for protection until after the inspecting Party has indicated which material it would
`like copied and produced. During the inspection and before the designation, all of the material
`made available for inspection shall be deemed “ZYNGA HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE
`COUNSEL EYES ONLY.” After the inspecting Party has identified the documents it wants
`copied and produced, Zynga must determine which documents, or portions thereof, qualify for
`protection under this Supplemental Protective Order. Then, before producing the specified
`documents, Zynga must affix the appropriate legend (“ZYNGA HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –
`OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES ONLY”) to each page that contains such material. If only a portion
`or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, Zynga also must clearly identify the
`
`- 4 -
`[PROPOSED] SUPPLEMENTAL PROTECTIVE ORDER
`GOVERNING DISCOVERY FROM ZYNGA, INC.
`Case Nos. 4:11-cv-06714-YGR, 4:19-cv-03074-YGR, 4:20-cv-05640-YGR
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 4:20-cv-05640-YGR Document 801 Filed 06/25/21 Page 5 of 8
`
`
`
`
`protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).
`
`b.
`for testimony given in deposition or in other pretrial proceedings not
`involving the court, that Zynga identify on the record, before the close of the deposition, hearing,
`or other proceeding, all protected testimony. When it is impractical to identify separately each
`portion of testimony that is entitled to protection and it appears that substantial portions of the
`testimony may qualify for protection, Zynga may invoke on the record (before the deposition,
`hearing, or other proceeding is concluded) a right to have up to 21 days to identify the specific
`portions of the testimony as to which protection is sought. Only those portions of the testimony
`that are appropriately designated for protection within the 21 days shall be covered by the
`provisions of this Supplemental Protective Order. Alternatively, Zynga may specify, at the
`deposition or up to 21 days afterwards if that period is properly invoked, that the entire transcript
`shall be treated as “ZYNGA HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES
`ONLY.” With respect to trial, Zynga can petition the Court for appropriate protective measures
`which shall be requested in advance of evidence being taken.
`Zynga and the Parties shall give the other parties notice if they reasonably expect a
`deposition, hearing, or other proceeding to include “ZYNGA HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –
`OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES ONLY” Information or Items so that the other parties can ensure that
`only authorized individuals who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound”
`(Exhibit A to the Protective Order) are present at those proceedings. The use of a document as an
`exhibit at a deposition shall not in any way affect its designation as “ZYNGA HIGHLY
`CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES ONLY.”
`Transcripts containing “ZYNGA HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE
`COUNSEL EYES ONLY” Information or Items shall have an obvious legend on the title page that
`the transcript contains such material, and the title page shall be followed by a list of all pages
`(including line numbers as appropriate) that have been designated as “ZYNGA HIGHLY
`CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES ONLY”. Zynga shall inform the court reporter
`of these requirements. Any transcript that is prepared before the expiration of a 21-day period for
`designation shall be treated during that period as if it had been designated “ZYNGA HIGHLY
`
`- 5 -
`[PROPOSED] SUPPLEMENTAL PROTECTIVE ORDER
`GOVERNING DISCOVERY FROM ZYNGA, INC.
`Case Nos. 4:11-cv-06714-YGR, 4:19-cv-03074-YGR, 4:20-cv-05640-YGR
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 4:20-cv-05640-YGR Document 801 Filed 06/25/21 Page 6 of 8
`
`
`
`
`CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES ONLY” in its entirety unless otherwise agreed.
`
`After the expiration of that period, the transcript shall be treated only as actually designated.
`c.
`for information produced in some form other than documentary and for any
`other tangible items, that Zynga affix in a prominent place on the exterior of the container or
`containers in which the information or item is stored the legend “ZYNGA HIGHLY
`CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES ONLY.” If only a portion or portions of the
`information or item warrant protection, Zynga, to the extent practicable, shall identify the
`protected portion(s).
`2.
`Disclosure of “ZYNGA HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE COUNSEL
`EYES ONLY” Information or Items. Nothing in this Supplemental Protective Order shall prohibit
`Zynga from choosing to disclose information to specific individuals or entities, including expert
`witnesses, at its own discretion. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court or permitted in writing by
`Zynga, a Party may disclose any information or item designated “ZYNGA HIGHLY
`CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES ONLY” only to:
`a.
`the Party’s Outside Counsel of Record in this action, as well as employees
`of said Outside Counsel of Record to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information
`for these Litigations and who have signed the “Acknowledgement and Agreement to be Bound”
`that is attached to the Protective Order as Exhibit A;
`b.
`Party Experts (as defined in this Supplemental Protective Order) (1) to
`whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for these Litigations and (2) who have signed the
`“Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A to the Protective Order);
`c.
`the Court and its personnel;
`d.
`court reporters and their staff, professional jury or trial consultants, and
`Professional Vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for these Litigations and who
`have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to be Bound” (Exhibit A to the Protective
`Order); and
`
`3.
`
`
`
`e.
`the author or recipient of a document containing the information.
`Any Party disclosing any information or item for which an “Acknowledgement and
`- 6 -
`[PROPOSED] SUPPLEMENTAL PROTECTIVE ORDER
`GOVERNING DISCOVERY FROM ZYNGA, INC.
`Case Nos. 4:11-cv-06714-YGR, 4:19-cv-03074-YGR, 4:20-cv-05640-YGR
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 4:20-cv-05640-YGR Document 801 Filed 06/25/21 Page 7 of 8
`
`
`
`
`Agreement to be Bound” (Exhibit A to the Protective Order) is required shall collect and maintain
`
`a copy of each executed form and promptly provide them to Zynga upon Zynga’s request. Zynga
`will not disclose the identity of any expert who has signed the “Acknowledgement and Agreement
`to be Bound” without first obtaining the consent of the party that retained the expert or,
`alternatively, authorization from the Court.
`4.
`In light of the close of discovery in Epic Games, Inc. v. Apple Inc., Case No. 4:20-
`cv-05640, Dkt. No. 116, any discovery produced by Zynga in In re Apple iPhone Antitrust
`Litigation and Cameron v. Apple Inc. (Case No. 4:11-cv-06714-YGR) or (Case No. 4:19-cv-
`03074-YGR) and designated either “CONFIDENTIAL” or “ZYNGA HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL
`– OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES ONLY” shall not be produced in or used at trial in Epic Games,
`Inc. v. Apple Inc.
`5.
`If additional named plaintiffs are joined in Cameron v. Apple Inc. Case No. 4:19-
`cv-03074-YGR, the existing named Plaintiffs in that matter—Donald R. Cameron and Pure Sweat
`Basketball, Inc.—shall notify Zynga. Zynga shall have reasonable opportunity to seek further
`protective orders and object to sharing of any discovery produced by Zynga and designated either
`“CONFIDENTIAL” or “ZYNGA HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES
`ONLY” as to the new named Plaintiffs.
`6.
`All other provisions of the Protective Order, including Paragraphs 2, 3, 4, 5.3, 6,
`7.1, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14 apply mutatis mutandis to information designated “ZYNGA
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES ONLY” to the same extent as they
`apply to information designated as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES
`ONLY”; except that the provision in Paragraph 3 of the Protective Order providing that any use of
`Protected Material at trial shall be governed by a separate agreement or order shall not apply to
`information designated “ZYNGA HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES
`ONLY”. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court or expressly permitted by Zynga, no Party
`seeking to introduce documents or information designated “ZYNGA HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL
`– OUTSIDE COUNSEL EYES ONLY” into the record at trial may disclose the materials to any
`persons other than those identified in Paragraph C.2. of this Supplemental Protective Order.
`
`- 7 -
`[PROPOSED] SUPPLEMENTAL PROTECTIVE ORDER
`GOVERNING DISCOVERY FROM ZYNGA, INC.
`Case Nos. 4:11-cv-06714-YGR, 4:19-cv-03074-YGR, 4:20-cv-05640-YGR
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 4:20-cv-05640-YGR Document 801 Filed 06/25/21 Page 8 of 8
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`DATED:
`
`June 25, 2021
`
`HON. YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
`United States District Judge
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`- 8 -
`[PROPOSED] SUPPLEMENTAL PROTECTIVE ORDER
`GOVERNING DISCOVERY FROM ZYNGA, INC.
`Case Nos. 4:11-cv-06714-YGR, 4:19-cv-03074-YGR, 4:20-cv-05640-YGR
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket