`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`RICHARD ROUSAY,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`No. CIV S-05-1588 FCD JFM PS
`
`vs.
`
`VICE PRESIDENT CHENEY,
`PRESIDENT BUSH, et al.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`ORDER
`
` /
`
`Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was
`
`referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21).
`
`On September 20, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations
`
`herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any
`
`objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. On October
`
`17, 2005, plaintiff filed a document which this court construes as objections to the findings and
`
`recommendations.
`
`In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-
`
`304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire
`1
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`
`
`Case 2:05-cv-01588-FCD-JFM Document 6 Filed 11/08/05 Page 2 of 2
`
`file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by
`
`proper analysis.
`
`Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
`
`1. The findings and recommendations filed September 20, 2005, are adopted in
`
`full; and
`
`2. Plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed.
`
`DATED:November 7, 2005
`
`/s/ Frank C. Damrell Jr.
`FRANK C. DAMRELL JR.
`United States District Judge
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`2
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
