`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SOUTHERN DIVISION
`
`Case No. 2:17-cv-05184-JVS-JCG
`
`ORDER OF DISMISSAL
`WITH PREJUDICE
`
`))))))))))))))
`
`DOCUMENT SECURITY SYSTEMS,
`INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`OSRAM GMBH; OSRAM OPTO
`SEMICONDUCTORS GMBH & CO.;
`OSRAM Licht AG; and OSRAM
`SYLVANIA INC.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`The Court has considered the Stipulation and Joint Motion to Dismiss With
`Prejudice filed by Plaintiff Document Security Systems, Inc. ("DSS") and Defendant
`OSRAM SYLVANIA Inc. ("OSI"). The motion is hereby GRANTED.
`IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the above-captioned litigation is
`dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice, as follows:
`
`
`1.
`
`All claims and counterclaims that DSS asserted against OSI, and against
`un-served Defendants OSRAM GmbH, OSRAM Opto Semiconductors
`
`[PROPOSED]
` ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
`Case No. 2:17-cv-05184-JVS-JCG
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`Case 2:17-cv-05184-JVS-JCG Document 68 Filed 03/14/18 Page 2 of 2 Page ID #:690
`
`GmbH, and OSRAM Licht AG, in the above-captioned litigation are
`dismissed in their entirety, with prejudice.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`All claims and counterclaims that OSI asserted against DSS in the
`above-captioned litigation are dismissed in their entirety, with prejudice.
`
`The parties shall each bear their own costs and attorneys' fees associated
`with the above-captioned litigation.
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`DATED: March 14, 2018
`
` _________________________________
` Hon. James V. Selna
` United States District Judge
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
` - 2 -
`
`[PROPOSED]
` ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
`Case No. 2:17-cv-05184-JVS-JCG
`
`