throbber
Study P01 :04-05
`
`‘
`
`NBA 21 -272
`UT-I 5 for pulmonary hypertension
`
`Table 76. Hemodynamic results (P01:04—05)"’1
`
`i l i1 I V
`
`i I
`
`ri i
`
`l i
`
`i
`
`i iill iii i 1a:5% > iil
`
`\l
`
`Week 12 chm?”
`iIi ii l1
`
`4 l 1l l 1
`
`<0.001 ‘
`
`.1. H- y—
`195
`-0.510.4
`194
`0.110.04
`193
`1.810.6
`
`199
`-2.710.8
`199
`.-2.210.6
`199
`-2.310.5
`163
`-3.510.6
`
`1 75
`-0. 110.3
`
`198
`-2.311.1
`198
`-1.810.9
`197
`-1.710.9
`175
`-3.511.0
`181
`2.0108
`194
`-0.610.3
`
`
`
`215
`- 111
`21 1
`1 .4103
`209
`~0. 110.04
`208
`-0.610.5
`
`215
`0.3109
`2 15
`0610.6
`215
`0710.6
`187
`1 210.6
`
`199
`0910.4
`
`2 14
`-0.410.8
`214
`-0.410.1
`21 1
`- 1 .010.9
`190
`-O.810.9
`l 82
`-1 .410.7
`205
`-0.410.3
`
`234
`8211
`23 l
`1 010.4
`' 232
`2.210.05
`23 l
`2810.7
`
`228
`8211
`228
`1010.4
`225
`2.410.06
`222
`3010.9
`
`235
`9511.5
`
`235
`4010.8
`235
`6011 .0
`203
`2510.9
`
`225
`9.3102
`
`234
`12111.3
`234
`7410.8
`234
`9110.9
`2 1 9
`3911 .0
`215
`6010.8
`227
`1910.3
`
`231
`9611.6
`23 1
`4311.0
`231
`6211.2
`204
`2711.0
`
`217
`9.5102
`
`230
`11911.1
`230
`7210.9
`229
`9010.9
`21 1
`3811 . 1
`2 1 5
`6210.7
`225
`1910.3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`mean1$E
`
`N m
`
`ean1SE
`
`mean1SE
`
`mean1SE
`
`N
`mean1SE
`
`N
`meaniSE
`
`Nm
`
`eaniSE
`
`N m
`
`ean18E
`
`N
`mean1$E
`
`N
`Ba
`
`an1SE
`
`N m
`
`eaniSE
`
`mean1SE
`
`N
`mean1SE
`N
`mean1SE
`Z
`mean1SE
`
`
`
`rate ‘
`
`0"’U
`Right atrial pressure
`mml-lg
`Cardiac index
`L/ min / m2
`Stroke index
`
`L/ beat/ m2
`Pulmonary systolic
`mml—l 1
`
`Pulmonary diastolic
`33
`:
`
`Pulmonary mean
`BBI
`Pulm vasc resis index
`
`mml-l /L/min/m2
`Pulmonary cap wedge
`mml-l:
`
`Systemic systolic
`mml-l ;
`
`Systemic diastolic
`mmHg
`Systemic mean
`BB:1:
`
`Syst vasc resis index
`mmH 1 /L/min/m2
`Mixed venous oxygen
`%
`
`Respiration rate
`min-1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`<0.001
`
`<0.001
`
`0.02
`
`<0.001
`
`0.08
`
`0.08
`
`03
`
`
`
`
`
`
`<0.001 .
`
`<0.2
`
`
`
`The table indicates that for this truncated population (i.e. completers), there were
`modest decreases in right atrial pressures, pulmonary artery pressures (mean,
`systolic and diastolic) and pulmonary vascular resistance. Cardiac index, stroke
`index and mixed venous oxygenation were increased.
`
`APPEARS ““8 W“
`
`’0' The p-ualue is based on the treatment effect of the ANCOVA with baseline and treatment as the couan'ates.
`
`G:\N21272.doc
`
`—129—
`
`16:09 Friday, March 09, 2001
`
`Last saved
`
`

`

`Study P01:04-01>
`
`,
`
`NBA 21 -272
`UT—I 5 for pulmonary hypertension
`
`
`
`Onlreatmen
`
`ZOAOGOEIWIZBA
`
`AOGOEDIWIZOMDA
`
`SAPD
`
`3“”
`
`SAPM 33"”
`
`Figure 15. Hemodynamics scatter plots (P01:04-05)
`Reviewers' analysis. Baseline and week-12 hemodynamic data are plotted for subjects
`on vehicle (P, square) and 01-15 (A, triangle). Marginal box-and—whiskers plots
`compare the distributions in the treatment groups at baseline and at 12 weeks.
`Panes are (HR) heart rate, (PAPD) pulmonary artery diastolic pressure, (PAP!)
`pulmonary artery mean pressure, (PAPS) pulmonary artery systolic pressure, (PCWP)
`pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, (RAP) right atrial pressure, (SAPD) systemic
`diastolic pressure, (SAW) systemic mean pressure, and (SAPS) systemic systolic
`pressure.
`
`G:\N21272.doc
`
`——1 30—
`
`Last saved
`16:09 Friday, March 09, 2001
`
`Ontreatmen
`
`Ontreatmen
`
`0ntreatmen
`
`Ontreatmen
`
`Ontreatmen
`
`0ntreatmen
`
`'40
`
`so 801001me
`
`HR
`
`Basel'ne
`
`s.-
`
`3E.
`
`-
`
`.33c
`0
`
`0 501(1)]me
`
`PAPS
`
`33““
`
`

`

`Study I 01:04-05
`
`,
`
`’
`‘
`
`NDA 21-272
`UT-I 5for pulmonary hypertension
`
`The effect on hemodynamics, though statistically significant is in general small and of
`uncertain consequence. For cardiac index the net change (assuming that the data for
`those measured is consistent with thewhole group) there was a net increase of 7.6%.
`There was an approximately 5% (3 mm Hg) decrease in mean pulmonary artery
`pressure. There was an approximately 18% decrease in pulmonary vascular resistance.
`
`The sponsor was requested to analyze whether there was a correlation between
`hemodynamics (change in and % change in C1, PVR or PAPm) and walking distance,
`dyspnea fatigue rating or Borg-score. Among these 18 analyses only the correlation
`between PVR and walk distance was nominally significant (by Spearman-Rank
`correlation). Change in mixed venous oxygenation was correlated with walk and
`dyspnea fatigue index. The % change in mixed venous oxygenation was correlated with
`walk distance and dyspnea-fatigue index.
`
`Egen saturation
`
`Although prespecified as a secondary end~point, this metric was not measured. In fact it
`did not appear that this metric was collected. With the exception of those who were on
`oxygen, during catheterization, no oxygen saturation data was captured.
`
`Other end points
`
`The following end points are often considered in drugs for use in subjects with CHF due
`to left-sided systolic dysfunction. The outcomes would be reasonable to consider for
`subjects with pulmonary hypertension. They were not prespecified as end-points for
`these studies.
`
`Mortality
`
`There did not appear to be a signal that mortality was altered by UT—15. There were a
`total of 19 subject who died during the course of the study. Nine in the UT-lS and ten
`in the vehicle group. Death occurred on treatment day (mean + SD) 42 1 26 for UT-15
`and on day 49 1 35 for vehicle.
`,
`
`Of these deaths, six UT-15 (#4017, #9006, #10002, #23002, #51007, and #55005) and
`seven vehicle (#9012, #10001, #15003, #16003, #60006, #60015 and #65004) were
`listed as deaths. Four subjects, two in the UT.15 (subjects #54005 and #58001) and
`one vehicle subject (#65011) were listed as having deteriorated, these subjects died after
`the assessment of deterioration. There were two subjects, one UT-15 (#4503) and one
`vehicle (#52006) subject who were listed as adverse events who died. One subject in the
`vehicle group (#16006) was listed as having completed (the subject had the last cardiac
`catheterization) but died during the hospitalization.
`
`Hospitalizations
`
`This data was culled from Table 14.3.4.1, p 5609. That section of the submission
`contained narratives of all serious adverse events. These narratives should have
`
`captured all hospitalizations. There was no difference in the number of subjects
`hospitalized in comparing UT-15 to vehicle. There were 40 vehicle subjects and 38 UT-
`15 subjects who were hospitalized or had their duration of hospitalization increased.
`Capsular summaries for those hospitalized are available under safety. Two of the .
`vehicle subjects who were hospitalized had actually inadvertently received UT-15 at the
`time of event that caused hospitalization.
`
`With respect to the number of subjects who were hospitalized for cardiovascular events
`or worsening of pulmonary hypertension, any analysis would be highly subjective. This
`reviewer, however, counted those who died or appeared to be hospitalized for
`cardiovascular diseases as 25 in the vehicle group and 22 in the UT-15 group. Check
`marks next to the number in Table 82 on page 138 reflect this reviewer’s judgement as
`to what was considered as a cardiovascular event.
`
`G:\N21272. doc
`
`—-131—
`
`Last saved
`16:09 Friday, March 09, 2001
`
`
`
`

`

`btudy P01:04-05
`
`.
`
`NBA 21 -2 72
`UT—1 5for pulmonary hypertension
`
`Need for medication chagges
`
`With respect to subjects who required either pressor support or flolan, this reviewer
`counted 12 UT- 15 subjects and 13 vehicle subjects who required pressors or flolan
`during the course of the study. Among those who were treated with pressors three
`vehicle subjects and no UT—15 subjects received flolan early on (day 2) of treatment for
`short duration (1 day). It seems that flolan in these subjects was used as a provocative
`test for pulmonary vascular responsiveness and not to treat worsening of status.
`Excluding these three subjects suggest l2 UT-15 and 10 vehicle subjects required
`inotropic or prostaglandin support during the study. There did not appear to be any
`differences in the need of pressors or flolan or pressors among the two treatments.
`
`This reviewer also explored the need or increase of medications used for pulmonary
`hypertension. The data was contained in sponsor’s Listing 16.2.4.7 of the NDA. This
`was not a pre-specified analysis, but has been used as support of medications that have
`been approved for the treatment of left-sided failure. Since this reviewer tabulated the
`data by hand and not by querying the database, the analysis is only be considered an
`approximation.
`
`The metric used was the number of subjects who received treatment with an additional
`drug used to treat pulmonary hypertension or had one of these ongoing medications
`increased at the end of treatment relative to baseline. The drug classes that were
`considered in this analysis were those that might be increased in subjects whose
`pulmonary hypertension status was worsening. The drugs included loop diuretics,
`calcium channel blockers, vasodilators (including hydralazine, clonidine, nitrates), ACE
`inhibitors or angiotensin II blockers, oxygen, flolan, pressors, steroids, digoxin,
`aldactone or non-loop diuretics. Topical steroids used for the treatment of infusion site
`pain were not included in the sponsor’s listing but captured in a subsequent listing
`16.2.4.8. These topical steroids were not included in this count. This reviewer also did ‘
`not consider changes in antithrombotics (e.g. coumadin and its derivatives, heparin) or
`antiplatelet drugs (e.g. ticlopidine) as a reflection of worsening disease but rather as
`responses to changing lNR.
`
`Based on this analysis, there were 165/233 subjects (70.8%) of those in the UT-lS
`group and 163/ 266 (69.1%) of the vehicle group who did not receive new medications
`and did not have baseline medications increased in doses (these patients could have
`medications changed i.e. decreased but were not counted). There did not appear to be
`an overwhelming signal that subject’s status was sufficiently altered to require less
`concurrent medications.
`
`Concomitant medications by class of drug, at the end of study and at screening are
`shown in table below (derived from sponsor’s Table 1 1.2.2. 12 and 11.4.5). There were
`slight increases in the number of subjects treated with each category of drug for both
`treatments. There were far more subjects treated with anticoagulants at the end of the
`study than at baseline-screening. Other classes of drugs were only slightly increased
`over baseline. There were more subjects on vehicle versus UT-15 subjects taking
`diuretics at the end of the study relative to baseline (28 versus 20), calcium channel
`blockers (4 versus 3), other vasodilators (0 versus 6) and digoxin (1 1 versus 9).
`
`PPEARS nus WAY
`A on omemu
`
`G:\N21272.doc
`
`Last saved
`
`'
`
`—-132—
`
`16:09 Friday, March 09, 2001
`
`

`

`Study 1001:04-043
`
`‘
`
`'
`
`NDA 21-272
`UT—1 5for pulmonary hypertension
`
`Table 77. Medication changes (P01:O4—05)
`
`Arpoloq:
`
`2.1,,
`
`_.
`
`,
`
`Anticoagulants
`
`Calcium channel
`blockers
`
`Other
`vasodilators
`
`Digoxin
`
`Diuretics
`
`Baseline
`Treatment
`
`Baseline
`Treatment
`
`Baseline
`Treatment
`
`, Baseline
`Treatment
`
`Baseline
`Tremam ,, ,
`
`58 (52)
`94 85
`
`50 (45)
`52 49
`
`19 (17)
`24 22
`
`30 (27)
`35 32
`
`54 (49)
`
`61 (54)
`95 84
`
`49 (43)
`50 44
`
`18 (16)
`18 16
`
`34 (30)
`41 36
`
`69 (6 1 )
`
`88 (82)
`116 92
`
`48 (38)
`49 39
`
`16 (13)
`17 14
`
`29 (23)
`33 26
`
`75 (60)
`
`88 (73)
`104 87
`
`160 (68)
`210 89
`
`149 (64) ‘
`199 85
`
`48 (40)
`51 43
`
`15 913)
`15 13
`
`22 (18)
`26 22
`
`57 (56)
`
`98 (42)
`101 43
`
`35 (15
`41 17
`
`59 (25)
`68 29
`
`97 (42)
`101 43
`
`33 (14)
`33 14
`
`56 (24)
`67 29
`
`1 29 (55)
`157
`
`l 36 (58)
`156
`
`Change in NYHA classification
`
`This parameter was not measured after baseline. No change in subject NYHA status
`was available.
`
`Dose response
`
`There was no formal dose-response data available. Since subjects were forced titrated
`based on symptom improvement as well as tolerance to drug, any dose~related data is
`confounded by duration of time in the study. Dose response data could theoretically be
`defined by the walking effect at a given infusion rate of drug.
`
`The relationship of infusion rate and walking distance at week 12 is shown in Figure
`16. Both vehicle (P) and UT-15 (A) have positive non-zero slope effects. The intercepts of
`the two drugs differ. The intercept for vehicle is negative and significantly different from
`baseline.
`
`APPEARS THIS WAY
`0N ORIGINAL
`
`APPEARS THIS WAY
`on ORIGINAL
`
`G:\N21272.doc
`
`-——1 33—
`
`Last saved
`1 6:09 Friday, March 09, 2001
`
`

`

`Study P01:04-05
`
`,
`
`NDA 21 «272
`UT-1 5 for pulmonary hypertension
`
`m
`
`Figure 16. Change from baseline. in walking distance (feet) by dose (studies P01:04, P01:05).
`P=Vehicle; Asaetive treatment. Data derived from dataaets for both studies combined,
`tables RANDCODE, WALK, and ODRUO. Horizontal line marks no change from
`baseline.
`
`The data from the figure above were fitted to a straight line (linear least squares
`procedure) using JMP. The resulting fitted parameters and their confidence limits are
`shown in Table 78.
`
`Table 78. Pit of change in walking distance (feet) by dose to y=m*DOSE+b.
`
`
`_ 55:27 m- aceisz mm-
`
`
`
`
`
`Subggug analysis based on baseline status
`
`Dr. Lawrence, the FDA statistician analyzed the time-dependent effect of the various
`cohorts that were enrolled in this study .A linear mixed-effect model was used here as
`an exploratory analysis in order to see the treatment effect over time. This model
`assumes that those subjects who discontinued early, regardless of the reason for
`discontinuation, would have walking distances similar to those subjects who completed
`the study. Missing data can be predicted based on the performance of other subjects
`that have similar characteristics to the one with missing data.
`'
`
`Since each subject would theoretically have three measurements post-baseline, Dr
`Lawrence modeled the change from baseline as a quadratic function of time. The
`specific linear model that was used contained fixed-effects for treatment group, baseline
`distance walked, etiology, vasodilator use among secondary PH subjects, and time as a
`quadratic function. In addition, all two-way interactions between treatment group and
`the other variables as well as the two—way interactions between stratification (etiolog/
`
`G:\N21272.doc
`
`—134—
`
`Last saved
`1 6:09 Friday, March 09, 2001
`
`

`

`Study P01 :04-05
`
`'
`
`,
`
`.
`
`NDA 21-272
`UT—1 5for pulmonary hypertension
`
`vasodilator use) and time were included in the model. There were random effects for
`the intercept, slope, and the quadratic term for time. The strategy was to specify a
`complex model and let the data decide which terms were important. The curves for
`each stratification level at the average baseline walking distance are shown in Figure 13
`on page 1 19.
`
`From Figure 13, it appears that at Week 1, subjects in all strata in the vehicle group
`improved walking distance by an average of about 10 meters. Over the course of the
`trial, there was a gradual deterioration in the performance of all subjects, independent
`of origin. In the UT-15 group, the change at Week 1 was about 15 m in the SPH (no
`vasodilator) subgroup and about 20 m in the other two subgroups, but over the course
`of the trial, the improvement was maintained or increased slightly.
`
`M2
`
`Pharmacokinetic measurements were collected on Days 2, week 1, week 6 and week 12.
`The kinetic data was not attached to this study report but was submitted separately as
`a biopharmaceutical report.
`
`Tolerance
`
`There is no information submitted that any effect of UTolS lasts more than the 12-week
`duration of this study. No randomized withdrawal information of the study was
`performed to convincingly demonstrate a persistent drug effect. The concern that there
`may be tolerance arises from the large increase in dose of UT-lS in going from week 1 to
`week 6 or week 12 and the minimal change in walking distances over these dose
`increases. The doses are graphically displayed in Figure 12 on page 90. There were a
`greater than 4-fold increase in dose in going from the end of weekl 1.2 ng/ kg/ min to
`week 6 (5.9 ng/ kg/ min). There was minimal change, however, in walking distance
`during the same period of time.
`
`There does not appear to be adequate information available from pre-clinical, animal
`and biopharm data to rule out a potential of diminishing effect of long duration of UT-
`15 treatment. Mechanism of tolerance may include
`
`o A decrease in the availability after long duration of infusion i.e. fibrosis at'
`the infusion site may limit availability. Because infusion sites were rotated
`frequently, this is not likely.
`
`o Metabolites may be produced that act in a counter-regulatory manner to the
`effect of UT—15 (the metabolic profile as well as the half—fife of the known
`metabolites as well as the potential for the existence of uncharacterized
`metabolites remain a possibility.
`
`0 Down regulation of receptors or de-linking of receptors from regulatory
`proteins may have occurred.
`
`54.4.8 Safety
`
`A.4A.8.1 Exposure
`
`There were a total of 469 subjects who were randomized and received at least one dose
`of drug/vehicle. The mean (iSD) duration of exposure for those treated with UTo15 was
`81.06 i 17.1 days and for vehicle it was 82.83 i 14.1 Days. There were 31 UT-15 and
`16 vehicle subjects who were treated for less than 72 days (the lower limit of the
`window for the 12-week visit). Subjects were exposed to UT—lS for a total of 18,887
`subject x days (51.75 subject it years) and to vehicle for 19,547 subject it days (53.55
`V subject it years). Exposure to vehicle was therefore 3.5% greater than that of UT—15 The
`mean dose of UT-lS/vehicle are shown in Figure 12 on page 103.
`
`G:\N21272.doc
`
`—135—
`
`Last saved
`16:09 Friday, March 09, 2001
`
`
`
`

`

`Study P01 :04-05
`
`J
`
`:
`
`NBA 21 -272
`UT-J 5for pulmonary hypertension
`
`The distribution of infusion rates for UT-15 and vehicle subjects are shown in Table 79.
`Approximately 50% of those treated with vehicle received doses of >20 ng/ kg/ min. For
`the UT—15 treated subjects the median dose was 9.3 ng/ kg/ min.
`
`Table 79. Distribution of doses by week (P01:04-05)
`Week 8
`
`
`
`More vehicle subjects were titrated upward and more UT—15 subjects were down titrated
`during the course of the study (Table 80). It should be noted that when doses were
`decreased, the usual reason was for either infusion site pain /reaction. There was no
`fixed dose decrease that was to occur in response to infusion site pain supervened.
`Trivial dose changes were often implemented as a consequence of infusion site pain.
`The reasons for dose decreases are shown in Table 81.
`
`Table 80. Increase: and decreases in dose (P01:04-05)1°2
`
`
`-_‘
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Week 5-8 “—
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Vomitm-
`
`' n53-" -I7 " ifl" 9 4
`'_-Ims1m€aunl''
`—m- 3113 —m
`—IIBJI 1113
`mm-
`m- 7 4
`
`‘
`
`Of the treated subjects who had dose reduction, 57 of the 64 UT—15 subjects with
`infusion site pain and 26 of the 31 subjects with infusion site reaction. For UT-IS
`infusion site pain and infusion site reaction were first noted at doses of 0- <2.5 '
`ng/ kg/ min. Only six subjects had the onset of pain and 4 subjects with infusion site
`reaction had the onset of symptoms at doses > 2.5 ng/kg/ min.
`
`Approximately 65% of those treated with UT-IS complained of infusion site pain by the
`end of the first week of treatment. The percentage increased to approzdmately 90%
`complained of pain by the end of week 3. Nearly all subjects had infusion site pain by
`the end of week 12.
`
`The fraction of subjects treated with opiates by the end of week 1 was 4%. This fraction
`increased to approximately 12% by the end of week 3 and 28% by the end of the study.
`The fraction of subjects treated with anti~inilammatory drugs was 16% at the end of
`week land increased to 28% at the end of week 3 and 44 % by the end of the 12-week
`
`"’9 Sponsor’s Table 12.1.2A
`
`G:\N21272.doc
`
`—136—-
`
`16:09 Friday, March 09, 2001
`
`Last saved
`
`

`

`Study P01:04—05
`
`.
`
`‘
`
`NDA 21-272
`UT~1 5 for pulmonary hypertension
`
`study. The fraction of UT-15 who received either opiates opr anti-inflammatory drugs
`was 16% by the end of week 1, 32% by the end of week 3 and 52% by the end of the
`study.
`"
`
`It is, however, unclear whether the need for pain medication was continuous and
`therefore a necessary component of treatment or the pain medication as taken only on a
`PRN basis and therefore only an intermittent nuisance. Based on discussions with the
`sponsor, patients were offered a prescription and compliance and use of the pain
`medication was not further followed.
`
`AAA-.83 Deaths
`
`There were a total of 19 deaths in or around the study. Nine of these deaths in people
`randomized to UT-lS and ten to vehicle. Subjects who died were: # 04/4017;
`#0514503; #04/9006; #04/ 10002; #04/23002; #05/ 51007; #05154005; #05/55005;
`and #0515800] in the UT-15 group and 04/9012; #04/ 10001; #04/15003; #04/ 16003;
`#04116006; #05l52006; #05/60006; #05 / 60015; #05 / 65004; #05165011 in the
`vehicle group. The underlined subjects discontinued for reasons other than death but
`died during the l2-week window of the study. Capsular summaries are available in
`Table 82 below which contains the list of all subjects hospitalized.
`
`A.4.4.8.3 Dropouts] diecontinuati one
`
`There were 20 dropouts for adverse events or withdrawal of consent in the UT— 15 group.
`One additional subject #4503 was listed as a dropout but died of sepsis.
`
`A.4.4.8.4 Hospitalizations or prolongation of hospitalization:
`
`There were 38 and 40 subjects, randomized to UT-15 and vehicle, respectively who were
`either hospitalized or whose hospitalization was prolonged. Two vehicle subjects were
`inadvertently administered UT~15 and were hospitalized after the cross-over while
`treated with active drug. Capsular summaries for those that were hospitalized,
`deteriorated or died are shown in Table 82.
`
`APPEARS “"8 WAY
`0N ORIGINAL
`
`APPEARS nus WAY
`
`ou ORIGINAL
`
`G:\N21272.doc
`
`-—-137— -
`
`Last saved
`16:09 Friday, March 09, 2001
`
`i
`“3
`
`‘
`sf
`
`
`
`

`

`Study FUIIU4-Ub
`
`NDA 21-272
`UT-l 5for pulmonary hypertension
`
`Table 82. Capsular summaries for those who died, were hospitalized or whose hospitalization was
`prolonged (Pill:04-05)
`
`Description
`
`Thiswasa37- year old Caucas1an female w1thpulmonaryhypertensron
`NYHA Class III status. She was hospitalized for an allergic reaction to Bactrim,
`rescribed for a UTl.
`
`This was a 35.year old Caucasian Female with pulmonary hypertension and systemic
`sclerosis and NYHA class ll]. Concomitant medications included furosemide, isradipine,
`-
`'
`-
`- usitive stools.
`
`This was a 38-year old Caucasian female subject with pulmonary hypertension and SLE
`.
`-italized for -neumococcal menin;itis.
`This was a 32-year old Caucasian female with primary pulmonary hypertension and
`NYHA Class Ill status. She was hospitalized on day 21 of the study for worsened heart
`This was a 36-year old Hispanic female with primary pulmonary hypertension and NYl-lA i
`Class III status. The subject became septic status post a medical termination of
`1
`pregnancy. The subject treated with antibiotics but subsequently died.
`
`Subject!”
`Arm
`Eirent
`
`404/2019
`UT-15
`
`04/2022
`111215
`
`04/ 3009
`UT- 1 5
`
`O4 /401 7
`UT— 1 5
`death
`
`05/ 4503
`UT— 1 5
`ADR
`Pt died
`
`04 / 5003
`UT~ 1 5
`
`04/5009
`ur-15
`ADR
`
`04/7004
`UT-15
`ADR
`
`04/9001
`UT—lS
`
`04/9002
`‘ UT- 1 5
`
`
`
`This was a 71.year old Caucasian female with pulmonary hypertension and limited
`scleroderma and NYHA Class IV. Concomitant medications included digoxin, enalapril
`and warfarin. She was hospitalized for diarrhea, rectal bleeding and vomiting. Warfarin
`was withheld and the sub'ect was reh drated.
`
`This was a 51-year old Caucasian female with pulmonary hypertension and a congenital
`systemic to pulmonary shunt and NYHA Class III status. She was hospitalized on day 2
`(one-day post—catheterization) for a right groin hematoma and a collection of blood in the ,
`- lvis. The sub‘ect was not takin- anticoa-
`lants at the time of the event.
`
`This was a 44-year old Caucasian female with pulmonary hypertension and a congenital
`systemic to pulmonary shunt. She was NYHA Class II. The subject was hospitalized
`twice, once for hemoptysis and a possible upper lobe infiltrate (on day 35) once again for
`hemoptysis (on day 43). Endobronchial embolization was performed. Concomitant
`medications included digoxin and furosemide. Coumadin was stopped on the day of the
`first event.
`
`This was a 30-year old Caucasian female with pulmonary hypertension and mixed
`connective tissue disease and NYHA Class III who was admitted to the hospital for
`nausea, vomiting dehydration and hyponatremia (serum sodium 126). The subject was
`,a'ven iv fluids and recovered.
`This was a 61-year old Caucasian female with pulmonary hypertension and mixed
`connective tissue disease who was admitted because of diarrhea, pancytopenia
`(Hemoglobin '- 8.9 g/dL; platelets 44 x 103 /uL; WBC = 3,74 x 103/uL) and hyponatremia
`(Na+ -= 117 mEq/L). She had recently been treated with cyclophosphamide. She was
`treated with fluid restrictions, electrolytes, dobutamine, prednisone and platelet and
`RBC transfusions. She recovered.
`
`This was a 29—year old Caucasian female with pulmonary hypertension and a congenital
`systemic to pulmonary shunt (atrial septal defect) and NYHA Class 111 status. She
`developed lightheadedness and bilateral loss of vision on day 2. A paradoxical embolism
`was suspected. The study drug was stopped. The next day the drug was commenced,
`New symptoms (facial droop and dysarthria) were noted. Angiography and thrombolysis
`were undertaken and a birds nest filter placed to intercept any emboli from the lower
`limbs The subject subsequently suffered seizures, with increased intracranial pressure.
`The sub'ect deteriorated to brain death and subse-
`This was a 53-year old Caucasian female subject with primary pulmonary hypertension
`_ NYHAClassIll. The subect was hos'. fl .,
`.
`_
`chiatnc d1sturbance
`
`’03 1/indicates non-fatal events the reviewer assess as cardiovascular in nature.
`
`G:\N21272.doc
`
`'
`
`Last saved
`
`—138—
`
`16:09 Friday, March 09, 2001
`
`
`
`

`

`Study P01:04-05
`
`.
`
`i
`
`NDA 21 -272
`UT-I 5 for pulmonary hypertension
`
`
`
`04/ 12007
`UT-15
`
`04/ 13001
`UT~15
`
`04 / 23002
`UT-15
`death
`
`05/ 24505
`UT-lS
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`i3lfilx
`
`
`
`7 Study/7
`Subjectl°3
`Arm
`
`
`
`Th1s was a 40—year old Caucasxan female with pulmonary hypertension ass66iated with
`;
`
`”64i1666é
`
`UT- 1 5
`
`mixed connective tissue disease and NYHA Class IV status. The subject was hospitalized
`death
`on study day 57 with worsening right heart failure. Her condition deteriorated and she
`
`
`
`suffered an arrh mia and died.
`
`
`04/10006
`This was a 46 year old Caucasian male with a history of primary pulmonary
`
`
`UT-15
`hypertension and NYHA Class III The subject was hospitalized on day 22 for altered
`
`
`renal function (BUN was 99mcreasing to l 15, Creatinine was 1. 7 and increased to 2.5
`
`
`mg/dL). The subject was hydrated with correction of the BUN (to 85mg/ d1.) The subject
`
`
`
`
`was aain hos vitalized on da s 38 and a ain on da 57 for fluid overload.
`404/ 12002 This was a 71 year old Caucasian female with a history of primary pulmonary
`
`
`
`UT-IS
`hypertension and NYHA Class 111 status. The subject sustained a CVA on day 52 of
`treatment but continued on thera 9 .
`
`
`This was a 70-year old Caucasian female with primary pulmonary hypertension and
`
`NYHA Class III status. The subject was hospitalized on day 86 for a pneumothorax post
`
`
`l2-week catheter-ization.
`This was a 58-year Caucasian female with primary pulmonary hypertension and NYHA
`
`
`
`
`Class lll status. The subject administered an excess of UT- 15 (a bolus of 1.5 mL or
`
`
`approximately 1500 ng). The subject had severe pain at the infusion site and removed
`
`
`the subcutaneous catheter. The symptoms, upon arriving at the emergency room,
`
`
`
`
`consisted of vomitin , headache, neck ache and 1e aim. The stud dru_ was restarted.
`
`1/04/ 14005 This was a 40-year old Caucasian female with a history of pulmonary hypertension and a
`
`
`
`
`UT-15
`congenital systemic to pulmonary shunt and NYHA Class 111. After the 12-week
`catheterization the subject developed increasing dyspnea, chest pain and left shoulder
`
`
`pain and was hypoxemic. She was treated with supplemental oxygen improved over the
`
`
`
`
`
`next two da 3 and was dischar ed.
`04/ 14009 This was a 36-year old Hispanic female with pulmonary hypertension associated with a
`
`
`
`
`UT-15
`congenital systemic to pulmonary shunt. She was treated with digoxin, oxygen and
`
`
`warfarin. After heavy menstrual bleeding she was seen in the ER on day 69 with a
`complaint of lightheadedness and dyspnea. Her hemoglobin was 7.3 g/dL, the INR was
`
`
`
`
`1.43. She was again hospitalized on day 79 with a diagnosis of acute right heart failure.
`
`
`
`-en and diuretics.
`
`05/ 14501
`This was a 41-year old Caucasian female with primary pulmonary hypertension and
`
`
`
`
`
`UT-15
`NYl-lA Class III status. The subject was hospitalized on day 48 an episode of acute
`
`
`1405/21501
`This was a 36~year old Hispanic female subject with primary pulmonary hypertension an
`
`Lnuis
`
`NYl-lA Class III. The subject was hospitalized because she was hypoxemic associated with
`
`
`drome. She recovered.
`an acute flu s
`
`
`
`This was a lS-year old Native American female with pulmonary hypertension and a
`
`congenital systemic to pulmonary shunt and NYHA Class II status. The subject was
`found comatose, pulseless and hardly breathing. Attempted resuscitation was
`unsuccessful and the sub'ect died.
`This was a 49-year old Caucasian female with pulmonary hypertension as a consequence
`
`of a congenital systemic to pulmonary shunt. She was NYHA Class 111. She was
`
`hos-italized on da 55 for deh dration.
`This was a 52 year old Caucasian female with pulmonary hypertension and limited
`
`
`scleroderrna and NYHA Class IV. The subject had a syncopal episode at cardiac
`
`catheterization on da 85 of the stud . The event was attributed to a vasova_al event.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`05/50015
`UT-lS
`
`
`
`3/05/ 50023 This was a 37—year old Caucasian female with a history of pulmonary hypertension
`
`3 UT-15
`associated with mixed connective tissue disease and NYHA Class IV status. The subject
`
`
`had her hospitalization duration increased because of supraventricular tachycardia. On
`
`
`day 3 of treatment. The subject was again hospitalized on day 70 and 76 for worsening
`
`
`
`heart failure and uain at the infusion site.
`
`
`
`
`
`05/51007
`This was a 28-year old Caucasian female with a history of primary pulmonary
`
`hypertension and NYHA Class 111 status. The subject had a syncopal episode at the time
`
`
`o cathetenzation for week 12. Thesub'ect had an e-isode of bradcardia with lossof
`G.\N21 2 72 doc
`Last saved
`
`———1 39—-
`
`16:09 Friday, March 09, 2001
`
`

`

`Study P01 :04-05
`
`NDA 21-272
`UT—I 5for pulmonary hypertension
`
`‘
`and subsequently developed electromechanical dissociation and died. Autopsy revealed
`severe pulmonary hypertension with cor pulmonale. Inflammatory changes were noted in g
`the m ocardium.
`‘
`
`405/ 52001
`UT-lS
`
`This was a 40-year old Caucasian male with primary pulmonary hypertension and NYHA 1
`Class III. The subject developed a recurrent event of atrial flutter and was treated with
`amiodarone.
`
`05/53020
`UT-15
`
`05/ 53001
`UT.15
`
`This was a 48—year old Caucasian female with pulmonary hypertension and a congenital
`systemic to pulmonary shunt and NYHA Class III. The subject complained of asthenia.
`The asthenia was attributed to malfunction of the infusion pump. The subject was
`admitted to the hos-ital for -um re-air on da 17 and a in on 26.
`This was a 61—year old Caucasian female with primary pulmonary hypertension and
`NYHA Class lll status. The subject was taking acenocoumarol and furosemide. The
`subject developed an episode of melena. The lNR at the time was 4.0. The hemoglobin
`was 4.9 g/dL. The subject received three units of packed red blood cells. At gastroscopy
`an active area of hemorrha 'c astritis was noted.
`‘ 405 / 53022 This was a 42-year old Caucasian male with a history of primary pulmonary
`UT-15
`hypertension and NYHA Class III. The subject was hospitalized on day 28 for worsening
`deteriorate
`heart failure. Because of intolerable site pain in conjunction with the worsening of heart
`failure the sub'ect was started on iv flolan.
`
`
`
`;
`;

`
`'g
`‘2
`
`L
`
`g
`
`i
`
`
`
`‘105/ 54005 This was a 20-year old Caucasian female with pulmonary hypertension and a congenital
`UT-15
`systemic to pulmonary shunt and NYHA Class III status. The subject was admitted to the
`deteriorate
`hospital on day 43 for worsening hypoxemia and unstable hemodynamics. The subject
`was suspected of having had a pulmonary embolism (the subject was not on any
`anticoagulant at the time of enrollment because of a history of menorrhagia). No
`ventilation-perfusion scan was performed. The subject had two cardio-respiratory arrests
`and died.
`
`405/ 54014 This was a 44 -year old Caucasian female with pulmonary hypertension and a congenital
`UT-lS
`systemic to pulmonary shunt. The subject was admitted to the hospital with asthenia
`and increasing dyspnea. The subject was diagnosed with adrenal insufficiency and was
`treated with intravenous then oral h drocortisone.
`
`‘
`
`‘
`
`05/ 55005
`UT-15
`death
`
`This was a 32-year old Caucasian female with a history of primary pulmonary
`hypertension and NYHA Class IV. The subject had an ep

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket