throbber
CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND
`RESEARCH
`
`
`
`APPLICATION NUMBER:
`
`205552Orig2s000
`
`PHARMACOLOGY REVIEW(S)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`MEMORANDUM
`
`
`Imbruvica (ibrutinib)
`
`Date: August 21, 2013
`To: File for NDA 205552
`From: John K. Leighton, PhD, DABT
`
`Acting Director, Division of Hematology Oncology Toxicology
`
`Office of Hematology and Oncology Products
`
`
` I
`
` have examined pharmacology/toxicology supporting review for Imbruvica
`conducted by Drs. Lee, Chiu, Brower and Chang, and secondary memorandum
`and labeling provided by Dr. Saber. I concur with Dr. Saber’s conclusion that
`Imbruvica may be approved and that no additional nonclinical studies are needed
`for the proposed indication.
`
`Reference ID: 3360581
`
`

`

`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed
`electronically and this page is the manifestation of the electronic
`signature.
`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`/s/
`----------------------------------------------------
`
`JOHN K LEIGHTON
`08/21/2013
`
`Reference ID: 3360581
`
`

`

`MEMORANDUM
`
`
`Date:
`From:
`
`
`
`August 20, 2013
`Haleh Saber, Ph.D.
`Pharmacology/Toxicology Supervisor
`Division of Hematology Oncology Toxicology (DHOT)
`Office of Hematology and Oncology Products (OHOP)
`Re:
`Approvability for Pharmacology and Toxicology
`
`NDA:
`205552
`Drug:
`IMBRUVICA (ibrutinib) capsules
`Indications: treatment of patients with MCL who have received at least one prior
`therapy and treatment of patients with CLL who have received at least one
`prior therapy
`Pharmacyclics, Inc.
`
`Applicant:
`
`
`Ibrutinib is a small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor developed for the treatment of
`mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Ibrutinib
`inhibits Bruton tyrosine kinase (Btk), an enzyme in the B cell receptor (BCR) signaling
`pathway. Btk is involved in B-lymphocyte activation and in the maintenance of some B-
`cell malignancies. Based on an in vitro kinase assay conduced, ibrutinib can also inhibit
`Bmx/Etk, another member of this kinase family, the function of which is not fully
`understood. It can also inhibit EGFR, and some members of the SRC family of kinases
`(e.g. Hck and Yes); however, with up to 10 fold less activity. In xenograft and/ or cell
`culture studies, ibrutinib showed anti-cancer activity against cells derived from B-cell
`malignancies, including MCL and CLL lines. Ibrutinib inhibited the adhesion of MCL
`and CLL cells to fibronectin and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1),
`suggesting the potential for ibrutinib to affect the trafficking of B-cells.
`
`Pharmacology, safety pharmacology, pharmacokinetic/ADME (absorption, distribution,
`metabolism and excretion), and toxicology studies were conducted in in vitro systems
`and/or in animal species. Animal toxicology studies were conducted in appropriate
`species, using the administration route and dosing regimens that adequately addressed
`safety concerns in humans. Ibrutinib-related toxicities in rats and dogs included: GI
`toxicities (e.g. ulceration and inflammation), adverse findings in the lymphoid tissues
`(e.g. depletion, necrosis, and inflammation), and epidermal necrosis and exudate. Other
`findings with unknown association to treatment included muscle degeneration in the
`stomach, effects on bone (e.g. thinning of cortical bone), and pancreatic acinar atrophy/
`reduced zymogen granules.
`
`Transient lymphocytosis reported in patients treated with IMBRUVICA may be due to
`reduced homing of leukocytes as expected based on the pharmacology studies. GI, skin
`and musculoskeletal disorders have been reported in patients and are listed in the label.
`The ongoing studies in patients will provide additional information on the toxicities
`associated with ibrutinib.
`
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 3360258
`
`1
`
`

`

`Ibrutinib was not mutagenic or clastogenic when tested in the battery of genotoxicity
`studies. Several impurities were tested in the bacterial mutagenicity (Ames) assay and/or
`assessed for mutagenicity through SAR (structure- activity relationship) computational
`methods. The impurities were considered negative for mutagenicity. Ibrutinib caused
`fetal malformations in rats when given to pregnant animals during the period of
`organogenesis, at a maternally toxic dose. Pregnancy category D is recommended.
`
`Fertility studies using ibrutinib have not been conducted. The general toxicology studies
`in rats and dogs did not demonstrate adverse findings in male or female reproductive
`organs.
`
`The nonclinical studies needed to support product labeling were reviewed by Drs. Shwu-
`Luan Lee, Brian Chiu, Margaret Brower, and George Chang. The nonclinical findings
`are summarized in the “Executive Summary” of the NDA review and reflected in the
`product label.
`
`Recommendation: I concur with the pharmacology/toxicology reviewers that from a
`nonclinical perspective, IMBRUVICA may be approved and that no additional
`nonclinical studies are needed to support approval of IMBRUVICA for the proposed
`indications.
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 3360258
`
`2
`
`

`

`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed
`electronically and this page is the manifestation of the electronic
`signature.
`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`/s/
`----------------------------------------------------
`
`HALEH SABER
`08/20/2013
`
`Reference ID: 3360258
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
`PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE
`FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION
`CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH
`
`PHARMACOLOGY/TOXICOLOGY NDA REVIEW AND EVALUATION
`
`
`Application number:
`
`NDA 205552
`
`Supporting document/s:
`Applicant’s letter date:
`CDER stamp date:
`Product:
`Indication:
`
`Applicant:
`Review Division:
`
`Reviewer:
`
`Supervisor/Team Leader:
`Division Director:
`
`Project Manager:
`
`N-000
`May 31, 2013
`April 30, 2013
`Ibrutinib (Imbruvica)
`Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) and chronic
`lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), with at least one
`prior therapy
`Pharmacyclics, Inc.
`Division of Hematology and Oncology
`Toxicology (DHOT), for
`Division of Hematology Products (DHP)
`Shwu-Luan Lee, Ph.D., Haw-Jyh (Brian) Chiu,
`Ph.D., George Ching-Jey Chang, Ph.D.,
`Margaret E. Brower, Ph.D.
`Haleh Saber, Ph.D.
`John Leighton, Ph.D., DABT (DHOT)
`Ann Farrell, MD (DHP)
`CAPT Diane Hanner
`
`
`Disclaimer
`Except as specifically identified, all data and information discussed below and
`necessary for approval of NDA 205552 are owned by Pharmacyclics or are data for
`which Pharmacyclics has obtained a written right of reference.
`Any information or data necessary for approval of NDA 205552 that Pharmacyclics does
`not own or have a written right to reference constitutes one of the following: (1)
`published literature, or (2) a prior FDA finding of safety or effectiveness for a listed drug,
`as described in the drug’s approved labeling. Any data or information described or
`referenced below from a previously approved application that [name of applicant] does
`
`Reference ID: 3360071
`
`1
`
`

`

`
`
`not own (or from FDA reviews or summaries of a previously approved application) is for
`descriptive purposes only and is not relied upon for approval of NDA 205552.
`
`Reference ID: 3360071
`
`2
`
`

`

`NDA # 205552
`
`
`
`
`Reviewer: Lee, Brower, Chiu, Chang
`
`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`
` 1
`
` EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................... 7
`1.1 RECOMMENDATIONS............................................................................................ 7
`1.2
`BRIEF DISCUSSION OF NONCLINICAL FINDINGS ...................................................... 7
`2 DRUG INFORMATION .......................................................................................... 10
`
`3 STUDIES SUBMITTED.......................................................................................... 13
`
`4 PHARMACOLOGY................................................................................................ 17
`4.1
`PRIMARY PHARMACOLOGY................................................................................. 17
`4.2
`SECONDARY PHARMACOLOGY............................................................................ 31
`4.3
`SAFETY PHARMACOLOGY................................................................................... 32
`5 PHARMACOKINETICS/ADME/TOXICOKINETICS .............................................. 41
`5.1
`PK/ADME........................................................................................................ 41
`5.2
`TOXICOKINETICS ............................................................................................... 47
`6 GENERAL TOXICOLOGY..................................................................................... 47
`6.1
`SINGLE-DOSE TOXICITY..................................................................................... 47
`6.2 REPEAT-DOSE TOXICITY.................................................................................... 48
`7 GENETIC TOXICOLOGY ...................................................................................... 77
`7.1
`IN VITRO REVERSE MUTATION ASSAY IN BACTERIAL CELLS (AMES)....................... 77
`7.2
`IN VITRO ASSAYS IN MAMMALIAN CELLS.............................................................. 81
`7.3
`IN VIVO CLASTOGENICITY ASSAY IN RODENT (MICRONUCLEUS ASSAY).................. 95
`8 CARCINOGENICITY ........................................................................................... 120
`
`9 REPRODUCTIVE AND DEVELOPMENTAL TOXICOLOGY .............................. 120
`9.1
`FERTILITY AND EARLY EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT............................................. 120
`9.2
`EMBRYONIC FETAL DEVELOPMENT ................................................................... 120
`9.3
`PRENATAL AND POSTNATAL DEVELOPMENT....................................................... 132
`10
`SPECIAL TOXICOLOGY STUDIES................................................................. 132
`
`INTEGRATED SUMMARY AND SAFETY EVALUATION ......................................... 132
`
`APPENDIX/ATTACHMENTS........................................................................... 133
`
`12
`
`
`Reference ID: 3360071
`
`3
`
`

`

`NDA # 205552
`
`
`
`
`Reviewer: Lee, Brower, Chiu, Chang
`
`Table of Tables
`
`Table 1- Clinical formulation......................................................................................... 11
`Table 2- Summary of impurities/degradants in drug substance and drug product ....... 12
`Table 3- IC50 values of PCI-32765 vs. selected kinases ............................................... 18
`Table 4- Growth inhibition of B cell lymphoma derived cell lines by PCI-32765 ........... 25
`Table 5- Inhibition of radioligand binding to receptors by PCI-32765 (10 μM).............. 31
`Table 6- Mean percent inhibition at PCI-32765 concentrations tested ......................... 35
`Table 7- Mean percent inhibition at PCI-45227 concentrations.................................... 36
`Table 8- Protein binding ............................................................................................... 42
`Table 9- Summary of in vitro metabolites in humans and laboratory animals .............. 46
`Table 10- Observations and Results: 4-week study in rats .......................................... 49
`Table 11- Histological Findings: 4-week study in rats................................................... 50
`Table 12- Toxicokinetics: 4-week study in rats............................................................. 50
`Table 13- Body weight changes: 13-week study in rats .............................................. 53
`Table 14- Hematology parameters: 13-week study in rats ........................................... 54
`Table 15- Clinical chemistry parameters: 13-week study in rats ................................... 55
`Table 16- Histopathological findings: 13-week study in rats......................................... 56
`Table 17- Summary of toxicokinetic parameters in rats: PCI-32765 (ibrutinib) and
`metabolite PCI-45227.................................................................................................... 60
`Table 18- Observations and Results: 4-week study in dogs......................................... 63
`Table 19- Toxicokinetic parameters: 4-week study in dogs.......................................... 64
`Table 20- Study design of the 13-week study in dogs.................................................. 65
`Table 21- Cumulative weight changes (weight gains) in the 13-week study in dogs.... 66
`Table 22- Hematology parameters................................................................................ 68
`Table 23- Clinical chemistry parameters ....................................................................... 71
`Table 24- Histopathology ............................................................................................. 74
`Table 25- Toxicokinetics parameters of PCI-32765 and PCI-45227: 13-week study in
`dogs .............................................................................................................................. 75
`Table 26- Summary of results from definitive mutagenicity assays (Experiments B2 and
`B3) with PCI-32765 (Study No. 06-027-Sal-X-MU). ...................................................... 80
`Table 27- Summary of results from in vitro mammalian chromosomal aberration assay
`(Assay 2) with PCI-32765 [Lot No. SCR-182-77
`. (Study No. 07-038-CHO-
`X-MU)............................................................................................................................ 85
`Table 28- Summary of results from in vitro mammalian chromosomal aberration assay
`(Assay 3) with PCI-32765 [Lot No. SCR-182-77
`. (Study No. 07-038-CHO-
`X-MU)............................................................................................................................ 86
`Table 29- Summary of results from in vitro mammalian chromosomal aberration assay
`(Assay 4) with PCI-32765 (Lot No. 082032). (Study No. 07-038-CHO-X-MU). ............ 87
`Table 30- Historical control data: chromosome aberration in CHO cells ...................... 89
`Table 31- Preliminary toxicity assay............................................................................. 92
`Table 32- Group means of mitotic index and cytogenetic analysis............................... 92
`Table 33- Summary of study design in Study No. 07-037-M-PO-MU........................... 96
`Table 34- Summary of bone marrow micronucleus analysis following a single oral
`concentration of PCI-32765 in ICR mice in Study No. 07-037-M-PO-MU. .................... 98
`Table 35- Summary of toxicokinetic data in Study No. 07-037-M-PO-MU.................... 98
`
`Reference ID: 3360071
`
`4
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`
`
`Reviewer: Lee, Brower, Chiu, Chang
`
`NDA # 205552
`
` in the absence of S9
`Table 36- Summary of results from Ames Assay with
`activation (Study No. 11-113-Sal-X-MU). .................................................................... 102
`Table 37- Summary of results from Ames Assay with
` in the presence of S9
`activation (Study No. 11-113-Sal-X-MU). .................................................................... 104
`Table 38- Summary of results from Ames Assay (Experiment B3) with
` (Lot
`No. 758-47-2) in the absence of S9 activation (Study No. 11-098-Sal-Mu)................. 109
`Table 39- Summary of results from Ames Assay (Experiment B3) with
` (Lot
`No. 758-47-2) in the presence of S9 activation (Study No. 11-098-Sal-Mu)................ 111
`Table 40- Summary of results from Ames Assay (Experiment B4) with
` (Lot
`No. 758-47-2) in the presence of S9 activation (Study No. 11-098-Sal-Mu)................ 113
`Table 41- Summary of results from Ames Assay (Experiment B5) with
` (Lot
`No. RM758-188-1) in the presence of S9 activation (Study No. 11-098-Sal-Mu). ....... 114
`Table 42- Summary of results from Ames Assay (Experiment B6) with
` (Lot
`No. RM758-188-1) in the presence of S9 activation (Study No. 11-098-Sal-Mu). ....... 115
`Table 43- Group mean body weight change in dams:................................................ 123
`Table 44- Toxicokinetic parameters ........................................................................... 124
`Table 45- Terminal and necroscopic evaluations, Dams............................................ 125
`Table 46- Offspring: external, visceral and skeletal variations ................................... 126
`Table 47-Summary of study result: embryo-fetal development study in rabbits
`(concentration range finding study) ............................................................................. 130
`
`
`Reference ID: 3360071
`
`5
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`NDA # 205552
`
`
`
`
`Reviewer: Lee, Brower, Chiu, Chang
`
`Table of Figures
`
`Figure 1- Structure of ibrutinib (PCI-32765) ................................................................. 10
`Figure 2- Inhibition of B and T Cell Activation by PCI-32765........................................ 19
`Figure 3- Active-site occupancy of Btk by PCI-32765 in whole blood correlates with
`Inhibition of B cell activation .......................................................................................... 20
`Figure 4- Inhibition of growth and occupancy of Btk in ABC DLBCL cell lines ............. 21
`Figure 5- Inhibition of BCR-stimulated MCL cell line adhesion by ibrutinib .................. 22
`Figure 6- Inhibition of BCR-signaling, adhesion and migration in CLL cells ................. 23
`Figure 7- Tumor growth in SCID female mice bearing OCl-Ly10 administered vehicle or
`ibrutinib.......................................................................................................................... 27
`Figure 8- DOHH2 Tumor volume – time profiles in mice dosed with PCI-32765.......... 28
`Figure 9- DOHH2 Tumor volume – time profiles in mice dosed once daily (QD) or twice
`daily (BID) with PCI-32765 by oral gavage.................................................................... 28
`Figure 10- DLCL2 tumor volume – time profiles in mice dosed twice daily (BID) with.. 29
`Figure 11- hCD19+ Mino mantle cell counts in tissues ................................................ 30
`Figure 12- Reduction in peripheral CLL cells by ibrutinib treatment ............................. 31
`Figure 13- Concentration-response relationship and mean percent inhibition of hERG
`potassium current.......................................................................................................... 35
`Figure 14- Concentration-response relationship and mean percent inhibition of hERG
`potassium current following treatment of PCI-45227.................................................... 37
`Figure 15- Radiotelemetry data – Heart Rate............................................................... 39
`Figure 16- Radiotelemetry data – Heart Rate............................................................... 39
`Figure 17- Radiotelemetry data – QTcV Interval .......................................................... 40
`
`
`Reference ID: 3360071
`
`6
`
`

`

`NDA # 205552
`
`
`1
`
`Executive Summary
`
`
`
`Reviewer: Lee, Brower, Chiu, Chang
`
`1.1 Recommendations
`There are no pharmacology/toxicology issues which preclude approval of Imbruvica for
`the proposed indication.
`
`1.1.1 Approvability
`
`Recommending approval
`
`1.1.2 Additional Non Clinical Recommendations
`
`No additional non-clinical studies are required for the proposed indications.
`
`1.1.3 Labeling
`
`Recommendations on labeling have been provided within team meetings and
`communicated to the Applicant. See the approved label.
`
`1.2 Brief Discussion of Nonclinical Findings
`
`Ibrutinib (PCI-32765) is an irreversible inhibitor of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (Btk); it binds
`covalently to a cysteine in the active site of Btk. The IC50 of ibrutinib was 0.46 nM in the
`in vitro kinase assay. Ibrutinib may also inhibit Bmx/Etk, another member of this
`tyrosine kinase family as indicated by the IC50 of 0.76 nM and B lymphocyte kinase,
`BLK (IC50= 0.52 nM). The following kinases were inhibited by ibrutinib with IC50s up to 4
`nM: CSK, FGR, Brk, and HCK. Ibrutinib showed anticancer activity against B cell tumor
`cells in cell culture or xenograft studies. The tumor cells tested included mantle cell
`lymphoma (e.g. MINO), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (TCL1-192, a line of murine
`leukemia cells), non-Hodgkin lymphoma/follicular lymphoma (e.g. DOHH2), and diffuse
`large B-cell lymphoma (e.g. OCI-LY10) cell lines.
`
`Ibrutinib inhibited the adhesion of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) and chronic lymphocytic
`leukemia (CLL) cell lines as well as the normal B cells to fibronectin and vascular cell
`adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1). Therefore, ibrutinib may affect the trafficking and
`localization of leukocytes; this effect may explain lymphocytosis reported in patients
`treated with ibrutinib.
`
`Ibrutinib inhibited hERG channel currents with an IC50 value of approximately 1 μM and
`may be considered a low-potency blocker. In a single-dose safety pharmacology study in
`Beagle dogs, an oral ibrutinib dose up to 150 mg/kg did not induce QT interval
`prolongation; increases in the RR interval were observed. Dose-dependent RR interval
`prolongation and decreased heart rate was reported in dogs in the 13-week toxicology
`
`Reference ID: 3360071
`
`7
`
`

`

`
`
`Reviewer: Lee, Brower, Chiu, Chang
`
`NDA # 205552
`
`study during Weeks 1 and 12. The effect occurred at 1 hour post-dose. One of the major
`metabolites of PCI-32765, PCI-45227, inhibited hERG channel currents with an IC50 value
`of 9.6 μM, i.e. ten fold less potency for blocking the Ikr current compared to the parent drug.
`QTc prolongation was not reported in patients treated with ibrutinib.
`
`The ADME studies were not reviewed; however, based on the summary information
`provided by the Applicant, orally administered ibrutinib was absorbed fairly rapidly (tmax
`of ~ 5 min-2.5 hr in rats and 0.5-4 hr in dogs), with variable oral bioavailability (~7% to
`23%) in animal species. Ibrutinib was highly bound to plasma proteins in all species
`tested (96-99%): mouse, rat, rabbit, dog, and human plasma. Following an oral dose of
`14C-ibrutinib in Long Evans male rats, radioactivity was high in the following tissues and
`organs: small intestine, esophagus, liver, urinary bladder, and kidney. Ibrutinib-derived
`radioactivity was not detectable in tissues of the central nervous system with the
`exception of the olfactory lobe, indicating a limited ability of ibrutinib and/or its
`metabolites to cross the blood-brain barrier in rats. The distribution in the milk of
`lactating rats was not investigated. There was no clear difference in the distribution of
`radioactivity in the pigmented tissues when compared to the non-pigmented tissues, in
`treated rats. A total of 41 metabolites were identified in the in vitro or in vivo studies.
`The main circulating metabolites in rat plasma were M15, M5 and M37 (PCI-45227).
`Following oral doses of 14C ibrutinib in rats, up to 47% of the radioactivity was excreted
`in bile, with M21 (a sulfate conjugate of M35) as the main metabolite. While very low
`radioactivity was found in urine (<2% of the dose), the main metabolites in feces were
`M34, M35 and M17 (approximately 8-16% of the dose). In human liver microsomes,
`ibrutinib was predominantly metabolized by CYP3A4/5. The primary route of elimination
`of ibrutinib was via feces (hepatobiliary) in animals. Accumulations of ibrutinib and one
`of its major metabolites, PCI-45227 (M37), occurred following repeated oral doses of
`ibrutinib in both rats and dogs.
`
`The general toxicology studies in rats and dogs identified GI tract, lymphoid tissues, bone
`and skin as the main target of toxicities. The major findings are as follows:
`
` •
`
` Gastro-intestinal tract:
`The most prominent effect of ibrutinib in rats and dogs was dose-dependent GI
`toxicities. The toxicities were observed following multiple oral administrations of the
`drug, and were considered the cause of mortalities in the rat (acute inflammation and
`ulceration of the small intestines) and the dog (enterocolitis). GI histopathology findings
`included atrophy of squamous epithelium with progression to ulceration in the
`nonglandular stomach, acute inflammation and ulceration of the intestinal tract, as well
`as muscle degeneration in the stomach.
`• Hematopoietic/lymphoid system:
`Findings included increased white blood cells and differentials (which may be due to
`ulceration/necrosis and inflammation reported in various tissues or may be due to
`reduced homing of B cells); lesions in lymphoid tissues; lymphoid depletion;
`inflammation, necrosis, and atrophy in lymph nodes, spleen, as well as thymus.
`Immunophenotyping incorporated into the 13-week study in rats indicated lower
`absolute B cells and increased T- and natural killer cells in peripheral blood.
`
`Reference ID: 3360071
`
`8
`
`

`

`
`
`Reviewer: Lee, Brower, Chiu, Chang
`
`NDA # 205552
`
`• Skin
`In rats, epidermal necrosis, surface exudate, dermal abscess, and acute and
`subacute inflammation were observed at the end of a 4-week treatment; squamous
`atrophy of epithelium was noted at the end of the 13-week study. There were no
`remarkable findings in the skin of dogs.
`• Liver
`Hepatotoxicity was evident in rats in the 4-week study, as shown by increased ALTAST
`and hepatic necrosis. Liver toxicities were not observed in the 13-week study in rats or
`in studies in dogs.
`• Bone
`Minimal to mild decreases in cortical and trabecular bones were found in rats treated for
`13 weeks.
`• Other target organs:
`Acinar atrophy and decrease in zymogen granules in pancreas was observed in rats.
`Bilateral corneal dystrophy/degeneration (opacity of the cornea) was found in dogs
`treated with ibrutinib for 4 weeks and in one dog in the 13-week study. The association
`of these findings to the ibrutinib treatment is unclear.
`
`
`
`
`Ibrutinib was not mutagenic in bacterial Ames test or clastogenic in a chromosome
`aberration test in Chinese Hamster Ovary cells (CHO). Ibrutinib did not increase
`micronucleus formation in mice after oral doses up to 2000 mg/kg. The mutagenicity of
`impurities was assessed through Ames test or by 2 computational SAR analyses (DEREK
`Nexus and MultiCase). The impurities tested were not mutagenic.
`
`Reproductive and developmental toxicities of ibrutinib were investigated in rats and rabbits.
`Ibrutinib was administered orally to pregnant rats during the period of organogenesis at
`doses of 10, 40 and 80 mg/kg/day. Increased post-implantation loss and increased
`resorption occurred at the high dose of 80 mg/kg. Fetal toxicities (visceral malformations and
`variations, and skeletal variations) were observed at the high dose of 80 mg/kg. Reduced
`fetal weight was seen at ibrutinib doses at 40 mg/kg and 80 mg/kg. The dose of 80 mg/kg
`resulted in maternal toxicities. The dose of 80 mg/kg/day in animals resulted in exposures
`(total AUC) approximately 14 times the AUC in patients with MCL (ibrutinib dose of 560
`mg/day) and 20 times the AUC in patients with CLL (ibrutinib dose of 420 mg/day). The
`exposure at 40 mg/kg/day was approximately 6 times the AUC in patients with MCL and 8
`times the AUC in patients with CLL.
`
`In a non-GLP study conducted in rabbits, ibrutinib was administered orally to pregnant
`animals during the period of organogenesis at doses of 10, 30, and 100 mg/kg/day. At the
`ibrutinib dose of 100 mg/kg, which is greater than the maternally-toxic dose (≥30
`mg/kg/day), there were embryo-fetal toxicities. Findings included increases in resorption
`and implantation loss, decreases in viable fetuses and fetal body weights, as well as
`spontaneous abortions.
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 3360071
`
`9
`
`

`

`
`
`Reviewer: Lee, Brower, Chiu, Chang
`
`NDA # 205552
`
`Ibrutinib did not cause adverse findings in male or female reproductive organs in
`general toxicology studies. Testicular seminiferous tubule degeneration was found in
`one dog that was treated with 220 mg/kg of ibrutinib and sacrificed early due to poor
`conditions. This finding was possibly an indirect effect of ibrutinib due to the poor
`condition of the animal.
`
`2
`
`Drug Information
`
`2.1 Drug
`
`2.1.1 CAS Registry Number
`
` 936563-96-12.1.2
`
`Generic Name
`
`Ibrutinib
`
`2.1.3 Code Name
`
`PCI-32765-00
`
`2.1.4 Chemical Name
`
`R enantiomer of 1-[3-[4-amino-3-(4-phenoxyphenyl)-1H-pyrazolo[3,4-
`d]pyrimidin-1-yl]-1-piperidinyl]-2-propen-1-one (free base)
`
`2.1.5 Molecular Formula/Molecular Weight
`
`C25H24N6O2/440.5 g/mol
`
`2.1.6 Structure
`
`Figure 1- Structure of ibrutinib (PCI-32765)
`
`
`
`10
`
`Reference ID: 3360071
`
`

`

`NDA # 205552
`
`Reviewer: Lee, Brower, Chiu, Chang
`
`POI-32765 is an R—enantiomeric chiral compound.
`
`2.1.7 Pharmacologic class
`
`Kinase inhibitor
`
`Mechanism of action: Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor
`
`2.2 Relevant IND/s, NDA/s, and DMF/s
`
`IND 102688; DMF W"
`
`2.3 Clinical Formulation
`
`2.3.1 Drug Formulation
`
`Table 1- Clinical formulation
`
`(Table from the Applicant, eCTD Module 3, Sction 3.2.P.1)
`Component
`Quality Reference
`Function
`
`Ibrutinib
`
`In house specification
`
`Active
`pharmaceutical agent
`
`Microcrystalline cellulose
`Croscarmellose sodium
`Sodium lauryl sulfate
`Magnesium .stearateh
`Size 0, white, opaque, hard gelatin
`capsule with black “ibr 140 mg"
`Print °
`
`NF. Ph. Eur, JP
`NF, Ph. Eur, JP
`NR Ph. Eur” JP
`NF, Ph. Eur, JP
`In house specification
`
`Quantityx’Unit Dose
`(mg/capsule)
`140 '
`
`00(4)
`
`Capsule shell
`
`1 capsule
`
`Total
`330.0
`mm mm—
`M‘" with a corresponding adjustment to the microcrystalline cellulose quantity.
`b
`(b) (4)
`
`‘ Capsules are composed of gelatin, NF. Ph. Eur. and titanium dioxide, USPtPhEurI'JP; the capsule shells are
`printed with
`“’m’printing inks (see Table 2 and Table 3 for ink
`compositions).
`
`2.3.2 Comments on Novel Excipients
`
`None. All excipients are USP or NF grade.
`
`mglcapsule is
`Reviewer’s note: the amount of microcrystalline cellulose, i.e.,
`within the range of FDA approved drug for this excipient in hard gelatin capsule (up to
`“mmg/capsule).
`
`(II) (4)
`
`Reference ID: 3360071
`
`1 1
`
`

`

`NDA # 205552
`
`2.3.3 Comments on Impurities/Degradants of Concern
`
`
`
`Reviewer: Lee, Brower, Chiu, Chang
`
`There are five impurities in the drug substance at levels higher than the qualification
`threshold described in ICH Q3A. Among them,
` and
` were also
`degradants found in the drug product (DP). However, the contents in the DP were
`below qualification threshold. All impurities above the qualification threshold of ICH
`Q3A were assessed for genotoxicity. Genotoxicity assessment was also done for
`impurities
` and
` which were below qualification threshold. The table
`below is the summary of safety assessment conducted for the impurities of concern:
`
`
`Table 2- Summary of impurities/degradants in drug substance and drug product
`Impurity
`Description
`Specification (NMT % w/w)
`Comment
`(ID #)
`
`Actual DS Impurity -
`Synthesis impurity
`
`
`
`Actual DS Impurity Synthesis
`Impurity Degradation product
`
`Actual DS impurity - Synthesis
`impurity
`
`
`Actual DS Impurity Synthesis
`impurity
` Degradation
`product
`
`Actual DS Impurity Degradation
`product
`(ibrutinib dimer)
`
`Potential DS Impurity* Carryover
`impurity from starting material
`
`Potential DS Impurity* Synthesis
`impurity
` Degradation
`product
`DS: drug substance; DP: drug product
`
`Reviewer’s note:
`The proposed specification limits (% w/w) of impurities
`acceptable, according to ICH guidance S9.
`
`Reference ID: 3360071
`
`12
`
`• Derek and MultiCase
`were conducted. The
`impurity is considered
`negative for
`mutagenicity
`
`• Qualified in a general
`toxicity study
`• Ames negative
`
`• Qualified in a general
`toxicity study
`• Ames negative;
`• A general toxicity: study
`with this impurity is
`ongoing
`• Derek and MultiCase:
`were conducted. The
`impurity is considered
`negative for
`mutagenicity
`• A general toxicity: study
`with this impurity is
`ongoing
`• Derek and MultiCase:
`were conducted. The
`impurity is considered
`negative for
`mutagenicity
`• Below qualification
`threshold
`• Ames negative
`• Below qualification
`threshold
`• Ames negative
`
` and
`
` are
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b)

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket