Case 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS Document 73-3 Filed 06/23/20 Page 1 of 20 Page ID #:1077
`
`
`Exhibit C to Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement
`Philips North America, LLC v. Garmin Int’l, Inc., et al. (C.D. Cal.) Case No. 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS
`Philips’s Proposed Claim Constructions and Supporting Evidence
`
`Philips’s Proposed Construction
`(and, where applicable, 35 U.S.C.
`§ 112, ¶ 6 disclosures)
`
`Patent &
`Claims
`
`Term
`
`Identification of Portions of
`Specification and Prosecution
`History
`
`Identification of Extrinsic
`Evidence
`
`Expert Testimony: Philips may
`rely on the expert testimony of
`one or more experts, including
`Dr. Thomas L. Martin, as
`summarized in accompanying
`Ex. E
`
`U.S. Pat. No. 6,013,007
`
`U.S. Pat. No.
`6,013,007
`Claims 1, 21
`
`“means for
`computing athletic
`performance
`feedback data from
`the series of time-
`stamped waypoints
`obtained by said
`GPS receiver”
`
`
`
`Specification:
`Fig.6 and related written
`disclosure; Fig. 11 and related
`written disclosure; col. 1 ll. 5-13;
`col. 1 ll. 59 – 68; col. 2 ll. 1-54;
`col. 4 ll. 4-40; col. 5 ll. 36-40; col.
`6 l. 63 – col. 7 l. 5; col. 7 ll. 41-
`50; col. 9 ll. 31-35; col. 9 l. 63 –
`col. 10 l. 58; col. 10 l. 63 – col. 11
`l. 7.
`Philips may rely on any aspects of
`the specification and prosecution
`history cited by Garmin for this
`term, as well any additional other
`portions necessary to rebut
`positions advanced by Garmin in
`support of any proposed
`construction.
`
`a processor (and equivalents
`thereof) that determines any of the
`following from a series of time-
`stamped waypoints obtained by
`said GPS receiver during an
`exercise session: elapsed distance
`of an athlete; current or average
`speed of an athlete; current or
`average pace of an athlete
`35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 6
`Structure:
`a processor and equivalents
`thereof (see, e.g., Fig.6, col. 5 ll.
`36-40 and col. 9 ll. 31-35.)
`Function:
`computing athletic performance
`feedback data [as construed above
`as elapsed distance of an athlete;
`current or average speed of an
`athlete; and/or current or average
`pace of an athlete] from the series
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS Document 73-3 Filed 06/23/20 Page 2 of 20 Page ID #:1078
`
`
`Exhibit C to Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement
`Philips North America, LLC v. Garmin Int’l, Inc., et al. (C.D. Cal.) Case No. 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS
`Philips’s Proposed Claim Constructions and Supporting Evidence
`
`Philips’s Proposed Construction
`(and, where applicable, 35 U.S.C.
`§ 112, ¶ 6 disclosures)
`of time-stamped waypoints
`obtained by said GPS receiver
`
`Term
`
`Identification of Portions of
`Specification and Prosecution
`History
`
`Identification of Extrinsic
`Evidence
`
`Philips may rely on any extrinsic
`evidence identified by Garmin
`for this term.
`
`Specification:
`Fig.6 and related disclosure, col. 5
`ll. 36-40; col. 8 ll. 5-13; col. 9 ll.
`31-35.
`
`Philips may rely on any aspects of
`the specification and prosecution
`history cited by Garmin for this
`term, as well any additional other
`portions necessary to rebut
`positions advanced by Garmin in
`support of any proposed
`construction.
`
`“means for
`suspending and
`resuming operation
`of said means for
`computing when a
`speed of the athlete
`falls below a
`predetermined
`threshold”
`
`
`a processor (and equivalents
`thereof) that suspends said
`computing when a speed of the
`athlete is below a predetermined
`threshold and resumes said
`computing when a speed of the
`athlete is not below said
`predetermined threshold
`35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 6
`Structure:
`a processor and equivalents
`thereof (see, e.g., Fig.6, col. 5 ll.
`36-40 and col. 9 ll. 31-35.)
`Function:
`resuming
`and
`suspending
`operation of said means
`for
`computing when a speed of the
`athlete falls below a predetermined
`threshold (as construed above)
`
`2
`
`Patent &
`Claims
`
`U.S. Pat. No.
`6,013,007
`Claim 7
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS Document 73-3 Filed 06/23/20 Page 3 of 20 Page ID #:1079
`
`
`Exhibit C to Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement
`Philips North America, LLC v. Garmin Int’l, Inc., et al. (C.D. Cal.) Case No. 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS
`Philips’s Proposed Claim Constructions and Supporting Evidence
`
`Philips’s Proposed Construction
`(and, where applicable, 35 U.S.C.
`§ 112, ¶ 6 disclosures)
`Not indefinite.
`
`Identification of Portions of
`Specification and Prosecution
`History
`
`Identification of Extrinsic
`Evidence
`
`Term
`
`Patent &
`Claims
`
`U.S. Pat. No.
`6,013,007
`Claims 1, 21
`
`Philips may rely on any extrinsic
`evidence identified by Garmin
`for this term.
`
`“means for
`presenting the
`athletic
`performance
`feedback data to an
`athlete”
`
`Specification:
`Figs. 1A, 2, 3, 5, 6 (and related
`disclosures of each figure),
`original claims, col. 4 ll. 4-13, col
`4. ll. 34-40, col. 7 ll. 56-67.
`Philips may rely on any aspects of
`the specification and prosecution
`history cited by Garmin for this
`term, as well any additional other
`portions necessary to rebut
`positions advanced by Garmin in
`support of any proposed
`construction.
`
`No construction necessary.
`However, if construed Philips
`proposes the following
`construction that reflects the
`structure and function: “a display
`and/or audio headphones (and
`equivalents thereof) that presents
`the athletic performance feedback
`data to an athlete”
`35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 6
`Structure:
`a display and/or audio
`headphones and equivalents
`thereof (See, e.g., Figs. 1A, 2, 3,
`5, 6, original claims, col. 4 ll. 4-
`13, col 4. ll. 34-40, col. 7 ll. 56-
`67)
`Function:
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS Document 73-3 Filed 06/23/20 Page 4 of 20 Page ID #:1080
`
`
`Exhibit C to Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement
`Philips North America, LLC v. Garmin Int’l, Inc., et al. (C.D. Cal.) Case No. 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS
`Philips’s Proposed Claim Constructions and Supporting Evidence
`
`Philips’s Proposed Construction
`(and, where applicable, 35 U.S.C.
`§ 112, ¶ 6 disclosures)
`presenting the athletic
`performance feedback data to an
`athlete
`
`Identification of Portions of
`Specification and Prosecution
`History
`
`Identification of Extrinsic
`Evidence
`
`Term
`
`Patent &
`Claims
`
`U.S. Pat. No.
`6,013,007
`Claim 21
`
`“modem for
`transmitting the
`athletic
`performance
`feedback data to a
`remote computer
`for comparison
`with athletic
`performance
`feedback data of
`other athletes”
`
`No construction necessary
`Alternatively: “modem” should be
`construed as “a device that
`modulates a digital signal into an
`analog one for transmission and
`which demodulates a received
`analog signal into a digital one.”
`
`
`Specification:
`col. 6 ll. 29-42
`Philips may rely on any aspects of
`the specification and prosecution
`history cited by Garmin for this
`term, as well any additional other
`portions necessary to rebut
`positions advanced by Garmin in
`support of any proposed
`construction.
`
`Barron’s Dictionary of
`Computer and Internet Terms
`(1998) “modem”
`IBM Dictionary of Computing
`(1994) “modem”
`Padgett, J.; Gunther, C.; and
`Hattori, T., IEEE
`Communications Magazine, Jan.
`1995, “Overview of Wireless
`Personal Communications.”
`Hills, A and Johnson, D., IEEE
`Personal Communications, Feb.
`1996, “A Wireless Data
`Network Infrastructure at
`Carnegie Mellon University.”
`Philips may also rely on any
`extrinsic evidence identified by
`Garmin for this term.
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS Document 73-3 Filed 06/23/20 Page 5 of 20 Page ID #:1081
`
`
`Exhibit C to Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement
`Philips North America, LLC v. Garmin Int’l, Inc., et al. (C.D. Cal.) Case No. 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS
`Philips’s Proposed Claim Constructions and Supporting Evidence
`
`Philips’s Proposed Construction
`(and, where applicable, 35 U.S.C.
`§ 112, ¶ 6 disclosures)
`
`Identification of Portions of
`Specification and Prosecution
`History
`
`Identification of Extrinsic
`Evidence
`
`Term
`
`Patent &
`Claims
`
`U.S. Pat. No.
`6,013,007
`Claim 25
`
`Philips may rely on any extrinsic
`evidence identified by Garmin
`for this term.
`
`Specification: Original claim, col.
`9 ll. 52-62.
`Philips may rely on any aspects of
`the specification and prosecution
`history cited by Garmin for this
`term, as well any additional other
`portions necessary to rebut
`positions advanced by Garmin in
`support of any proposed
`construction.
`
`“means for
`exchanging GPS
`route waypoints via
`said Internet web
`site”
`
`No construction necessary.
`However, if construed Philips
`proposes the following
`construction that reflects the
`structure and function: “an
`Internet web site (and equivalents
`thereof) that exchanges GPS route
`waypoints”
`35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 6
`Structure:
`an Internet web site and
`equivalents thereof (See, e.g.,
`original claim, col. 9 ll. 52-62)
`
`Function:
`exchanging GPS route waypoints
`
`
`U.S. Pat. No. 7,088,233
`
`U.S. Pat. No.
`7,088,233
`Claim 1
`
`“governing
`information
`transmitted between
`the first personal
`
`
`
`controlling the transmission of
`information between the first
`
`Specification:
`Figs. 1, 5, 6 (and related written
`disclosures for each figure)
`
`Merriam Webster dictionary
`definition of “govern”
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS Document 73-3 Filed 06/23/20 Page 6 of 20 Page ID #:1082
`
`
`Exhibit C to Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement
`Philips North America, LLC v. Garmin Int’l, Inc., et al. (C.D. Cal.) Case No. 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS
`Philips’s Proposed Claim Constructions and Supporting Evidence
`
`Philips’s Proposed Construction
`(and, where applicable, 35 U.S.C.
`§ 112, ¶ 6 disclosures)
`personal device and the second
`device
`
`
`Patent &
`Claims
`
`Term
`
`device and the
`second device.”
`
`Identification of Portions of
`Specification and Prosecution
`History
`col. 7 ll. 58-65; col. 10 ll. 25-45;
`col. 10 l.46 – col. 12 l. 49; col. 13
`l. 15 – col. 14 l. 15.
`Prosecution History:
`Notice of Allowance dated June
`11, 2004
`Philips may rely on any aspects of
`the specification and prosecution
`history cited by Garmin for this
`term, as well any additional other
`portions necessary to rebut
`positions advanced by Garmin in
`support of any proposed
`construction.
`
`Identification of Extrinsic
`Evidence
`
`Collins English dictionary
`definition of “govern”
`Expert Testimony: Philips may
`rely on the expert testimony of
`one or more experts, including
`Dr. Thomas L. Martin, as
`summarized in accompanying
`Ex. E more experts, including
`Dr. Thomas L. Martin.
`Philips may rely on any extrinsic
`evidence identified by Garmin
`for this term.
`
`U.S. Pat. No.
`7,088,233
`Claims 1, 13,
`15, 16
`
` “wireless
`communication” /
`“wireless
`communications”
`
`an over-the-air communication
`(e.g. using radiofrequency (RF),
`infrared, or optical techniques)
`
`Specification:
`Figs. 4A-4F (and related written
`disclosure); col. 3 ll. 54-59; col. 4
`l. 11 – col. 8 l. 63; col. 9 ll. 39-45;
`col. 10 l. 46 – col. 13 l. 14;
`original claims.
`
`Oxford Dictionary of
`Electronics and Electrical
`Engineering, definition of
`“wireless”
`Barron’s Dictionary of
`Computer and Internet Terms,
`definition of “wireless
`communication.”
`
`
`
`6
`
`

`

`Case 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS Document 73-3 Filed 06/23/20 Page 7 of 20 Page ID #:1083
`
`
`Exhibit C to Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement
`Philips North America, LLC v. Garmin Int’l, Inc., et al. (C.D. Cal.) Case No. 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS
`Philips’s Proposed Claim Constructions and Supporting Evidence
`
`Philips’s Proposed Construction
`(and, where applicable, 35 U.S.C.
`§ 112, ¶ 6 disclosures)
`
`Identification of Extrinsic
`Evidence
`
`Philips may rely on any extrinsic
`evidence identified by Garmin
`for this term.
`
`Patent &
`Claims
`
`Term
`
`Identification of Portions of
`Specification and Prosecution
`History
`Also, the specification’s overall
`reference to wireless
`communications.
`Philips may rely on any aspects of
`the specification and prosecution
`history cited by Garmin for this
`term, as well any additional other
`portions necessary to rebut
`positions advanced by Garmin in
`support of any proposed
`construction.
`
`“first personal
`device”
`
`U.S. Pat. No.
`7,088,233
`Claims 1, 10,
`14, 15 24
`
`No construction necessary
`Alternatively: “a device for private
`use by a person”
`
`
`Merriam-Webster Dictionary,
`“personal.”
`Philips may rely on any extrinsic
`evidence identified by Garmin
`for this term.
`
`Specification:
`Abstract; col. 8 ll. 50-67; col. 9 ll.
`12-15; col. 9 l. 49- col. 12 l. 49;
`col. 13 ll. 29-54 col. 14 ll. 9-19;
`col. 14 ll. 49-51.
`Philips may rely on any aspects of
`the specification and prosecution
`history cited by Garmin for this
`term, as well any additional other
`portions necessary to rebut
`positions advanced by Garmin in
`
`
`
`7
`
`

`

`Case 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS Document 73-3 Filed 06/23/20 Page 8 of 20 Page ID #:1084
`
`
`Exhibit C to Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement
`Philips North America, LLC v. Garmin Int’l, Inc., et al. (C.D. Cal.) Case No. 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS
`Philips’s Proposed Claim Constructions and Supporting Evidence
`
`Philips’s Proposed Construction
`(and, where applicable, 35 U.S.C.
`§ 112, ¶ 6 disclosures)
`
`Patent &
`Claims
`
`Term
`
`Identification of Portions of
`Specification and Prosecution
`History
`support of any proposed
`construction.
`
`Identification of Extrinsic
`Evidence
`
`U.S. Pat. No.
`7,088,233
`Claims 8, 9
`
`“body or
`physiological
`parameters”
`
`No construction necessary
`Not indefinite
`
`U.S. Pat. No.
`7,088,233
`Claim 24
`
`“location
`determination
`module”
`
`No construction necessary
`
`Philips may rely on any extrinsic
`evidence identified by Garmin
`for this term.
`
`Philips may rely on any extrinsic
`evidence identified by Garmin
`for this term.
`
`Specification:
`Table 1; col. 3 ll. 27-33; claim 9.
`Philips may rely on any aspects of
`the specification and prosecution
`history cited by Garmin for this
`term, as well any additional other
`portions necessary to rebut
`positions advanced by Garmin in
`support of any proposed
`construction.
`
`Specification:
`12:53-13:23
`Philips may rely on any aspects of
`the specification and prosecution
`history cited by Garmin for this
`term, as well any additional other
`portions necessary to rebut
`positions advanced by Garmin in
`
`
`
`8
`
`

`

`Case 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS Document 73-3 Filed 06/23/20 Page 9 of 20 Page ID #:1085
`
`
`Exhibit C to Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement
`Philips North America, LLC v. Garmin Int’l, Inc., et al. (C.D. Cal.) Case No. 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS
`Philips’s Proposed Claim Constructions and Supporting Evidence
`
`Philips’s Proposed Construction
`(and, where applicable, 35 U.S.C.
`§ 112, ¶ 6 disclosures)
`
`Patent &
`Claims
`
`Term
`
`Identification of Portions of
`Specification and Prosecution
`History
`support of any proposed
`construction.
`
`Identification of Extrinsic
`Evidence
`
`U.S. Pat. No.
`7,088,233
`Claim 26
`
`“bi-directional
`communications
`module has a
`powered-down
`state”
`
`No construction necessary
`Alternatively: “bi-directional
`communications module has a
`powered state that is lower than the
`powered-up state”
`
`
`U.S. Pat. No.
`7,088,233
`Claim 26
`
`“means for
`signaling the bi-
`directional
`communications
`module to transition
`from the powered-
`down state to the
`powered-up state”
`
`No construction necessary.
`However, if construed Philips
`proposes the following
`construction that reflects the
`structure and function: “a
`radiofrequency (RF) receiver,
`switch, pressure pad, or magnet
`(or equivalents thereof) that
`causes the bi-directional
`communications module to
`
`
`
`9
`
`Philips may rely on any extrinsic
`evidence identified by Garmin
`for this term.
`
`Philips may rely on any extrinsic
`evidence identified by Garmin
`for this term.
`
`Specification:
`col. 14 ll. 15-60
`Philips may rely on any aspects of
`the specification and prosecution
`history cited by Garmin for this
`term, as well any additional other
`portions necessary to rebut
`positions advanced by Garmin in
`support of any proposed
`construction.
`
`Specification:
`Fig. 7 (and related written
`disclosure), col.14 ll. 34-47
`Philips may rely on any aspects of
`the specification and prosecution
`history cited by Garmin for this
`term, as well any additional other
`portions necessary to rebut
`positions advanced by Garmin in
`
`

`

`Case 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS Document 73-3 Filed 06/23/20 Page 10 of 20 Page ID #:1086
`
`Patent &
`Claims
`
`Term
`
`
`Exhibit C to Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement
`Philips North America, LLC v. Garmin Int’l, Inc., et al. (C.D. Cal.) Case No. 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS
`Philips’s Proposed Claim Constructions and Supporting Evidence
`
`Philips’s Proposed Construction
`(and, where applicable, 35 U.S.C.
`§ 112, ¶ 6 disclosures)
`transition from the powered-down
`state to the powered-up state.”
`Structure:
`a radiofrequency (RF) receiver,
`mechanical switch, pad, or
`magnet or equivalents thereof.
`(See, e.g., Fig. 7, col.14 ll. 34-47)
`Function:
`signaling the bi-directional
`communications module to
`transition from the powered-down
`state to the powered-up state
`
`Identification of Portions of
`Specification and Prosecution
`History
`support of any proposed
`construction.
`
`Identification of Extrinsic
`Evidence
`
`U.S. Pat. No. 6,976,958
`
`U.S. Pat. No.
`6,976,958
`Claims 15,
`16, 17
`
`“internet-enabled
`wireless web
`device”
`
`a device designed to display
`interactive information through a
`connection to the Internet
`
`
`
`10
`
`Philips may rely on any extrinsic
`evidence identified by Garmin
`for this term.
`
`Specification:
`Abstract; Figs.
`col. 1 l. 30 – col. 2 l. 37; col. 3 l.
`28 – col. 5 l. 2; col. 8 l. 61 - col. 9
`l. 9; col. 9 l. 62 - col. 10 l. 3
`Philips may rely on any aspects of
`the specification and prosecution
`
`

`

`Case 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS Document 73-3 Filed 06/23/20 Page 11 of 20 Page ID #:1087
`
`
`Exhibit C to Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement
`Philips North America, LLC v. Garmin Int’l, Inc., et al. (C.D. Cal.) Case No. 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS
`Philips’s Proposed Claim Constructions and Supporting Evidence
`
`Philips’s Proposed Construction
`(and, where applicable, 35 U.S.C.
`§ 112, ¶ 6 disclosures)
`
`Patent &
`Claims
`
`Term
`
`Identification of Extrinsic
`Evidence
`
`Identification of Portions of
`Specification and Prosecution
`History
`history cited by Garmin for this
`term, as well any additional other
`portions necessary to rebut
`positions advanced by Garmin in
`support of any proposed
`construction.
`
`U.S. Pat. No.
`6,976,958
`Claims 15, 16
`
`“disease state or
`condition”
`
`
`
`No construction necessary
`
`
`“health monitoring
`device”
`
`No construction necessary
`
`U.S. Pat. No.
`6,976,958
`Claims 15, 16
`
`
`
`Philips may rely on any extrinsic
`evidence identified by Garmin
`for this term.
`
`Philips may rely on any extrinsic
`evidence identified by Garmin
`for this term.
`
`Specification:
`col. 2 ll. 48-57; col. 6 ll. 1-11; col.
`9 ll. 57-61.
`Philips may rely on any aspects of
`the specification and prosecution
`history cited by Garmin for this
`term, as well any additional other
`portions necessary to rebut
`positions advanced by Garmin in
`support of any proposed
`construction.
`
`Specification:
`col. 2 ll. 48-65; col. 3:51-61; col.
`6 ll. 1-11; col. 9 ll. 57-61.
`Philips may rely on any aspects of
`the specification and prosecution
`
`11
`
`

`

`Case 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS Document 73-3 Filed 06/23/20 Page 12 of 20 Page ID #:1088
`
`Term
`
`
`Exhibit C to Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement
`Philips North America, LLC v. Garmin Int’l, Inc., et al. (C.D. Cal.) Case No. 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS
`Philips’s Proposed Claim Constructions and Supporting Evidence
`
`Philips’s Proposed Construction
`(and, where applicable, 35 U.S.C.
`§ 112, ¶ 6 disclosures)
`
`Identification of Extrinsic
`Evidence
`
`Identification of Portions of
`Specification and Prosecution
`History
`history cited by Garmin for this
`term, as well any additional other
`portions necessary to rebut
`positions advanced by Garmin in
`support of any proposed
`construction.
`
`Patent &
`Claims
`
`U.S. Pat. No.
`6,976,958
`Claims 15, 16
`
`“[a/the] health
`parameter / the
`health parameter
`indicative of a
`disease state or
`condition of a
`patient / the health
`parameter or visual
`data corresponding
`to a patient’s
`disease state or
`condition”
`
`No construction necessary
`Alternatively: “the health parameter
`indicative of [or visual data
`corresponding to] a disease state or
`condition of a person under the care
`of a physician or a healthy
`individual interested in maintaining
`a healthy physiologic balance.”
`
`
`Specification:
`col. 2 ll. 48-57; col. 6 ll. 1-11; col.
`9 ll. 57-61.
`Philips may rely on any aspects of
`the specification and prosecution
`history cited by Garmin for this
`term, as well any additional other
`portions necessary to rebut
`positions advanced by Garmin in
`support of any proposed
`construction.
`
`Philips may rely on any extrinsic
`evidence identified by Garmin
`for this term.
`
`U.S. Pat. No. 8,277,377
`
`U.S. Pat. No.
`8,277,377
`Claims 1, 4
`
`“web-enabled
`wireless phone”
`
`
`
`No construction necessary
`
`Specification:
`col. 3 ll. 42-65; col. 6 ll. 14-28;
`col. 6 ll. 45-51; col. 9 ll. 29-44;
`
`Philips may rely on any extrinsic
`evidence identified by Garmin
`for this term.
`
`12
`
`

`

`Case 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS Document 73-3 Filed 06/23/20 Page 13 of 20 Page ID #:1089
`
`
`Exhibit C to Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement
`Philips North America, LLC v. Garmin Int’l, Inc., et al. (C.D. Cal.) Case No. 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS
`Philips’s Proposed Claim Constructions and Supporting Evidence
`
`Philips’s Proposed Construction
`(and, where applicable, 35 U.S.C.
`§ 112, ¶ 6 disclosures)
`
`Patent &
`Claims
`
`Term
`
`U.S. Pat. No.
`8,277,377
`Claim 1
`
`“a method for
`interactive exercise
`monitoring”
`(’377 Claim 1
`Preamble
`
`No construction necessary
`
`
`
`13
`
`Identification of Extrinsic
`Evidence
`
`Philips may rely on any extrinsic
`evidence identified by Garmin
`for this term.
`
`Identification of Portions of
`Specification and Prosecution
`History
`col. 10 ll. 8-18; col. 10 ll. 35-48;
`col. 12 l. 50 – col. 13 l. 20.
`Philips may rely on any aspects of
`the specification and prosecution
`history cited by Garmin for this
`term, as well any additional other
`portions necessary to rebut
`positions advanced by Garmin in
`support of any proposed
`construction.
`
`Specification:
`Abstract; col. 2 l. 55 – col. 3 l. 13;
`col. 3 l. 21 – col. 4 l. 7; col. 5 l. 65 –
`col. 6 l. 13; col. 10 ll. 20-61.
`Philips may rely on any aspects of
`the specification and prosecution
`history cited by Garmin for this
`term, as well any additional other
`portions necessary to rebut
`positions advanced by Garmin in
`support of any proposed
`construction.
`
`

`

`Case 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS Document 73-3 Filed 06/23/20 Page 14 of 20 Page ID #:1090
`
`
`Exhibit C to Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement
`Philips North America, LLC v. Garmin Int’l, Inc., et al. (C.D. Cal.) Case No. 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS
`Philips’s Proposed Claim Constructions and Supporting Evidence
`
`Philips’s Proposed Construction
`(and, where applicable, 35 U.S.C.
`§ 112, ¶ 6 disclosures)
`
`Patent &
`Claims
`
`Term
`
`Identification of Portions of
`Specification and Prosecution
`History
`
`
`Identification of Extrinsic
`Evidence
`
`U.S. Pat. No.
`8,277,377
`Claim 1
`
`“sending the
`exercise-related
`information to an
`internet server”
`
`No construction necessary
`
`No construction necessary
`Not indefinite
`
`U.S. Pat. No.
`8,277,377
`Claim 1
`
`“wherein at least
`one of the data
`indicating a
`physiological status
`of a subject or the
`data indicating an
`amount of exercise
`performed by the
`
`
`
`Philips may rely on any extrinsic
`evidence identified by Garmin
`for this term.
`
`Philips may rely on any extrinsic
`evidence identified by Garmin
`for this term.
`
`Specification:
`col. 3 ll. 42-65; col. 6 ll. 14-28;
`col. 6 ll. 45-51; col. 9 ll. 29-44;
`col. 10 ll. 8-18; col. 10 ll. 35-48;
`col. 12 l. 50 – col. 13 l. 20.
`Philips may rely on any aspects of
`the specification and prosecution
`history cited by Garmin for this
`term, as well any additional other
`portions necessary to rebut
`positions advanced by Garmin in
`support of any proposed
`construction.
`
`Specification:
`Abstract; col. 3 ll. 21-52; col. 4 ll.
`43-64; col. 5:65 – col. 6:3; col. 6
`ll. 4-13; col. 7 ll. 8-45; col. 10 ll.
`20-56.
`Philips may rely on any aspects of
`the specification and prosecution
`
`14
`
`

`

`Case 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS Document 73-3 Filed 06/23/20 Page 15 of 20 Page ID #:1091
`
`
`Exhibit C to Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement
`Philips North America, LLC v. Garmin Int’l, Inc., et al. (C.D. Cal.) Case No. 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS
`Philips’s Proposed Claim Constructions and Supporting Evidence
`
`Philips’s Proposed Construction
`(and, where applicable, 35 U.S.C.
`§ 112, ¶ 6 disclosures)
`
`Identification of Extrinsic
`Evidence
`
`Identification of Portions of
`Specification and Prosecution
`History
`history cited by Garmin for this
`term, as well any additional other
`portions necessary to rebut
`positions advanced by Garmin in
`support of any proposed
`construction.
`
`
`Philips may rely on any extrinsic
`evidence identified by Garmin
`for this term.
`
`Specification:
`Abstract; col. 3 ll. 21-52; col. 4 ll.
`43-64; col. 5:65 – col. 6:3; col. 6
`ll. 4-13; col. 7 ll. 8-45; col. 10 ll.
`20-56
`Philips may rely on any aspects of
`the specification and prosecution
`history cited by Garmin for this
`term, as well any additional other
`portions necessary to rebut
`positions advanced by Garmin in
`support of any proposed
`construction.
`
`15
`
`Patent &
`Claims
`
`U.S. Pat. No.
`8,277,377
`Claim 1
`
`Term
`
`subject is received
`from the device
`which provides
`exercise-related
`information”
`
`“calculated
`response from the
`server, the response
`associated with a
`calculation
`performed by the
`server based on the
`exercise-related
`information."
`
`No construction necessary
`
`U.S. Pat. No. 9,314,192
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS Document 73-3 Filed 06/23/20 Page 16 of 20 Page ID #:1092
`
`
`Exhibit C to Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement
`Philips North America, LLC v. Garmin Int’l, Inc., et al. (C.D. Cal.) Case No. 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS
`Philips’s Proposed Claim Constructions and Supporting Evidence
`
`Philips’s Proposed Construction
`(and, where applicable, 35 U.S.C.
`§ 112, ¶ 6 disclosures)
`
`Patent &
`Claims
`
`Term
`
`Identification of Portions of
`Specification and Prosecution
`History
`
`Identification of Extrinsic
`Evidence
`
`U.S. Pat. No.
`9,314,192
`Claims 1, 20
`
`“any one of a
`plurality of
`positions on a body
`of a subject”
`
`No construction necessary
`
`U.S. Pat. No.
`9,314,192
`Claims 1, 20
`
`“analyzing the
`measured value for
`features that are
`position-
`dependent”
`
`No construction necessary
`
`
`
`16
`
`Philips may rely on any extrinsic
`evidence identified by Garmin
`for this term.
`
`Philips may rely on any extrinsic
`evidence identified by Garmin
`for this term.
`
`Specification:
`Abstract; col. 2 l. 29 – col. 3 l. 31;
`col. 4 ll. 11-54; col. 6 ll. 38-58;
`col. 10 ll. 36-48.
`Philips may rely on any aspects of
`the specification and prosecution
`history cited by Garmin for this
`term, as well any additional other
`portions necessary to rebut
`positions advanced by Garmin in
`support of any proposed
`construction.
`
`Specification:
`Abstract; col. 3 l. 47 – col. 5 l. 2;
`col. 8 ll. 13-52; col. 9 ll.13-44;
`col. 10 ll. 36-67.
`Philips may rely on any aspects of
`the specification and prosecution
`history cited by Garmin for this
`term, as well any additional other
`portions necessary to rebut
`positions advanced by Garmin in
`
`

`

`Case 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS Document 73-3 Filed 06/23/20 Page 17 of 20 Page ID #:1093
`
`
`Exhibit C to Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement
`Philips North America, LLC v. Garmin Int’l, Inc., et al. (C.D. Cal.) Case No. 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS
`Philips’s Proposed Claim Constructions and Supporting Evidence
`
`Philips’s Proposed Construction
`(and, where applicable, 35 U.S.C.
`§ 112, ¶ 6 disclosures)
`
`Identification of Portions of
`Specification and Prosecution
`History
`support of any proposed
`construction.
`
`Identification of Extrinsic
`Evidence
`
`Term
`
`Patent &
`Claims
`
`U.S. Pat. No.
`9,314,192
`Claims 1, 20
`
`No construction necessary
`
`Philips may rely on any extrinsic
`evidence identified by Garmin
`for this term.
`
`Specification:
`Abstract; col. 3 l. 47 – col. 5 l. 2;
`col. 8 ll. 13-52; col. 9 ll.13-44;
`col. 10 ll. 36-67.
`Philips may rely on any aspects of
`the specification and prosecution
`history cited by Garmin for this
`term, as well any additional other
`portions necessary to rebut
`positions advanced by Garmin in
`support of any proposed
`construction.
`
`“derive a subject-
`related value from
`the measured value,
`where the
`derivation of the
`subject-related
`value also depends
`on the one of the
`plurality of
`positions of the
`sensor on the
`subject / deriving,
`using the processor,
`a subject-related
`value from the
`measured value in
`dependence on the
`one of the plurality
`of positions of the
`sensor on the
`subject”
`
`
`
`17
`
`

