throbber
Case 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS Document 55 Filed 01/09/20 Page 1 of 5 Page ID #:865
`Case 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS Document 55 Filed 01/09/20 Page 1 of 5 Page ID #:865
`Name and address:
`
`Ruben I. Rodrigues
`Foley 8t Lardner LLP
`111 Huntington Avenue
`Suite 2500
`
`Boston, MA 02199
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`
`Philips North America LLC
`CASE NUMBER
`
`
`2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS
`
`
`
`APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY
`Garmin International, Inc, et all.
`To APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE
`
`
`PRO HAC VICE Defendant(s),
`INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS
`
`v.
`
`Plaintiff(s),
`
`
`
`(1) The attorney seeking to appear pro hac vice must complete Section I of this Application, personally sign, in ink, the certification in
`Section II, and have the designated Local Counsel sign in Section III. ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES ARE NOT ACCEPTED. Space to
`supplement responses is provided in Section IV. The applicant must also attach a Certificate of Good Standing (issued within the last 30
`days)from every state bar to which he or she is admitted; failure to do so will be groundsfor denying the Application. Scan the
`completed Application with its original ink signature, together with any attachment(s), to a single Portable Document Format (PDF)file.
`(2) Have the designated Local Counselfile the Application electronically using the Court's CM/ECF System ("Motions and Related Filings
`=> Applications/Ex Parte Applicatians/Motions/Petitions/Requests => Appear Pro Hac Vice (6-64)"), attach a Proposed Order (using
`Form 6-64 ORDER, availablefrom the Court's website), and pay the required $400 fee online at the time offiling (using a credit card).
`Thefee is requiredfor each case in which the applicantfiles an Application. Failure to pay thefee at the time offiling will be groundsfor
`denying the Application. Out-of-statefederal government attorneys are not required to pay the $400fee. (Certain attorneysfor the
`United States are also exemptfrom the requirement of applyingfor pro hac vice status. See L.R. 83—2.1.4.) A copy of the 6-64 ORDER in
`Word or WordPerjfectformat must be emailed to the generic chambers email address. L.R. 5-4.4.2.
`SECTION I - INFORMATION
`
`Rodrigues, Ruben I.
`
`Applicant's Name (Last Name. First Name eh Middle Initial)
`check here iffederal government attorney El
`
`Foley 8: Lardner LLP
`
`Firm/Agency Name
`
`111 Huntington Avenue
`
`Suite 2500
`Street Address
`
`Boston, MA 02199
`City, State, Zip Code
`
`617-342-4000
`
`Telephone Number
`
`617—342—4001
`
`Fax Number
`
`
`rrodrigues@foley.com
`E-mail Address
`
`I have been retained to represent the following parties:
`
`Philips North America LLC
`
`Name(s) ofParty(ies) Represented
`
`8] PlaintifiYs) D Defendant(s) D Other:
`
`E] Plaintiff(s) I] Defendant(s) C] Other:
`
`List all state and federal courts (including appellate courts) to which the applicant has been admitted, and provide the current status of his or
`her membership. Use Section IV if more room is needed, or to provide additional information.
`
`Name at Court
`State of Massachusetts
`
`District of Massachusetts
`
`State of Illinois
`
`Date at Admission
`12/4/2009
`
`Active Member in Good Standing? (if not, please explain)
`
`Yes
`
`2/ 18/2014
`
`2/23/20 1 0
`
`Yes
`
`Yes
`
`
`
`G-64 (11/18)
`
`APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE
`
`Page ] of 3
`
`

`

`Case 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS Document 55 Filed 01/09/20 Page 2 of 5 Page ID #:866
`Case 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS Document 55 Filed 01/09/20 Page 2 of 5 Page ID #:866
`
`
`List all cases in which the applicant has applied to this Court for pro hac vice status in the previous three years (continue in Section IV if
`needed):
`
`Case Number
`
`Title at Action
`
`Date at Application
`
`Grantedz Denied?
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`If any pro hac vice applications submitted within the past three (3) years have been denied by the Court, please explain:
`
`Has the applicant previously registered as a CM/ECF user in the Central District of California?
`
`[:I Yes
`
`[Z] No
`
`If yes, was the applicant's CM/ECF User account associated with the e-mail address provided above? E] Yes
`
`D No
`
`Attorneys must be registered for the Court's Case Management/Electronic Case Filing ("CM/ECF") System to be admitted to practice pro hac
`vice in this Court. Submission of this Application will constitute your registration (or re-registration) as a CM/ECF User. If the Court signs an
`Order granting your Application, you will either be issued a new CM/ECF login and password, or the existing account you identified above
`will be associated with your case.
`
`Previous Email Used (ifapplicable)
`
`SECTION II - CERTIFICATION
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury that:
`
`(1) All of the above information is true and correct.
`
`I am not regularly employed in, or engaged in substantial business,
`(2) I am not a resident of the State of California.
`professional, or other activities in the State of California.
`(3) I am not currently suspended from and have never been disbarred from practice in any court.
`(4) I am familiar with the Court's Local Civil and Criminal Rules, the Federal Rules of Civil and Criminal Procedure,
`and the Federal Rules of Evidence.
`
`(5) I designate the attorney listed in Section III below, who is a member in good standing of the Bar of this Court and
`maintains an office in the Central District of California for the practice of law, as local counsel pursuant to Local
`Rule 83-2.1.3.4.
`
`Dated January 9, 2020
`
`Ruben I. Rodrigues
`
`Applicant's
`
`e (please t
`
`
`
`——————_———————————_—__________
`
`G-64 (11/18)
`
`APPLICATION OF NON~RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE
`
`Page 2 of3
`
`

`

`Case 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS Document 55 Filed 01/09/20 Page 3 of 5 Page ID #:867
`Case 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS Document 55 Filed 01/09/20 Page 3 of 5 Page ID #:867
`
`M S
`
`ECTION III - DESIGNATION OF LOCAL COUNSEL
`
`Ciardullo, Jean-Paul
`
`Designee's Name (Last Name, First Name at Middle Initial)
`
`Foley 8t Lardner LLP“fix—
`Firm/Agency Name
`
`
`555 S. Flower Street
`213-972-4500
`213-486-0065
`
`
`Suite 3300
`
`Telephone Number
`
`Fax Number
`
`Street Address
`
`Los Angeles, CA 90071—2411
`
`City, State, Zip Code
`
`
`jciardullo@foley.com
`
`E‘mail Address
`284170
`
`Designee's California State Bar Number
`
`I hereby consent to the foregoing designation as local counsel, and declare under penalty of perjury that I maintain an office in the
`Central District of California for the practice of law.
`
`Dated January 9, 2020
`
`Jean-Paul Ciardullo
`
`SECTION IV - SUPPLEMENT ANSWERS HERE (ATTACH ADDITION L PAGES IF NECESSARY)
`
`Designee's Nam please type or print)
`
`
`Northern District of Illinois (2010) Good Standing
`Eastern District of Texas (8/24/2011) Good Standing
`United State Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (3/20/2014) Good Standing
`United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit (2/18/2011) Good Standing
`United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (7/19/2019) Good Standing
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`6-64 (1 l/ 18)
`
`APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY T0 APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE
`
`Page 3 of 3
`
`

`

`Case 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS Document 55 Filed 01/09/20 Page 4 of 5 Page ID #:868
`
`Gertificate of Adm ission
`To the Bar of lllinois
`l, Carolyn Taft Grosboll, Clerk of the Supreme Court of lllinois, do hereby certify that
`
`Ruben Jose Rodrigues
`
`has been duly licensed and admitted to practice as an Attorney and Counselor at
`Law within this State; has duly taken the required oath to support the
`CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES and of the STATE OF lLLlNOlS, and
`also the oath of otfice prescribed by law, that said name was entered upon the Roll
`of Attorneys and Counselors in my office on0212312010 and is in good standing, so
`far as the records of this office disclose.
`
`lN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto
`subscribed my name and affixed the
`seal of said Court, this 27th daY of
`December, 2019.
`
`C^Lr^fA G"sh'q
`
`Clerk,
`Supreme Court of the State of lllinois
`
`

`

`Case 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS Document 55 Filed 01/09/20 Page 5 of 5 Page ID #:869
`
`COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
`
`SUFFOLK, SS.
`
`BE IT REMEMBERED, that at the Supreme Judicial Court holden at Boston
`fourth
`within and for said County of Suffolk, on the
`A.D. 2009 , said Court being the highest
`December
`day of
`Court of Record in said Commonwealth:
`
`Ru hen Rodrigues
`
`being found duly qualified in that behalf, and having taken and subscribed
`the oaths required by law, was admitted to practice as an Attorney, and, by virtue
`thereof, as a Counsellor at Law, in any of the Courts of the said Commonwealth:
`that said Attorney is at present a member of the Bar, and is in good standing
`according to the records of this Court*.
`
`In testimony whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the
`seal of said Court, this twenty-seventh day of December
`in the year of our Lord two thousand and nineteen.
`
`• Records of private discipline, if any, such as a private reprimand imposed by the Board of Bar Overseers or by any co1111, are not covered by this certification.
`X3116
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket