• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
51 results

Mantikas et al v. Kellogg Company

Docket 2:16-cv-02552, New York Eastern District Court (May 19, 2016)
Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein, presiding, Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shields
Fraud
DivisionCentral Islip
FlagsCLOSED, ACO
Cause28:1332 Diversity-Fraud
Case Type370 Fraud
Tags370 Fraud, 370 Fraud
Plaintiff Kristen Mantikas
Plaintiff Kristin Burns
Plaintiff Linda Castle
...
cite Cite Docket

Worth et al v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.

Docket 2:16-cv-00498, New York Eastern District Court (Feb. 1, 2016)
Magistrate Judge Steven M. Gold, presiding
Tort Product Liability
DivisionCentral Islip
FlagsCLOSED, ACO
Demand$5,000,000
Cause28:1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Case Type245 Tort Product Liability
Tags245 Tort Product Liability, Tort, Civil, 245 Tort Product Liability, Tort, Civil
Plaintiff Jeffrey Worth
Plaintiff Robert Burns
Defendant CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
cite Cite Docket

Coe et al v. General Mills, Inc.

Docket 4:15-cv-05112, California Northern District Court (Nov. 9, 2015)
Judge Haywood S Gilliam, Jr, presiding, Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler
Statutory Actions - Other
DivisionOakland
FlagsADRMOP, CLOSED, PROTO, PRVADR, REFDIS
DemandPlaintiff
Cause28:1331 Fed. Question
Case Type890 Statutory Actions - Other
Tags890 Statutory Actions, Other, 890 Statutory Actions, Other
Plaintiff Nancy Coe
Plaintiff Tori Castro
Plaintiff Pamela Mizzi
...
cite Cite Docket

Coe et al v. General Mills, Inc.

Docket 3:15-cv-05112, California Northern District Court (Nov. 9, 2015)
Judge Haywood S Gilliam, Jr, presiding, Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler
Statutory Actions - Other
DivisionSan Francisco
DemandPlaintiff
Cause28:1331 Fed. Question
Case Type890 Statutory Actions - Other
Tags890 Statutory Actions, Other, 890 Statutory Actions, Other
Plaintiff Nancy Coe
Plaintiff Tori Castro
Plaintiff Pamela Mizzi
...
cite Cite Docket

No. 119 ORDER granting 111 Motion for Settlement; granting 112 Motion for Attorney Fees

Document Worth et al v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc., 2:16-cv-00498, No. 119 (E.D.N.Y. Sep. 26, 2019)
Excluded from membership of the Settlement Class are Defendant and its past and present parents, subsidiaries, divisions, affiliates, assignors, predecessors, successors and assigns; the past and Case 2:16-cv-00498-SMG Document 117 Filed 09/26/19 Page 3 of 7 PageID #: 2090Case 2:16-cv-00498-SMG Document 119 Filed 09/26/19 Page 3 of 7 PageID #: 2098 present partners, shareholders, managers, members, directors, officers, employees, agents, attorneys, insurers, accountants and representatives of any and all of the foregoing entities; any government entities; and persons who purchased the Algal-900 DHA Product for the purpose of resale.
Based on the declaration of Meagan Brunner of KCC Class Action Services, LLC (“KCC LLC”) filed on September 6, 2019 (ECF No. 111-3), the Court finds that the Notice and Claim Form were properly disseminated.
The Court finds that the following counsel have fairly and Case 2:16-cv-00498-SMG Document 117 Filed 09/26/19 Page 5 of 7 PageID #: 2092Case 2:16-cv-00498-SMG Document 119 Filed 09/26/19 Page 5 of 7 PageID #: 2100 adequately represented the interests of the Class and hereby appoints Center for Science in the Public Interest; Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer, LLP; Reese LLP; and, Mehri & Skalet, PLLC as Class Counsel pursuant to Rule 23(g).
The Court finds that the persons listed on Exhibit A have properly opted out of these proceedings and are not bound by the terms of this Order and Judgment.
Angelica Chavez Bradley Westpfahl Danielle Richards Donald Kilmer Evelyn Christie Joscy Hope Kathleen Carlton
cite Cite Document

No. 109 ORDER granting 108 Motion for Settlement

Document Worth et al v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc., 2:16-cv-00498, No. 109 (E.D.N.Y. May. 28, 2019)
This matter having been submitted to the Court by plaintiffs Jeffrey Worth and Robert Burns (“Plaintiffs”) and the firms Center for Science in the Public Interest; Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer, LLP, Reese LLP; and, Mehri & Skalet, PLLC (collectively “Class Counsel”) on behalf of the Plaintiffs and by CVS Pharmacy, Inc. (“CVS”) by its counsel, by way of Plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary approval of the proposed settlement in the above captioned action; WHEREAS, the Court having reviewed and considered Plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary approval and supporting materials filed by Class Counsel and CVS’s counsel; and WHEREAS, this Court has fully considered the record and the requirements of law; and good cause appearing;
Excluded from the membership are Defendant and its past and present parents, subsidiaries, divisions, affiliates, assignors, predecessors, successors and assigns; the past and present partners, shareholders, managers, members, directors, officers, employees, agents, attorneys, insurers, accountants and representatives of any and all of the foregoing entities; any government entities; and persons who purchased the Algal-900 DHA Product for the purpose of resale.
The Court finds that these procedures, carried out with reasonable diligence, will constitute the best notice practicable under the circumstances and will satisfy the requirements of Fed. R. Civ.
The Court preliminarily finds that the following counsel fairly and adequately represent the interests of the Settlement Class and hereby appoints Kaplan, Fox & Kilsheimer, Center for Science in the Public Interest; LLP; Reese LLP; and Mehri & Skalet, PLLC as Settlement Class Counsel pursuant to Rule 23(g).
Any attorney representing a member of the Settlement Class for the purpose of making objections must also file a “Notice of Appearance” with the Clerk, and must also serve copies by mail to the counsel listed above.
cite Cite Document

No. 83 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr

Document Coe et al v. General Mills, Inc., 4:15-cv-05112, No. 83 (N.D.Cal. Apr. 17, 2018)
Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. NANCY COE, TORI CASTRO, and PAMELA MIZZI, individually, and on behalf of those similarly situated, Plaintiffs,
Plaintiffs Nancy Coe, Tori Castro, and Pamela Mizzi (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) and Defendant General Mills, Inc. (“Defendant”), by and through their undersigned counsel, stipulate as follows, subject to an Order approving the Stipulation: This Amendment to Stipulation and Order Extending Deadlines, entered by the court on April 10, 2018, is submitted to inform the court that at the request of Defendant’s counsel, who has a scheduling conflict for the current Second Mediation Date on May 14, 2018, the parties have agreed to move the second day of mediation with Judge Lichtman from May 14 to May 24, 2018 and that all other terms of the Stipulation and Order Extending Deadlines remain the same.
DATED: April 16, 2018 Respectfully submitted, KAPLAN FOX & KILSHEIMER LLP
5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that I have on file written records documenting that I have obtained concurrence in the filing of this document from the other signatories.
Pursuant to the foregoing Stipulation, the revised schedule for the Second Mediation Day as stated above is SO ORDERED.
cite Cite Document

No. 81 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr

Document Coe et al v. General Mills, Inc., 4:15-cv-05112, No. 81 (N.D.Cal. Apr. 10, 2018)
Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. NANCY COE, TORI CASTRO, and PAMELA MIZZI, individually, and on behalf of those similarly situated, Plaintiffs, Defendant.
Case No.4:15-cv-05112-HSG Plaintiffs Nancy Coe, Tori Castro, and Pamela Mizzi (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) and Defendant General Mills, Inc. (“Defendant”) (collectively with Plaintiffs, the “Parties”), by and through their undersigned counsel, stipulate as follows, subject to an Order approving the Stipulation: WHEREAS, on November 14, 2017, the Parties jointly stipulated and sought an order extending the discovery schedule and other deadlines because the Parties had agreed to enter into mediation [ECF No. 76]; WHEREAS, on November 16, 2017, the Court held a telephone conference and, thereafter, entered the following deadlines [ECF No. 78]:
WHEREAS, in order to preserve the resources of both the Court and the Parties, the Parties have agreed that completion of the remaining class certification discovery should be stayed pending the continued mediation without prejudice to resume discovery should this case not resolve through mediation;
NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate and request that the Court enter an order staying all further discovery and all Class Certification related deadlines.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct.
cite Cite Document
1 2 3 4 >>