throbber
CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND
`RESEARCH
`
`
`APPLICATION NUMBER:
`
`209089Orig1s000
` 209090Orig1s000
`
`
`
`SUMMARY REVIEW
`
`

`

`Division Director Review
`
`NDA 209089 (tablet) and NDA 209090 (oral solution)
`
`levocetirizine dihydrochloride
`
`Summary Review for Regulatory Action
`
` 1
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`On behalf of UCB, Inc., Sanofi US Services, Inc. (Sanofi) submitted these 505(b)(2) new
`drug applications seeking approval for levocetirizine dihydrochloride tablets and oral
`solution (levocetirizine; proposed trade names Xyzal Allergy 24HR and Children’s Xyzal
`Allergy 24HR),
`M“) for OTC use for the temporary relief of symptoms due
`to hay fever or other respiratory allergies, including nmny nose; sneezing; itchy, watery
`eyes; and itching of the nose or throat.
`
`Levocetirizine is a histamine H1 -receptor antagonist, which is the R—enantiomer of the
`racemate, cetirizine. As such, the sponsor references not only the levocetirizine
`prescription NDAs 22064 (oral tablet) and NDA 22157 (oral solution), but also NDAs
`19835, 21621, and 20346 for the Zyrtec (cetirizine dihydrochloride) tablets, chewable
`tablets, and oral solution, respectively. Levocetirizine is approved as a prescription product
`for the management of symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR; adults and children
`ages 2 years and older), perennial allergic rhinitis G’AR; adults and children ages 6 months
`and older) and the treatment of uncomplicated skin manifestations of chronic idiopathic
`urticaria (CIU; adults and children ages 6 months and older). Dosing is 5 mg once daily in
`
`Reference ID: 4048782
`
`Theresa M. Michele, MD
`From Director, Division ofNonprescription Drug Products
`
`
`
`Subject
`
`NDA/BLA #
`
`Division Director Summary Review
`
`209089 (tablet), 209090 (oral solution)
`
`Union Chimique Belge, Inc. GJCB)
`Applicant Name
`Agent: Sanofi US Services Inc.
`
`Date of Submission
`
`March 31, 2016
`
`PDUFA Goal Date
`
`January 31, 2017
`
`Proprietary Name /
`Establ'shed (USAN) Na e
`l
`m
`
`Xyzal Allergy 24HR (levocetirlzme dihydrochloride)
`Children s Xyzal Allergy 24HR (levocetirlzme
`dihydrochloride)
`Allergic rhinitis (seasonal and perennial):
`
`o Tablet, 5 mg (adults and children 6—64 years
`of age)
`
`Dosage Forms / Route of
`Administration / Strength
`0 Oral solution 2.5 mg/5 mL (adults and
`
`children ages 2-64 years)
`Temporary relieves these symptoms due to hay fever
`or other respiratory allergies: runny nose; sneezing;
`Proposed Indication(s)
`
`itchy, watery eyes; itching of the nose or throat
`
`Recommended Regulatory
`Action
`
`Approval
`
`

`

`Division Director Review
`NDA 209089 (tablet) and NDA 209090 (oral solution)
`
`levocetirizine dihydrochloride
`
`the evening for adults and children ages 12 years and older, 2.5 mg once daily in the
`evening for adults and children ages 6 to 11 years, and 1.25 mg once daily in the evening
`for children ages 6 months to 5 years. There are dose adjustments required for various
`degrees of renal impairment ranging from 2.5 mg once daily for adults with mild renal
`impairment to a contraindication in patients with end-stage renal disease. The sponsor is
`proposing a partial switch of the SAR and PAR indications down to age 2 years. The
`indication for CIU and PAR indication for children younger than 2 years would remain
`prescription.
`The indication that the sponsor is proposing “temporarily relieves these symptoms due to
`hay fever or other respiratory allergies: runny nose; sneezing; itchy, watery eyes; itching of
`the nose or throat” is consistent with other OTC products available for treatment of allergic
`rhinitis. However, Sanofi proposes that dosing of the product could occur
`
` in the evening to avoid somnolence as with the prescription product. To
`justify this dosing revision, Sanofi submitted analyses of clinical safety data from morning-
`dosed studies compared to evening-dosed studies.
`The allergic rhinitis indications of SAR and PAR are considered to be similar for both
`prescription and OTC use, and consumer ability to understand and use products in this
`category is well established. As such, no new nonclinical pharmacology and toxicology,
`human pharmacokinetics and bioavailability, clinical pharmacology, clinical efficacy or
`safety studies were submitted as part of this application. As part of this application, Sanofi
`conducted a label comprehension study in order to support warning language for kidney
`disease and urinary retention.
`This summary review provides an overview of the application with a focus on the new
`dosing instructions and labeling.
`
`2 BACKGROUND
`
`2.1 Allergic rhinitis (seasonal and perennial)
`Allergic rhinitis is a common IgE-mediated inflammatory condition characterized by one or
`more of the following symptoms: congestion, rhinorrhea (anterior and posterior), sneezing,
`and itching. Symptoms may significantly affect quality of life, and may be associated with
`sleep disturbance, fatigue, headache, cognitive impairment. Traditionally, allergic rhinitis is
`divided into two subsets, SAR and PAR, depending on the aeroallergens involved and
`persistence of symptoms. Although estimates vary, allergic rhinitis may affect as many as
`30-60 million people in the US, including 10-30% of adults and up to 40% of children.1
`Allergic rhinitis is a well-established OTC indication, with both monograph and NDA OTC
`products available in a variety of intranasal and oral formulations. These include first and
`second generation oral antihistamines, oral antihistamine/decongestant combination
`products, intranasal decongestants, and intranasal cromolyn. In addition, in October 2013,
`FDA approved the first intranasal corticosteroid as a prescription to OTC switch [Nasacort
`Allergy 24 HR (triamcinolone acetonide) nasal spray; NDA 20,468], with several
`
`1 The diagnosis and management of rhinitis: An updated practice parameter, Joint Task Force on
`Practice Parameters for Allergy and Immunology. 2008
`
`2
`
`Reference ID: 4048782
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`Division Director Review
`NDA 209089 (tablet) and NDA 209090 (oral solution)
`
`levocetirizine dihydrochloride
`
`subsequent OTC approvals of other nasal steroid products. Professional guidelines for the
`treatment of adults with allergic rhinitis recommend nasal steroids as first line therapy for
`moderate-severe disease with or without a second generation antihistamine.
`The standard OTC indication language for allergic rhinitis, covering the prescription
`indications for both SAR and PAR, is derived from the OTC monograph indication for first
`generation antihistamines “temporarily relieves runny nose and sneezing, itching of the
`nose or throat, and itchy, watery eyes due to hay fever or other upper respiratory
`allergies.2” While consumers can generally recognize the symptoms of allergic rhinitis,
`diagnosis of PAR in infants and children under the age of 2 years is more complex and
`requires the evaluation of a physician.
`
`2.3 Relevant Regulatory History for fluticasone propionate
`As part of this application, one formal pre-submission meeting was held between
`Sanofi/UCB and FDA regarding the content and format of the planned NDAs for the
`prescription to OTC switch of levocetirizine.
`
`(cid:22) CHEMISTRY, MANUFACTURING, AND CONTROLS
`Levocetirizine 5 mg tablets are white to off-white film-coated, oval, scored tablets. They
`may be split in half to give a 2.5 mg dose for children ages 6 to 11 who are able to swallow
`tablets. The liquid formulation is a clear, colorless solution at a concentration of 0.5 mg/mL
`(2.5 mg/5 mL) which is bioequivalent to the tablet. The sponsor states that there are no
`changes to the prescription quality information except for inclusion of a debossed tablet,
`new packaging configurations,
` the blister packages, and
`addition of new packaging sites. There is a shelf life of 36 months under room temperature
`storage conditions. To be in compliance with the USP salt policy of the active moiety, the
`established name should contain the active moiety in the neutral form without the name of
`the salt. However, to avoid confusion with the prescription product, which will remain on
`the market for the CIU indication, the quality team recommends accepting the proposed
`established name of “levocetirizine dihydrochloride”. I concur with this recommendation as
`well as their recommendation for approval from a quality standpoint.
`
`4 NONCLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY/TOXICOLOGY
`No new nonclinical data were submitted as part of this application. As the OTC product is
`the same as the prescription product, there are no new excipients or impurities. There are no
`outstanding nonclinical pharmacology/toxicology issues.
`
`5 CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND BIOPHARMACEUTICS
`No new clinical pharmacology data were submitted as part of this application. According to
`the prescription label, levocetirizine is rapidly and extensively absorbed following oral
`administration and has a peak plasma concentration 0.9 hour after administration of the oral
`tablet without a food effect. The drug is excreted primarily through the kidney by both
`
`2 21 CFR 341.72 Cold, Cough, Allergy, Bronchodilator, and Antiasthmatic Drug Products for Over-the-
`Counter Human Use; Labeling of antihistamine drug products (1992, as amended Dec 6, 2002).
`
`3
`
`Reference ID: 4048782
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`Division Director Review
`NDA 209089 (tablet) and NDA 209090 (oral solution)
`
`levocetirizine dihydrochloride
`
`glomerular filtration and active tubular secretion, leading to a plasma half-life of
`approximately 8 to 9 hours after administration of either the tablet or oral solution.
`Excretion varies with renal function and the plasma blood levels increase approximately 6
`fold in persons with end-stage renal disease. Because the adverse effect of somnolence is
`known to increase with increasing dose, dosing in the prescription setting is based on renal
`function. Levocetirizine is contraindicated in persons with end-stage renal disease or who
`are on hemodialysis. For the OTC label, the sponsor recommends the following warning:
`“Do not use if you have kidney disease.” While an argument could potentially be made for
`a lesser warning of “ask a doctor before use if you have kidney disease,” the sponsor has
`taken a conservative approach, which is reasonable. Furthermore, this warning was tested
`in a label comprehension study, with reasonably good comprehension.
`There are no outstanding clinical pharmacology issues.
`
`6 CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY
`Not applicable.
`
`7 CLINICAL AND STATISTICAL EFFICACY
`A large number of clinical trials have been conducted with levocetirizine, including a
`number of trials supporting the SAR and PAR, as well as pediatric dosing. The efficacy of
`levocetirizine for SAR and PAR has been previously established for the prescription
`product, so efficacy will be reviewed only briefly here, as the OTC indication is similar.
`The clinical program for the prescription NDAs included a total of 12 clinical trials in
`allergic rhinits: 6 efficacy and safety trials in adult and adolescents with SAR or PAR (3
`dose ranging, one pivotal trial in PAR, one pivotal trial in SAR, and one shorter duration
`trial), 2 efficacy and safety trials in children 6 to 12 years of age with SAR or PAR, 2
`environmental exposure unit trials, and 2 long term safety trials. Efficacy in children under
`age 6 was extrapolated based on pharmacokinetic data.
`Reflective total symptom scores (rTSS), a composite symptom score of rhinorrhea,
`sneezing, and nasal itching, and ocular itching) were evaluated over treatment periods of 2
`to 4 weeks for SAR and PAR, respectively. Subjects treated with fluticasone propionate
`aqueous nasal spray (FPANS) exhibited significantly greater decreases in rTSS than
`placebo-treated patients (see product prescription labeling). In environmental chamber
`studies evaluating onset of action, a decrease in nasal symptoms in treated subjects
`compared to placebo was shown to occur as soon as 1 hour after treatment.
`
`8 SAFETY
`The safety profile of levocetirizine is well-characterized, including a large clinical trial
`database (primarily in SAR and PAR) of more than 6000 subjects exposed to levocetirizine,
`and postmarketing data from prescription approval in over 60 countries worldwide and in
`12 countries as a nonprescription drug. The U.S. prescription label contains warnings and
`precautions related to sedation, avoiding concurrent use of alcohol or other CNS
`suppressants, and instructions to use with caution in patients with predisposing factors for
`urinary retention. As noted previously, dose adjustment for renal impairment (including
`
`Reference ID: 4048782
`
`4
`
`

`

`Division Director Review
`
`NDA 209089 (tablet) and NDA 209090 (oral solution)
`
`levocetirizine dihydrochloride
`
`mild impairment) is required. Levocetirizine is contraindicated in patients with a known
`hypersensitivity, end-stage renal disease, or hemodialysis.
`
`8.1
`
`Safety in clinical trials
`
`The sponsor provided an analysis of 62 clinical trials conducted with levocetirizine at doses
`ranging from 1.25 mg/day to 30 mg/day. The most common adverse events in adult studies
`occurring more often in the levocetirizine group than placebo in short term studies were
`somnolence and fatigue. In long-term studies, somnolence, fatigue, and dry mouth occurred
`more frequently in the levocetirizine group compared to placebo. In children, infectious
`adverse events were more frequent, potentially confounding drug associations.
`
`Efi'ect on QT interval
`
`A QT study performed using a single dose of 30 mg (6 times the recommended dose) did
`not show a significant QT effect. In general, multiple dose QT studies are required to assure
`that the study is performed at steady state; however, the clinical reviewer notes that PK data
`demonstrate that steady state is reached after 2 days of dosing, with only a slight increase in
`blood levels from day one to day 2. In addition, four clinical studies conducted with 30 mg
`of cetirizine in healthy males did not demonstrate QT prolongation. While there are a few
`cases of potential QT prolongation/torsades in post-marketing data, the clinical team
`determined that there were confounding factors and a clear signal is not seen. As such, they
`concluded that QT prolongation is not a significant concern with levocetirizine, and I
`concur.
`
`Sedation
`
`In short-term studies in adults, somnolence occurred in 5.3% of subjects receiving
`levocetirizine compared to 1.6% of the placebo group, and fatigue occurred in 3.1% versus
`1.4%. In long-term studies, somnolence occurred in 4.7% of the levocetirizine group versus
`1.7% of the placebo group, and fatigue occurred in 5.8% versus 4.8%. A small cross-over
`study evaluating cognitive and psychomotor function demonstrated no significant
`differences between levocetirizine, cetirizine, loratadine, and placebo. In addition, a
`randomized, double—blind driving study 1.5 hours after dosing found that diphenhydramine
`reduced driving ability while levocetirizine did not.
`
`Sedation (combining the preferred terms of lethargy, neonatal oversedation, sedation,
`somnolence, somnolence neonatal, stupor, sopor, and narcosis) was found to be dose
`related, increasing with increasing dose, which is not surprising.
`mm
`M w
`
`"m" the sponsor compared
`3 studies in which levocetirizine was dosed in the morning with 8 studies dosed in the
`evening, and concluded that there was no significant difl'erence in somnolence between the
`groups. Of note, the total daily dose of the morning studies was 5 mg per day, while the
`total daily dose of the evening studies was variable, with some subjects receiving 10 mg.
`To address the concern that the studies chosen by the sponsor may not be representative of
`the overall clinical database, Dr. Gierhart reviewed all available clinical studies, including
`32 studies dosed only in the morning and 17 studies dosed only in the evening. When
`subjects receiving doses of 5 mg or less were compared, it appears that sedation occurred
`
`Reference ID: 4048782
`
`

`

`Division Director Review
`
`NDA 209089 (tablet) and NDA 209090 (oral solution)
`
`levocetirizine dihydrochloride
`
`more frequently with morning dosing than evening dosing, which is further supported by
`the phannacokinetics showing a peak serlnn level approximately 1 hour after dosing.
`Although cross-study comparisons are fraught with difficulty, the overall data
`om)
`(b) m
`
`ow)
`
`Geriatric population
`
`Limited clinical study data are available in the geriatric population. Given the risk of
`sedation and the increasing risk of renal impairment with increasing age, the sponsor
`proposes to limit use in the OTC setting to consumers less than 65 years of age. The clinical
`team agreed with this conservative approach, and I concur.
`
`8.2 Consumer studies
`
`The sponsor conducted a single label comprehension study enrolling 417 adults and
`adolescents ages 16 years and older, including 28% of subjects with low literacy. Self-
`selection, human factors, and actual use studies were not required for this switch
`application given that the antihistamine category and indication of allergic rhinitis
`(SAR/PAR) are already established for OTC use. The label comprehension study was a
`multi-site, single-visit, study to evaluate comprehension of warnings and directions related
`to kidney disease and urinary retention. See Table 2 for results.
`
`Table 1: Label comprehension primary objectives: normal versus low literacy
`
`(Question 3) Objective
`
`(Q 5) Stop l‘se and Ask a Doctor It
`You have trouble minatmgor
`M1118 your bladder
`
`Normal Literacy
`3‘40]
`PE%
`
`95% Cl
`
`n
`
`Low Liter“?
`_\'=1 16
`PE%
`
`95% CI
`
`n
`
`193
`
`97.3
`
`94.8. 98 9
`
`113
`
`97.4
`
`92.6. 99.5
`
`(Q 4) Do Not l'se
`disease
`lt'you have In!
`(Q 2) Ask a Doctor before l'se It You
`
`,
`-86
`
`S
`9- 0
`
`,
`91 9. 97 _
`
`98
`
`84.5
`
`76.6. 90 5
`
`"m
`ever had trouble urinating or
`Mug your bladder
`
`204
`
`67 s
`
`62 z. 73 o
`
`72
`
`62.1
`
`52.6. 70 9
`
`Overall, consumers showed generally good comprehension of these first two warnings,
`“stop use and ask a doctor if you have trouble urinating or emptying your bladder” and “do
`not use if you have kidney disease.” The relatively low comprehension of the kidney
`disease warning (Lower Bound of the Confidence Interval @BCI) for the low literacy
`population of 77%) is potentially concerning; however, the majority of incorrect answers
`were from consumers who stated that they would ask a doctor before use, which is a safe
`alternative. Likewise, consumers scored relatively poorly on the warning to “ask a doctor
`before use if you have ever had trouble urinating or emptying your bladder”, but when
`mitigated to include subjects who responded with other safe alternatives of “do not use” or
`“ask a doctor” without a correct rationale, the overall results improved from 66% correct to
`89%. Further, since the warning to stop use if urinary retention occurs was well understood,
`it seems unlikely that consumers will have an unacceptable level of risk when using this
`product. The social science reviewer notes that the response pattern and verbatim
`
`Reference ID: 4048782
`
`

`

`Division Director Review
`NDA 209089 (tablet) and NDA 209090 (oral solution)
`
`levocetirizine dihydrochloride
`
`responses suggest that consumers may be confused between kidney and bladder; however,
`this may be of lesser import if they choose a safe course of action based on the label.
`
`Post-marketing data
`8.3
`As part of this application, post-marketing safety data for levocetirizine were submitted and
`reviewed from the following sources: the sponsor’s pharmacovigilance database, FDA’s
`Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), the American Association of Poison Control
`Centers’ National Poison Data System (NPDS), the Drug Abuse Warning Network
`(DAWN), and the published literature. The sponsor also reviewed the French
`Pharmacovigilance Database for the racemate cetirizine. All of these sources are subject to
`a number of limitations, primarily due to issues inherent in spontaneous reporting. Overall,
`the adverse events reported in the post-market setting are consistent with the clinical trials
`database and the known adverse event profile of antihistamines.
`
`9 ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING
`An advisory committee meeting was not held for this application as this is not a first in class
`switch and there were no novel or controversial issues raised by the application.
`
`10 PEDIATRICS
`Levocetirizine is approved in the prescription setting down to age 2 years for SAR and age
`6 months for PAR and CIU. The CIU indication will remain prescription. Because this
`application does not involve a new indication, dosage form, route of administration, or
`dosing regimen, PREA is not triggered. The sponsor fulfilled PREA obligations with the
`prescription product by conducting pediatric trials. Diagnosis of allergic rhinitis may be
`complex in infants and young children, with a variety of other more serious conditions such
`as pharyngonasal reflux resulting from prematurity, neuromuscular disease, or cleft palate,
`adenoidal hypertrophy, congenital syphilis, and otitis media, to be considered.3 As such, it
`is appropriate for indications for infants and children less than 2 years of age to remain
`prescription.
`
`11 OTHER RELEVANT REGULATORY ISSUES
`
`11.1 OSI Audits
`OSI site inspections were not conducted for this application.
`
`11.2 Financial Disclosure
`Not applicable.
`
`11.3 Environmental Assessment
`A categorical exclusion was granted for this application.
`
`3 The diagnosis and management of rhinitis: An updated practice parameter, Joint Task Force on
`Practice Parameters for Allergy and Immunology. 2008
`
`Reference ID: 4048782
`
`7
`
`

`

`Division Director Review
`
`NDA 209089 (tablet) and NDA 209090 (oral solution)
`
`levocetirizine dihydrochloride
`
`12 LABELING
`
`12.1 Proprietary name
`
`The proposed proprietary names, Xyzal Allergy 24HR (5 mg tablet) and Children’s Xyzal
`Allergy 24HR (oral solution 2.5 mg/S ml), were deemed acceptable by the Division of
`Medication Error Prevention and Analysis (DMEPA).
`
`12.2 Consumer labeling
`
`Sanofi submitted Drug Facts label, outer carton labels, and immediate container labels for a
`variety of count sizes ranging from 10-count to a 110-count club pack for the tablets and a
`5 ounce bottle of the oral solution.
`
`Specific labeling reviews were completed by DMEPA and DNDP in addition to labeling
`reviews completed by the various review disciplines. For the most part, the proposed
`labeling reflects standard language for other second generation antihistamines, including
`specific sedation wamings as follows: “When using this product: drowsiness may occur,
`avoid alcoholic drinks; alcohol, sedatives, and tranquilizers may increase drowsiness; and
`be careful when driving a motor vehicle or operating machinery.” As noted previously, the
`Drug Facts label includes warnings related to kidney disease as well as urinary retention,
`which were tested in a label comprehension study. The kidney disease warning is more
`conservative than the dose adjustments permitted on the prescription label, which is
`reasonable for the OTC setting and tested well in label comprehension.
`
`(m4) taking the
`The sponsor proposed
`om)- This was the subject of
`product in the evening
`a comprehensive review by the clinical team, with the ultimate decision that the data
`support retaining evening dosing schedule. After discussion with the sponsor, the
`instructions for use will state “take once daily in the evening” for consistency with the
`prescription labeling.
`
`The other labeling issue that was discussed extensively by the review team was the
`sponsor’s proposal to add the phrase “Original Prescription Strength” 011 the PDP for the 5
`mg tablet. In general, DNDP has allowed this phrase only for full switch programs in order
`to avoid consumer and physician confusion with other indications and dosing strengths that
`remain prescription. The racemate Zyrtec (cetiiizine) was permitted to have this flag on
`labeling because it was a full switch application. In this case, the sponsor proposed that
`while Xyzal is not a full switch for the 5 mg tablet because the CIU indication did not
`switch, there would be no confusion because there are no other tablet strengths available in
`either the prescription or the OTC setting. This is a reasonable argument provided that the 5
`mg tablet remains the only strength available for both prescription and OTC use.
`
`13 DECISION/ACTION/BENEFIT RISK ASSESSMENT
`
`13.1 Regulatory action
`
`Sanofi has submitted adequate data to support approval of Xyzal (levocetiiizine) 5 mg
`tablet and oral solution for OTC use for seasonal and perennial allergic rhinitis. This
`
`Reference ID: 4048782
`
`

`

`Division Director Review
`NDA 209089 (tablet) and NDA 209090 (oral solution)
`
`levocetirizine dihydrochloride
`
`approval will constitute a partial switch of the SAR and PAR indications down to age 2
`years. The CIU indication for all age groups as well as PAR for children ages 6 months to
`under 2 years will remain prescription.
`
`13.2 Risk Benefit Assessment
`The overall risk-benefit assessment supports approval of Xyzal (levocetirizine) tablets and
`oral solution for the indication “temporarily relieves these symptoms of hay fever or other
`respiratory allergies: runny nose, sneezing, itchy, watery eyes, and itching of the nose or
`throat” in adults and children 2 to 64 years of age. The efficacy and safety of allergic
`rhinitis indications (SAR and PAR) have been established for prescription use. It is
`expected that this second generation antihistamine product would have similar efficacy in
`the OTC setting, as the allergic rhinitis indication is similar for both prescription and OTC.
`No new safety signals were identified as part of this application, including evaluation of the
`safety database of 62 clinical trials and an extensive post-marketing database. Given the
`contraindication for use in severe renal impairment or in patients on hemodialysis on the
`prescription label and complex dosing algorithm for patients with lesser degrees of renal
`impairment, OTC labeling will contain the more conservative warning of “Do not use if
`you have kidney disease.” This warning along with warnings related to urinary retention
`were tested in a label comprehension study. Further, the labeling will contain class labeling
`warnings related to sedation.
`
`13.3 Recommendation for Postmarketing Risk Evaluation and Mitigation
`Strategies
`None.
`
`13.4. Recommendation for other Postmarketing Requirements and
`Commitments
`None.
`
`Reference ID: 4048782
`
`9
`
`

`

`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed
`electronically and this page is the manifestation of the electronic
`signature.
`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`/s/
`----------------------------------------------------
`THERESA M MICHELE
`01/30/2017
`
`Reference ID: 4048782
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket