throbber
Case 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS Document 140 Filed 02/21/22 Page 1 of 13 Page ID #:5650
`Local Rule 56-1 Separate Statement (Corrected)
`Garmin Summary Judgment Motion
`Philips v. Garmin, Case No. 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS
`
`
`Garmin herein submits this Corrected Separate Statement, originally filed as
`
`Dkt. No. 134-3.
`
`
`
` ¶
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`
`
`Evidence
`Undisputed Fact
`Garmin Does Not Infringe the ’542 Patent
`The alleged “statistical analyzer” in the
`Martin Depo Tr., 195:24-197:19
`Accused Devices is not trained by the
`Dkt No. 134-4
`end-user.
`
`The alleged “statistical analyzer” in the
`Martin Depo Tr., 195:24-197:19
`Accused Devices was trained by First
`Dkt No. 134-4
`Beat.
`
`Martin Inf. Rpt., ¶¶358-59, n. 34
`Dkt No. 134-5
`Martin Inf. Rpt., ¶336
`Dkt No. 134-5
`
`Martin Depo Tr., 197:17-19
`Dkt No. 134-4
`
`
`According to Philips, ’542 Limitation
`(a) is met whenever a user wears an
`Accused Device.
`Dr. Martin testified, “Yeah. As I’ve
`outlined in my report, I don’t think that
`the algorithm is – the algorithm is
`trained by the -- the user.”
`According to Philips, the statistical
`analyzer is not trained by the user.
`
`The statistical analyzer was trained in
`Finland by FirstBeat.
`
`Martin Depo Tr., 195:24-197:19
`Dkt No. 134-4
`
`Martin Inf. Rpt., ¶¶358-59, n. 34
`Dkt No. 134-5
`Heikes Depo Tr., 107:13-108:20
`Dkt No. 134-6
`
`Martin Depo Tr., 196:14-197:19
`Dkt No. 134-4
`
`Martin Inf. Rpt., ¶¶358-59, n. 34
`Dkt No. 134-5
`Philips Failed to Evidence That Any Person or Entity Actually Performed
`the Steps of Claim 1 of the ’377 Patent
`’377 Claim 1 requires the phone
`’377, 13:39-41
`application to receive “physiologic
`Claim Construction Order, at 34
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS Document 140 Filed 02/21/22 Page 2 of 13 Page ID #:5651
`Local Rule 56-1 Separate Statement (Corrected)
`Garmin Summary Judgment Motion
`Philips v. Garmin, Case No. 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS
`Undisputed Fact
`Evidence
`status” data from Accused Devices
`while the user is exercising.
`The Accused Devices (the watches)
`show real time activity such as heart
`rate and steps on their watch face.
`Viewing real time data on an Accused
`Device alone—without using a phone
`application—does not infringe the
`claims of the ’377 Patent
`The Accused Devices cannot sync with
`the Garmin Connect Mobile
`Application when an Accused Device
`is “in Activity” mode.
`
`¶
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`See, e.g., Fenix 6 Manual, at 361
`Dkt No. 134-7
`
`’377, Claim 1 lims(a)-(f), (i)
`
`Martin Depo Tr., 138:24-139:4,
`142:17-19, 143:23-144:2
`Dkt No. 134-4
`
`Martin Inf. Rpt. ¶196
`Dkt No. 134-5
`Martin Depo Tr., 138:24-139:4,
`142:17-19, 143:23-144:2
`Dkt No. 134-4
`
`Martin Inf. Rpt. ¶196
`Dkt No. 134-5
`Martin Depo Tr., 142:20-22
`Dkt No. 134-4
`
`Martin Inf. Rpt., ¶¶180-182
`Dkt No. 134-5
`Martin Inf. Rpt., ¶¶199-209
`Dkt No. 134-5
`
`11
`
`Syncs cannot occur when an Accused
`Device is “in Activity” mode.
`
`12
`
`13
`
`Syncing is required to infringe Claim 1
`of the ’377 Patent
`
`For the limitation 1(f)(ii)—“and
`wherein the data indicating a
`physiologic status of a subject is
`received at least partially while the
`subject is exercising,” Dr. Martin
`opines on that limitation at ¶¶199-209
`of his Infringement Report.
`
`
`1 Philips has accused nearly one hundred (100) Garmin devices. Garmin cites a
`few exemplary devices herein but can file any or all manuals for the accused
`devices upon request or should Philips contest that an Undisputed Fact applies to
`all devices/manuals.
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS Document 140 Filed 02/21/22 Page 3 of 13 Page ID #:5652
`Local Rule 56-1 Separate Statement (Corrected)
`Garmin Summary Judgment Motion
`Philips v. Garmin, Case No. 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS
`Undisputed Fact
`Evidence
`Dr. Martin does not identify any
`Martin Inf. Rpt., ¶¶199-209
`specific physiologic status data at
`Dkt No. 134-5
`¶¶199-209 of his Infringement Report.
`The data sent from an Accused Device
`to Garmin’s phone application and
`servers upon a sync is all data since the
`last sync.
`Real time data such as heart rate can be
`seen directly on an Accused Device.
`Real time data does not get sent to
`Garmin’s servers.
`Audio prompts occur when the user is
`in Activity
`Audio prompts do not require a mobile
`phone
`You can listen to music on the Accused
`Devices (watches) without a mobile
`phone.
`
`¶
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`Martin Depo Tr., 178:1-10
`Dkt No. 134-4
`
`
`See, e.g., Fenix 6 Manual, at 36.
`Dkt No. 134-7
`Henderson Depo Tr., 22:15-24:19
`Dkt No. 134-8
`See, e.g., Fenix 6 Manual, at 7.
`Dkt No. 134-7
`See, e.g., Fenix 6 Manual, at 7.
`Dkt No. 134-7
`See, e.g., Fenix 6 Manual, at 35;
`Dkt No. 134-7
`
`Forerunner 245 Music, at 46.
`Dkt No. 134-9
`Martin Inf. Rpt., n. 23 (p. 105)
`Dkt No. 134-5
`
`Martin Depo Tr., 146:6-150:21, at
`150:16-21
`Dkt No. 134-4
`Martin Depo Tr., 148:19-24
`Dkt No. 134-4
`
`Martin Inf. Rpt., n. 23 (p. 105)
`Dkt No. 134-5
`
`Martin Inf. Rpt., n. 23
`Dkt No. 134-5
`
`Martin Depo Tr., 147:22-24
`Dkt No. 134-4
`
`3
`
`The only evidence cited by Dr. Martin
`of an actual person or entity
`performing Claim 1 limitation (f) is at
`footnote 23 of his infringement report.
`
`The date of any alleged activity cited
`by Dr. Martin at footnote 23 is
`unknown.
`
`The post at footnote 23 actually states
`that he recorded three separate
`Activities.
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS Document 140 Filed 02/21/22 Page 4 of 13 Page ID #:5653
`Local Rule 56-1 Separate Statement (Corrected)
`Garmin Summary Judgment Motion
`Philips v. Garmin, Case No. 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS
`Undisputed Fact
`Evidence
`There is no evidence that the post at
`Martin Depo Tr., 146:6-148:24
`footnote 23 involved performance of
`Dkt No. 134-4
`all limitations of Claim 1
`
`The data gathered by the Accused
`Martin Depo Tr. 152:21-25
`Devices can be divided into two
`Dkt No. 134-4
`categories: data gathered when the
`
`watch is “in Activity” mode and data
`Henderson Depo Tr., 111:1-10
`gathered when not “in Activity” mode
`Dkt No. 134-8
`(or all day data).
`There is no physiological status data
`associated with a Move IQ event.
`
`¶
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`Philips has not pointed to a specific
`instruction whereby Garmin instructs
`its users to exercise when the Accused
`Devices are not “in Activity” mode.
`Not all walking can be considered
`exercise.
`
`Not all walking is activity requiring
`physical effort carried out to sustain or
`improve health and fitness.
`LiveTrack does not involve the sending
`of data from an Accused Device to the
`Garmin Connect Mobil Application to
`Garmin’s servers and back to the
`Application.
`The user has to be in Activity mode to
`use LiveTrack
`
`Many Garmin customers want to leave
`their phone at home when they train.
`
`27
`
`28
`
`29
`
`30
`
`31
`
`32
`
`
`
`Martin Depo Tr., 164:19-23
`Dkt No. 134-4
`
`Martin Depo Tr., 168:6-175:6
`Dkt No. 134-4
`
`
`Martin Depo Tr., 34:10-36:3
`Dkt No. 134-4
`
`Martin Depo Tr., 34:10-36:3
`Dkt No. 134-4
`
`Heikes Depo Tr., 39:23-41:25
`Dkt No. 134-10
`
`See, e.g., Fenix 6 Manual, at 29;
`Dkt No. 134-7
`
`Heikes Depo Tr., 39:23-41:25
`Dkt No. 134-10
`Heikes Depo Exh. 6, at 5.
`Dkt No. 134-11
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS Document 140 Filed 02/21/22 Page 5 of 13 Page ID #:5654
`Local Rule 56-1 Separate Statement (Corrected)
`Garmin Summary Judgment Motion
`Philips v. Garmin, Case No. 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS
`Undisputed Fact
`Evidence
`
`¶
`
`33
`
`34
`
`35
`
`36
`
`37
`
`Exh J -
`https://youtu.be/VhJ_017Szv02
`See also GARMIN_FT_00077575,
`77546, 13189, 21482, 25694, 531713
`Henderson Depo Tr., 22:12-24:25
`Dkt No. 134-8
`Henderson Depo Tr., 85:1-86:14
`Dkt No. 134-48
`
`Real time data is never sent to
`Garmin’s servers
`The Insights feature is not on by
`default. Users have to opt in to
`Insights.
`Henderson Depo Tr., 93:6-8
`Move IQ events are not captured in
`Dkt No. 134-8
`Insights
`Garmin Does Not Have the Specific Intent to Induce Infringement
`None of the user manuals for the
`Martin Depo Tr., 60:3-10, 67:1-23
`Accused Devices tell a customer that
`Dkt No. 134-4
`the Garmin Connect Mobil Application
`
`is the only way to send data from the
`Lamkin Decl., Exh K – (Martin Depo
`watch to Garmin’s servers.
`Exh. 3)
`Dkt No. 134-12
`
`See, e.g., Fenix 6 Manual, at 28
`Dkt No. 134-7
`
`Forerunner 245 Music, at 52
`Dkt No. 134-9
`
`Martin Inf. Rpt., ¶212 (customers can
`use Garmin Express: USB + desktop
`computer)
`Dkt No. 134-5
`Martin Depo Tr., 60:3-10, 67:1-5
`Dkt No. 134-4
`
`Garmin does not instruct its customers
`to exercise when not in Activity mode.
`
`
`2 Courtesy copies of Exhibit J and the Separate Statement with hyperlinks to
`evidence was provided to the Court on 2/22/22.
`3 The Garmin_FT documents are highly confidential but if Philips denies that these
`documents (and about 52 other confidential documents produced) stand for the
`proposition that many customers want to leave their phone at home, Garmin will
`file under seal.
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS Document 140 Filed 02/21/22 Page 6 of 13 Page ID #:5655
`Local Rule 56-1 Separate Statement (Corrected)
`Garmin Summary Judgment Motion
`Philips v. Garmin, Case No. 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS
`Undisputed Fact
`Evidence
`
`¶
`
`38
`
`Garmin tells its customers to exercise
`in Activity mode.
`
`You can use any Accused Device out
`of the box and without sending any
`data to a mobile application or
`Garmin’s servers
`
`A user must be in Activity mode to get
`her Vo2 Max calculation
`
`Audio prompts provides audio
`feedback while the device is in Activity
`mode.
`The automatic sync interval varies
`across devices
`The user manuals for the Accused
`Devices instruct the end-users to
`exercise in Activity mode.
`
`39
`
`40
`
`41
`
`42
`
`43
`
`
`
`
`Fenix 6 Manual, at 58
`Dkt No. 134-7
`
`Forerunner 245, at 5-6
`Dkt No. 134-9
`
`Approach S62, at 24-25
`Dkt No. 134-13
`Fenix 6 Manual, at 58
`Dkt No. 134-7
`
`Forerunner 245, at 5-6
`Dkt No. 134-9
`
`Approach S62, at 24-25
`Dkt No. 134-13
`Garmin Privacy Policy, at PNA-
`GAR0000067 (you can use your
`device without uploading data to
`Garmin’s servers).
`Dkt No. 134-14
`
`
`Martin Depo Tr., 140:9-17
`Dkt No. 134-4
`
`Heikes Depo Tr., 64:14-16
`Dkt No. 134-6
`
`Henderson Depo Tr., 118:3-8
`Dkt No. 134-8
`Fenix 6 Manual, at 58
`Dkt No. 134-7
`
`Forerunner 245, at 5-6
`Dkt No. 134-9
`
`
`6
`
`

`

`Case 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS Document 140 Filed 02/21/22 Page 7 of 13 Page ID #:5656
`Local Rule 56-1 Separate Statement (Corrected)
`Garmin Summary Judgment Motion
`Philips v. Garmin, Case No. 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS
`Undisputed Fact
`Evidence
`Approach S62, at 24-25
`Dkt No. 134-13
`
`
`¶
`
`44
`
`45
`
`46
`
`47
`
`48
`
`49
`
`50
`
`51
`
`52
`
`53
`
`54
`
`
`
`Move IQ does not send data in real
`time (i.e., while performing the
`movement being captured).
`Move IQ events are only reported after
`a sync occurs
`Move IQ events do not contain
`physiologic status data
`
`Move IQ events do not infringe the
`’377 Patent
`
`LiveTrack does not infringe the ’377
`Patent
`Insights does not infringe the ’377
`Patent
`A user can use any Accused Device
`without sending data to Garmin’s
`servers
`
`A user of the Accused Devices only
`receives detailed training data when the
`Devices are used in Activity mode.
`
`A user can only see their average and
`best pace data when exercising in
`Activity mode.
`A user can only see their average and
`maximum heart rate data when
`exercising in Activity mode.
`A user can only see their aerobic and
`anaerobic training effect data when
`exercising in Activity mode.
`
`
`
`Martin Depo Tr., 163:19-24
`Dkt No. 134-4
`
`Martin Depo Tr., 170:15-19
`Dkt No. 134-4
`
`Heikes Depo Tr., 39:23-41:25
`Dkt No. 134-10
`
`
`Garmin Privacy Policy, PNA-
`GAR000064-81, at 67
`Dkt No. 134-14
`
`
`Martin Depo Tr., 138:4-141:14,
`159:10-163:24
`Dkt No. 134-4
`
`See also, e.g., Fenix 6 Owner’s
`Manual, at pps. 36-67.
`Dkt No. 134-7
`Id.
`
`
`Id.
`
`
`Id.
`
`
`7
`
`

`

`Case 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS Document 140 Filed 02/21/22 Page 8 of 13 Page ID #:5657
`Local Rule 56-1 Separate Statement (Corrected)
`Garmin Summary Judgment Motion
`Philips v. Garmin, Case No. 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS
`Undisputed Fact
`Evidence
`A user can only see their cadence data
`when exercising in Activity mode.
`A user can only see their elevation data
`when exercising in Activity mode.
`A user can only see their temperature
`data when exercising in Activity mode.
`A user can only see their heart rate
`training zone data when exercising in
`Activity mode.
`A user can only see their exercise load
`data when exercising in Activity mode.
`A user can only see their running
`cadence data when exercising in
`Activity mode.
`A user can only see their intensity
`minutes data when exercising in
`Activity mode.
`None of the data on pages 91-92 of Dr.
`Martin’s Infringement Report is
`available to the user unless that user
`exercised in Activity mode.
`Philips Cannot Evidence Contributory Infringement As Failed to Prove
`No Substantial Non-Infringing Uses
`See ¶¶36-62, incorporated by reference.
`63
`The Accused Devices can send data to
`Garmin’s servers in one of four ways:
`(1) WiFi; (2) Garmin Connect Mobile
`Application; (3) Garmin Express [USB
`and desktop software]; and (4) an
`ANT+ Stick
`
`¶
`55
`
`56
`
`57
`
`58
`
`59
`
`60
`
`61
`
`62
`
`The accused VivoFit devices can send
`data from the device to Garmin’s
`servers using either Garmin Connect
`Mobile Application or an ANT+Stick
`inserted in a computer.
`None of the Accused Devices require
`the use of a smartphone
`
`64
`
`65
`
`
`
`Id.
`
`Id.
`
`Id.
`
`Id.
`
`
`Id.
`
`Id.
`
`
`Id.
`
`
`Dr. Martin Inf. Rpt., pps. 91-92
`Dkt No. 134-5
`
`Martin depo Tr., 60:3-10, 67:1-5
`Dkt No. 134-4
`
`Exh K (Martin Depo Exh. 3)
`Dkt No. 134-12
`
`
`VivoFit 4 Manual, at 5-6
`Dkt No. 134-15
`
`Martin Depo Tr., 60:3-10, 67:1-23
`Dkt No. 134-4
`
`8
`
`

`

`Case 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS Document 140 Filed 02/21/22 Page 9 of 13 Page ID #:5658
`Local Rule 56-1 Separate Statement (Corrected)
`Garmin Summary Judgment Motion
`Philips v. Garmin, Case No. 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS
`Undisputed Fact
`Evidence
`
`¶
`
`66
`
`Garmin does not require its users to
`own a smartphone
`
`There is no instruction or direction
`from Garmin to its customers telling
`customers to only sync data using the
`Garmin Connect Mobil Application
`In the fourth quarter of 2020, more
`than two million users used Garmin
`
`67
`
`68
`
`
`
`
`Lamkin Decl., Exh K – (Martin Depo
`Exh. 3)
`Dkt No. 134-12
`
`See, e.g., Fenix 6 Manual, at 28
`Dkt No. 134-7
`
`Forerunner 245 Music, at 52
`Dkt No. 134-9
`
`Martin Inf. Rpt., ¶212 (customers can
`use Garmin Express: USB + desktop
`computer)
`Dkt No. 134-5
`Martin Depo Tr., 60:3-10, 67:1-23
`Dkt No. 134-4
`
`Lamkin Decl., Exh K – (Martin Depo
`Exh. 3)
`Dkt No. 134-12
`
`See, e.g., Fenix 6 Manual, at 28
`Dkt No. 134-7
`
`Forerunner 245 Music, at 52
`Dkt No. 134-9
`
`Martin Inf. Rpt., ¶212 (customers can
`use Garmin Express: USB + desktop
`computer)
`Dkt No. 134-5
`Martin Depo Tr. 65:13-16
`Dkt No. 134-4
`
`Lamkin Decl., Exh O (Martin Depo
`Exh. 11; Kiaei Rebuttal Rpt., ¶95)
`
`9
`
`

`

`Case 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS Document 140 Filed 02/21/22 Page 10 of 13 Page ID #:5659
`Local Rule 56-1 Separate Statement (Corrected)
`Garmin Summary Judgment Motion
`Philips v. Garmin, Case No. 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS
`Undisputed Fact
`Evidence
`Express desktop software to send data
`Dkt No. 134-16
`from Garmin devices to Garmin’s
`servers.
`
`¶
`
`The Claims of the ’377 Patent are Not Patent Eligible
`Quy did not
`invent web enabled
`Quy Depo Tr., 194:9-13.4
`wireless phones.
`Dkt No. 134-17
`
`Lamkin Decl., Exh Q (Quy Depo Exh
`12, at 4, 6.)
`Dkt No. 134-18
`
`Quy Depo Tr. 195:6-8.
`Dkt No. 134-17
`
`September 2, 2020 Quy Depo Tr.,
`180:24-181:14
`Dkt No. 134-21
`Quy Depo Tr., 197:19-22
`Dkt No. 134-17
`
`69
`
`70
`
`71
`
`72
`
`73
`
`74
`
`75
`
`76
`
`Quy did not invent the use of
`applications on web enabled wireless
`phones
`
`invent downloading
`Quy did not
`applications directly over the internet to
`web enabled wireless phones
`Quy did not invent devices that provide
`exercise-related information
`Quy did not invent coupling web
`enabled wireless phones and devices
`which
`provided
`exercise-related
`information
`Quy did not invent user interfaces on
`web enabled wireless phones
`Quy did not invent devices that provide
`physiological information
`Quy did not invent a specific mobile
`phone application
`that could be
`downloaded or purchased that could
`
`Quy Depo Tr., 198:5-8
`Dkt No. 134-17
`Quy Depo Tr., 201:13-18
`Dkt No. 134-17
`
`Quy Depo Tr., 202:21-24
`Dkt No. 134-17
`Quy Depo Tr., 199:8-13
`Dkt No. 134-17
`Quy Depo Tr., 205:8-17
`Dkt No. 134-17
`
`
`4 Citations to the Quy deposition transcript are to his September 1, 2020 deposition
`unless otherwise noted.
`
`
`
`10
`
`

`

`Case 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS Document 140 Filed 02/21/22 Page 11 of 13 Page ID #:5660
`Local Rule 56-1 Separate Statement (Corrected)
`Garmin Summary Judgment Motion
`Philips v. Garmin, Case No. 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS
`Undisputed Fact
`Evidence
`data
`indicating
`receive
`physiological status of a subject
`Quy did not invent a specific software
`application that could be purchased that
`would receive data
`indicating
`the
`amount of exercise done by a subject
`Quy you did not invent the concept of a
`device receiving data while a subject is
`exercising.
`Qiu did not invent the concept of a
`device that receives the physiologic
`status of a subject while that subject is
`exercising.
`Quy did not invent sending information
`to an internet server.
`Quy did not invent the concept of
`mobile devices sending information to
`an internet server over a wireless
`network.
`Quy did not invent servers that perform
`calculations.
`Quy did not invent servers that send
`responses of calculations to mobile
`devices.
`Quy did not invent applications or user
`interfaces on mobile phones.
`Before the priority date of the ’377
`Patent,
`it was already commonly
`understood that software applications
`could be downloaded to a wireless
`phone
`Before the priority date of the ’377
`Patent,
`it was already commonly
`understood that mobile devices could
`
`the
`
`¶
`
`77
`
`78
`
`79
`
`80
`
`81
`
`82
`
`83
`
`84
`
`85
`
`86
`
`Quy Depo Tr., 205:8-17
`Dkt No. 134-17
`
`Quy Depo Tr., 215:9-17
`Dkt No. 134-17
`
`Quy Depo Tr., 215:9-17
`Dkt No. 134-17
`
`Quy Depo Tr., 215:22-24
`Dkt No. 134-17
`Quy Depo Tr., 216:3-6
`Dkt No. 134-17
`
`Quy Depo Tr., 216:9-14
`Dkt No. 134-17
`Quy Depo Tr., 216:9-14
`Dkt No. 134-17
`
`Quy Depo Tr., 202:21-24
`Dkt No. 134-17
`September 2, 2020 Quy Depo Tr.,
`180:24-181:14
`Dkt No. 134-21
`
`Quy Depo Tr., 180-205
`Dkt No. 134-17
`
`
`
`11
`
`

`

`Case 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS Document 140 Filed 02/21/22 Page 12 of 13 Page ID #:5661
`Local Rule 56-1 Separate Statement (Corrected)
`Garmin Summary Judgment Motion
`Philips v. Garmin, Case No. 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS
`Undisputed Fact
`Evidence
`send information to an internet server
`for processing
`A key component of the ’377 Patent was
`using off the shelf components.
`
`¶
`
`87
`
`Quy Depo Tr., 47:15-24, 52:20-25
`’377, 2:37-40, 3:52-58, 6:29-33
`Dkt No. 134-17
`’377, 7:46-55
`
`88
`
`89
`
`90
`
`91
`
`92
`
`93
`
`94
`
`95
`
`96
`
`97
`
`98
`
`
`
`The internet communications in the
`’377 were done “in known fashion”.
`The preferred embodiment described in
`the provisional application comprised a
`then-available Sprint phone and then-
`available glucose monitor.
`Mr. Quy is a paid consultant for Philips. Quy Depo Tr., 21:11-22:9
`Dkt No. 134-17
`Quy Depo Tr., 21:11-22:9
`Dkt No. 134-17
`Quy Depo Tr., 40:20-41:3
`Dkt No. 134-17
`Lamkin Decl., Exh R (Martin
`Rebuttal Invalidity Rpt. ¶¶95-96)
`Dkt No. 134-19
`’377 Claim 1
`
`Lamkin Decl., Exh Q (Quy Depo Exh
`12, at 4, 6.)
`Dkt No. 134-18
`
`Mr. Quy makes $500 an hour for his
`work for Philips in this litigation.
`The ’377 describes
`the use of a
`“standard cell phone”.
`Dr. Martin limits his discussion to Alice
`step two to two paragraphs, ¶¶95-96
`
`Claim 1 of the ’377 does not cover
`“significant application functionality on
`the backend”.
`The ’542 Patent is Anticipated by Wen ’498
`The named inventors on the ’542
`’542
`Patent are Tran and Tran
`The named inventors on the ’498
`Patent are Wen and Tran
`The application that matured into the
`’542 Patent was filed after the ’498
`Patent
`The ’542 Patent has the same
`disclosures as the following from the
`Wen ’498: 2:39-51, 3:4-9:60 (except
`3:41), 10:64-15:60, 16:15-18, 16:64-
`19:3
`
`’498
`
`’542 and ’498
`
`Lamkin Decl., Exh S (Kiaei
`Invalidity Report, Exh D.)
`Dkt No. 134-20
`
`12
`
`

`

`Case 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS Document 140 Filed 02/21/22 Page 13 of 13 Page ID #:5662
`Local Rule 56-1 Separate Statement (Corrected)
`Garmin Summary Judgment Motion
`Philips v. Garmin, Case No. 2:19-cv-06301-AB-KS
`Undisputed Fact
`Evidence
`There is also no dispute that Wen ’498
`Kiaei Inv. Rep. ¶¶605-613; Martin
`anticipates each asserted claim of the
`Rebuttal 2/5/21 Rpt. ¶278.
`’542 Patent.
`
`¶
`99
`
`
`
`
`
`13
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket