`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
`
`
`Date: May 27, 2020
`Case No. CV 19-6301-AB (KS)
`Title
` Philips North America LLC v. Garmin International, Inc., et al.
`
`
`
`Present: The Honorable: Karen L. Stevenson, United States Magistrate Judge
`
`
`Gay Roberson
`Deputy Clerk
`
` N/A
`Court Reporter / Recorder
`
`
`Attorneys Present for Defendants:
`Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:
`
`
`Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`The Court is in receipt of the parties’ proposed protective order (“Stipulation”), which
`Plaintiff filed on May 26, 2020. (Dkt. No. 67.) However, the Stipulation does not contain a good
`cause statement, and the Court may only enter a protective order upon a showing of good cause.
`See Kamakana v. City and Cnty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1176 (9th Cir. 2006), Phillips v.
`Gen. Motors Corp., 307 F.3d 1206, 1210-11 (9th Cir. 2002), Makar-Wellbon v. Sony Elecs., Inc.,
`187 F.R.D. 576, 577 (E.D. Wis. 1999) (even stipulated protective orders require good cause
`showing). The parties’ mere designation of any information, document, or thing as confidential,
`proprietary, private, or other designation(s) used by parties does not constitute good cause.
`
`Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the parties shall revise the Stipulation to include a
`Good Cause Statement in support of the Stipulation and, no later than June 3, 2020: (1) file the
`amended Stipulation for Protective Order; and (2) email a writeable version to Judge Karen L.
`Stevenson’s chambers email address. Additionally, the parties are reminded that they will
`receive expedited consideration if they use the Court’s model protective order, available on
`the Court’s website, and provide a redline comparison between the model order and their proposed
`order.
`
`
`If the parties fail to comply with this order, the Stipulation will be denied.
`
`Initials of Preparer
`
`:
` gr
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CV-90 (03/15)
`
`Civil Minutes – General
`
`Page 1 of 1
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
