Kevin Turner and Shawn Wooden, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Plaintiffs,

National Football League and NFL Properties, LLC, successor-in-interest to NFL Properties, Inc.

Audit of Byron Cuthbert and Associates,

WHEREAS, Byron Cuthbert and Associates, LLC, by and through its counsel JMeyers Group, LLC and the Cuthbert Firm, LLC, filed a Motion For Reconsideration in the above-captioned matter on March 4, 2024 (the “Motion,” ECF No. 12379); WHEREAS, the National Football League and NFL Properties LLC have requested an extension of time from March 18, 2024 to through and including April 1, 2024, to respond to the Motion; It is ORDERED that the request for an extension of time is GRANTED.

day of March, 2024. s/ANITA B. BRODY, J. Anita B. Brody United States District Court Judge

They also agreed that either party could apply to a Pennsylvania state or federal court for interim or emergent relief “in the event of an emergent issue.” (Id.) In or around January 2024, Balanced Bridge commenced an arbitration action against the SCM with AAA on the question of the SCM’s efforts to collect an award.

Citing the contractual provision for jurisdiction in a federal court for an emergent issue, the SCM has moved here for a stay of that arbitration.

The SCM contends that the arbitration proceeding should be stayed based upon demands he expects Balanced Bridge to make of him in his pursuit of a monetary award under this Settlement.2 He also fears that Balanced Bridge will use the arbitration process to rewrite the terms of their Funding Agreement, suggesting 2 The SCM had not received a monetary award as of the time he filed his motion to stay the arbitration proceeding.

that Balanced Bridge is attempting “to control or curtail” his rights in the process by which he prepares and submits a claim under the Settlement.

AND NOW, this 11TH day of March, 2024, it is ORDERED that the Motion to Stay Arbitration in AAA Case No. 01-23-0004-8971 (ECF No. 12375) is DENIED.

No. 2:12-md-02323-AB MDL No. 2323 Kevin Turner and Shawn Wooden, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Plaintiffs,

National Football League and NFL Properties, LLC, successor-in-interest to NFL Properties, Inc., Defendants.

AND NOW, this 13th day of November, 2023, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge David R. Strawbridge (ECF No. 12160 _______), and any objections thereto, it is ORDERED that:

The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED; The Withdrawal of the Lien Dispute is REJECTED; and The matter is REMANDED to the Claims Administrator for further proceedings consistent with the Rules Governing Attorney Lien Disputes.

Kevin Turner and Shawn Wooden, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Plaintiffs,

AND NOW, this 5th day of September, 2023, for the reasons set out in the accompanying

Memorandum Opinion, the funds currently withheld for counsel fees and costs for the above- referenced Settlement Class Member from the Monetary Award approved on September 6, 2022 are APPORTIONED as follows: 1.

Of the remaining funds currently withheld by the Claims Administrator for distribution of counsel fee at present, as well as the 5% portion of R.B.’s Monetary Award that is currently withheld in the Attorneys’ Fees Qualified Settlement Fund pursuant to the Court’s June 27, 2018 Order Regarding Withholdings for Common Benefit Fund (Doc. No. 10104), to the extent any of these funds are later released for payment to individual attorneys: a. 10/22nds is allocated to Pope McGlamry PC as attorney’s fees; and b.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Claims Administrator disburse the withheld funds in accordance with this allocation, the provisions of the Settlement Agreement, and all Court Orders regarding implementation.

... be deemed “fraudulent.” See also id. (characterizing Pope McGlamry’s lien as 18 Case 2:12-md-02323-AB Document 12328 Filed 09/05/23 Page 19 of 29 “fraudulent” and an “unfortunate deceit presented to” the Court).13 Nonetheless, ...

No. 2:12-md-02323-AB MDL No. 2323 Kevin Turner and Shawn Wooden, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Plaintiffs,

Enclosed please find a copy of the Report and Recommendation filed by United States Magistrate Judge DAVID R. STRAWBRIDGE on this date in the above captioned matter.

You are hereby notified that within fourteen (14) days from the date of service of this Notice of the filing of the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, any party may file with the clerk and serve upon all other parties’ written objections thereto (See Local Civil Rule 72.1 IV (b)).

Failure of a party to file timely objections to the Report & Recommendation shall bar that party, except upon grounds of plain error, from attacking on appeal the unobjected-to factual findings and legal conclusions of the Magistrate Judge that are accepted by the District Court Judge.

In accordance with 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B), the judge to whom the case is assigned will make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.