throbber
Case 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS Document 62 Filed 04/24/20 Page 1 of 3 Page ID #:929
`iled 04/24/20 Page 1 of 3 Page ID #:929
`Name mgficéglg-CV-OGBOl-AB-KS Document 62
`
`Rachael D. Lamkin (State Bar No. 246066)
`rdl@lamkinipdefense.com
`
`Lamkin IP Defense
`One Harbor Drive, Suite 304
`
`Sausalito, CA 94965
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
` CASE NUMBER
`Philips North America LLC
`
`2:19-cv—06301-AB-KS
`
`
`
`APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY
`TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE
`
`Defendant(s),
`PRO HAC VICE
`
`INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS
`
`V.
`
`Plaintiffls),
`
`Gar-min International, Inc. and Garmin Ltd.,
`
`(1) The attorney seeking to appear pro hac vice must complete Section I ofthis Application, personally sign, in ink, the certification in
`Section H, and have the designated Local Counsel sign in Section III. ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES ARE NOT ACCEPTED. Space to
`supplement responses is provided in Section IV. The applicant must also attach a Certificate ofGood Standing (issued within the last 30
`days) from every state bar to which he or she is admitted; failure to do so will be groundsfor denying the Application. Scan the
`completed Application with its original ink signature, together with any attachment(s), to a single Portable DocumentForrnat (PDF)file.
`(2) Have the designated Local Counselfile the Application electronically using the Court's CM/ECF System ("Motions and Related Filings
`=> Applications/Ex Parte Applications/Motions/Petitions/Requests => Appear Pro Hac Vice (6-64) "), attach a Proposed Order (using
`Form 6—64 ORDER, availablefrom the Court's website), and pay the required $400fee online at the time offiling (using a credit card).
`Thefee is requiredfor each case in which the applicantfiles on Application. Failure to pay thefee at the time offiling will be groundsfor
`denying the Application. Out-ofistatefederalgovernment attorneys are not required to pay the $400fee.
`(Certain attorneysfor the
`United States are also exemptfrom the requirement ofapplyingfor pro hac vice status. See L.R. 8.3-2.1.4.) A copy of the 6-64 ORDER in
`Word or WordPerj’ectformat must be emailed to the generic chambers email address. LR 5-4.4.2.
`SECTION I - INFORMATION
`
` Marriott, Michelle L.
`
`Applicant's Name (Last Name, First Name ei- Middle Initial)
`
`check here iffederal government attorney El
`
`Erise IP, P.A.
`
`Firm/Agency Name
`
`7015 College Blvd.
`
`Suite 700
`Street Address
`
`Overland Park, KS 66211
`
`City, State, Zip Code
`
`913-777-5600
`
`Telephone Number
`
`913-777-5601
`
`Fax Number
`
`michelle.marriott@eriseip.com
`
`Email Address
`
`1 have been retained to represent the following parties:
`
`Garmin International, Inc. and Garmin Ltd.
`
`|:| Plaintifis) [E] Defendant(s) D Other:
`
`|:| Plaintifiis) I: Defendanfls) C] Other.
`
`Name(s) ofParly(ies) Represented
`
`List all state and federal courts (including appellate courts) to which the applicant has been admitted, and provide the current status of his or
`her membership. Use Section IV if more room is needed, or to provide additional information.
`
`Name of Court
`Supreme Court of Missouri
`
`Supreme Court of Kansas
`
`Supreme Court of Texas
`
`Date of :1desion
`09-17-2003
`
`Active Member in Good Standing? (it not, please explain)
`Yes
`
`05-10-2005
`
`Yes
`
`05—04—2004
`
`Inactive: No longer resident of Texas
`
`6-64 (11/13.)
`
`APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY T0 APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE
`
`Page I of 3
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS Document 62 Filed 04/24/20 Page 2 of 3 Page ID #:930
`Case 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS Document 62 Filed 04 2
`_
`List all cases in which the applicant has applied to this Court for pro hac vice status in the previous three years (continue in Section IV if
`needed):
`'
`Case Number
`Granted / Denied?
`Quiz otAgpliggtion
`
`19-cv-09325-SIO—SS
`11-05-2019
`Granted
`
`
`06-10-2019
`Granted
`19-cv—1061—DOC-KES
`
`19—cv—1062-AG-DFM
`06-12—2019
`Granted
`
`
`18-cv—9136—PSG-FFM
`10-29-2018
`Granted
`
`18-cv-1097-IAK—KS
`07-09-2018
`Granted
`
`
`Title ofAction
`The Ergo Baby Carrier, Inc. v Brands Four Kids, LLC
`Square Enix, Inc. et al. v Uniloc 2017 LLC
`Ubisoft, Inc. v Uniloc 2017 LLC
`Interactive Toybox, LLC v The Walt Disney Co, et a1.
`Pure Data Systems, LLC v Electronic Arts Inc.
`
`
`
`Ifany pro hac vice applications submitted within the past three (3) years have been denied by the Court, please explain:
`
`
`
`D No
`El Yes
`Has the applicant previously registered as a CMIECF user in the Central District of California?
`1:] No
`If yes, was the applicant's CWECF User account associated with the e—mail address provided above? E] Yes
`
`
`Previous E-moil Used (if applicable)
`
`Attorneys must be registeredfor the Court's Case Management/Electronic Case Filing ("CM/ECF") System to be admitted to practice pro hac
`vice in this Court. Submission of this Application will constitute your registration (or ire-registration) as a CM/ECF User. If the Court signs on
`Order granting your Application, you will either be issued a new CM/ECF login and password, or the existing account you identified above
`will be associated with your case.
`
`SECTION II - QERTIFICATION
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury that:
`
`(1) All of the above information is true and correct-
`(2) I am not a resident of the State of California.
`I am not regularly employed in, or engaged in substantial business.
`professional, or other activities in the State of California.
`(3) I am not currently suspended from and have never been disbarred from practice in any court.
`(4) I am familiar with the Court's. Local Civil and Criminal Rules, the Federal Rules of Civil and Criminal Procedure,
`and the Federal Rules of Evidence.
`
`(5) I designate the attorney listed in Section III below, who is a member in good standing of the Bar of this Court and
`maintains an office in the Central District of California for the practice of law, as local counsel pursuant to Local
`Rule 83-2.1.3.4.
`
`Dated 4! '7! ”7—17
`
`Michelle L. Marriott
`
`Ap liconi’s Namef lease
`
`
`Applicant's Signature
`
`—_____._—__—__.._....——————-———
`
`(3-64 (I U18)
`
`APPLICATION OF NON—RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAG WCE
`
`Page 2 of 3
`
`

`

`Case 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS Document 62 Filed 04/24/20 Page 3 of 3 Page ID #:931
`
`SECTION III - DESIGNATION OF LOCAL COUNSEL
`
`
`Lamkin, Rachael D.
`
`Designee's Name (Last Name, First Name o'- Middle Initial)
` Lamkin IP Defense
`
`Finn/Agency Name
`
`One Harbor Drive, Suite 304
`
`Street Address
`
`Sausalito, CA 94965
`
`City, State, Zip Code
`
`916-747-6091
`
`Telephone Number
`
`rdl@1amkinipdefense.com
`
`E—mail Addm“
`
`Fax Number
`
`246066
`Designee’s California State Bar Number
`
`I hereby consent to the foregoing designation as local counsel, and declare under penalty of perjury that I maintain an office in the
`Central District of California for the practice of law.
`4/24/20
`Dated 4/24/20
`
`Rachael D. Lamkin
`
`Designates Name (please type or print)
`
`Mam
`
`Designee's Signature
`
`SECTION IV - SUPPLEMENT ANSWERS HERE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES IF NECESSARY
`
`Continued from Section 1:
`
`Court/ Date Admitted I Status
`
`Northern District of Texas I 12-09-2004! Good Standing
`Western District of Missouri I 07-14-2009 I Good Standing
`Western District of Michigan I 01-20-2010 I Good Standing
`9th Circuit Court of Appeals I 11—14—2011 I Good Standing
`Federal Circuit Court of Appeals I 10-23-2015 I Good Standing
`Eastern District of Michigan I 05-25-2016 I Good Standing
`District of Kansas I 11—21-2017 I Good Standing
`
`District of Colorado I 01-21—2020 I Good Standing
`
`M (
`
`APPLICATION OF NON—RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAG VICE
`9-64 (1 1I18)

`
`Page 3 of 3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket