throbber
CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND
`RESEARCH
`
`APPLICA TION NUMBER.-
`
`22-387
`
`PHARMACOLOGY REVIEW! S)
`
`

`

`PHARMACOLOGY/TOXICOLOGY REVIEW AND EVALUATION
`
`NDA NUMBER:
`
`22—387
`
`DATE RECEIVED BY CENTER:
`
`6/3 0/2008
`
`PRODUCT:
`
`INTENDED CLINICAL POPULATION:
`
`TyvasoTM (treprostinil sodium) Inhalation
`Solution (0.6 mg/ml)
`
`Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH)
`patients with NYHA Class III r.‘
`symptoms
`
`31(4)
`
`SPONSOR:
`
`REVIEW DIVISION:
`
`United Therapeutics Corporation,
`. Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
`
`Division of Cardiovascular and Renal
`Products
`
`PHARM/TOX REVIEWER:
`
`Xavier Joseph
`
`PHARM/TOX SUPERVISOR:
`
`Charles A. Resnick
`
`DIVISION DIRECTOR:
`
`Norman Stockbridge
`
`PROJECT MANAGER:
`
`Dan Brum
`
`

`

`NDA 22—387
`
`2
`
`REVIEW AND EVALUATION OF PHARMACOLOGY
`AND TOXICOLOGY DATA
`
`Xavier Joseph, D.V.M.
`March 23, 2009
`
`ORIGINAL NDA DATED: June 26, 2008
`CENTER RECEIPT DATE: June 30, 2008
`REVIEWER RECEIPT DATE: July 7, 2008
`
`SPONSOR: United Therapeutics Corporation
`One Park Drive
`
`Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
`
`DRUG PRODUCT:
`
`Trade name - TyvasoTM Inhalation Solution
`
`DRUG SUBSTANCE: Generic name — treprostinil sodium
`Code names — UT-15, LRX-IS and 15AU81
`
`Chemical Structure
`
`.0“.
`
`
`
`
`Cl'iHHOS
`Moi. Wt: 390.52
`
`1:: mo};
`
`FORMULATION: TyvasoTM Inhalation Solution contains 0.6 mg treprostinil/ml,
`sodium chloride, sodium citrate (dihydrate), 1N hydrochloric acid, sodium hydroxide and
`water for injection. (1N sodium hydroxide is used for adjusting the pH of the product.)
`The sodium salt of treprostinil, the active ingredient, is formed during the drug product
`
`manufacturing procedure. Treprostinil inhalation solution (2.9 ml) is
`7
`‘
`'
`’1 packaged into
`f...
`ampoules.
`[Remodulin® (treprostinil sodium)
`Injection, the marketed product, has the same formulation as Tyvaso except for the
`
`
`hm)
`
`MODE OF ADMINISTRATION: Tyvaso is administered by oral inhalation using an
`Optineb-ir ultrasonic, pulsed delivery nebulizer; each pulse of Tyvaso contains 6 pg of
`treprostinil.
`
`

`

`NDA 22-387
`
`3
`
`PHARMACOLOGICAL CLASS: Prostacyclin (PGIz) analogue (vasodilator)
`
`PROPOSED INDICATIONS: For the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension
`(PAH)1n patients with NYHA Class III * symptoms
`
`33(4)
`
`PROPOSED DOSAGE REGIMEN: Treatment should be started with 3 breaths (18 pg
`of treprostinil) per treatment session given 4 times daily. If 3 breaths are not tolerated, the
`dose may be reduced to 1 or 2 breaths and later increased to 3 breaths as tolerated. The
`dosage should be increased to 6 breaths and subsequently to the target maintenance dose
`of 9 breaths (54 ug of treprostinil) per inhalation session given 4 times daily, as tolerated.
`The maximum dose studied in clinical trials was 12 breaths (72 pg of treprostinil) per
`inhalation session.
`
`IND UNDER WHICH CLINICAL TRIALS WERE CONDUCTED: IND 70,362 (for
`inhalation therapy of PAH patients)
`
`RELATED NDAs: United Therapeutics’ NDA 21-272 — Remodulin for the 30 treatment
`of PAH patients, and United Therapeutics’ NDA 21-272 SE3 — Remodulin for the iv
`treatment of PAH patients.
`
`

`

`NDA 22-387
`
`4
`
`EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
`
`TyvasoTM (treprostinil sodium for inhalation), a chemically stable tricyclic benzindene
`analogue of prostacyclin (PGIZ), with potent systemic and pulmonary vasodilatory as well
`as platelet antiaggregatory effects,
`is being developed for inhalation treatment of
`pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) patients. An injectable formulation of treprostinil
`sodium has been approved for marketing (Remodulin®) for the treatment of PAH patients
`either by continuous subcutaneous (so) or intravenous (iv) routes. Infusion site pain and
`reactions, and catheter—related infection or sepsis were reported to be the most common
`adverse events among patients treated 50 or iv with treprostinil. With inhalation therapy,
`by directly applying the drug at the primary site of manifestation of the condition, the
`adverse effects associated with sc or iv infusion can be avoided.
`
`1. Recommendations
`
`A. Recommendation on Approvability
`
`TyvasoTM is approvable from a nonclinical perspective.
`
`B. Recommendations for Additional Nonclinical Studies
`
`None
`
`C. Recommendations for Labeling
`
`l. Sponsor’s proposed text under section 8. USE IN SPECIFIC POPULATION, 8.1‘
`Pregnancy presently read as follows:
`
`Wax/r-
`
`33(4)
`
`We recommend that the above text be revised to read as follows:
`
`hi4}
`
`

`

`NDA 22-387
`
`5
`
`M4}
`
`M
`
`section 13. NONCLINICAL TOXICOLOGY, 13.1 Carcinogenesis,
`2. Under
`Mutagenesis, Impairment of Fertility, sponsor’s proposed text presently reads as
`follows:
`
`~24-.‘a.uum¢.ravob.wzw.Mm
`
`bid}
`
`“ ""' ""“"“c r -.._ '” ' “""'" " "‘ “"‘"" "' "" " " 'V"" r"‘" " "”"““D “'”" D"""""‘“ “”J "
`
`We recommend that the above text be revised to read as follows and to add a new
`
`section 13.3 on Developmental Toxicology.
`
`Long-term studies have not been performed to evaluate the carcinogenic potential of
`treprostinil. In vitro and in vivo genetic toxicology studies did not demonstrate any
`mutagenic or clastogenic effects of treprostinil. Treprostinil sodium did not ajfectfertility
`or mating performance of male or female rats given continuous subcutaneous (sc)
`infusions at rates of up to 450 ng treprostinil/kg/min [about 59 times the recommended
`starting human sc infusion rate (1.25 ng/kg/min) and 8 times the average rate (9.3
`ng/kg/min) achieved in clinical trials, on a ng/mZ basis.] In this study, males were dosed
`fiom 8 weeks prior to mating and through the 2-week mating period. Females were dosed
`from 2 weeks prior to mating until gestational day 6.
`
`13.3 Developmental Toxicity
`
`In pregnant rats, continuous sc infusions of treprostinil sodium during organogenesis
`and late gestational development, at rates as high as 900 ng treprostinil/kg/min (about
`117 times the recommended starting human sc infusion rate and about 16 times the
`average rate achieved in clinical trials, on a ng/m2 basis), resulted in no evidence of
`harm to the fetus. In pregnant rabbits, efi’ects of continuous sc infusions of treprostinil
`during organogenesis were limited to an increased incidence offetal skeletal variations
`(bilateralfull rib or right rudimentary rib on lumbar 1) associated with maternal toxicity
`(reduction in body weight and food consumption) at an infusion rate of 150 ng
`treprostinil/kg/min (about 41 times the starting human dose rate for sc infusion and 5
`times the average rate used in clinical trials, on a ng/mz basis).
`
`

`

`NDA 22-387
`
`’
`
`6
`
`II. Summary of Nonclinical Findings
`
`Nonclinical studies conducted with treprostinil were reviewed under NDA 21 —272 for
`Remodulin® Injection. The sponsor is referencing the above NDA for the support of the
`present NDA for Tyvaso Additional nonclinical studies conducted with treprostinil,
`including safety pharmacology studies (hERG assay, cardiac action potential assay in
`rabbit Purkinje fibers and in viva cardiovascular and respiratory studies) and repeat-dose
`inhalation toxicity studies in rats and dogs are included in this Tyvaso NDA and are
`reviewed below.
`
`treprostinil was tested (at different concentrations) to
`In the in vitro hERG assay,
`determine its potential for the inhibition of hERG-mediated In current (the most common
`cause of increased cardiac action potential duration that could lead to QT interval
`prolongation and fatal ventricular arrhythmias in animals and humans) in cultured human
`embryonic kidney cells. Treprostinil did not
`inhibit hERG-mediated current at
`concentrations up to 100 11M (39,052 ng/ml), while terfenadine, the positive control, at
`60 nM, inhibited hERG current by 85%.
`
`The in vitro effects of treprostinil on cardiac action potential duration were determined in
`isolated rabbit Purkinje fibers. Treprostinil did not prolong action potential duration at
`concentrations up to 300 1.1M (117,156 ng/ml), whi1e the positive control dl-sotalol, at 50
`11M, significantly prolonged the action potential duration. (The Cmax value in patients
`receiving Tyvaso at the maximum recommended dose is 1.8 ng/ml.)
`
`Female beagle dogs were given single iv bolus injections of treprostinil sodium solution
`at dose levels of 0, 2, 20 or 200 ug/kg and cardiovascular parameters were evaluated.
`Treprostinil caused an initial drop in arterial blood pressure and a compensatory increase
`of heart rates at all dose levels during the first hour after dosing. The initial drop in
`arterial blood pressure was followed by a period (up to 6 hours) of elevated systolic,
`diastolic and mean blood pressure at the 200 ug/kg dose level. Increased incidences of
`atrioventricular block were observed in 1 of 4 dogs at 2 pig/kg and in l of 4 dogs at 200
`pg/kg; however, PR interval was not affected. Treprostinil did not affect QT interval at
`any dose level.
`
`.
`
`In a study to evaluate potential effects on respiratory function, nebulized treprostinil
`sodium was administered to groups of male rats, via nose-only inhalation, at an aerosol
`concentration of about-50 ug/L for 2, 3 or 4 hours. Treprostinil, at achieved inhaled dose
`levels of 300, 416 and 569 pig/kg, produced significant decreases in respiratory rates and
`derived minute volumes compared to predose and control values. All values returned to
`predose and control levels 24 hours following treatment.
`
`In a 13-week inhalation toxicity study, groups of rats were exposed, by nose only
`administration, to aerosol concentrations of 7.1 ug/L for 20 minutes/day, 44.0 ug/L for
`30 minutes/day, and 40.3 ug/L for 225 minutes/day, resulting in estimated achieved dose
`levels of 7, 67 and 464 ug/kg/day, respectively. Control animals were exposed to
`conditioned room air for the same duration as the high dose animals. At the termination
`
`

`

`NDA 22-387
`
`7
`
`of the study, there were reductions in body weight gain at all dose levels [17 - 65%
`(dose-dependent) in males and 22 - 23% in females]. Other treatment-related findings
`included decreased food consumption (mid and high dose groups), decreased platelet,
`white cell and lymphocyte counts (high dose males), increased reticulocyte counts (high
`dose males and females), increased adrenal and lung weights and decreased testis and
`thymus weights (mid and high dose groups).
`
`Microscopically, lesions observed in the respiratory tract included squamous metaplasia
`in
`the
`larynx,
`hemorrhage
`and macrophage
`accumulation
`in
`the
`lung
`and
`hyperplasia/hypertrophy of goblet cells
`in the nasal
`cavity (all dose groups);
`degeneration/regeneration of the respiratory epithelium in the nasal cavity. (mid and high
`dose groups); and respiratory epithelium ulceration and olfactory epithelium degeneration
`in the nasal cavity (high dose). Other histopathological findings included myocardial
`degeneration/fibrosis in the heart and degeneration of seminiferous epithelium in the
`testis (all treated groups); oligo/aspermia in the epididymis and cortical hypertrophy in
`the adrenals (mid and high dose groups); and vacuolation of the zona glomerulosa in the
`adrenals (high dose). Treatment-related microscopic findings were still present in the
`adrenals, heart, testis, larynx, lung and nasal cavity of high dose recovery group animals.
`Epididymal lesions showed reversibility. A NOAEL was not achieved in this study.
`
`Dose-related increases in 24 hr AUC values were noted in the study. At each dose level,
`the AUC values were generally'similar after the 15‘, 30th and 80th doses except for high
`dose males in which the levels were twice as high at week 13 (80th dose) than at day 30.
`The mean AUC values in males at mid and high dose levels were higher than the
`respective values in females. The terminal phase half—life values for treprostinil ranged
`from 20 to 50 minutes.
`
`In another 13-week inhalation toxicity study, groups of dogs were exposed, by oronasal
`inhalation, to treprostinil aerosol concentrations of 0.025 mg/L for 15 minutes and 0.224
`mg/L for 6 and 30 minutes daily for 13 weeks, resulting in achieved dose levels of 107,
`322 and 1558 ug/kg/day, respectively. The controls were exposed to the vehicle for the
`same duration as the high dose group. One high dose female died on day 22; the death
`was attributed to choking on food. Decreased activity, salivation, tremors, vomiting and
`labored breathing were noted at the high dose. There were no effects on EKG. Although a
`dose~related sinus tachycardia was seen at mid and high dose levels during the early part
`of the study, by day 80, tachycardia had decreased and was limited to the high dose
`group. There were no treatment-related findings in hematology, clinical chemistry,
`respiratory minute volume, urinalysis, organ weight or gross pathology parameters.
`
`Microscopically, treatment-related lesions were observed only in the respiratory tract,
`especially in the nasal cavity and larynx of mid and high dose group animals. Focal or
`multifocal
`respiratory epithelial degeneration/regeneration in the nasal cavity was
`observed in these groups, the incidence and/or severity being higher at the highest dose.
`Other nasal cavity findings, observed only at the highest dose level, included goblet cell
`hyperplasia/hypertrophy, ulceration in the squamous or respiratory epithelium, and
`degeneration/necrosis in the squamous epithelium. Degeneration of the ciliated
`
`

`

`NDA 22387
`
`8
`
`epithelium in the larynx was noted in mid and high dose males and females. Lesions in
`the larynx were still present in 1 of 2 male dogs (not in females) after the recovery period.
`Although lung hemorrhage (minimal in severity) was observed in 1 of 6 low dose dogs,
`since the incidence rate for this lesion is same or lower than the concurrent or historical
`control incidence rates, andvalso because the low dose did not produce any nasal or larynx
`lesions, the low dose (107 ug/kg/day) could be considered as a NOAEL for the dog
`study.
`
`The Cmax and AUC values increased between day 1 and week 6, but generally no
`additional increases were observed between weeks 6 and 13. The terminal phase half-life
`values ranged from 18 to 26 minutes.
`
`Animal reproduction and developmental toxicity studies have not been conducted with
`treprostinil administered by the inhalation route. Animal reproduction and developmental
`toxicity studies were conducted previously with treprostinil administered by continuous
`sc infusion. In those studies, treprostinil did not affect fertility or mating performance of
`male or female rats at infusion rates of up to 450 ng/kg/min (about 59 times the
`recommended starting human 30 infusion rate and 8 times the average rate achieved in
`clinical trials). In pregnant rats, continuous sc infusions of treprostinil sodium during
`organogenesis and late gestational development, at rates as high as 900 ng treprostinil/
`kg/min (about 117 times the recommended starting human 30 infusion rate and about 16
`times the average rate achieved in clinical trials), resulted in no evidence of harm to the
`fetus.
`In pregnant rabbits, effects of continuous 50 infusions of treprostinil during
`organogenesis were limited to an increased incidence of fetal
`skeletal variations
`associated with maternal toxicity at an infusion rate of 150 ng treprostinil/kg/min (about
`41 times the starting human dose rate for so infusion and 5 times the average rate used in
`clinical trials).
`‘
`
`The sponsor is planning to conduct a 2-year bioassay in rats by the inhalation route. The
`range-finding study for the selection of the doses for the carcinogenicity study is being
`repeated as per the recommendations of the Executive CAC. In vitro and in viva genetic
`toxicology studies did not demonstrate any mutagenic or clastogenic effects of
`treprostinil.
`.
`
`Nonclinical Safety Issues Relevant to Clinical Use
`
`13-week inhalation toxicity studies with treprostinil revealed respiratory tract lesions,
`attributed to local irritation, in both rats and dogs. (In previous studies with treprostinil,
`local
`irritation was noted at
`the site of infusion when the drug was administered
`subcutaneously.)
`In
`the
`rat, no-observable-adverse-effect-levels
`(NOAELs)
`for
`respiratory or other treatment-related findings (myocardial, adrenal or testicular lesions)
`were not demonstrated. Myocardial
`lesions were considered to be due to reflex
`tachycardia induced by the exaggerated pharmacological action of treprostinil because of
`higher cardiac exposure to the drug when given by inhalation. Adrenal
`lesions were
`considered to be related to the stress of dosing and/or to the prolonged period of exposure
`
`

`

`NDA 22-387
`
`9
`
`of rats in the inhalation apparatus (225 minutes/day at the high dose level vs 6 to 8
`minutes/day in humans; lesions were mainly limited to the high dose).
`
`The histopathological findings in the adrenal, heart, respiratory or reproductive organs
`observed in the 13-week inhalation study were not seen in a previous 26-week
`continuous sc infusion study (50, 150, 450 ng treprostinil/kg/min) in rats. This may be
`related to'the higher plasma drug concentration obtained in the inhalation study; the mean
`maximum plasma treprostinil concentration obtained at the high dose in the rat inhalation
`study (307 ng/ml) was about 15—fold higher than the mean steady state concentration
`achieved at the high dose (20 ng/ml) in the 26-week sc continuous infusion study. (The
`Cmax value in patients receiving Tyvaso at the maximum recommended dose appears to
`be about 2 ng/ml.)
`
`The NOAEL in the dog (107 ug/kg/day) for the respiratory findings is about 12 times
`higher than the maximum dose used1n clinical studies [72 uglinhalation session (4. Sug/
`kg/day)], on a mg/m2 basis. The other treatment-related findings (myocardial, adrenal or
`testicular lesions) observed1n the rat were not seen in the dog even at doses as high as
`178 times the maximum clinical trial dose, on a body surface area basis. Since the above
`lesions were not seen in dogs even at relatively high dose multiples, and also because the
`plasma drug levels in patients at the recommended therapeutic dose level are far less than
`that seen in rats in the inhalation toxicity study, we do not consider the rat toxicity
`findings to constitute an approvability issue. Also, the long term clinical experience with
`treprostinil supports the safety of the drug.
`
`In conclusion, there are no approvability issues for Tyvaso based on the non—clinical
`toxicity-testing program.
`
`TABLE OF CONTENTS -— PIL4RMA COLOGY/TOXICOLOGY RE VIEW
`
`SAFETY PHARMACOLOGY STUDIES ......................................
`
`INHALATION TOXICITY STUDIES
`
`......................................
`
`page
`
`10
`
`12
`
`

`

`NDA 22-387
`
`‘
`
`10
`
`NONCLINICAL SUPPORT FOR THE PROPOSED NDA FOR TYVASO
`
`Nonclinical studies®conducted with treprostinil sodium were reviewed under NDA 21-
`272 for Remodulin® Injection for sc and1v administration. The sponsor is referencing the
`above NDA for the support of the present NDA for Tyvaso. Additional nonclinical
`studies conducted with treprostinil sodium included safety pharmacology studies (an in
`vitro hERG assay, an ex vivo action potential assay in rabbit Purkinje fibers, a cardio-
`vascular iv safety pharmacology study in dogs and a respiratory safety pharmacology
`study in rats) and repeat-dose inhalation toxicity studies in rats and dogs. These studies
`are summarized below.
`
`SAFETY PHARMACOLOGY STUDIES
`
`The hERG (human ether-a—go——go——related gene) assay and the action potential assay in
`A
`rabbit Purkinje fibers were conducted
`_ N
`
`11(4)
`
`In the hERG assay, the effects of treprostinil on cloned hERG potassium channels
`expressed in cultures of human embryonic kidney cells were determined using electro-
`physiological procedures. The cardiac potassium channel, hERG,
`is responsible for a
`rapid delayed rectifier current (kg) in ventricles. The inhibition of IKr current is the most
`common cause of cardiac action potential prolongation by non-cardiac drugs. Increased
`action potential duration causes prolongation of the QT interval which has been shown to
`be associated with a lethal ventricular arrhythmia, torsade de pointes. In this study,
`treprostinil was tested at concentrations of 0, 5, 10, 50 and 100 11M to determine its
`potential
`for
`the inhibition of hERG-mediated current. Treprostinil, at different
`concentrations, inhibited hERG current at the following rates: 0.5% inhibition for the
`vehicle control, 0.7% at 5 11M, 0.5% at 10 11M, 1.9% at 50 pM and 1.4% at 100 “M.
`Terfenadine,
`the positive control, at 60 nM,
`inhibited hERG current by 85.0%.
`In
`summary, treprostinil did not inhibit hERG—mediated current at concentrations up to 100
`11M [39,052 ng/ml;
`the Cmax value in patients receiving Tyvaso at the maximum
`recommended dose is 1.8 ng/ml.]
`
`The in vitro effects of treprostinil on cardiac action potentials were determined in isolated
`rabbit Purkinje fibers. Increased action potential duration (APD) is associated with
`prolongation of QT interval. Rabbit Purkinje fibers-have been shown to be more sensitive
`to drug-induced APD prolongation than Purkinje fibers from other species. In rabbit
`Purkinje fibers, the action potential wave form and the underlying ionic currents are
`similar to those of humans. In this study, the test drug treprostinil, at concentrations of 3,
`30 and 300 11M, was added to isolated rabbit Purkinje fiber preparations (r1 = 4) at two
`stimulus intervals [basic cycle lengths (BCL) of l and 0.5 s] and the effects of treprostinil
`on action potential parameters were compared to the time-matched vehicle controls.
`Treprostinil at 3 pM did not induce any significant changes in APD60 and APDgo (action
`
`

`

`NDA 22-387
`
`11
`
`potential duration measured at 60 and 90% repolarization) when compared to vehicle
`controls. Treprostinil at 30 11M produced shortening in APDso and APDgo at 1 s BCL, but
`not at 0.5 s BCL. Treprostinil at 300 uM induced significant shortening in APD60 and
`APDgo at both 1 and 0.5 s BCL. Treprostinil at all
`three concentrations did not
`significantly change the resting membrane potentials of the Purkinje fibers, the action
`potential amplitude and the maximum rate of depolarization (dV/dt max). The positive
`control dl-sotalol (50 uM) significantly prolonged the APD60 and the APDgo at both
`stimulus intervals without significant changes in resting membrane potential, action
`potential amplitude and the maximum rate of depolarization. In conclusion, treprostinil
`did not prolong action potential duration at concentrations up to 300 uM (117,156 ng/ml).
`
`A cardiovascular safety pharmacology study in dogs was conducted A
`.
`_
`,.//——
`'
`Treprostinil sodium solution was administered as a
`single iv bolus injection to 4 female beagle dogs (radiotelemetry-implanted) at dose
`levels of 0, 2, 20 or 200 ug/kg, according to a Latin-square design, such that each dog
`received each treatment once, with at least a 3-day washout period between doses. Heart
`rate, arterial blood pressure and EKG parameters were evaluated every 10 minutes for
`about 24 hours post-dose. As expected, treprostinil caused an initial drop in arterial blood
`pressure (systolic, diastolic and mean) and a compensatory increase in heart rate at all
`dose levels during the first hour after dosing. Elevated heart rates (up to 39%) were seen
`at the 200 ug/kg dose level 3 hr post-dose. The initial drop in arterial blood pressure was
`followed by a period (up to 6 hours) of elevated systolic (up to 15%), diastolic (27%)
`and mean (23%) blood pressures at 200 ug/kg dose level. The increase in blood pressure
`is considered to be due to a compensatory sympathetic reflex mechanism after the initial
`drop in pressure. Increased incidences of atrioventricular block were observed in one dog
`at 2 pig/kg and another dog at 200 ug/kg. However,.PR interval was not affected.
`Prolongation of QRS complex was observed at 200 rig/kg. Treprostinil did not affect QT
`interval at any dose level.
`
`31(4)
`
`[In a separate study, the hemodynamic activity of treprostinil and four of its metabolites
`(M334, M388, M392 and M566) on mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR)
`were investigated in anesthetized rats given iv bolus doses of treprostinil at 0.13, 1.3,
`12.7 and 127 pg/kg or each metabolite at 10, 100, 1000 or 10000 ug/kg. At the lowest
`dose levels, neither treprostinil (0.13 pig/kg) nor its metabolites (10 ug/kg) affected MAP
`or HR. At the highest dose levels, treprostinil (127 rig/kg) and its 3 metabolites (M388,
`M392 and M566; 10000 rig/kg) caused a fall in MAP within 1 minute and a subsequent
`rise in HR, indicating that the metabolites were much less active than treprostinil itself.
`The metabolite M344 did not affect MAP or HR at any dose level]
`
`'
`
`.

`A respiratory safety pharmacology study was conducted in rats
`
`,
`. To evaluate the potential effects on respiratory
`function, nebulized treprostinil sodium was administered to groups of male rats via nose-
`only inhalation at an aerosol concentration of about 50 ug/L for 2, 3 or 4 hours. An
`additional group of male rats was given citrate buffer vehicle for 4 hours. Respiratory rate
`and tidal volume were measured, and the minute volume was calculated. Treprostinil, at
`achieved inhaled dose levels of 300, 416 and 569 pig/kg, produced significant decreases
`
`
`
`[3(4)
`
`

`

`NDA 22-387
`
`12
`
`in respiratory rates and derived minute volumes compared to predose and control values.
`These decreases occurred within 15 minutes of aerosol administration and rates and
`
`volumes remained decreased for the duration of exposure. However, all values returned
`to predose and control levels 24 hours following treatment.
`
`INHALATION TOXICITY STUDIES
`
`13-week inhalation toxicity studies were conducted in rats and dogs (with a 4-week
`recovery period)
`"I“ 7‘ _
`' 3.4.“, ‘
`'
`.These studies
`were reviewed earlier under IND 70,362, and are summarized below.
`
`Thirteen-Week Study in Rats With 4—Week Recovery Period
`
`Groups of Sprague—Dawley rats [15/sex/group for the main study; 9/sex/treatment for the
`toxicokinetic (TK) evaluations and 5/sex in the control and high dose groups for
`reversibility studies] were exposed, by nose only administration, to treprostinil aerosol
`concentrations of 7 pig/L for 20 minutes/day, 44 ug/L for 30 minutes/day and 40 ug/L for
`225 minutes/day for 13 weeks, resulting in estimated achieved dose levels of 7, 67 and ~
`464 pg/kg/day. Control animals were exposed to conditioned room air for the same
`duration as the high dose animals. All animals were observed twice daily for mortality
`and clinical
`signs. Body weight and food consumption were recorded weekly.
`Respiratory minute volume was recorded on 5 rats/sex/group for 15 minutes prior to
`closing and then for
`the first 15 minutes post-dose during weeks
`1, 6 and 13.
`Ophthalmoscopic examination was performed on all rats before the initiation of treatment
`and during weeks 13 and 17 (recovery group). Hematology, serum chemistry and
`urinalysis parameters were evaluated during weeks 4 and 13 and at the end of the
`recovery period. Plasma samples were collected from TK rats just before dosing and at 5,
`15, 30, 75 and 105 minutes post-dose on days 1, 30 and 80 for TK evaluations.
`
`Complete necropsy was performed on all animals found dead during the study and those
`sacrificed at the termination of the study, select organs weighed, and the following tissues
`were collected and preserved: adrenals, aorta, bone and marrow (sternum), brain, bronchi,
`cecum, colon, duodenum, epididymides, esophagus, eyes, Harderian glands, heart, ileum,
`jejunum, kidneys, larynx, lacrimal glands, liver, lungs, lymph nodes, mammary gland,
`nasal cavities, optic nerves, ovaries, pancreas, pharynx, pituitary, prostate, salivary gland,
`sciatic nerve, seminal vesicles, skeletal muscle, skin, spinal cord, spleen, stomach, testes,
`thymus, thyroid, tongue, trachea, urinary bladder, uterus, vagina and all gross lesions. All
`tissues from control and high dose group rats, and also respiratory tract tissues, adrenals,
`epididymides, heart, sternum, testis, thymus and all gross lesions from low and mid dose
`group rats, were examined microscopically.
`
`Five rats (1 low dose male, 2 HD males and 2HD females) died during the study. Two
`deaths (low dose male and 1 HD female) were attributed to bleeding procedures; the
`cause of the other deaths was not determined. Labored breathing and decreased activity
`and muscle tone were observed in high dose rats; At the termination of the study, body
`
`

`

`NDA 22-387
`
`'
`
`13
`
`weight gains at 7, 67 and 464 ug/kg/day were 17, 36 and 65% lower than control for
`males and 22, 23 and 23% lower than control for females, respectively. Treatment-related
`decreases in food consumption were observed in mid and high dose males and females.
`Respiratory minute volume was reduced at mid and high dose levels during weeks 6 and
`13. Decreased platelet, white cell and lymphocyte counts in high dose males, and
`increased reticulocyte counts in high dose males and females were observed. Organ
`weight findings included significantly higher than control adrenal (mid and high dose
`male and female groups) and lung weights (high dose — both sexes) and lower than
`control testis (high dose) and thymus weights (mid and high dose groups —- both sexes).
`Apart from the above organ weight findings, there were no gross pathology findings at
`necropsy.
`
`included squamous
`the lesions observed in the respiratory tract
`Microscopically,
`metaplasia in the larynx, hemorrhage and macrophage accumulation in the lung and
`hyperplasia/hypertrophy of goblet cells
`in the nasal cavity (all dose groups);
`degeneration/regeneration of the respiratory epithelium in the nasal cavity (mid and high
`dose groups); and respiratory epithelium ulceration and olfactory epithelium degeneration
`in the nasal cavity (high dose; Table 1). Other histopathological findings included
`myocardial degeneration/fibrosis
`in the heart and degeneration .of seminiferous
`epithelium in the testis (all treated groups); oligo/aspermia in the epididymis and cortical
`hypertrophy in the adrenals (mid and high dose groups); and vacuolation of the zona
`glomerulosa in the adrenals (high dose; Table 2).
`
`food consumption, platelet count and epididymal
`Treatment—related body weight,
`findings appeared to be reversible. However, treatment-related microscopic findings in
`the adrenals, heart, testis, larynx, lung and nasal cavity of high dose animals were also
`present in recovery animals.
`
`A NOAEL was not achieved in this study.
`
`

`

`NDA 22-387
`
`14
`
`Table 1.
`
`'
`
`Incidence and Severity of Treprostinll-related Histopathological
`Changes In Respiratory Tract Organs
`
`
`Tissue/findings
`Group ID
`Dose level ggflgday}
`Larynx
`Squamous metaplasia -
`
`Lung
`Hemorrhage
`
`Macrophage accumulation
`
`'
`
`sex
`
`Male
`3
`2
`1
`70
`10
`0
`15
`15
`15
`No examined
`1 1
`3
`Total No. affected —-
`3
`Minimal - 3
`Slight — — 8
`No examined
`15
`15
`15
`Total No. affected — 3
`7
`Minimal
`—-—
`3
`6
`Slight — —
`1
`Total No. afl‘ected
`——
`5
`7
`Minimal — 5
`7
`Sli
`t — -—
`—-
`
`4
`526
`16
`l3
`4
`9
`16
`7
`3
`4
`12
`10
`2
`
`Female
`4
`3
`2
`1
`526
`70
`10
`0
`15
`15
`15
`15
`13
`5
`— 1
`6
`3
`——-
`1
`7
`2
`—-
`—-
`15
`15
`15
`15
`5
`l
`— 2
`3
`— 2 —
`2
`— —
`1
`9
`——
`1
`1
`9
`— l
`1
`— —— — ——
`
`15
`
`15
`
`1’5
`
`16
`
`No examined
`v Nasal cavity
`Degeneration/regeneration: respiratory epithelium
`15
`— — —
`16
`2
`Total No. affected — —-
`3
`—— — —
`5
`2
`Minimal
`——
`~—
`Slight — —— —
`9
`—-—
`—- —
`11
`
`Moderate
`—— — —
`2
`— — —
`1
`Infiltration: neutrophilic cells Total No. afl'ected — ——
`-—
`6
`-—- — —~
`1
`Minimal
`—~ — —
`6
`— — ——
`-—-—
`Sli
`t — —— — ——
`—~ — —
`1
`
`15
`
`15
`
`15
`
`15
`
`Ulcerafion: respiratory epithelium
`Total No. afl‘ected — ‘— —
`Minimal — -——
`—-—
`Sli
`t — —— —
`
`Degeneration/regeneration: olfactory epithelium
`—-—
`——
`—~—
`Total No. affected
`-—
`Minimal — —-
`Slight —- — —
`
`2
`——
`2
`
`3
`——
`3
`
`~ — —-
`— — —
`——
`——
`——
`
`~— — ——
`3
`-— — ~
`— — —— -
`
`Hyperplasia/hypertrophy: goblet cells
`7
`4
`5
`——
`10
`1
`Total No. affected — 6
`7
`4
`— 5
`5
`1 .
`Minimal
`——
`6
`Slight—~——.5 —————
`
`.
`
`

`

`NDA 22-387
`
`.
`
`15
`
`Table 2.
`
`Incidence and Severity of Treprostinil-related Histopathological
`Changes in Non-Respiratory Tract Organs
`
`Tissue/findmgg
`Groung
`Dose levelgggljgdaxl
`Adrenal
`Hypertrophy: cortical
`
`Vacuolation: Iona granulosa
`
`.
`
`Heart
`Degeneration/fibrosis
`
`sex
`
`Male
`
`1
`0
`15
`
`Female
`3
`2
`70
`10
`15
`15
`3
`4
`3
`4
`—~
`— -— —
`—— — —
`— — —
`— — -—-
`—— — —
`15
`15
`15
`— 5
`4
`~ — 5
`4
`——
`~— —
`
`.
`
`4
`526
`15
`12
`ll
`l
`4
`3
`1
`—
`15
`3
`2
`1
`
`4
`3
`, 2
`1
`526
`70
`10
`0
`16
`15
`15
`15
`No examined
`12
`-— — l
`Total No. affected
`11
`—— — 1
`Minimal
`1
`—-— — —~
`Slight
`——-
`-— — 4
`Total N01 affected
`Minimal — —-
`——
`3
`Slight
`—— — —— —
`Moderate — — —
`1
`No examined
`15
`15
`15
`16
`Total No. affected —
`2
`2
`8
`Minimal —
`2
`2
`5
`Slight — — —
`3
`m
`No examined
`15
`15
`15
`1
`Testis
`Degeneration: seminiferous epithelium
`2
`2
`——
`Total No. affected
`~—
`2
`——
`Minimal
`— l
`——
`Slight
`——
`——
`Moderate
`l
`Marked — —
`
`Epidldymis
`Oligo/aspermia
`
`15
`15
`15
`No examined
`7
`Total No. afi'ected — — 2
`3
`Minimal
`—— — -—
`Slight — . —- — 3
`Moderate — ——
`-—
`-—
`l
`
`Marked — —- 2W
`
`

`

`NDA 22-387
`
`16
`
`The Cmax and AUC values obtained at different intervals (after 18‘, 30th and 80th doses) in
`the 13 week study are prese

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket