Case 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS Document 73-4 Filed 06/23/20 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #:1097
`EXHIBIT D to Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement
`Philips North America LLC v. Garmin Int’l, et al., Case NO. 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS
`Garmin’s Proposed Claim Constructions and Supporting Evidence
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,013,007
`
`means for
`computing athletic
`performance
`feedback data from
`the series of time-
`stamped waypoints
`obtained by said
`GPS receiver
`(Claims 1, 21)
`
`’007 Claim Term Defendants’ Proposed
`Construction
`35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 6.
`Indefinite.
`
`Function: computing
`athletic performance
`feedback data from the
`series of time-stamped
`waypoints obtained by
`said GPS receiver
`
`Structure or algorithm:
`not disclosed.
`35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 6.
`
`Function: presenting the
`athletic performance
`feedback data to an
`athlete
`
`Structure: Wired headset
`(including all technical
`components for audio
`connections,
`amplification, speech
`
`means for
`presenting the
`athletic
`performance
`feedback data to an
`athlete
`(Claims 1, 21)
`
`Defendants’ Supporting Evidence1
`
`’007: FIG 1(c)(122); FIGs 3-6, 1:33-36, 1:46-48, 1:59-64, 2:21-25, 2:58-62, 5:30-
`31, 5:36-43, 7:29-32, 7:35-56, 7:36 (citing 604).
`
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`
`
`GPS Land Navigation, Michael Ferguson, pps. 1-31 (GARM-CDCA-002359-
`2384)
`
`’007 Patent: FIG 1(c)(122); FIGs 3-6, 1:33-36, 1:45-58, 1:59-64, 2:21-25, 2:58-
`62, 4:4-16, 5:41-43, 7:35-40, 7:45-48, 7:36 (citing 604), 7:35-39.
`
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`
`’377 Prosecution History
`• Final Rejection dated August 13, 2010 at 5
`• Reasons for Requesting Pre-Appellate Review dated December 17, 2010
`at p.1-3
`
`
`1 In addition to the evidence cited herein, Garmin may rely on any aspects of the specification and prosecution history cited by Philips for a given term, as well as
`any other additional portions necessary to rebut positions advanced by Philips in support of any proposed construction. In addition, Garmin may rely on any
`extrinsic evidence identified by Philips.
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS Document 73-4 Filed 06/23/20 Page 2 of 15 Page ID #:1098
`EXHIBIT D to Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement
`Philips North America LLC v. Garmin Int’l, et al., Case NO. 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS
`Garmin’s Proposed Claim Constructions and Supporting Evidence
`
`
`Defendants’ Supporting Evidence1
`
`’007 Claim Term Defendants’ Proposed
`Construction
`synthesizer etc.).
`Feedback data is
`optionally also scrolled
`across the display while
`it is also being
`announced via the audio
`headphones.
`
`35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 6.
`Indefinite.
`
`Function: suspending
`and resuming operation
`of said means for
`computing when a speed
`of the athlete falls below
`a predetermined
`threshold
`modulator capable of
`sending signals through
`a standard telephone line
`and a demodulator
`capable of receiving
`signals from a standard
`telephone line
`
`means for
`suspending and
`resuming operation
`of said means for
`computing when a
`speed of the athlete
`falls below a
`predetermined
`threshold
`(Claim 7)
`modem for
`transmitting the
`athletic
`performance
`feedback data to a
`remote computer
`for comparison with
`athletic
`performance data of
`other athletes
`(Claim 21)
`
`’007 Patent: 8:5-9
`
`
`’007 Patent: FIGs 8-9, 3:47-50, 4:60-67, 6:12-16, 6:29-42, 8:57-65
`
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`
`
`IBM Dictionary of Computing (1994) “modem” (GARM-CDCA-002385-2387)
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS Document 73-4 Filed 06/23/20 Page 3 of 15 Page ID #:1099
`EXHIBIT D to Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement
`Philips North America LLC v. Garmin Int’l, et al., Case NO. 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS
`Garmin’s Proposed Claim Constructions and Supporting Evidence
`
`
`Defendants’ Supporting Evidence1
`
`’007 Claim Term Defendants’ Proposed
`Construction
`35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 6.
`Indefinite.
`
`Function: exchanging
`GPS route waypoints via
`said Internet web site
`
`
`“comprising means
`for exchanging GPS
`route waypoints via
`said Internet web
`site”
`(Claim 25)
`
`’007 Patent: 9:46-62
`
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`
`
`GPS Land Navigation, Michael Ferguson, pps. 1-31 (GARM-CDCA-002359-
`2384)
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS Document 73-4 Filed 06/23/20 Page 4 of 15 Page ID #:1100
`EXHIBIT D to Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement
`Philips North America LLC v. Garmin Int’l, et al., Case NO. 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS
`Garmin’s Proposed Claim Constructions and Supporting Evidence
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,088,233
`
`’233 Claim Term Defendants’ Proposed
`Construction
`first personal medical
`device
`
`
`
`first personal device
`(Claims 1, 10, 14,
`24)
`
`Defendants’ Supporting Evidence
`
`’233 Patent: Title, 1:20-27, 1:28-59, 1:63-2:10, 2:11-35, 2:38-48, 3:10-26, 4:11-
`45, 8:37-39, 8:41-47, 10:13-11:22, 11:46-12:46, 13:28-40, 14:15-20, Figs.
`1, 4A, 4B, 4C, 4D, 4E, 4F, 5, 6, Table 1.
`
`
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`(GARM-CDCA-0002227-2358)
`21 USCS § 321(h) [aka Section 201(h) of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.]
`US6152933A, passem
`US5827224A, 1:18-62
`US5738661A, passem
`US8663103B2, 8:61-64
`US7967855B2, 1:28-65
`
`’233 Patent: 2:1-10, 3:27-34, 11:49-59, 13:56-59, Table 1, Claims 8 and 9
`
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`’377 Patent Prosecution History:
`• Office Action dated May 4, 2009, p. 3
`• Response to Office Action dated August 4, 2009, p.9
`
`
`
`Indefinite.
`
`
`
`Body or
`physiological
`parameters
`
`wherein the detector
`senses body or
`physiological
`parameters
`
`(Claims 8, 9)
`location
`determination
`module
`
`(Claim 24)
`
`
`
`a terrestrial location
`system
`
`’233 Patent: 12:53-13:23, Claims 24- 25
`
`U.S. Patent Application No. 10/112,669 (as-filed specification and drawings):
`9:19-10:6, Figs. 4A, 4B, 4C
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS Document 73-4 Filed 06/23/20 Page 5 of 15 Page ID #:1101
`EXHIBIT D to Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement
`Philips North America LLC v. Garmin Int’l, et al., Case NO. 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS
`Garmin’s Proposed Claim Constructions and Supporting Evidence
`
`
`Defendants’ Supporting Evidence
`
`’233 Patent: 14:15-60, Fig. 7
`
`
`
`’233 Patent: 14:15-60, Fig. 7
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the bi-directional
`communications
`module has a
`powered-down state
`
`(Claim 26)
`
`“means for
`signaling the bi-
`directional
`communications
`module to transition
`from the
`powered-down state
`to the powered-up
`state”
`(Claim 26)
`
`’233 Claim Term Defendants’ Proposed
`Construction
`the bi-directional
`communications module
`of the first and second
`devices, each having a
`state that consumes no
`power
`
`
`
`Function: signaling the
`bi-directional
`communications module
`to transition from the
`powered-down state
`[i.e., state that consumes
`no power] to the
`powered-up state
`
`Structure: a mechanical
`signal, such as throwing
`a switch or applying
`pressure to a pad; a
`magnetic signal, as in
`passing a magnet in the
`vicinity of the
`communications
`module; sound or ultra-
`sound; infrared,
`provided there is a direct
`line of sight to the
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS Document 73-4 Filed 06/23/20 Page 6 of 15 Page ID #:1102
`EXHIBIT D to Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement
`Philips North America LLC v. Garmin Int’l, et al., Case NO. 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS
`Garmin’s Proposed Claim Constructions and Supporting Evidence
`
`
`Defendants’ Supporting Evidence
`
`’233 Claim Term Defendants’ Proposed
`Construction
`communications
`module; or combination
`of RF transmitter and
`un-powered RF receiver
`that are tuned to the
`same frequency, and
`structural equivalents
`thereof
`plain and ordinary
`meaning
`
`governing
`information
`transmitted between
`the first personal
`device and the
`second device
`wireless
`communication
`
`plain and ordinary
`meaning
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,277,377 and 6,965,958
`
`’233 Patent: 12:54-56, 13:24-14:14
`
`’233 Patent: 1:63-2:10, 2:11-35, 2:65-3:3, 3:54-59, FIG. 2, 4:10-44, FIG. 4A-4E,
`4:45-6:16, FIG. 5, 11:47-12:49, FIG 6, claim 32
`
`Claim Term
`(’377 and ’958)
`
`a method for interactive
`exercise monitoring
`(’377 Claim 1
`Preamble)
`
`Defendants’
`Proposed
`Construction
`method for a user or
`third party to
`monitor during
`exercise
`
`Supporting Evidence
`
`’377 Patent: 1:45-53, 2:11-14, 3:42-48, claim 1.
`
`’377 Prosecution History:
`• Applicant Remarks dated March 16, 2010, at p. 7-8
`• Applicant Remarks dated June 14, 2011, p.6-7
`• Applicant Pre-Appeal Brief dated January 10, 2012 at p.4/5
`• Applicant Appeal Brief dated March 12, 2012 at 2-16
`
`
`
`6
`
`

`

`Claim Term
`(’377 and ’958)
`
`Defendants’
`Proposed
`Construction
`
`web-enabled wireless
`phone (’377 Claims 1,
`4)
`
`
`internet-enabled
`wireless web device
`(’958 Claims 15-17)
`
`
`
`device without
`computing and
`processing
`capability that uses
`mobile
`telecommunication
`cellular network
`technologies to
`transfer data
`
`
`
`Case 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS Document 73-4 Filed 06/23/20 Page 7 of 15 Page ID #:1103
`EXHIBIT D to Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement
`Philips North America LLC v. Garmin Int’l, et al., Case NO. 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS
`Garmin’s Proposed Claim Constructions and Supporting Evidence
`
`
`Supporting Evidence
`
`
`See also ’377 Provisional Application, 60/172,246
`
`’377 Patent2: Abstract, 2:15-51, 3:14-20, 3:52-65, 4:30-42, 8:34-37
`
`’958 Patent: 4:18-23
`
`’377 Patent Prosecution History:
`• Office Action dated August 13, 2010
`• Response after Final Office Action dated September 20, 2010, pp.7-8
`• Reasons for Requesting Pre-Appellate Review dated December 17, 2010,
`pp. 1-4
`• Office Action Response dated June 14, 2011, pp.10-11
`• Reasons for Requesting Pre-Appellate Review dated October 28, 2011, pp.
`4-5
`• Appeal Brief dated March 3, 2012, pp. 7-9, 12-15
`
`
`Australian Counterpart Prosecution History: AU Patent Application No.
`2011207170:
`• Response to Examiner’s Report dated March 21, 2016, p. 2
`
`
`US Publication 2005/0228242: (D1 discussed in the Australian application above)
`
`European Counterpart: EP Patent Application No. 00989280, p. 8, lines 2-7
`
`
`
`2 The ‘377 Patent shares an identical specification with its parent patents, namely U.S. Patent Nos. 7,156,808 (“Quy ’808 Patent”), 6,936,007 (“Quy ’007
`Patent”), and 6,602,191 (“Quy ’191 Patent”). Any reference to disclosures from the ‘377 Patent also includes corresponding citations to the Quy ’808, the
`Quy ’007, and the Quy ’191 Patents.
`
`
`
`7
`
`

`

`Case 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS Document 73-4 Filed 06/23/20 Page 8 of 15 Page ID #:1104
`EXHIBIT D to Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement
`Philips North America LLC v. Garmin Int’l, et al., Case NO. 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS
`Garmin’s Proposed Claim Constructions and Supporting Evidence
`
`
`Claim Term
`(’377 and ’958)
`
`Defendants’
`Proposed
`Construction
`
`Indefinite
`
`
`
`
`“wherein at least one of
`the data indicating a
`physiologic status of a
`subject or the data
`indicating an amount of
`exercise performed by
`the subject is received
`from the device which
`provides exercise-
`related information, and
`wherein the data
`indicating a physiologic
`status of a subject is
`received at least
`partially while the
`subject is exercising
`(’377 Claim 1;
`
`
`
`Supporting Evidence
`
`European Counterpart Prosecution History: EP Patent Application No. 00989280:
`• Response to Communication from Examining Division dated October 20,
`2003, p. 2
`• Written Submission in preparation for Oral Hearing dated November 11,
`2005, p. 8
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,602,191: Claims 3-6 and 33-43
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,013,007 to Root
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,353,839 to King, 1:35-54, 2:3-29
`
`’377 Patent: 3:34-36, 4:43-47, 7:65-8:12, 10:27-34 FIG 6 (220-240-222)
`
`US Publication 2005/0228242: [0109]-[0110], [0108]
`
`’377 Patent Prosecution History:
`• Appeal Brief dated 3/12/2012
`
`
`Australian Counterpart Prosecution History: AU Patent Application No.
`2011207170
`• Examiner’s Report dated September 3, 2014 (citing Document D1: US
`2005/0228245 to Quy)
`• Response to Examiner’s Report dated September 1, 2015, p. 1
`• Response to Examiner’s Report dated February 15, 2016, p. 1-2
`• Response to Examiner’s Report dated March 21, 2016, p. 1-2
`
`
`8
`
`

`

`Case 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS Document 73-4 Filed 06/23/20 Page 9 of 15 Page ID #:1105
`EXHIBIT D to Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement
`Philips North America LLC v. Garmin Int’l, et al., Case NO. 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS
`Garmin’s Proposed Claim Constructions and Supporting Evidence
`
`
`Defendants’
`Proposed
`Construction
`
`Supporting Evidence
`
`Claim Term
`(’377 and ’958)
`
`“physiological status”
`Claim 12)
`sending the exercise-
`related information to
`an internet server
`(’377 Claim 1)
`
`calculated response
`from the server, the
`response associated
`with a calculation
`performed by
`the server based on the
`exercise-related
`information
`(’377 Claim 1)
`[a/the] health parameter
`(’958 Claims 15, 16)
`
`the health parameter
`indicative of a patient’s
`disease state or
`condition
`
`
`
`uploading the
`exercise-related
`information to an
`internet server in
`real-time, which
`does not include
`storing data about
`exercise and then
`uploading the same
`at a later time
`
`calculation
`performed at the
`server based on the
`exercise related
`information sent to
`the server during the
`time of exercise
`
`’377 Patent: 3:33-36, Claim 1
`
`’377 Patent Prosecution History:
`• Response after Final Office Action dated September 20, 2010, pp.11-12
`
`
`European Counterpart Prosecution History: EP Patent Application No. 00989280:
`• Response to Communication from Examining Division dated February 23,
`2005, p. 4
`
`’377 Patent: 8:14-20, 9:37-50, 10:47-56
`
`’377 Patent Prosecution History:
`• Office Action Response dated August 4, 2009, p. 12
`• Response after Final Office Action dated September 20, 2010, p.12
`• Reasons for Requesting Pre-Appellate Review dated December 17, 2010,
`pp. 1-3
`
`information used by
`health care
`professional in
`diagnosing/treating a
`patient’s [illness or
`sickness]
`
`
`’958 Patent: 2:51-57, 5:62-67, 9:57-61, 9:35-11:16
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,712,510 (App. No. 12/692080) Prosecution History:
`• Office Action Response dated October 22, 2012, pp. 12-13, 17
`• Office Action Response dated June 10, 2013, pp. 17
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,602,191: Claims 3-6 and 33-43:
`
`9
`
`

`

`Case 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS Document 73-4 Filed 06/23/20 Page 10 of 15 Page ID #:1106
`EXHIBIT D to Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement
`Philips North America LLC v. Garmin Int’l, et al., Case NO. 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS
`Garmin’s Proposed Claim Constructions and Supporting Evidence
`
`
`Supporting Evidence
`
`
`U.S. Application No. 11/649355 Prosecution History:
`• Preliminary Amendment dated June 24, 2008, pp. 2-4
`• Office Action dated January 30, 2009, pp. 2-4
`• Office Action Response dated April 30, 2009, pp. 4-5, 11 (355 FH pdf at
`p.46-47, 53)
`
`
`’377 Patent Prosecution History:
`• Reasons for Requesting Pre-Appellate Review dated December 17, 2010,
`pp. 4-5
`• Response after Final Office Action dated September 20, 2010, p.8
`’958 Patent: 2:51-57, 5:62-67, 9:57-61, 9:35-11:16
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,712,510 (App. No. 12/692080) Prosecution History:
`• Office Action Response dated October 22, 2012, pp. 12-13,17
`• Office Action Response dated June 10, 2013, pp. 17
`
`
`U.S. Application No. 11/649355 Prosecution History:
`• Preliminary Amendment dated June 24, 2008, pp. 2-4
`• Office Action dated January 30, 2009, pp. 2-4
`• Office Action Response dated April 30, 2009, pp. 4-5, 11 (355 FH pdf at
`p.46-47, 53)
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`Definition of “disease” – “illness or sickness characterized by specific signs and
`symptoms”
`Available at https://www.medicinenet.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=3011
`
`
`
`
`Defendants’
`Proposed
`Construction
`
`“disease state or
`disease condition”
`
` a
`
` person of ordinary
`skill in the art would
`understand “disease”
`to mean illness or
`sickness
`
`
`Claim Term
`(’377 and ’958)
`
`(’958 Claim 15)
`
`the health parameter or
`visual data
`corresponding to a
`patient’s disease state or
`condition
`(’958 Claim 16)
`
`
`disease state or
`condition
`(’958 Claims 15, 16)
`
`
`
`10
`
`

`

`Case 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS Document 73-4 Filed 06/23/20 Page 11 of 15 Page ID #:1107
`EXHIBIT D to Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement
`Philips North America LLC v. Garmin Int’l, et al., Case NO. 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS
`Garmin’s Proposed Claim Constructions and Supporting Evidence
`
`
`Supporting Evidence
`
`Webster’s II New College Dictionary, p. 325 (“disease”) (GARM-CDCA-
`002388-2390)
`
`To the extent contested, Garmin reserves the right to supplement with additional
`dictionary definitions of “disease”
`’958 Patent: 2:51-57, 5:58-61, 9:35-11:16
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,712,510 (App. No. 12/692080) Prosecution History:
`• Office Action Response dated October 22, 2012, pp. 12-13, 17
`
`
`
`11
`
`Claim Term
`(’377 and ’958)
`
`Defendants’
`Proposed
`Construction
`
`health monitoring
`device
`(’958 Claim 15, 16)
`
`medical device, not
`exercise machine
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS Document 73-4 Filed 06/23/20 Page 12 of 15 Page ID #:1108
`EXHIBIT D to Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement
`Philips North America LLC v. Garmin Int’l, et al., Case NO. 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS
`Garmin’s Proposed Claim Constructions and Supporting Evidence
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 9,314,192
`
`’192 Claim Term Defendants’ Proposed
`Construction
`any position on the body
`of a subject
`
`
`
`Defendants’ Supporting Evidence
`
`’192 Patent: FIG 5-7, 2:61-3:8, 3:17-27, 3:51-67, 4:11-645:23, 6:38-55, 7:25-
`9:12, 10:3-5
`
`
`’192 Prosecution History:
`• Office Action Response dated July 21, 2011, p. 2, 8-10
`• Office Action Response dated October 20, 2014, p. 10
`
`
`European Counterpart Prosecution History: EP Application No. 06832085:
`• Applicant Remarks dated December 22, 2012
`
`
`
`
`any one of a
`plurality of
`positions on a body
`of a subject
`(Claims 1, 20)
`
`one of the plurality
`of positions on
`the subject
`(Claims 1, 20)
`
`
`one of the plurality
`of positions of the
`sensor on the
`subject
`(Claims 1, 20)
`“analyzing the
`measured value for
`features that are
`position dependent”
`(Claims 1, 20)
`
`
`
`
`
`analyzing the signal
`from the sensor that is
`correlated with activity
`to determine the position
`of the sensor on the
`body
`
`’192 Patent: FIG 5-7, 2:61-3:8, 3:17-27, 3:51-67, 4:11-645:23, 6:38-55, 7:25-
`9:12, 10:3-5
`
`
`’192 Prosecution History:
`• Office Action Response dated April 10, 2015, p. 2, 6-7, 10-11
`
`
`European Counterpart Prosecution History: EP Patent Application No. 06832085:
`• Observations on the PCT search report and written opinion dated July 15,
`2008, p. 2
`• Reply to Communication Division dated January 27, 2010, p. 1-2 (FH pdf
`
`12
`
`

`

`Case 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS Document 73-4 Filed 06/23/20 Page 13 of 15 Page ID #:1109
`EXHIBIT D to Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement
`Philips North America LLC v. Garmin Int’l, et al., Case NO. 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS
`Garmin’s Proposed Claim Constructions and Supporting Evidence
`
`
`Defendants’ Supporting Evidence
`
`’192 Claim Term Defendants’ Proposed
`Construction
`
`derive a subject-
`related value from
`the measured value,
`where the
`derivation of the
`subject-related
`value also depends
`on the one of the
`plurality of
`positions of the
`sensor on the
`subject
`(Claim 1)
`
`deriving, using the
`processor, a
`subject-related
`value from the
`measured value in
`dependence on the
`one of the plurality
`of positions of the
`sensor on the
`subject
`(Claim 20)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`automatically adapt the
`measured value to
`compensate for
`measurement deviations
`that result from the
`location of the sensor
`
`at p.199-200)
`’192 Patent: FIG 5-7, 2:61-3:8, 3:17-27, 3:51-67, 4:11-645:23, 6:38-55, 7:25-
`9:12, 10:3-5
`
`
`’192 Prosecution History:
`• Office Action Response dated August 25, 2010, p. 14, lines 9-13
`• Office Action Response dated July 21, 2011, p. 8-10
`• Office Action Response dated February 15, 2011, p. 12-14
`• Office Action Response dated October 20, 2014, p. 7, 11-13
`
`US Publication No. 2007/003298 to Merkel
`
`
`
`
`13
`
`

`

`Case 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS Document 73-4 Filed 06/23/20 Page 14 of 15 Page ID #:1110
`EXHIBIT D to Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement
`Philips North America LLC v. Garmin Int’l, et al., Case NO. 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS
`Garmin’s Proposed Claim Constructions and Supporting Evidence
`
`
`U.S. Patent 9,801,542
`
`’542 Claim Term Defendants’ Proposed
`Construction
`Indefinite
`
`Defendants’ Supporting Evidence
`
`
`
`Analyzing the one
`or more vital
`parameters using a
`statistical analyzer
`(claim 13)
`trained with training
`data representing
`physiological
`conditions
`determined to be
`undesirable for the
`user
`(Claim 13)
`
`analyze the vital
`parameters to
`determine if the
`physiological
`conditions are
`undesirable
`(Claim 13)
`
`warning indication
`when the user’s
`physical condition
`is undesirable
`(Claim 13)
`
`
`
`Indefinite
`
`Indefinite
`
`Indefinite
`
`’542 Patent: 1:55-2:31, 9:21-42, 34:19-36:64
`
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`
`Prosecution History of U.S. Application 10/938,783 (issued as U.S. Patent
`7,502,498 to Wen et al):
`• Applicant Argument dated August 22 2008 at 5-8
`• Amended Claims dated December 30, 2008
`
`’542 Patent: 1:55-2:31, 9:21-42, 34:19-36:64
`
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`
`Prosecution History of U.S. Application 10/938,783 (issued as U.S. Patent
`7,502,498 to Wen et al):
`• Applicant Argument dated August 22 2008 at 5-8
`• Amended Claims dated December 30, 2008
`
`
`’542 Patent: 1:55-2:31, 9:21-42, 34:19-36:64
`
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`
`Prosecution History of U.S. Application 10/938,783 (issued as U.S. Patent
`
`14
`
`

`

`Case 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS Document 73-4 Filed 06/23/20 Page 15 of 15 Page ID #:1111
`EXHIBIT D to Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement
`Philips North America LLC v. Garmin Int’l, et al., Case NO. 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS
`Garmin’s Proposed Claim Constructions and Supporting Evidence
`
`
`Defendants’ Supporting Evidence
`
`7,502,498 to Wen et al):
`• Applicant Argument dated August 22 2008 at 5-8
`• Amended Claims dated December 30, 2008
`
`
`
`15
`
`’542 Claim Term Defendants’ Proposed
`Construction
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`