throbber

`
`
`
`DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Food and Drug Administration
`
`
` Silver Spring MD 20993
`
`
`
`
`
` NDA 021880/S-035
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` SUPPLEMENT APPROVAL
`
` REMS ASSESSMENT ACKNOWLEDGMENT
`
`REMS ASSESSMENT PLAN REVISION
`
`
`
`
`Celgene Corporation
`
`
`Attention: Marion Ceruzzi, PhD
`
`
`
`Senior Director, Regulatory Affairs
`
`
`400 Connell Drive, Suite 7000
`
`
`Connell Corporate Park
`
`
`Berkley Heights, NJ 07922
`
`
`
`
`
`Dear Dr. Ceruzzi:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Please refer to your Supplemental New Drug Application (sNDA) dated May 17, 2013, received
`
`
`
`
`
`
`May 17, 2013, submitted under section 505(b) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
`
`(FDCA) for Revlimid® (lenalidomide) capsules 2.5, 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 mg.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`We acknowledge receipt of your amendments dated June 19, July 22, September 16,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`October 30, 2013, and your risk evaluation and mitigation strategy (REMS) assessment dated
`
`
`
`August 2, 2013. We have found the REMS assessment to be complete.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`This “Prior Approval” supplemental new drug application (S-035) provides for proposed
`
`modifications to the REMS to continue the harmonization of the REMS for Thalomid®
`
`
`
`
`
`(thalidomide), Revlimid® (lenalidomide), and Pomalyst® (pomalidomide) capsules, that began
`
`
`
`
`
`with the February 8, 2013 approval of the REMS modifications for Revlimid® (lenalidomide)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`and Thalomid® (thalidomide) capsules, and the approval of the REMS for Pomalyst®
`
`
`
`
`
`(pomalidomide) capsules.
`
`
`
`APPROVAL
`
` We have completed our review of this supplemental application, as amended. It is approved,
`
`
`
`
`
`
` effective on the date of this letter. Your proposed modified REMS, submitted on
` October 30, 2013, and appended to this letter, is approved.
`
`
` REQUIRED PEDIATRIC ASSESSMENTS
`
`
`
`Under the Pediatric Research Equity Act (PREA) (21 U.S.C. 355c), all applications for new
`
`
`
`active ingredients, new indications, new dosage forms, new dosing regimens, or new routes of
`
`
`administration are required to contain an assessment of the safety and effectiveness of the
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 3408088
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
` NDA 021880/S-035
`
` Page 2
`
`
` product for the claimed indication(s) in pediatric patients unless this requirement is waived,
`
`
` deferred, or inapplicable.
`
`
`
`Because none of these criteria apply to your application, you are exempt from this requirement.
`
`
`RISK EVALUATION AND MITIGATION STRATEGY REQUIREMENTS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The REMS for Revlimid® (lenalidomide) capsules was originally approved on August 3, 2010,
`
`
`
`
`
`and REMS modifications were approved on May 9, 2012, February 8, 2013, and last modified on
`
`
`
`June 5, 2013. The REMS consists of elements to assure safe use, implementation system, and a
`
`
`
`
`
`timetable for submission of assessments of the REMS. Your proposed modifications to the
`
`
`
`
`REMS consist of the addition and implementation of a pharmacy portal to facilitate pharmacy
`activity within the REMS, and to harmonize the REMS with the Thalomid® (thalidomide)
`
`
`capsules and Pomalyst® (pomalidomide) capsules REMS. In addition, the REMS assessment
`
`
`
`
`
`
`plan will now include implementation of a survey of contraceptive use in females of reproductive
`
`
`
`potential and a survey of knowledge for pharmacists.
`
`
`
`
`
`Your proposed modified REMS, submitted on October 30, 2013, and appended to this letter, is
`
`approved.
`
`
`The timetable for submission of assessments of the REMS will remain the same as that approved
`
`
`on August 3, 2010.
`
`
`
`Our February 8, 2013 REMS modification approval letter described the REMS assessment plan.
`
`
`
`
`The REMS assessment plan should be revised to include the results from the new Pharmacist
`
`Risk Assessment Survey Protocol of pharmacist understanding of the serious risks and safe-use
`
`
`
`conditions, and the results from the Adult Female of Reproductive Potential (AFRP)
`
`Contraception Choice Survey Protocol regarding contraceptive use.
`
`
`
`The revised REMS assessment plan should include, but is not limited to, the following:
`
`
`
`1. Pregnancies:
`
`a. Number of pregnancies reported during the REMS assessment reporting period and
`
`
`
`annually for each REMS reporting period
`
`
`b. Outcome of each pregnancy
`
`
`
`
`
`c. Follow-up of outstanding pregnancy reports from previous assessment reporting
`
`
`period
`
`
`d. Root cause analysis of each reported pregnancy
`
`
`e. Link to most recent Periodic Safety Update Report (PSUR) or Periodic Benefit-Risk
`
`
`Evaluation Report (PBRER) that provides information on worldwide pregnancies.
`
`
`Discussion of any new information provided in the PSUR or PBRER regarding
`
`pregnancy
`
`Reference ID: 3408088
`
`

`

`
`
` NDA 021880/S-035
`
` Page 3
`
`
`
`
`
` 2. Reporting on the restricted distribution program:
`
`
`
` a. The number of pharmacies and physicians certified, and patients enrolled during
`
`
`
` the current REMS assessment reporting period and during each previous REMS
`
`assessment reporting period
` b. Patient demographics for the current REMS assessment reporting period and for
`
`
`
` previous REMS assessment reporting periods to include gender, age, diagnosis,
`
`
` females of reproductive potential (FRP)
` c. Number of female patients for whom pregnancy testing can be discontinued
`
`
`
` because menopause has been documented by follicle-stimulating
` hormone/luteinizing hormone (FSH/LH) levels during this REMS assessment
`
`
` reporting period and for previous REMS assessment reporting periods
`
`
`
`
`
` 3. Documentation of safe use conditions
`
`
`
` Based on information collected through patient enrollment and mandatory surveys that are
`
` used to document safe use conditions, provide information on:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` a. Flagged prescriptions/documentations of safe use of particular interest include
`
`
` those that have the potential of allowing pregnant patients access to the drug, and
` those that result in a delay or interruption of treatment. Provide the following,
`
` relative to flagged prescriptions/documentation of safe use:
`
`
` i. A summary of identified flags, the reasons for the flags, and the actions
`
`
`
`
` taken to correct. Provide for the reporting period; and summarize findings
`
`
` from each previous assessment report.
` ii. The number and proportion of flagged prescriptions intended for an FRP
`
`
`
` due to lack of documentation of a negative pregnancy test, positive
`
`
`
` pregnancy test, and/or a delay in obtaining a pregnancy test.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` iii. The number and proportion of flags that caused a delay in treatment
`
` initiation or a gap in therapy for patients. The time to resolution of flags
`
`
`
` (mean, minimum, maximum) and include a graph of time to resolution
` versus numbers of prescriptions (or number of mandatory surveys
`
`
` conducted to document safe use conditions) for the reporting period and
` for each previous reporting period.
`
`
`4. Results of pharmacist survey of knowledge regarding the serious risks and safe-use
`
`
` conditions.
`
`5. Using patient survey data, documentation of choice of contraception (information from
`
`
`patients of method/use), and of changes to methods used (numbers of FRP using method at
`
`
`entry and ongoing): numbers/proportions using highly effective form of birth control;
`
`number/proportions using other less effective forms of birth control.
`
`
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 3408088
`
`

`

`
`
` NDA 021880/S-035
`
` Page 4
`
`
` The requirements for assessments of an approved REMS under section 505-1(g)(3) include, with
`
`
`
` respect to each goal included in the strategy, an assessment of the extent to which the approved
` strategy, including each element of the strategy, is meeting the goal or whether one or more such
`
`
`
`
`
`
` goals or such elements should be modified.
`
`
`
`
`
`In addition to the assessments submitted according to the timetable included in the approved
`REMS, you must submit a REMS assessment and may propose a modification to the approved
`REMS when you submit a supplemental application for a new indication for use as described in
`section 505-1(g)(2)(A) of the FDCA.
`
`
`
`
` If the assessment instruments and methodology for your REMS assessments are not included in
` the REMS supporting document, or if you propose changes to the submitted assessment
`
`
` instruments or methodology, you should update the REMS supporting document to include
`
`
` specific assessment instrument and methodology information at least 90 days before the
` assessments will be conducted. Updates to the REMS supporting document may be included in a
`
` new document that references previous REMS supporting document submission(s) for
` unchanged portions. Alternatively, updates may be made by modifying the complete previous
`
`
` REMS supporting document, with all changes marked and highlighted. Prominently identify the
`
` submission containing the assessment instruments and methodology with the following wording
`
`
` in bold capital letters at the top of the first page of the submission:
`
`
`
`
`NDA 021880 REMS CORRESPONDENCE
`
`
`
`
`(insert concise description of content in bold capital letters, e.g.,
`
`
`UPDATE TO REMS SUPPORTING DOCUMENT - ASSESSMENT
`
`
`METHODOLOGY
`
`
`
`
`We remind you that section 505-1(f)(8) of FDCA prohibits holders of an approved covered
`
`
`application with elements to assure safe use from using any element to block or delay approval
`
`
`
`of an application under section 505(b)(2) or (j). A violation of this provision in 505-1(f) could
`
`result in enforcement action.
`
`
`An authorized generic drug under this NDA must have an approved REMS prior to marketing.
`Should you decide to market, sell, or distribute an authorized generic drug under this NDA,
`
`contact us to discuss what will be required in the authorized generic drug REMS submission.
`
`
`Prominently identify the submission containing the REMS assessments or proposed
`
`modifications of the REMS with the following wording in bold capital letters at the top of the
`
`
`first page of the submission as appropriate:
`
`
`
`NDA 021880 REMS ASSESSMENT
`
`
`
`
`NEW SUPPLEMENT FOR NDA 021880
`
`
`
`
`PROPOSED REMS MODIFICATION
`
`
`
`NEW SUPPLEMENT (NEW INDICATION FOR USE)
`
`
`FOR NDA 021880
`
`
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 3408088
`
`

`

`
`
` NDA 021880/S-035
`
` Page 5
`
`
`
` REMS ASSESSMENT
`
`
` PROPOSED REMS MODIFICATION (if included)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`If you do not submit electronically, please send 5 copies of REMS-related submissions.
`
`
`
`PROMOTIONAL MATERIALS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`You may request advisory comments on proposed introductory advertising and promotional
`
`
`labeling. To do so, submit the following, in triplicate, (1) a cover letter requesting advisory
`
`comments, (2) the proposed materials in draft or mock-up form with annotated references, and
`
`(3) the package insert(s) to:
`
`
`
`Food and Drug Administration
`
`Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
`
`Office of Prescription Drug Promotion (OPDP)
`
`5901-B Ammendale Road
`
`Beltsville, MD 20705-1266
`
`
`
`You must submit final promotional materials and package insert(s), accompanied by a Form
`
`
`
`
`
`FDA 2253, at the time of initial dissemination or publication [21 CFR 314.81(b)(3)(i)]. Form
`
`FDA 2253 is available at http://www.fda.gov/opacom/morechoices/fdaforms/cder.html;
`instructions are provided on page 2 of the form. For more information about submission of
`
`
`
`promotional materials to the Office of Prescription Drug Promotion (OPDP), see
`
`http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/CDER/ucm090142.htm.
`
`
`REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
`
`
`We remind you that you must comply with reporting requirements for an approved NDA
`
`
`
`(21 CFR 314.80 and 314.81).
`
`
`
`If you have any questions, call Theresa Carioti, Regulatory Project Manager, at (301) 796-2848.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Sincerely,
`
`
`{See appended electronic signature page}
`
`
`
`Robert C. Kane, MD
`
`Deputy Director of Safety
`
`
`Division of Hematology Products
`
`
`Office of Hematology and Oncology Products
`
`Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
`
`
`
`ENCLOSURE:
`
`REMS
`
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 3408088
`
`

`

`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed
`electronically and this page is the manifestation of the electronic
`signature.
`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`/s/
`----------------------------------------------------
`
`ROBERT C KANE
`11/15/2013
`
`Reference ID: 3408088
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket