`Exhibit!B!
`
`Exhibit B
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit A
`Philips North America, LLC v. Garmin Int’l, Inc., et al. (C.D. Cal.) Case No. 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS
`Philips’s Preliminary Claim Constructions and Other P.R. 4-2 Disclosures
`
`
`Patent &
`Claims
`
`Term
`
`U.S. Pat. No.
`6,013,007
`Claims 1, 21
`
`“means for
`computing athletic
`performance
`feedback data from
`the series of time-
`stamped waypoints
`obtained by said
`GPS receiver”
`
`Preliminary Identification of
`Portions of Specification and
`Prosecution History
`
`Preliminary Identification of
`Extrinsic Evidence
`
`Expert Testimony: Philips may rely
`on the expert testimony of one or
`more experts, including Dr. Thomas
`L. Martin.
`
`Specification:
`Fig.6 and related written
`disclosure; Fig. 11 and related
`written disclosure; col. 1 ll. 5-13;
`col. 1 ll. 59 – 68; col. 2 ll. 1-54;
`col. 4 ll. 4-40; col. 5 ll. 36-40; col.
`6 l. 63 – col. 7 l. 5; col. 7 ll. 41-
`50; col. 9 ll. 31-35; col. 9 l. 63 –
`col. 10 l. 58; col. 10 l. 63 – col. 11
`l. 7.
`Philips may rely on any aspects of
`the specification and prosecution
`history to rebut positions
`advanced by Garmin in support of
`any proposed construction.
`
`Philips’s Preliminary
`Construction (and, where
`applicable, 35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 6
`disclosures)
`
`a processor (and equivalents
`thereof) that determines any of the
`following from a series of time-
`stamped waypoints obtained by
`said GPS receiver during an
`exercise session: elapsed distance
`of an athlete; current or average
`speed of an athlete; current or
`average pace of an athlete
`35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 6
`Structure:
`a processor and equivalents
`thereof (see, e.g., Fig.6, col. 5 ll.
`36-40 and col. 9 ll. 31-35.)
`Function:
`computing athletic performance
`feedback data [as construed above
`as elapsed distance of an athlete;
`current or average speed of an
`athlete; and/or current or average
`pace of an athlete] from the series
`
`
`
`
`