`

`Case 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS Document 73-3 Filed 06/23/20 Page 18 of 20 Page ID #:1094
`
`
`Exhibit C to Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement
`Philips North America, LLC v. Garmin Int’l, Inc., et al. (C.D. Cal.) Case No. 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS
`Philips’s Proposed Claim Constructions and Supporting Evidence
`
`Philips’s Proposed Construction
`(and, where applicable, 35 U.S.C.
`§ 112, ¶ 6 disclosures)
`
`Patent &
`Claims
`
`Term
`
`Identification of Portions of
`Specification and Prosecution
`History
`
`Identification of Extrinsic
`Evidence
`
`No construction necessary
`Not indefinite.
`
`U.S. Pat. No. 9,801,542
`
`U.S. Pat. No.
`9,801,542
`Claim 13
`
`“using one or more
`sensors physically
`coupled to the user
`and connected to a
`network, to monitor
`one or more vital
`parameters,
`providing data
`representative of
`the user’s physical
`condition”
`
`U.S. Pat. No.
`9,801,542
`Claim 13
`
`“analyzing the one
`or more vital
`parameters using a
`statistical analyzer”
`
`No construction necessary
`Not indefinite
`
`
`
`18
`
`Philips may rely on any extrinsic
`evidence identified by Garmin
`for this term.
`
`Philips may rely on any extrinsic
`evidence identified by Garmin
`for this term.
`
`Specification:
`Abstract; col. 1 l. 48 – col. 4 l. 9;
`col. 6 l. 40 – col. 7 l. 10; col. 7 l.
`35 – col. 8 l. 23; col. 9 l. 16 – 46;
`col. 34 l. 44 – col. 37 l. 13.
`Philips may rely on any aspects of
`the specification and prosecution
`history cited by Garmin for this
`term, as well any additional other
`portions necessary to rebut
`positions advanced by Garmin in
`support of any proposed
`construction.
`
`Specification:
`col. 9 l. 16 – 46; col. 34 l. 44 –
`col. 37 l. 13.
`Philips may rely on any aspects of
`the specification and prosecution
`history cited by Garmin for this
`term, as well any additional other
`
`

`

`Case 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS Document 73-3 Filed 06/23/20 Page 19 of 20 Page ID #:1095
`
`
`Exhibit C to Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement
`Philips North America, LLC v. Garmin Int’l, Inc., et al. (C.D. Cal.) Case No. 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS
`Philips’s Proposed Claim Constructions and Supporting Evidence
`
`Philips’s Proposed Construction
`(and, where applicable, 35 U.S.C.
`§ 112, ¶ 6 disclosures)
`
`Patent &
`Claims
`
`Term
`
`Identification of Extrinsic
`Evidence
`
`Identification of Portions of
`Specification and Prosecution
`History
`portions necessary to rebut
`positions advanced by Garmin in
`support of any proposed
`construction.
`
`No construction necessary
`Not indefinite
`
`U.S. Pat. No.
`9,801,542
`Claim 13
`
`“trained with
`training data
`representing
`physiological
`conditions
`determined to be
`undesirable for the
`user”
`
`U.S. Pat. No.
`9,801,542
`Claim 13
`
`“warning indication
`when the user’s
`physical condition
`is undesirable”
`
`No construction necessary
`Not indefinite
`
`Philips may rely on any extrinsic
`evidence identified by Garmin
`for this term.
`
`Philips may rely on any extrinsic
`evidence identified by Garmin
`for this term.
`
`Specification:
`col. 9 l. 16 – 46; col. 34 l. 44 –
`col. 37 l. 13.
`Philips may rely on any aspects of
`the specification and prosecution
`history cited by Garmin for this
`term, as well any additional other
`portions necessary to rebut
`positions advanced by Garmin in
`support of any proposed
`construction.
`
`Specification:
`col. 2 ll. 1-31; col. 9 ll. 16-55; col.
`25:44 – col. 26 l. 2; col. 28 ll. 44-
`49; col. 33