throbber

`
`
`
`DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
`
`
`
`
`
`Public Health Service
`Food and Drug Administration
`Rockville, MD 20857
`
`Gretchen Toolan
`Director, Regulatory Affairs
`
`
`
`NDA 21-880/S-001
`
`Celgene Corporation
`86 Morris Avenue
`Summit, New Jersey 07901
`
`Attention:
`
`
`
`Dear Ms. Toolan:
`
`Please refer to your supplemental new drug application (NDA) dated December 29, 2005, received
`December 30, 2005, submitted under section 505 (b) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act for
`Revlimid® (lenalidomide) capsules 5 mg, 10 mg, 15 mg and 25 mg.
`
`We acknowledge receipt of your submissions dated January 4, 13, 18, 27 and 31, 2006; February 24,
`2006; March 10, 14, 22, and 23, 2006; April 6, 7, 18, 21, and 24, 2006; May 2, 5, 9, 10, 15, 19, 22, 24,
`26 and 31, 2006; June 2, 9, 22 and 23, 2006.
`
`This supplemental new drug application, considered for approval under 21 CFR 314.520 (Subpart H),
`provides for the use of Revlimid® 15 mg and 25 mg capsules in combination with dexamethasone for
`the treatment of multiple myeloma patients who have received at least one prior therapy.
`
`We have completed our review of this supplemental application, as amended. It is approved under the
`provisions of 21 CFR 314.520 (Subpart H), effective on the date of this letter, for use as recommended
`in the agreed upon labeling text, required patient labeling, and the components of the RevAssistSM Risk
`Minimization Action Plan (RiskMAP).
`
`We also remind you of your post marketing study commitments specified in your submission dated
`June 26, 2006. These commitments, along with any completion dates agreed upon, are listed below.
`
`A. Conduct an epidemiologic study to address the questions detailed below:
`
`
`1. What is the failure rate for each of the different types of thromboembolic prophylaxis (e.g.
`antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy) for multiple myeloma patients treated with a lenalidomide-
`containing regimen?
`
`
`2. What is the failure rate for each type of Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) treatment (dose-adjusted
`heparin, low molecular weight heparin, coumadin) for those patients with multiple myeloma and
`a DVT who continue to receive ongoing treatment with lenalidomide?
`
`
`3. What is the failure rate for each type of post-DVT thromboembolic prophylaxis for those
`patients with multiple myeloma and a DVT who continue to receive ongoing treatment with
`lenalidomide?
`
`
`
`

`

`NDA 21-880/S-001
`Page 2
`
`
`This prospective epidemiologic study will enroll select patients identified in the RevAssistSM
`program, and collect the necessary additional data on these patients to further evaluate occurrences
`of thrombosis and anticoagulant use. The final details of the design will be as agreed upon between
`the Agency and Celgene.
`
`Protocol Submission:
`Study Start:
`
`
`Final Report Submission:
`
`by December 2006
`by June 2007
`by December 2012
`
`
`
`
`B. Provide updated time to progression (TTP) and survival data for studies MM-009 and MM-010
`when 194 death events have occurred in each study.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Protocol Submission:
`MM-009 original protocol submitted November 26, 2002 Serial No. 92.
`Amendment No. 2 submitted April 29, 2005 Serial No. 550
`
`MM-010 original protocol submitted December 10, 2002, Serial No. 96.
`Amendment No. 2 submitted May 12, 2005, Serial No. 557.
`
`Study Start:
`
`
`MM-009
`
`
`MM-010
`
`
`
`
`Final Report Submission:
`
`September 22, 2003
`February 11, 2003
`
`by December 2008
`
`
`
`Proposal Submission:
`
`
`
`by December 2006
`
`
`C. Provide a proposal to assess for QTc prolongation.
`
`
`
`D. Conduct a bioequivalence study comparing the 25 mg capsule (test) to 5 X 5 mg capsules
`(reference).
`
`
`Protocol Submission:
`Study Start:
`
`
`Final Report Submission:
`
`by December 2006
`by March 2007
`by December 2007
`
`
`
`
`We also remind you of your required post marketing study commitments specified in your submission
`dated December 21, 2005 for Revlimid® for use in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), approved on
`December 27, 2005. These commitments, along with any completion dates agreed upon, are listed
`below.
`
`1. The embryo-fetal toxicity assessment of Revlimid® has not been adequately addressed.
`You have agreed to provide adequate information for this assessment in appropriate
`models designed to fully assesses the possible toxicity of Revlimid®. You indicated you
`plan to conduct these studies in two different species that are appropriate to assess the full
`range of thalidomide embryo-fetal effects. As discussed, the rat is not an acceptable
`model. If the study with lenalidomide in the first species shows clear evidence of
`teratogenesis, than a confirmatory study will not be necessary. Although not generally
`considered “definitive” test systems for pharmaceutical products, additional studies of an
`
`

`

`NDA 21-880/S-001
`Page 3
`
`
`exploratory nature on the embryo-fetal effects of lenalidomide (e.g., frog embryo assay;
`FETAX assay), may be useful.
`
`Protocol Submission:
`Study Start:
`
`
`Final Report Submission:
`
`06/06
`09/06
`12/07
`
`
`
`
`
`2. You have agreed to submit the study report and data from the ongoing study, CC-5013-MDS-
`004, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, 3-arm study of the efficacy
`and safety of 2 doses of lenalidomide (5 mg daily versus 10 mg day 21 days of a 28 day cycle)
`versus placebo in red blood cell (RBC) transfusion-dependent patients with low-or
`intermediate-1-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) associated with a deletion 5q
`cytogenetic abnormality when completed.
`
`Protocol Submission:
`Study Start:
`
`
`Final Report Submission:
`
`03/05
`08/05
`12/08
`
`3. Following Revlimid® dosing, approximately 2/3 of lenalidomide is excreted as unchanged
`drug in urine. In multiple myeloma patients with mild renal impairment, exposure (plasma
`AUC) was 56% higher than in similar patients with normal renal function who received the
`same dose. Based on these data, you have agreed to conduct a study to determine the
`pharmacokinetics of lenalidomide in subjects with renal impairment. To assist with the
`study design, please refer to the FDA Guidance, "Pharmacokinetics in Patients with
`Impaired Renal Function.”
`
`Protocol Submission:
`Study Start:
`
`
`Final Report Submission:
`
`11/04
`03/06
`12/07
`
`
`4. Regarding the Evaluation/Surveillance Plan:
`
`
`You have agreed to submit a Pregnancy Exposure follow-up plan which will document your
`plan to follow-up pregnancy exposures to their outcome. This plan may be submitted as a post-
`marketing commitment.
`
`Plan submission:
`
`
`
`06/01/06
`
`You have agreed to submit an Evaluation Plan of RevAssistSM to FDA within 3 to 6 months of
`approval. Please include, at a minimum, plans to study the Pharmacy Audit Plan, Outcomes of
`Pregnancy Exposures, and the Knowledge Surveys of physicians, nurses, and patients.
`
`Plan submission:
`
`5. You have agreed to submit all exposed pregnancies within 15 days of receipt as 15 day
`expedited reports.
`
`
`
`06/01/06
`
`
`Submit clinical protocols to your IND for this product. Submit nonclinical and chemistry,
`manufacturing, and controls protocols and all study final reports to this NDA. In addition, under 21
`CFR 314.81(b)(2)(vii) and 314.81(b)(2)(viii), you must include a status summary of each commitment
`
`

`

`NDA 21-880/S-001
`Page 4
`
`in your annual report to this NDA. The status summary should include expected summary completion
`and final report submission dates, any changes in plans since the last annual report, and, for clinical
`studies, number of patients entered into each study. All submissions, including supplements, relating
`to these postmarketing study commitments should be prominently labeled “Postmarketing Study
`Commitment Protocol”, “Postmarketing Study Commitment Final Report”, or “Postmarketing
`Study Commitment Correspondence.”
`
`Pursuant to 21 CFR Part 208, FDA has determined that Revlimid® poses a serious and significant
`public health concern requiring distribution of a Medication Guide. The Medication Guide is
`necessary for patients' safe and effective use of Revlimid®. FDA has determined that Revlimid® is a
`product that has serious risks of which patients should be made aware because information concerning
`the risks could affect patients' decisions to use Revlimid®. In addition, patient labeling could help
`prevent serious adverse events related to use of the product. Under 21 CFR 208, you are responsible
`for ensuring that the Medication Guide is available for distribution to patients who are dispensed
`Revlimid®.
`
`The final printed labeling (FPL) must be identical to the enclosed labeling (package insert, Medication
`Guide and immediate container and carton labels). Marketing the product with FPL that is not identical
`to the approved labeling text may render the product misbranded and an unapproved new drug.
`
`Please submit an electronic version of the FPL according to the guidance for industry titled Providing
`Regulatory Submissions in Electronic Format - NDA. Alternatively, you may submit 20 paper copies
`of the FPL as soon as it is available but no more than 30 days after it is printed. Individually mount 15
`of the copies on heavy-weight paper or similar material. For administrative purposes, designate this
`submission “FPL for approved NDA 21-880.” Approval of this submission by FDA is not required
`before the labeling is used.
`
`Submit content of labeling [21 CFR 601.14(b)] in structured product labeling (SPL) format, as
`described at http://www.fda.gov/oc/datacouncil/spl.html, that is identical in content to the enclosed
`labeling text. Upon receipt and verification, we will transmit that version to the National Library of
`Medicine for posting on the DailyMed website.
`
`As part of the approval under Subpart H, we acknowledge that you submitted to the Agency your
`promotional materials (both promotional labeling and advertisements) that are to be used within the
`first 120 days after approval. In addition, as required by 21 CFR 314.550, after the initial 120 day
`period following this approval, you must submit all subsequent promotional labeling as well as
`advertisements at least 30 days before the intended time of initial distribution of the labeling or initial
`publication of the advertisement. Send one copy to the Division of Drug Oncology Products and two
`copies of the promotional materials and the package insert directly to:
`
`
`Food and Drug Administration
`
`
`Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
`Division of Drug Marketing, Advertising, and Communications
`Food and Drug Administration
`5901-B Ammendale Road
`Beltsville, MD 20705-1266
`
`
`We remind you that you must comply with the reporting requirements for an approved NDA (21 CFR
`314.80 and 314.81).
`
`

`

`NDA 21-880/S-001
`Page 5
`
`
`The MedWatch-to-Manufacturer Program provides manufacturers with copies of serious adverse event
`reports that are received directly by the FDA. New molecular entities and important new biologics
`qualify for inclusion for three years after approval. Your firm is eligible to receive copies of reports for
`this product. To participate in the program, please see the enrollment instructions and program
`description details at www.fda.gov/medwatch/report/mmp.htm
`
`If you have any questions, call Carl Huntley, Regulatory Project Manager, at (301) 796-1372.
`
`
`Sincerely,
`
`{See appended electronic signature page}
`
`Robert Justice, M.D.
`Division Director
`Division of Drug Oncology Products
`Office of Oncology Drug Products
`Office of New Drugs
`Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
`Food and Drug Administration
`
`
`
`Enclosure -Label
`
`

`

`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed electronically and
`this page is the manifestation of the electronic signature.
`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
` /s/
`---------------------
`Robert Justice
`6/29/2006 07:34:17 PM
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket