throbber
CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND
`RESEARCH
`
`
`
`APPLICATION NUMBER:
`
`205552Orig2s000
`
`
`OTHER REVIEW(S)
`
`

`

`Department of Health and Human Services
`Public Health Service
`Food and Drug Administration
`Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
`Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology
`
`Pharmacovigilance Memo
`
`March 14, 2014
`
`Katherine Coyle, PharmD, BCPS
` Division of Pharmacovigilance II (DPV II)
`
`Tracy Salaam, PharmD
`DPV II
`
`Scott Proestel, MD
`DPV II
`
`Imbruvica (ibrutinib)
`
`Type B meeting response
`
`NDA 205552
`
`Pharmacyclics, Inc.
`
`2014-148
`
`Date:
`
`Safety Evaluator:
`
`
`Team Leader:
`
`
`Division Director:
`
`
`Product Name:
`
`Subject:
`
`Application Type/Number:
`
`Applicant/Sponsor:
`
`OSE RCM #:
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 3471635
`
`

`

`
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`1
`The Division of Pharmacovigilance II (DPV II) was asked by the Division of Hematology
`Products (DHP) to provide a response to Question 12 posed by Pharmacyclics, Inc. in their Type
`B (Pre-supplemental NDA) meeting package. The purpose of the Type B Pre-supplemental
`NDA meeting is to discuss the efficacy and safety analysis data from the Phase 3 study PCYC-
`1112-CA in support of regular (full) approval of ibrutinib as monotherapy for the treatment of
`patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) who have
`received at least one prior therapy. Additionally, Pharmacyclics would like to discuss the content
`of the proposed supplemental NDA (sNDA) including: the collective clinical efficacy and safety
`data in support of the sNDA filing. Specifically pertaining to DPV II, Pharmacyclics would like
`to discuss and obtain agreement with the Agency on the proposed update to the pharmacovigilance
`plan.
`
`
`1.1 BACKGROUND
`Imbruvica is a Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor indicated for the treatment of patients
`with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) who have received
`at least one prior therapy.1 Imbruvica was FDA-approved November 13, 2013.
`
`Atrial fibrillation is a labeled adverse event found in the following sections of the ibrutinib
`label:1
`
`Section 6 Adverse Reactions
`Subsection 6.1 Mantle Cell Lymphoma and 6.2 Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
`
`Section 8 Use in Specific Populations
`
`Subsection 8.5 Geriatric Use
`
`On August 26, 2013, Pharmacyclics, Inc. submitted a pharmacovigilance plan as requested by
`FDA on August 8, 2013. On February 5, 2014, Pharmacyclics, Inc. submitted a Type B Pre-
`supplemental NDA meeting package for the upcoming March 12, 2014 Type B meeting with
`FDA. Pharmacyclics, Inc. provided the following question and rationale that was referred to
`DPV II for a response:
`
`Question 12
`Is the proposed update to the pharmacovigilance plan acceptable to the FDA?
`
`Based on the available safety data on PCYC-1112-CA, atrial fibrillation has been
`identified as a new important potential risk compared to the pharmacovigilance (PV)
`plan in the original NDA dated 23 August 2013. The original PV plans includes the
`following risk and potential risks:
`
`Important Identified Risk
`Leukostasis
`
`
`Reference ID: 3471635
`
`2
`
`

`

`Important Potential Risks
`Infections
`Hemorrhage
`Hypersensitivity
`Other malignancy
`Drug-drug interaction
`Teratogenicity
`
`Other potential area of safety information:
`Off-label use
`Medication errors, overdose, and accidental exposure
`
`New Important Potential Risk: Atrial fibrillation
`
`The following activity is proposed:
`1. Routine pharmacovigilance (ongoing/post-marketing): Targeted surveillance with use
`of a guided collection form to obtain additional clinical and diagnostic information
`related to atrial fibrillation.
`2. Additional PV (for ongoing clinical studies): Case series analyses on controlled
`studies to clarify background incidence.
`
`
`
` 2
`
` 3
`
` RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
`On March 2, 2014, DPV II searched the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS)
`database utilizing the higher level term (HLT) supraventricular arrhythmias to identify cases of
`atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter with ibrutinib since the approval date of November 13, 2013.
`After removing duplicates, the search retrieved 11 cases of atrial fibrillation (8) and atrial flutter
`(3). All 11 cases reported a primary serious outcome of hospitalization (10) or other medically
`serious outcome (1). All 11 cases were either confounded by concomitant medications labeled
`for an association with atrial fibrillation or cardiac arrhythmia (10) or provided limited
`information to assess the case (1).
`
`DPV II agrees with the sponsor’s addition of atrial fibrillation to the PV plan based on the
`available information.
`
` REFERENCES
`
` 1
`
` Imbruvica (ibrutinib) [package insert]. Pharmacyclics, Inc. Sunnyvale, CA. Label issued November 2013.
`
`Reference ID: 3471635
`
`3
`
`

`

`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed
`electronically and this page is the manifestation of the electronic
`signature.
`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`/s/
`----------------------------------------------------
`
`KATHERINE M COYLE
`03/14/2014
`
`TRACY M SALAAM
`03/14/2014
`
`SCOTT E PROESTEL
`03/14/2014
`
`Reference ID: 3471635
`
`

`

`PMR/PMC Development Template PMR 2122-2
`
`
`This template should be completed by the PMR/PMC Development Coordinator and included for each
`PMR/PMC in the Action Package.
`
`
`NDA#
`Product Name:
`
`PMR Description:
`
`205552
`IMBRUVICA, PCI-32765 (ibrutinib) capsules,140 mg
`
`Complete and submit the results of the ongoing randomized, double-
`blind, placebo-controlled Phase 3 clinical trial (PCI-32765CLL3001) of
`ibrutinib in combination with bendamustine and rituximab in patients
`with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia or relapsed or
`refractory small lymphocytic lymphoma. Enrollment of 578 patients
`was completed. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival as
`assessed by an Independent Review Committee.
`
`
`
`
`
`PMR/PMC Schedule
`Milestones:
`
`
`
`
`
`1. During application review, explain why this issue is appropriate for a PMR/PMC instead of a pre-approval
`requirement. Check type below and describe.
` Unmet need
` Life-threatening condition
` Long-term data needed
` Only feasible to conduct post-approval
` Prior clinical experience indicates safety
` Small subpopulation affected
` Theoretical concern
` Other
`
`Final Protocol Submission:
`
`Trial Completion:
`Final Report Submission:
`Other:
`
`
` Completed
` (September /2013)
`July 2016
`
` November 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`Relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a life-threatening condition. Although
`most patients who undergo chemotherapy for CLL achieve an initial response, disease relapse invariably
`occurs. The median progression free-survival varies according the subsequent treatment regimen, with
`reported median PFS for FCR, FR, and single-agent fludarabine of 52 months, 42 months, and 18 months,
`respectively.
`
`In the single-arm clinical trial PCYC-1102-CA, the applicant reports a 58% overall response rate in 48
`patients with relapsed or refractory CLL. The duration of response ranged from 5.6 to 24.2+ months. The
`median DOR was not reached.
`
`
`
`PMR/PMC Development Template
`
`Last Updated 2/11/2014
`
`Page 1 of 4
`
`Reference ID: 3452288
`
`

`

`2. Describe the particular review issue and the goal of the study/clinical trial. If the study/clinical trial is a
`FDAAA PMR, describe the risk. If the FDAAA PMR is created post-approval, describe the “new safety
`information.”
`
`The Agency has previously accepted overall response rates supported by duration of response from a
`single-arm clinical trial as a basis for initial approval.
`
`The goal for this PMR would be to obtain long-term efficacy outcomes including progression-free survival
`from a randomized clinical trial. Time-to-event endpoints cannot be adequately interpreted in single-arm
`clinical trials due to confounding effects of the natural history of the disease.
`
`3. If the study/clinical trial is a PMR, check the applicable regulation.
`If not a PMR, skip to 4.
`- Which regulation?
` Accelerated Approval (subpart H)
` Animal Efficacy Rule
` Pediatric Research Equity Act
` FDAAA required safety study/clinical trial
`
`
`
`- If the PMR is a FDAAA safety study/clinical trial, does it: (check all that apply)
` Assess a known serious risk related to the use of the drug?
` Assess signals of serious risk related to the use of the drug?
` Identify an unexpected serious risk when available data indicate the potential for a serious risk?
`
`
`- If the PMR is a FDAAA safety study/clinical trial, will it be conducted as:
` Analysis of spontaneous postmarketing adverse events?
`Do not select the above study/clinical trial type if: such an analysis will not be sufficient to assess
`or identify a serious risk
`
`
`
` Analysis using pharmacovigilance system?
`Do not select the above study/clinical trial type if: the new pharmacovigilance system that the FDA
`is required to establish under section 505(k)(3) has not yet been established and is thus not sufficient
`to assess this known serious risk, or has been established but is nevertheless not sufficient to assess
`or identify a serious risk
`
` Study: all other investigations, such as investigations in humans that are not clinical trials as defined
`below (e.g., observational epidemiologic studies), animal studies, and laboratory experiments?
`Do not select the above study type if: a study will not be sufficient to identify or assess a serious
`risk
`
`
`
`
`
` Clinical trial: any prospective investigation in which the sponsor or investigator determines the
`method of assigning investigational product or other interventions to one or more human subjects?
`4. What type of study or clinical trial is required or agreed upon (describe and check type below)? If the study
`or trial will be performed in a subpopulation, list here.
`Required: Submit the clinical study report and data from the ongoing randomized, double-blind,
`placebo-controlled Phase 3 clinical trial (PCI-32765CLL3001) of ibrutinib in combination with
`bendamustine and rituximab in patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia
`or relapsed or refractory small lymphocytic lymphoma.
`
`PMR/PMC Development Template
`
`Last Updated 2/11/2014
`
`Page 2 of 4
`
`Reference ID: 3452288
`
`

`

`
`Required
` Observational pharmacoepidemiologic study
` Registry studies
` Primary safety study or clinical trial
` Pharmacogenetic or pharmacogenomic study or clinical trial if required to further assess safety
` Thorough Q-T clinical trial
` Nonclinical (animal) safety study (e.g., carcinogenicity, reproductive toxicology)
` Nonclinical study (laboratory resistance, receptor affinity, quality study related to safety)
` Pharmacokinetic studies or clinical trials
` Drug interaction or bioavailability studies or clinical trials
` Dosing trials
` Additional data or analysis required for a previously submitted or expected study/clinical trial
`(provide explanation)
`
` Meta-analysis or pooled analysis of previous studies/clinical trials
` Immunogenicity as a marker of safety
` Other (provide explanation)
`Confirmatory clinical trial under subpart H
`
`
`
`Agreed upon:
` Quality study without a safety endpoint (e.g., manufacturing, stability)
` Pharmacoepidemiologic study not related to safe drug use (e.g., natural history of disease, background
`rates of adverse events)
` Clinical trials primarily designed to further define efficacy (e.g., in another condition, different disease
`severity, or subgroup) that are NOT required under Subpart H/E
` Dose-response study or clinical trial performed for effectiveness
` Nonclinical study, not safety-related (specify)
`
` Other
`
`
`
`5. Is the PMR/PMC clear, feasible, and appropriate?
` Does the study/clinical trial meet criteria for PMRs or PMCs?
` Are the objectives clear from the description of the PMR/PMC?
` Has the applicant adequately justified the choice of schedule milestone dates?
` Has the applicant had sufficient time to review the PMRs/PMCs, ask questions, determine feasibility,
`and contribute to the development process?
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Check if this form describes a FDAAA PMR that is a randomized controlled clinical trial
`
`If so, does the clinical trial meet the following criteria?
`
` There is a significant question about the public health risks of an approved drug
` There is not enough existing information to assess these risks
` Information cannot be gained through a different kind of investigation
` The trial will be appropriately designed to answer question about a drug’s efficacy and safety, and
` The trial will emphasize risk minimization for participants as the protocol is developed
`
`PMR/PMC Development Template
`
`Last Updated 2/11/2014
`
`Page 3 of 4
`
`Reference ID: 3452288
`
`

`

`PMR/PMC Development Coordinator:
` This PMR/PMC has been reviewed for clarity and consistency, and is necessary to further refine the
`safety, efficacy, or optimal use of a drug, or to ensure consistency and reliability of drug quality.
`
`
`RCK_______________________________________
`(signature line for BLAs)
`
`PMR/PMC Development Template
`
`Last Updated 2/11/2014
`
`Page 4 of 4
`
`Reference ID: 3452288
`
`

`

`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed
`electronically and this page is the manifestation of the electronic
`signature.
`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`/s/
`----------------------------------------------------
`
`DIANE C HANNER
`02/11/2014
`
`ROBERT C KANE
`02/11/2014
`
`Reference ID: 3452288
`
`

`

`PMR/PMC Development Template PMR 2122-1:
`
`
`This template should be completed by the PMR/PMC Development Coordinator and included for each
`PMR/PMC in the Action Package.
`
`
`NDA#
`Product Name:
`
`PMR Description:
`
`205552
`IMBRUVICA, PCI-32765 (ibrutinib) capsules,140 mg
`
`Submit the results of the completed randomized, open-label Phase 3
`clinical trial (PCYC-1112-CA) of ibrutinib versus ofatumumab in
`patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia or
`relapsed or refractory small lymphocytic lymphoma. Enrollment of 391
`patients was completed. The primary endpoint is progression-free
`survival as assessed by an Independent Review Committee.
`
`
`Final Protocol Submission:
`
` Completed (January 2014)
`
`
`
`PMR Schedule
`Milestones:
` Completed (January 2014 )
`Trial Completion:
`
`
`June 2014
`Final Report Submission:
`
`1. During application review, explain why this issue is appropriate for a PMR/PMC instead of a pre-approval
`requirement. Check type below and describe.
` Unmet need
` Life-threatening condition
` Long-term data needed
` Only feasible to conduct post-approval
` Prior clinical experience indicates safety
` Small subpopulation affected
` Theoretical concern
` Other
`
`
`
`Relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a life-threatening condition. Although
`most patients who undergo chemotherapy for CLL achieve an initial response, disease relapse invariably
`occurs. The median progression free-survival varies according the subsequent treatment regimen, with
`reported median PFS for FCR, FR, and single-agent fludarabine of 52 months, 42 months, and 18 months,
`respectively.
`
`In the single-arm clinical trial PCYC-1102-CA, the applicant reports a 58% overall response rate in 48
`patients with relapsed or refractory CLL. The duration of response ranged from 5.6 to 24.2+ months. The
`median DOR was not reached.
`
`
`2. Describe the particular review issue and the goal of the study/clinical trial. If the study/clinical trial is a
`FDAAA PMR, describe the risk. If the FDAAA PMR is created post-approval, describe the “new safety
`information.”
`
`PMR/PMC Development Template
`
`Last Updated 2/11/2014
`
`Page 1 of 4
`
`Reference ID: 3452285
`
`

`

`The Agency has previously accepted overall response rates supported by duration of response from a
`single-arm clinical trial as a basis for initial approval.
`
`The goal for this PMR would be to obtain long-term efficacy outcomes including progression-free survival
`from a randomized clinical trial. Time-to-event endpoints cannot be adequately interpreted in single-arm
`clinical trials due to confounding effects of the natural history of the disease.
`
`3. If the study/clinical trial is a PMR, check the applicable regulation.
`If not a PMR, skip to 4.
`- Which regulation?
` Accelerated Approval (subpart H)
` Animal Efficacy Rule
` Pediatric Research Equity Act
` FDAAA required safety study/clinical trial
`
`
`
`- If the PMR is a FDAAA safety study/clinical trial, does it: (check all that apply)
` Assess a known serious risk related to the use of the drug?
` Assess signals of serious risk related to the use of the drug?
` Identify an unexpected serious risk when available data indicate the potential for a serious risk?
`
`
`- If the PMR is a FDAAA safety study/clinical trial, will it be conducted as:
` Analysis of spontaneous postmarketing adverse events?
`Do not select the above study/clinical trial type if: such an analysis will not be sufficient to assess
`or identify a serious risk
`
`
`
` Analysis using pharmacovigilance system?
`Do not select the above study/clinical trial type if: the new pharmacovigilance system that the FDA
`is required to establish under section 505(k)(3) has not yet been established and is thus not sufficient
`to assess this known serious risk, or has been established but is nevertheless not sufficient to assess
`or identify a serious risk
`
` Study: all other investigations, such as investigations in humans that are not clinical trials as defined
`below (e.g., observational epidemiologic studies), animal studies, and laboratory experiments?
`Do not select the above study type if: a study will not be sufficient to identify or assess a serious
`risk
`
`
`
`
`
` Clinical trial: any prospective investigation in which the sponsor or investigator determines the
`method of assigning investigational product or other interventions to one or more human subjects?
`4. What type of study or clinical trial is required or agreed upon (describe and check type below)? If the study
`or trial will be performed in a subpopulation, list here.
`Required: Submit the clinical study report and data from the recently completed, randomized,
`open-label Phase 3 clinical trial (PCYC-1112-CA) of ibrutinib versus ofatumumab in patients
`with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia or relapsed or refractory small
`lymphocytic lymphoma.
`
`
`
`PMR/PMC Development Template
`
`Last Updated 2/11/2014
`
`Page 2 of 4
`
`Reference ID: 3452285
`
`

`

`Required
` Observational pharmacoepidemiologic study
` Registry studies
` Primary safety study or clinical trial
` Pharmacogenetic or pharmacogenomic study or clinical trial if required to further assess safety
` Thorough Q-T clinical trial
` Nonclinical (animal) safety study (e.g., carcinogenicity, reproductive toxicology)
` Nonclinical study (laboratory resistance, receptor affinity, quality study related to safety)
` Pharmacokinetic studies or clinical trials
` Drug interaction or bioavailability studies or clinical trials
` Dosing trials
` Additional data or analysis required for a previously submitted or expected study/clinical trial
`(provide explanation)
`
` Meta-analysis or pooled analysis of previous studies/clinical trials
` Immunogenicity as a marker of safety
` Other (provide explanation)
`Confirmatory clinical trial under subpart H
`
`
`
`Agreed upon:
` Quality study without a safety endpoint (e.g., manufacturing, stability)
` Pharmacoepidemiologic study not related to safe drug use (e.g., natural history of disease, background
`rates of adverse events)
` Clinical trials primarily designed to further define efficacy (e.g., in another condition, different disease
`severity, or subgroup) that are NOT required under Subpart H/E
` Dose-response study or clinical trial performed for effectiveness
` Nonclinical study, not safety-related (specify)
`
` Other
`
`
`
`5. Is the PMR/PMC clear, feasible, and appropriate?
` Does the study/clinical trial meet criteria for PMRs or PMCs?
` Are the objectives clear from the description of the PMR/PMC?
` Has the applicant adequately justified the choice of schedule milestone dates?
` Has the applicant had sufficient time to review the PMRs/PMCs, ask questions, determine feasibility,
`and contribute to the development process?
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Check if this form describes a FDAAA PMR that is a randomized controlled clinical trial
`
`If so, does the clinical trial meet the following criteria?
`
` There is a significant question about the public health risks of an approved drug
` There is not enough existing information to assess these risks
` Information cannot be gained through a different kind of investigation
` The trial will be appropriately designed to answer question about a drug’s efficacy and safety, and
` The trial will emphasize risk minimization for participants as the protocol is developed
`
`
`PMR/PMC Development Coordinator:
`
`PMR/PMC Development Template
`
`Last Updated 2/11/2014
`
`Page 3 of 4
`
`Reference ID: 3452285
`
`

`

` This PMR/PMC has been reviewed for clarity and consistency, and is necessary to further refine the
`safety, efficacy, or optimal use of a drug, or to ensure consistency and reliability of drug quality.
`
`
`RCK_______________________________________
`(signature line for BLAs)
`
`PMR/PMC Development Template
`
`Last Updated 2/11/2014
`
`Page 4 of 4
`
`Reference ID: 3452285
`
`

`

`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed
`electronically and this page is the manifestation of the electronic
`signature.
`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`/s/
`----------------------------------------------------
`
`DIANE C HANNER
`02/11/2014
`
`ROBERT C KANE
`02/11/2014
`
`Reference ID: 3452285
`
`

`

`REGULATORY PROJECT MANAGER LABELING REVIEW
`Division of Hematology Products (DHP)
`
`
`
`Application: 205552-Original #2
`
`Name of Drug: Imbruvica® (ibrutinib) capsules, 140 mg.
`
`Applicant: Pharmacyclics, Inc.
`
`Labeling Reviewed
`
`
`Submission Date: January 9, 2014
`
`
`Receipt Date: January 9, 2014
`
`
`
`
`Background and Summary Description:
`
`The NDA 205552-Original #1 was approved on November 13, 2013, for Mantle Cell Lymphoma
`(MCL) that has received at least one prior therapy.
`The NDA was initially received on June 28, 2013, and it was split on October 11, 2013, in order
`to accommodate taking an earlier action on Original #1 Mantle Cell Lymphoma.
`
`This new drug application – Original #2 provides for the use of Imbruvica® (ibrutinib) capsules,
`140 mg for the treatment of patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) that have
`received at least one prior therapy.
`
`
`Review
`
`
`This review is based on the applicant’s submitted word format of the PI. The proposed PI was
`compared to the (11/13/13) Mantle Cell Lymphoma –Original #1 currently approved PI. This was
`done to ensure that all the changes were shown as track changes to allow for an appropriate review
`of the PI. The following changes have been identified as follows: Deletions are shown as
`strikeouts and additions are shown as double underlines. The following revisions were noted.
`
`The labeling meetings for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) –Original #2 have been
`scheduled for January 16, 23, 27, and February 4, 2014, at which time the clinical team will be
`reviewing the PI.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 3446667
`
`26 Page(s) of Draft Labeling have been Withheld in Full as b4 (CCI/
`TS) immediately following this page
`
`

`

`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed
`electronically and this page is the manifestation of the electronic
`signature.
`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`/s/
`----------------------------------------------------
`
`DIANE C HANNER
`02/04/2014
`
`MONSURAT O AKINSANYA
`02/04/2014
`
`Reference ID: 3446667
`
`

`

`Department of Health and Human Services
`Public Health Service
`Food and Drug Administration
`Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
`Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology
`
`Pharmacovigilance Memo
`
`January 31, 2014
`
`Tracy Salaam, PharmD
`Division of Pharmacovigilance II (DPV II)
`
`Scott Proestel, MD
`DPV II
`
`Imbruvica (ibrutinib)
`
`CLL Indication and PMR 2060-4
`
`NDA 205552
`
`Pharmacyclics, Inc.
`
`2014-281
`
`Date:
`
`Team Leader:
`
`
`Division Director:
`
`
`Product Name:
`
`Subject:
`
`Application Type/Number:
`
`Applicant/Sponsor:
`
`OSE RCM #:
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 3445997
`
`

`

`
`
`1
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`The Division of Pharmacovigilance II (DPV II) was asked by the Division of Hematology
`Products (DHP) to provide a memo regarding whether DPV recommends applying the
`postmarketing requirement (PMR) 2060-4, approved under the mantle cell lymphoma (MCL)
`indication for Imbruvica (ibrutinib), to the proposed indication of chronic lymphocytic leukemia
`(CLL), which is presently under review by FDA.
`
`1.1 BACKGROUND
`
`Imbruvica is a Bruton's kinase inhibitor indicated for the treatment of patients with MCL who
`have received at least one prior therapy.1 Imbruvica was FDA-approved November 13, 2013
`under Fast Track designation, priority review, and accelerated approval, as a first-in-class
`breakthrough therapy with orphan drug status.
`
`In the approval letter, FDA determined that among other postmarketing requirements (PMRs),
`the sponsor was required to conduct the following2:
`
`
`PMR 2060-4
`Conduct an assessment and an analysis of data from clinical trials and all post-
`marketing sources in order to characterize the risk of serious bleeding in patients treated
`with Imbruvica®,(ibrutinib) Capsules. The risks of special interest are major
`hemorrhagic events and their potential association with concomitant use of anti-platelet
`and/or anticoagulant drugs. Major hemorrhagic events are defined as any one of the
`following:
`
`
`I. Symptomatic bleeding in a critical area or organ, such as intracranial,
`intraspinal, intraocular, retroperitoneal, intra-articular or pericardial, or
`intramuscular with compartment syndrome,
`
`II. Bleeding causing a fall in hemoglobin level of 20 g/L or more, or leading to
`transfusion of two or more units of whole blood or red cells,
`
`III. Bleeding resulting in a serious adverse drug experience [as per 21 CFR
`314.80(a)]
`
`
`This enhanced pharmacovigilance study will include:
`
`1. Targeted and expedited surveillance with a guided collection form (as referenced in
`Pharmacyclics’ Pharmacovigilance Plan dated August 23, 2013) to obtain additional
`salient clinical and diagnostic information related to major hemorrhagic events.
`
`2. Submission of Post-marketing 15-day Alert Reports for all initial and follow-up reports
`of serious hemorrhagic adverse events from clinical trials and all post-marketing
`sources, including consumer reports, solicited reports, and foreign reports, utilizing the
`
`Reference ID: 3445997
`
`2
`
`

`

`
`
`Standardized Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) Query (SMQ) –
`Haemorrhages.
`
`3. Submission of interval and cumulative analyses, as well as line listing for all major
`hemorrhagic events (utilizing the SMQ Haemorrhages) from clinical trials and all
`postmarketing sources, including consumer reports, solicited reports, and foreign
`reports.
`
`4. The interval and cumulative analyses should assess potential risk factors for
`cumulative major hemorrhagic events identified from both clinical trials and all
`postmarketing sources, and an overall assessment about these events in patients treated
`with Imbruvica® (ibrutinib) Capsules. In the overall assessment, discuss whether the
`data warrants further detailed assessment, labeling changes and/or other communication
`about these adverse events.
`
`Continue the study for a period of four years from the date of final protocol submission
`as noted below. Prior to starting the study, submit for FDA review, a protocol describing
`how you will conduct the study and report results, according to the timeline below.
`
`The timetable you submitted on November 13, 2013, states that you will conduct this
`study according to the following schedule:
`Draft Protocol Submission: 03/2014
`Final Protocol Submission: 06/2014
`#1 Interim Report Submission 12/2014
`#2 Interim Report Submission 06/2015
`#3 Interim Report Submission 12/2015
`#4 Interim Report Submission 06/2016
`#5 Interim Report Submission 12/2016
`#6 Interim Report Submission 06/2017
`#7 Interim Report Submission 12/2017
`Study Completion: 06/2018
`Final Report Submission: 11/2018
`
`2 RECOMMENDATION
`
`DPV II recommends applying the Imbruvica (ibrutinib) PMR 2060-4, approved under the mantle
`cell lymphoma (MCL) indication, to the proposed indication of CLL.
`
` 3
`
` REFERENCES
`
` 1
`
` Imbruvica (ibrutinib) [package insert]. Pharmacyclics, Inc. Sunnyvale, CA. Label issued November 2013.
`2 Imbruvica (ibrutinib) Pazdur R. Approval Letter. DHHS, dated November 13, 2013. Accessed January 28, 2014 at
`http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/drugsatfda/index.cfm?fuseaction=Search.Label ApprovalHistory#labeli
`nfo
`
`
`Reference ID: 3445997
`
`3
`
`

`

`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed
`electronically and this page is the manifestation of the electronic
`signature.
`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`/s/
`----------------------------------------------------
`
`TRACY M SALAAM
`01/31/2014
`
`SCOTT E PROESTEL
`01/31/2014
`
`Reference ID: 3445997
`
`

`

`
`Date:
`
`To:
`
`
`Through:
`
`
`From:
`
`Department of Health and Human Services
`Public Health Service
`Food and Drug Administration
`Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
`Office of Medical Policy
`
`PATIENT LABELING REVIEW
`
`January 22, 2014
`
`Ann Farrell, MD
`Director
`Division of Hematology Products (DHP)
`Robert Kane, MD
`Deputy Director for Safety
`Division of Hematology Products (DHP)
`
`LaShawn Griffiths, MSHS-PH, BSN, RN
`Associate Director for Patient Labeling
`Division of Medical Policy Programs (DMPP)
`Barbara Fuller, RN, MSN, CWOCN
`Team Leader, Patient Labeling
`Division of Medical Policy Programs (DMPP)
`
`Karen Dowdy, RN, BSN
`Division of Medical Policy Programs (DMPP)
`Nisha Patel, PharmD
`Regulatory Review Officer
`Office of Prescription Drug Promotion (OPDP)
`Review of Patient Labeling: Patient Package Insert (PPI)
`
`Subject:
`
`IMBRUVICA (ibrutinib)
`Drug Name (established
`name):
`
`Dosage Form and Route: capsules, for oral use
`
`Application
`Type/Number:
`Applicant:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`NDA 205552
`
`Pharmacyclics, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 3439740
`
`

`

`INTRODUCTION
`On June 28, 2013, Pharmacyclics, Inc. submitted for the Agency’s review an original
`New Drug Application (NDA) 205552 for IMBRUVICA (ibrutinib) capsules, with
`the proposed indication for the treatment of patients with:
`• mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) who have received at least one prior therapy
`• chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) who have received at least one prior
`therapy
`On October 11, 2013, this NDA was administratively separated with the MCL
`indication identified as Original #1 and the CLL indication identified as Original #2.
`On November 13, 2013, IMBRUVICA (ibrutinib) capsules was approved with the
`indication for the treatment of patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) who have
`received at least one prior therapy.
`On January 10, 2014, DMPP and OPDP were consulted to review the PPI for the
`IMBRUVICA (ibrutinib) Original # 2 indication for the treatment of patients with
`chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) who have received at least one prior therapy.
`This collaborative review is written by the Division of Medical Policy Programs
`(DMPP) and the Office of Prescription Drug Promotion (OPDP) in response to the
`requests by the Division of Hematology Products (DHP) on January 10, 2014, for
`DMPP and OPDP to review the Applicant’s proposed Patient Package Insert (PPI)
`for IMBRUVICA (ibrutinib)

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket