throbber
CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND
`RESEARCH
`
`
`APPLICATION NUMBER:
`
`214324Orig1s000
`
`RISK ASSESSMENT and RISK MITIGATION
`REVIEW(S)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Division of Risk Management (DRM)
`Office of Medication Error Prevention and Risk Management (OMEPRM)
`Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology (OSE)
`Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER)
`
`NDA
`214324
`October 16, 2021
`2021-794
`
`Brian Caruth, Pharm.D., BCPS
`Laura Zendel, Pharm.D., BCPS
`Cynthia LaCivita, Pharm.D.
`October 4, 2021
`Evaluation of Need for a REMS
`
`Treprostinil
`Tyvaso DPI
`United Therapeutics Corporation
`Prostacyclin Mimetic
`Inhalation Powder
`16 mcg to 64 mcg inhaled orally four times daily during waking hours
`
`
`Application Type
`Application Number
`PDUFA Goal Date
`OSE RCM #
`
`Reviewer Name(s)
`Team Leader
`Division Director
`Review Completion Date
`Subject
`
`Established Name
`Trade Name
`Name of Applicant
`Therapeutic Class
`Formulation(s)
`Dosing Regimen
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 4867408
`
`1
`
`

`

`Table of Contents
`
`EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................................................... 3
`1
`Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................................... 3
`2 Background ...................................................................................................................................................................... 3
`2.1
`Product Information ........................................................................................................................................... 3
`2.2
`Regulatory History ............................................................................................................................................... 4
`3
`Therapeutic Context and Treatment Options .................................................................................................... 4
`3.1
`Description of the Medical Condition .......................................................................................................... 4
`3.2
`Description of Current Treatment Options ............................................................................................... 5
`4 Benefit Assessment ....................................................................................................................................................... 6
`5 Risk Assessment & Safe-Use Conditions .............................................................................................................. 8
`Expected Postmarket Use ........................................................................................................................................... 8
`6
`7 Risk Management Activities Proposed by the Applicant ............................................................................... 9
`8 Discussion of Need for a REMS ................................................................................................................................. 9
`9
`Conclusion & Recommendations ........................................................................................................................... 10
`10
`Appendices ................................................................................................................................................................ 10
`10.1 References ............................................................................................................................................................. 10
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 4867408
`
`2
`
`

`

`EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
`This review by the Division of Risk Management (DRM) evaluates whether a risk evaluation and
`mitigation strategy (REMS) for Tyvaso DPI (treprostinil) is necessary to ensure the benefits outweigh its
`risks. United Therapeutics Corporation submitted a New Drug Application (NDA) 214324 for treprostinil
`with the proposed indication for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension ([PAH]; World Health
`Organization [WHO] Group 1) or pulmonary hypertension associated with interstitial lung disease (PH-
`ILD; WHO Group 3) to improve exercise ability in adult patients. Treprostinil is associated with an
`increased risk for cough and throat irritation, headache, nausea, flushing, and syncope. The Applicant
`did not submit a proposed REMS or risk management plan with this application.
`The Division of Risk Management (DRM) has determined that a REMS is not needed to ensure the
`benefits of treprostinil outweigh its risks. The increased risk for cough and throat irritation, headache,
`nausea, flushing, and syncope are similar to the currently approved referenced formulations (NDA
`022387 [treprostinil inhalation solution], NDA 021272 [treprostinil injection], NDA 203496 [treprostinil
`diolamine]). The excipient, fumaryl diketopiperazine (FDKP), is referenced in the approved BLA 022472
`([insulin human] inhalation powder). The most commonly reported adverse events for treprostinil
`inhalation powder observed in the single-sequence safety and tolerability study (TIP-PH-101
`[NCT03950739]) were similar to the adverse events in the placebo-controlled study (TRIUMPH I
`[NCT00147199]) conducted for the referenced formulation of treprostinil inhalation solution.
`Treprostinil is likely to be prescribed in a specialized setting by cardiologists and pulmonologists familiar
`with pulmonary hypertension (PH) therapy. Prescribers are expected to closely monitor patients for
`disease progression and response to therapy with frequent follow-up visits. The risks of treprostinil will
`be communicated in the Adverse Reactions section in labeling.
`1 Introduction
`This review by the Division of Risk Management (DRM) evaluates whether a risk evaluation and
`mitigation strategy (REMS) for Tyvaso DPI (treprostinil) is necessary to ensure the benefits outweigh its
`risks. United Therapeutics Corporation submitted a New Drug Application (NDA) 214324 for treprostinil
`with the proposed indication for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH; World Health
`Organization [WHO] Group 1) or pulmonary hypertension associated with interstitial lung disease (PH-
`ILD; WHO Group 3) to improve exercise ability in adult patients. This application is under review in the
`Division of Cardiology and Nephrology (DCN). The Applicant did not submit a proposed REMS or risk
`management plan with this application.
`2 Background
`2.1 PRODUCT INFORMATION
`Treprostinil is a prostacyclin mimetic proposed for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension
`(PAH; WHO Group 1) or pulmonary hypertension associated with interstitial lung disease (PH-ILD; WHO
`Group 3) to improve exercise ability in adult patients. Prostacyclins are potent dilators of pulmonary and
`systemic blood vessels and also mediate a variety of cellular processes including inhibiting inflammation,
`smooth muscle cell proliferation, and platelet aggregation.1 Inhalation of prostacyclin analogs provide
`selectivity of the hemodynamic effects to the lung vasculature reducing pulmonary arterial pressure and
`stabilizing systemic arterial pressure.
`
`3
`
`
`Reference ID: 4867408
`
`

`

`Tyvaso DPI is proposed to be available as an inhalation powder in a 16 mcg, 32 mcg, 48 mcg, or 64 mcg
`single dose cartridge. The content of the cartridge is administered using the corresponding inhaler.
`Duration of treatment is expected to be long term and likely administered in an outpatient setting.a
`Tyvaso DPI, while not a new molecular entity, utilized the 505(b)2 pathway relying on the Agency’s
`previous findings of safety and effectiveness for the referenced approved formulations and excipients.b
`Tyvaso DPI uses the same active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) approved in Remodulin (treprostinil
`injection, NDA 021272) and Tyvaso (treprostinil inhalation solution, NDA 022387). It is also the same
`active moiety as the drug substance approved in Orenitram (treprostinil diolamine, NDA 203496).
`Tyvaso DPI contains 1% treprostinil adsorbed onto carrier particles consisting of fumaryl
`diketopiperazine (FDKP). Afrezza (insulin human inhalation powder, BLA 022472) uses FDKP and was
`approved on June 27, 2014 with a Communication Plan REMS to ensure the benefits of the drug
`outweighed the risk of acute bronchospasm in patients with chronic lung disease. The REMS was
`eliminated on April 13, 2018 according to available safety data, the status of the communication plan
`activities, and the results of the 3-Year Assessment Review findings that the goals of the REMS were
`being met.2
`2.2 REGULATORY HISTORY
`The following is a summary of the regulatory history for NDA 214324 relevant to this review:
`• 01/29/2018: IND 134582 received for treprostinil
`• 04/16/2021: NDA 214324 received for treprostinil
`• 06/15/2021: FDA granted Priority Review designation citing the use of a Rare Pediatric Disease
`Priority Review Voucher (PRV BLA 761171)
`3 Therapeutic Context and Treatment Options
`3.1 DESCRIPTION OF THE MEDICAL CONDITION
`Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH) is a progressive and fatal lung disease of multifactorial etiology.3
`Clinical presentation typically involves exertional dyspnea and fatigue that progresses over time until
`severe pulmonary hypertension (PH) with right ventricular (RV) failure develops. Increased pulmonary
`pressures leading to RV failure is the major cause of death in this rare disease.c According to
`international registry data, the incidence and prevalence ranges from 2.5 to 7.1 cases per million and 5
`to 52 per million adults, respectively.4,d Surveillance data in the United States suggests increased
`mortality associated with PH in men, women, and all race and ethnic groups.5 The 7-year survival rate is
`about 49%.6
`
`
`
`a Section 505-1 (a) of the FD&C Act: FDAAA factor (D): The expected or actual duration of treatment with the drug.
`b Section 505-1 (a) of the FD&C Act: FDAAA factor (F): Whether the drug is a new molecular entity.
`c Section 505-1 (a) of the FD&C Act: FDAAA factor (B): The seriousness of the disease or condition that is to be
`treated with the drug.
`d Section 505-1 (a) of the FD&C Act: FDAAA factor (A): The estimated size of the population likely to use the drug
`involved.
`
`
`Reference ID: 4867408
`
`4
`
`

`

`3.2 DESCRIPTION OF CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS
`Non pharmacologic interventions for managementof PH include exercise as tolerated, counselling
`against smoking, and maintaining a normal body massindex (BMI). Current FDA-approved treatment
`optionsfor PH include prostacyclin derivatives, endothelin receptor antagonists (ERA),
`phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE-5) inhibitor, and a soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC) stimulator (Table 1).
`
`Table 1: FDA-Approved Treatment Options for Pulmonary Hypertension
`Product Trade Name
`Year of
`EYhcas
`4th
`
`(Generic)
`
`Approval
`
`Uetore AET ay 4]
`ation
`Prostacyclin Derivatives
`
`Tralee late Melee lary
`
`.
`
`Fluid Retention, Hemoglobin
`and Hematocrit Decrease,
`PVOD, Decreased Sperm Counts
`Fluid Retention, Hemoglobin
`and Hematocrit Decrease,
`PVOD, Decreased Sperm Counts
`Hepatotoxicity, Fluid Retention,
`Hemoglobin and Hematocrit
`Decrease, PVOD, Decreased
`Sperm Counts
`
`ReboundPHfollowing Abrupt
`Withdrawal, Hypotension,
`Bleeding, PVOD
`Syncope, PVOD, Bronchospasm,
`Avoid Contact with Skin and
`Eyes, and Ingestion
`Hypotension, Bleeding,
`.
`Rebound PAHfollowing Abrupt
`Withdrawal
`
`Oral, IV,
`SubQ, INH
`
`Endothelin Receptor Antagonists
`
`Yes
`
`(Embryo-Fetal Toxicity)
`
`Yes
`(Embryo-Fetal Toxicity
`and Hepatotoxicity)
`
`Yes
`(Embryo-Fetal Toxicity)
`
`Phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE-5) Inhibitors
`
`Oral, IV
`ra
`
`2005
`
`2009
`
`Mortality with Pediatric Use,
`Epistaxis, Vaso-OcclusiveCrisis
`.
`,
`Hypotension, PVOD,VisualLoss,
`Hearing Impairment, Priapism
`Hypotension, PVOD,VisualLoss,
`.
`.
`.
`Hearing Impairment, Priapism
`
`Soluble Guanylate Cyclase (sGC) Stimulator
`Yes
`
`.
`
`Flolan, Veletri
`(epoprostenol)
`
`Ventavis
`(iloprost)
`
`Orenitram, Remodulin,
`Tyvaso
`(treprostinil)
`Uptravi
`
`Letairis
`
`(ambrisentan)
`
`Tracleer
`(bosentan)
`
`Opsumit
`(macitentan)
`
`Revatio
`(sildenafil)
`
`Adcirca
`.
`(tadalafil)
`
`Adempas
`
`Reference ID: 4867408
`
`

`

`No safety issues warranting a REMS have been identified for current FDA-approved prostacyclin
`derivatives or PDE-5 inhibitors. All ERAs and the sGC stimulator require a REMS with elements to assure
`safe use (ETASU) to ensure the benefits outweigh the risk of embryo-fetal toxicity. The bosentan REMS
`also addresses the risk of hepatotoxicity. In general, the warnings and precautions for prostacyclin
`derivatives are similar, as are the warnings and precautions for PDE-5 inhibitors. Pulmonary Veno-
`Occlusive Disease (PVOD) has been identified in all classes of currently FDA-approved treatment options
`for PH despite similar signs and symptoms of PVOD and progressive PH. Modest changes in mortality
`rates and progressive clinical manifestations of PH represent an unmet medical need.
`4 Benefit Assessment
`The efficacy of treprostinil inhalation powder for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension
`(PAH; WHO Group 1) or pulmonary hypertension associated with interstitial lung disease (PH-ILD; WHO
`Group 3) to improve exercise ability in adult patients relies on the Agency’s previous findings of safety
`and effectiveness for the referenced approved formulations and excipients. Additional efficacy data was
`evaluated as a secondary outcome measure in one single-sequence, open-label, multicenter phase 1b
`study (TIP-PH-101 [NCT03950739]). The study enrolled 51 patients (8 males and 43 females), 23 to 82
`years of age (median age at baseline 57 years) with PAH on a stable regimen of treprostinil inhalation
`solution for at least 3 months with a baseline 6-Minute Walk Distance (6MWD) of at least 150 meters
`and evidence of forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) of at least 60% and FEV1/forced vital
`capacity ratio of at least 60% during the six months prior to enrollment. Patients were excluded if they
`were pregnant or lactating, taking any other prostacyclin derivatives, had a history of uncontrolled sleep
`apnea, parenchymal lung disease, or hemodynamically significant left-sided heart disease, or had
`experienced an acute exacerbation of disease or hospitalization for any reason within 30 days of the
`screening visit or between screening and baseline. The study evaluated a 32 mcg, 48 mcg, and 64 mcg
`dose of treprostinil inhalation powder administered four times daily for three weeks. At the end of the
`treatment phase, patients were offered the opportunity to continue treprostinil inhalation powder in
`the Optional Extension Phase (OEP) of the study with clinic visits every eight weeks. The main evaluation
`of efficacy included a 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), Preference Questionnaire for Inhaled Treprostinil
`Devices (PQ-ITD) and the PAH-Symptoms and Impact (PAH-SYMPACT) Questionnaire (Table 2).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 4867408
`
`6
`
`

`

`Bielwe Pes
`Baseline (n)
`WeekThree(n)
`
`Mean(SD
`Median
`
`interquartile
`
`Table 2: Summary of Efficacy Results From TIP-PH-101 Study
`Pale
`Ele
`v2
`yay
`2
`24
`6MWDChangefrom baseline (m)
`
`yp
`20
`
`7
`
`PQ-ITD statement“I am satisfied with the inhaler” (n)
`Strongly Disagree
`Disagree
`
`!.
`
`Agree
`Strongly Agree
`
`Mean(SD)
`Median
`Interquartile
`
`Mean(SD)
`Median
`Interquartile
`
`Mean(SD)
`Median
`interquartile
`
`PAH-SYMPACT Questionnaire Change from baseline
`Cardiopulmonary Symptoms Domain Score
`
`OTs rsd
`0.16, 0.17
`
`Cardiovascular Symptoms DomainScore
`
`zo Po
`-0.40, 0.60
`
`Physical Impacts Domain Score
`-0.01 (1.01)
`-0.09 (0.40)
`
`-0.21 (0.48)
`
`Overall
`51
`>0
`
`p=0.0217
`11.5 (32.9
`
`-14, 33
`-46, 110
`p=0.0001
`
`Ww©
`
`p=0.2451
`-0.05 (0.27)
`
`-0.17, 0.17
`-0.7, 0.5
`p=0.2492
`-0.06 (0.33)
`
`-0.20, 0
`-1, 0.6
`p=0.0438
`-0.14 (0.46)
`
`-0.43, 0
`-1.1, 1
`p=0.0048
`-0.17 (0.40)
`
`utee S
`©Pant
`
`Cognitive and Emotional Impacts Domain Score
`
`PoC
`
`Mean(SD)
`Median
`interquartile
`
`-0.25, 0
`1.3, 0.5
`Source: Adapted from Applicant’s original submission April 16, 2021; Table 4-3, 4-5, 4-6, and 4-7, Appendix 2.7.3
`
`An 11.5 meter mean increase from baseline was observed in the 6MWDat weekthreefor treprostinil
`inhalation powder. According to a response of agree or strongly agree to the PQ-ITD statement “I am
`satisfied with the inhaler,” patient-reported satisfaction with the inhaled treprostinil device was
`improved at week three (95.7% [44/46]) comparedto baseline (31.4% [16/51]). Mean changes at week
`three compared to baseline improved forall domain scores. According to results from the PAH-
`SYMPACT Questionnaire, the mean scores(-0.05 to -0.17) for all domains improved at week three
`comparedto baseline. Improved domain scoresfor the physical impacts (-1.1 to 1 [p=0.0438]) and
`cognitive and emotional impacts (-1.3 to 0.5 [p=0.0048]) werestatistically significant. The Applicant
`concluded the supplementalefficacy data from the TIP-PH-101 study demonstrated significant
`improvementsin the 6MWD, PQ-ITD, and PAH-SYMPACT Questionnaire for patients with PAH.
`
`Reference ID: 4867408
`
`

`

`The clinical reviewer concluded the short-term efficacy results of the TIP-PH-101 study did not show
`clinical worsening for patients transitioning from treprostinil inhalation solution to treprostinil inhalation
`powder.e This determination relied on the eight meter median increase from baseline in 6MWD and
`unchanged median results for the cardiopulmonary symptoms, cardiovascular symptoms, and cognitive
`and emotional impacts domain scores from the PAH-SYMPACT Questionnaire.
`5 Risk Assessment & Safe-Use Conditions
`The safety of treprostinil inhalation powder for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH;
`WHO Group 1) or pulmonary hypertension associated with interstitial lung disease (PH-ILD; WHO Group
`3) to improve exercise ability in adult patients relied on the Agency’s previous findings of safety and
`effectiveness for the referenced approved formulations and excipients. Additional safety analysis relies
`on data from the treatment phase and OEP in the TIP-PH-101 study. A total of 51 patients enrolled in the
`study and 49 patients enrolled in the OEP after completing the treatment phase. The three most
`common adverse events (AE) during the treatment phase (incidence ≥ 4%) include cough, headache, and
`dyspnea.
`There were no deaths or treprostinil related serious adverse events during the TIP-PH-101 study. During
`the treatment phase, two patients experienced AEs of dyspnea and globus pharyngeus leading to
`treprostinil discontinuation. During the OEP, two additional patients experienced AEs leading to
`treprostinil discontinuation due to dyspnea and chest pain with dyspnea.
`The review team also evaluated the use of the FDKP excipient in treprostinil inhalation powder. The TIP-
`PH-101 study included 12 patients with respiratory disease (COPD [5], asthma [4], and ILD [3]). No
`patients with a history of COPD, asthma, or non-PAH respiratory disease withdrew from treprostinil
`inhalation powder therapy and there was no evidence of bronchospasm in this small cohort of patients.
`Additional review of the TIP-PH-101 study demonstrated little to no dose-dependent increase of AEs
`(respiratory, thoracic, and mediastinal disorders) for treprostinil inhalation powder and a substantial
`increase in AEs associated with the transition from treprostinil inhalation solution to treprostinil
`inhalation powder was not observed.
`Overall, the most commonly reported adverse events for treprostinil inhalation powder observed in the
`TIP-PH-101 study were similar to the adverse events in the placebo-controlled study (TRIUMPH I
`[NCT00147199]) conducted for the referenced approved formulation of treprostinil inhalation solution.7
`The clinical reviewer concluded the safety profile of treprostinil is consistent with predicted risks of
`prostacyclin mimetic therapy and the overall benefit-risk profile appears acceptable.
`6 Expected Postmarket Use
`Treprostinil is likely to be prescribed in an outpatient setting by cardiologists and pulmonologists
`familiar with PAH therapy. The likely prescribers are expected to be familiar with predicted risks of
`inhaled prostacyclin therapy and closely monitor patients for disease progression and response to
`therapy with frequent follow-up visits for this rare disease.
`
`e Section 505-1 (a) of the FD&C Act: FDAAA factor (C): The expected benefit of the drug with respect to such disease
`or condition.
`
`
`Reference ID: 4867408
`
`8
`
`

`

`7 Risk Management Activities Proposed by the Applicant
`The Applicant did not propose any risk management activities for treprostinil beyond routine
`pharmacovigilance and labeling.
`8 Discussion of Need for a REMS
`The clinical reviewer recommends approval of treprostinil citing the Agency’s previous findings of safety
`and efficacy for the referenced approved formulations and excipients (NDA 022387, NDA 021272, NDA
`203496, and BLA 022472), safety and efficacy data from the phase 1b TIP-PH-101 study, the seriousness
`of PH, and an adequately favorable benefit-risk profile.
`A REMS for Afrezza (BLA 022472), referenced in this application for the excipient FDKP, was approved on
`June 27, 2014 with a REMS that comprised of a communication plan to ensure the benefits of the drug
`outweighed the risk of acute bronchospasm in patients with chronic lung disease. The REMS was
`eliminated on April 13, 2018.2 DRM documented, in detail, the Agency decision regarding the need for a
`REMS.8 The rationale for the REMS included that additional measures were needed to disseminate
`information about the risk of acute bronchospasm in patients with chronic lung disease, citing concern
`for the estimated size of the population likely to use the drug outside a clinical study and that
`prescribers of insulin do not routinely need to consider lung function when prescribing insulin. In
`addition, no reports of serious bronchospasm were identified during the 3-year REMS assessment
`review.
`Although acute bronchospasm in patients with asthma and patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary
`disease (COPD) was observed in material reviewed for BLA 022472, no patients with a history of COPD,
`asthma, or non-PAH respiratory disease withdrew from treprostinil inhalation powder therapy in the
`TIP-PH-101 study and there was no evidence of bronchospasm in these 12 patients with respiratory
`disease.
`Previous findings for the referenced approved formulations and excipients (NDA 022387, NDA 021272,
`NDA 203496, and BLA 022472) and data from the phase 1b TIP-PH-101 study evaluated efficacy and
`safety of treprostinil inhalation powder in adults with PH. The short-term efficacy and safety results of
`the TIP-PH-101 study did not show clinical worsening for patients transitioning from treprostinil
`inhalation solution to treprostinil inhalation powder and did not produce any new safety findings for
`treprostinil inhalation powder compared to treprostinil inhalation solution, which is not currently
`approved with a REMS. In general, healthcare providers who treat PH should be familiar with predicted
`risks of inhaled prostacyclin therapy and closely monitor patients for disease progression and response
`to therapy with frequent follow-up visits for this rare disease. Relying on a smaller estimated patient
`population size, likely prescribers to include cardiologists and pulmonologists, and limited therapeutic
`options for patients with PH compared to those identified in BLA 022472, a REMS is not necessary to
`ensure that the benefits outweigh the risks for treprostinil inhalation powder for the intended
`population. Therefore, this reviewer is not recommending a REMS for the management of the risks of
`treprostinil inhalation powder.
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 4867408
`
`9
`
`

`

`9 Conclusion & Recommendations
`Relying on the data available, a REMS is not necessary to ensure the benefits of treprostinil inhalation
`powder outweigh the risks for cough and throat irritation, headache, nausea, flushing, and syncope. The
`safety concerns associated with treprostinil inhalation powder use are similar to the referenced
`approved formulations of treprostinil and they are not currently approved with a REMS. Healthcare
`providers who treat PAH should be familiar with monitoring and treating predicted risks of inhaled
`prostacyclin therapy. The risks of cough and throat irritation, headache, nausea, flushing, and syncope
`will be communicated in labeling in Adverse Reactions. At the time of this review, labeling is still under
`negotiation and the clinical review is ongoing. Should DCN have any concerns or questions or if new
`safety information becomes available, please send a consult to DRM.
`10 Appendices
`10.1 REFERENCES
`
`
`1 Lang IM, Gaine SP. Recent advances in targeting the prostacyclin pathway in pulmonary arterial
`hypertension. European Respiratory Review. 2015;24:630-641.
`2 Pippins, J. Afrezza REMS Elimination Memo. DARRTS Reference ID: 4249716. April 13, 2018.
`3 Bisserier M, Pradhan N, Hadri L. Current and emerging therapeutic approaches to pulmonary
`hypertension. Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine. 2020;21(2):163-179.
`4 Prins KW, Thenappan T. World Health Organization Group I Pulmonary Hypertension: Epidemiology
`and Pathophysiology. Cardiology Clinics. 2016;34(3):363-374.
`5 George MG, Schieb LJ, Ayala C, Talwalkar A, Levant S. Pulmonary hypertension surveillance: United
`States, 2001 to 2010. Chest. 2014;146(2):476-495.
`6 Benza RL, Miller DP, Barst RJ, Badesch DB, Frost AE, McGoon MD. An evaluation of long-term survival
`from time of diagnosis in pulmonary arterial hypertension from the REVEAL Registry. Chest.
`2012;142(2):448-456.
`7 See Tyvaso at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda docs/label/2021/022387s017lbl.pdf
`8 See FDA REMS Review for Afrezza (BLA 22472), dated June 24, 2014, available at
`https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda docs/nda/2014/022472Orig1s000RiskR.pdf
`
`
`Reference ID: 4867408
`
`10
`
`

`

`Signature Page 1 of 1
`--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed
`electronically. Following this are manifestations of any and all
`electronic signatures for this electronic record.
`--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`/s/
`------------------------------------------------------------
`
`BRIAN J CARUTH
`10/04/2021 05:10:19 PM
`
`LAURA A ZENDEL
`10/04/2021 05:54:31 PM
`
`CYNTHIA L LACIVITA
`10/04/2021 09:23:17 PM
`
`Reference ID: 4867408
`
`(
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket