throbber
CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND
`RESEARCH
`
`
`
`APPLICATION NUMBER:
`22-264
`
`
`OTHER ACTION LETTER(s)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN
`SERVICES
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Public Health Service
`
`Food and Drug Administration
`Rockville, MD 20857
`
`
`
`NDA 22-264
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`COMPLETE RESPONSE
`
`
`
`Ortho-McNeil-Jansen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
`Attention: Rodney Malchow
`Associate Director, Regulatory Affairs
`1125 Trenton-Harbourton Road
`P.O. Box 200
`Titusville, N.J. 80560
`
`
`Dear Mr. Malchow:
`
`Please refer to your new drug application (NDA) dated October 25, 2007, received
`October 26, 2007, submitted under section 505(b) of the Federal Food, Drug, and
`Cosmetic Act for Invega Sustenna (paliperidone palmitate)
`
`
`We acknowledge receipt of your submissions dated:
`
`January 9, 2008
`December 12, 2007 December 21, 2007
`February 25, 2008
`February 27, 2008(2) May 2, 2008
`
`May 21, 2008
`May 28, 2008
`May 29, 2008
`June 3, 2008
`
`June 13, 2008
`June 26, 2008
`July 11, 2008
`July 15, 2008(2)
`August 20, 2008
`
`
`We also acknowledge receipt of your amendment dated August 12, 2008, which was not
`reviewed for this action. You may incorporate applicable sections of the amendment by
`specific reference as part of your response to the deficiencies cited in this letter.
`
`We have completed the review of your application, and have determined that we cannot
`approve this application in its present form. We have described below our reasons for
`this action and, where possible, our recommendations to address these issues.
`
`PRODUCT QUALITY
`
`
`1. The Drug Master File
`to support the NDA.
`
`February 21, 2008
`May 12, 2008
`June 2, 2008
`July 2, 2008
`
`
`
`
` for
`
` has been found to be inadequate
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`NDA 22-264
`Page 2
`
`2. It is FDA policy that the strength of the drug substance has to be provided as part
`of the established name. The proposal to just remove the reference to strength
`(mg) from the product name is not sufficient. The historical evidence provided to
`justify your proposal is not sufficient because most products listed were approved
`quite awhile ago and do not reflect current practices. According to information
`you provided in the original NDA submission “paliperidone palmitate dissolves
`slowly after intramuscular injection before being hydrolyzed to paliperidone and
`absorbed into the systemic circulation”, which indicates that paliperidone
`palmitate is a prodrug and that the palmitate ester exerts a biopharmaceutic effect.
`3. Establish an acceptance criteria equal to or less than
` ppm for the two genotoxic
`impurities,
` and
`.
`4.
`
`
`5. The syringe barrel should contain calibrated markings to indicate the appropriate
`volume of drug product in the syringe and allow for partial doses to be given from
`the syringe.
`6. A transparent label that allows for the viewing of the syringe calibration marks
`and drug product should be used for labeling of the syringes.
`
`
`
`
`LABELING
`
`
`Submit draft labeling that incorporates revisions in the attached labeling. In addition,
`submit updated content of labeling [21 CFR 314.50(l)(1)(i)] in structured product
`labeling (SPL) format as described at http://www.fda.gov/oc/datacouncil/spl.html.
`
`When responding to this letter, submit labeling that includes all previous revisions, as
`reflected in the most recently approved package insert. To facilitate review of your
`submission, provide a highlighted or marked-up copy that shows all changes, as well
`as a clean Microsoft Word version. The marked-up copy should include annotations
`with the supplement number for previously-approved labeling changes.
`
`Please submit draft carton and container labeling revised as follows:
`
`
`Syringe Labeling
`1. The product strength should be relocated so that it no longer appears to be part
`of the proprietary name (e.g., TRADENAME 25 mg). Instead, the product
`strength should follow or be immediately adjacent to the established name.
`2. Express the strengths of the prefilled syringes in terms of milligrams per total
`volume (e.g., 25 mg/0.25 mL, 50 mg/0.5 mL, 75 mg/0.75 mL, and 100
`mg/mL) to decrease the potential for dose calculation errors. This information
`should be displayed on the syringe label and immediately following or
`adjacent to the established name.
`3. If space permits,
`
`
`
`
`
`(b)
`(4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`NDA 22-264
`Page 3
`
`
`
`4.
`
`Carton Labeling
`1. Revise the fonts of the proprietary and established names so that the
`established name is at least one half the size of the proprietary name per 21
`CFR 201.10(g)(2).
`2. The product strength should be relocated so that it no longer appears to be part
`of the proprietary name (e.g., TRADENAME 25 mg). Instead, the product
`strength should follow or be immediately adjacent to the established name.
`3. Express the strengths of the prefilled syringes in terms of milligrams per total
`volume (e.g., 25 mg/0.25 mL, 50 mg/0.5 mL, 75 mg/0.75 mL, and 100
`mg/mL) to decrease the potential for dose calculation errors. This information
`should be prominently displayed on the principal display panel immediately
`following or adjacent to the established name so that it is not overlooked by
`the reader.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dissolution Method and Specification
`
`The following dissolution method and specification are acceptable for Invega Sustenna
`
`(paliperidone palmitate)
`
`Parameter
`Apparatus Type
`Media
`Volume
`Temperature
`Frequency
`Sampling Times
`Acceptance
`Criteria
`
`Analysis
`
`
`
`SAFETY UPDATE
`
`When you respond to the above deficiencies, include a safety update as described at 21
`CFR 314.50(d)(5)(vi)(b). The safety update should include data from all nonclinical and
`
`Dissolution Method and Specification
`USP Type II (paddle)
`0.001 M HCL containing 0.489% Polysorbate 20 (Tween®20)
`900 ml
`25 ± 0.5 °C
`50 rpm
`8,20 and 45 minutes
`8 minutes
`20 minutes
`45 minutes
`HPLC UV detection
`
` of Label Claim
` of Label Claim
` of Label Claim
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`NDA 22-264
`Page 4
`
`clinical studies/trials of the drug under consideration regardless of indication, dosage
`form, or dose level.
`
`
`1. Describe in detail any significant changes or findings in the safety profile.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2. When assembling the sections describing discontinuations due to adverse events,
`serious adverse events, and common adverse events, incorporate new safety data
`as follows:
`
`
`
`• Present new safety data from the studies for the proposed indication using the
`same format as the original NDA submission.
`• Present tabulations of the new safety data combined with the original NDA
`data.
`Include tables that compare frequencies of adverse events in the original NDA
`with the retabulated frequencies described in the bullet above.
`• For indications other than the proposed indication, provide separate tables for
`the frequencies of adverse events occurring in clinical trials.
`
`•
`
`
`3. Present a retabulation of the reasons for premature study discontinuation by
`incorporating the drop-outs from the newly completed studies. Describe any new
`trends or patterns identified.
`
`4. Provide case report forms and narrative summaries for each patient who died
`during a clinical study or who did not complete a study because of an adverse
`event. In addition, provide narrative summaries for serious adverse events.
`
`5. Describe any information that suggests a substantial change in the incidence of
`common, but less serious, adverse events between the new data and the original
`NDA data.
`
`6. Provide updated exposure information for the clinical studies/trials (e.g., number
`of subjects, person time).
`
`7. Provide a summary of worldwide experience on the safety of this drug. Include
`an updated estimate of use for drug marketed in other countries.
`
`8. Provide English translations of current approved foreign labeling not previously
`submitted.
`
`
`
`PROPRIETARY NAME
`
`The Division of Medication Error Prevention and Analysis (DMEPA) and the Division of
`Psychiatry Products do not object to the use of the proprietary name, Invega Sustenna, for
`
`

`

`NDA 22-264
`Page 5
`
`this product. However, if the product approval is delayed beyond 90 days of the review
`date, the proposed name must be resubmitted for evaluation.
`
`OTHER
`
`Within one year after the date of this letter, you are required to resubmit or take one of
`the other actions available under 21 CFR 314.110. If you do not take one of these
`actions, we will consider your lack of response a request to withdraw the application
`under 21 CFR 314.65. A resubmission must fully address all the deficiencies listed. A
`partial response to this letter will not be processed as a resubmission and will not start a
`new review cycle.
`
`Under 21 CFR 314.102(d), you may request a meeting or telephone conference with us to
`discuss what steps you need to take before the application may be approved. If you wish
`to have such a meeting, submit your meeting request as described in the FDA Guidance
`for Industry Formal Meetings With Sponsors and Applicants for PDUFA Products,
`February, 2000 (http://www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/2125fnl.htm).
`
`The drug product may not be legally marketed until you have been notified in writing that
`this application is approved.
`
`If you have any questions, call Kimberly Updegraff, M.S., Regulatory Project Manager,
`at (301) 796-2201.
`
`
`
`Sincerely,
`
`{See appended electronic signature page}
`
`Thomas Laughren, M.D.
`Director
`Division of Psychiatry Products
`Office of Drug Evaluation I
`Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
`
`
`
`
`
`Enclosure
`
`
`
`
`45 pp withheld immediately following this page as (b)(4) Draft Labeling
`
`

`

`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed electronically and
`this page is the manifestation of the electronic signature.
`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
` /s/
`---------------------
`Thomas Laughren
`8/25/2008 01:37:30 PM
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket