`
`
`
`DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Food and Drug Administration
`
`
` Silver Spring MD 20993
`
`
`
`
`
` NDA 021880/S-035
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` SUPPLEMENT APPROVAL
`
` REMS ASSESSMENT ACKNOWLEDGMENT
`
`REMS ASSESSMENT PLAN REVISION
`
`
`
`
`Celgene Corporation
`
`
`Attention: Marion Ceruzzi, PhD
`
`
`
`Senior Director, Regulatory Affairs
`
`
`400 Connell Drive, Suite 7000
`
`
`Connell Corporate Park
`
`
`Berkley Heights, NJ 07922
`
`
`
`
`
`Dear Dr. Ceruzzi:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Please refer to your Supplemental New Drug Application (sNDA) dated May 17, 2013, received
`
`
`
`
`
`
`May 17, 2013, submitted under section 505(b) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
`
`(FDCA) for Revlimid® (lenalidomide) capsules 2.5, 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 mg.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`We acknowledge receipt of your amendments dated June 19, July 22, September 16,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`October 30, 2013, and your risk evaluation and mitigation strategy (REMS) assessment dated
`
`
`
`August 2, 2013. We have found the REMS assessment to be complete.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`This “Prior Approval” supplemental new drug application (S-035) provides for proposed
`
`modifications to the REMS to continue the harmonization of the REMS for Thalomid®
`
`
`
`
`
`(thalidomide), Revlimid® (lenalidomide), and Pomalyst® (pomalidomide) capsules, that began
`
`
`
`
`
`with the February 8, 2013 approval of the REMS modifications for Revlimid® (lenalidomide)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`and Thalomid® (thalidomide) capsules, and the approval of the REMS for Pomalyst®
`
`
`
`
`
`(pomalidomide) capsules.
`
`
`
`APPROVAL
`
` We have completed our review of this supplemental application, as amended. It is approved,
`
`
`
`
`
`
` effective on the date of this letter. Your proposed modified REMS, submitted on
` October 30, 2013, and appended to this letter, is approved.
`
`
` REQUIRED PEDIATRIC ASSESSMENTS
`
`
`
`Under the Pediatric Research Equity Act (PREA) (21 U.S.C. 355c), all applications for new
`
`
`
`active ingredients, new indications, new dosage forms, new dosing regimens, or new routes of
`
`
`administration are required to contain an assessment of the safety and effectiveness of the
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 3408088
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` NDA 021880/S-035
`
` Page 2
`
`
` product for the claimed indication(s) in pediatric patients unless this requirement is waived,
`
`
` deferred, or inapplicable.
`
`
`
`Because none of these criteria apply to your application, you are exempt from this requirement.
`
`
`RISK EVALUATION AND MITIGATION STRATEGY REQUIREMENTS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The REMS for Revlimid® (lenalidomide) capsules was originally approved on August 3, 2010,
`
`
`
`
`
`and REMS modifications were approved on May 9, 2012, February 8, 2013, and last modified on
`
`
`
`June 5, 2013. The REMS consists of elements to assure safe use, implementation system, and a
`
`
`
`
`
`timetable for submission of assessments of the REMS. Your proposed modifications to the
`
`
`
`
`REMS consist of the addition and implementation of a pharmacy portal to facilitate pharmacy
`activity within the REMS, and to harmonize the REMS with the Thalomid® (thalidomide)
`
`
`capsules and Pomalyst® (pomalidomide) capsules REMS. In addition, the REMS assessment
`
`
`
`
`
`
`plan will now include implementation of a survey of contraceptive use in females of reproductive
`
`
`
`potential and a survey of knowledge for pharmacists.
`
`
`
`
`
`Your proposed modified REMS, submitted on October 30, 2013, and appended to this letter, is
`
`approved.
`
`
`The timetable for submission of assessments of the REMS will remain the same as that approved
`
`
`on August 3, 2010.
`
`
`
`Our February 8, 2013 REMS modification approval letter described the REMS assessment plan.
`
`
`
`
`The REMS assessment plan should be revised to include the results from the new Pharmacist
`
`Risk Assessment Survey Protocol of pharmacist understanding of the serious risks and safe-use
`
`
`
`conditions, and the results from the Adult Female of Reproductive Potential (AFRP)
`
`Contraception Choice Survey Protocol regarding contraceptive use.
`
`
`
`The revised REMS assessment plan should include, but is not limited to, the following:
`
`
`
`1. Pregnancies:
`
`a. Number of pregnancies reported during the REMS assessment reporting period and
`
`
`
`annually for each REMS reporting period
`
`
`b. Outcome of each pregnancy
`
`
`
`
`
`c. Follow-up of outstanding pregnancy reports from previous assessment reporting
`
`
`period
`
`
`d. Root cause analysis of each reported pregnancy
`
`
`e. Link to most recent Periodic Safety Update Report (PSUR) or Periodic Benefit-Risk
`
`
`Evaluation Report (PBRER) that provides information on worldwide pregnancies.
`
`
`Discussion of any new information provided in the PSUR or PBRER regarding
`
`pregnancy
`
`Reference ID: 3408088
`
`
`
`
`
` NDA 021880/S-035
`
` Page 3
`
`
`
`
`
` 2. Reporting on the restricted distribution program:
`
`
`
` a. The number of pharmacies and physicians certified, and patients enrolled during
`
`
`
` the current REMS assessment reporting period and during each previous REMS
`
`assessment reporting period
` b. Patient demographics for the current REMS assessment reporting period and for
`
`
`
` previous REMS assessment reporting periods to include gender, age, diagnosis,
`
`
` females of reproductive potential (FRP)
` c. Number of female patients for whom pregnancy testing can be discontinued
`
`
`
` because menopause has been documented by follicle-stimulating
` hormone/luteinizing hormone (FSH/LH) levels during this REMS assessment
`
`
` reporting period and for previous REMS assessment reporting periods
`
`
`
`
`
` 3. Documentation of safe use conditions
`
`
`
` Based on information collected through patient enrollment and mandatory surveys that are
`
` used to document safe use conditions, provide information on:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` a. Flagged prescriptions/documentations of safe use of particular interest include
`
`
` those that have the potential of allowing pregnant patients access to the drug, and
` those that result in a delay or interruption of treatment. Provide the following,
`
` relative to flagged prescriptions/documentation of safe use:
`
`
` i. A summary of identified flags, the reasons for the flags, and the actions
`
`
`
`
` taken to correct. Provide for the reporting period; and summarize findings
`
`
` from each previous assessment report.
` ii. The number and proportion of flagged prescriptions intended for an FRP
`
`
`
` due to lack of documentation of a negative pregnancy test, positive
`
`
`
` pregnancy test, and/or a delay in obtaining a pregnancy test.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` iii. The number and proportion of flags that caused a delay in treatment
`
` initiation or a gap in therapy for patients. The time to resolution of flags
`
`
`
` (mean, minimum, maximum) and include a graph of time to resolution
` versus numbers of prescriptions (or number of mandatory surveys
`
`
` conducted to document safe use conditions) for the reporting period and
` for each previous reporting period.
`
`
`4. Results of pharmacist survey of knowledge regarding the serious risks and safe-use
`
`
` conditions.
`
`5. Using patient survey data, documentation of choice of contraception (information from
`
`
`patients of method/use), and of changes to methods used (numbers of FRP using method at
`
`
`entry and ongoing): numbers/proportions using highly effective form of birth control;
`
`number/proportions using other less effective forms of birth control.
`
`
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 3408088
`
`
`
`
`
` NDA 021880/S-035
`
` Page 4
`
`
` The requirements for assessments of an approved REMS under section 505-1(g)(3) include, with
`
`
`
` respect to each goal included in the strategy, an assessment of the extent to which the approved
` strategy, including each element of the strategy, is meeting the goal or whether one or more such
`
`
`
`
`
`
` goals or such elements should be modified.
`
`
`
`
`
`In addition to the assessments submitted according to the timetable included in the approved
`REMS, you must submit a REMS assessment and may propose a modification to the approved
`REMS when you submit a supplemental application for a new indication for use as described in
`section 505-1(g)(2)(A) of the FDCA.
`
`
`
`
` If the assessment instruments and methodology for your REMS assessments are not included in
` the REMS supporting document, or if you propose changes to the submitted assessment
`
`
` instruments or methodology, you should update the REMS supporting document to include
`
`
` specific assessment instrument and methodology information at least 90 days before the
` assessments will be conducted. Updates to the REMS supporting document may be included in a
`
` new document that references previous REMS supporting document submission(s) for
` unchanged portions. Alternatively, updates may be made by modifying the complete previous
`
`
` REMS supporting document, with all changes marked and highlighted. Prominently identify the
`
` submission containing the assessment instruments and methodology with the following wording
`
`
` in bold capital letters at the top of the first page of the submission:
`
`
`
`
`NDA 021880 REMS CORRESPONDENCE
`
`
`
`
`(insert concise description of content in bold capital letters, e.g.,
`
`
`UPDATE TO REMS SUPPORTING DOCUMENT - ASSESSMENT
`
`
`METHODOLOGY
`
`
`
`
`We remind you that section 505-1(f)(8) of FDCA prohibits holders of an approved covered
`
`
`application with elements to assure safe use from using any element to block or delay approval
`
`
`
`of an application under section 505(b)(2) or (j). A violation of this provision in 505-1(f) could
`
`result in enforcement action.
`
`
`An authorized generic drug under this NDA must have an approved REMS prior to marketing.
`Should you decide to market, sell, or distribute an authorized generic drug under this NDA,
`
`contact us to discuss what will be required in the authorized generic drug REMS submission.
`
`
`Prominently identify the submission containing the REMS assessments or proposed
`
`modifications of the REMS with the following wording in bold capital letters at the top of the
`
`
`first page of the submission as appropriate:
`
`
`
`NDA 021880 REMS ASSESSMENT
`
`
`
`
`NEW SUPPLEMENT FOR NDA 021880
`
`
`
`
`PROPOSED REMS MODIFICATION
`
`
`
`NEW SUPPLEMENT (NEW INDICATION FOR USE)
`
`
`FOR NDA 021880
`
`
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 3408088
`
`
`
`
`
` NDA 021880/S-035
`
` Page 5
`
`
`
` REMS ASSESSMENT
`
`
` PROPOSED REMS MODIFICATION (if included)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`If you do not submit electronically, please send 5 copies of REMS-related submissions.
`
`
`
`PROMOTIONAL MATERIALS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`You may request advisory comments on proposed introductory advertising and promotional
`
`
`labeling. To do so, submit the following, in triplicate, (1) a cover letter requesting advisory
`
`comments, (2) the proposed materials in draft or mock-up form with annotated references, and
`
`(3) the package insert(s) to:
`
`
`
`Food and Drug Administration
`
`Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
`
`Office of Prescription Drug Promotion (OPDP)
`
`5901-B Ammendale Road
`
`Beltsville, MD 20705-1266
`
`
`
`You must submit final promotional materials and package insert(s), accompanied by a Form
`
`
`
`
`
`FDA 2253, at the time of initial dissemination or publication [21 CFR 314.81(b)(3)(i)]. Form
`
`FDA 2253 is available at http://www.fda.gov/opacom/morechoices/fdaforms/cder.html;
`instructions are provided on page 2 of the form. For more information about submission of
`
`
`
`promotional materials to the Office of Prescription Drug Promotion (OPDP), see
`
`http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/CDER/ucm090142.htm.
`
`
`REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
`
`
`We remind you that you must comply with reporting requirements for an approved NDA
`
`
`
`(21 CFR 314.80 and 314.81).
`
`
`
`If you have any questions, call Theresa Carioti, Regulatory Project Manager, at (301) 796-2848.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Sincerely,
`
`
`{See appended electronic signature page}
`
`
`
`Robert C. Kane, MD
`
`Deputy Director of Safety
`
`
`Division of Hematology Products
`
`
`Office of Hematology and Oncology Products
`
`Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
`
`
`
`ENCLOSURE:
`
`REMS
`
`
`
`
`Reference ID: 3408088
`
`
`
`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed
`electronically and this page is the manifestation of the electronic
`signature.
`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`/s/
`----------------------------------------------------
`
`ROBERT C KANE
`11/15/2013
`
`Reference ID: 3408088
`
`