`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SOUTHERN DIVISION
`
`
`
`Case No. 2:17-cv-05184-JVS-JCG
`
`
`[PROPOSED]
`ORDER OF DISMISSAL
`WITH PREJUDICE
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`DOCUMENT SECURITY SYSTEMS,
`INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`OSRAM GMBH; OSRAM OPTO
`SEMICONDUCTORS GMBH & CO.;
`OSRAM Licht AG; and OSRAM
`SYLVANIA INC.,
`
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`The Court has considered the Stipulation and Joint Motion to Dismiss With
`Prejudice filed by Plaintiff Document Security Systems, Inc. ("DSS") and Defendant
`OSRAM SYLVANIA Inc. ("OSI"). The motion is hereby GRANTED.
`IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the above-captioned litigation is
`dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice, as follows:
`
`
`1. All claims and counterclaims that DSS asserted against OSI, and against
`un-served Defendants OSRAM GmbH, OSRAM Opto Semiconductors
`GmbH, and OSRAM Licht AG, in the above-captioned litigation are
`dismissed in their entirety, with prejudice.
`
`10465669
`
`
`
`- 1 -
`
`PROPOSED]
`ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
`Case No. 2:17-cv-05184-JVS-JCG
`
`
`
`Case 2:17-cv-05184-JVS-JCG Document 67-1 Filed 03/12/18 Page 2 of 2 Page ID #:688
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`2. All claims and counterclaims that OSI asserted against DSS in the above-
`captioned litigation are dismissed in their entirety, with prejudice.
`
`3. The parties shall each bear their own costs and attorneys' fees associated
`with the above-captioned litigation.
`
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`DATED:
`
`
`
`
`
`Hon. James V. Selna
`United States District Judge
`
`10213316
`
`
`
`- 2 -
`
`[PROPOSED]
`ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
`Case No. 2:17-cv-05184-JVS-JCG
`
`