• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
180 results

Belcalis Almanzar v. Latasha Kebe, et al

Docket 22-12512, U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit (July 29, 2022)
Assault, Libel & Slander (Appeals)
Case Type4320 Assault, Libel & Slander
Tags4320 Assault, Libel and Slander, Slander, Libel and Slander, Tort, Civil, Libel, 4320 Assault, Libel and Slander, Slander, Libel and Slander, Tort, Civil, Libel
Plaintiff - Appellee BELCALIS MARLENIS ALMANZAR
Defendant - Appellant LATASHA TRANSRINA KEBE, a.k.a. Latasha Transrina Howard
Defendant - Appellant KEBE STUDIOS LLC
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Higher Tech Realty, LLC v. Craig Proctor Holdings Limited

Docket 87653262, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (Sept. 9, 2020)
Case TypeExtension of Time
TagsExtension, Time
MarksGUARANTEED CASH OFFER ON YOUR HOME WITHIN 24 HOURS
Defendant Craig Proctor Holdings Limited
Potential Opposer Higher Tech Realty, LLC
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Bogart LLC v. Tap Root Solutions LLC

Docket 88826152, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (Aug. 25, 2020)
Case TypeExtension of Time
TagsExtension, Time
MarksBOGART
Defendant Tap Root Solutions LLC
Potential Opposer Bogart LLC
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Bogart LLC v. Tap Root Solutions LLC

Docket 88826124, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (Aug. 25, 2020)
Case TypeExtension of Time
TagsExtension, Time
MarksBOGART
Defendant Tap Root Solutions LLC
Potential Opposer Bogart LLC
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

No. 27 Opinion issued by court as to Appellants Latasha Transrina Kebe and Kebe Studios LLC

Document Belcalis Almanzar v. Latasha Kebe, et al, 22-12512, No. 27 (11th Cir. Mar. 21, 2023)
One is whether the jury had suf- ficient evidence to hold appellants—Latasha Kebe and others—lia- ble for defamation (and other privacy torts) against appellee Belcalis Almanzar (better known as ‘Cardi B’).
When a party fails to invoke these rules in the district court, we “ha[ve] no au- thority to consider [an] appeal from the jury verdict.” Hi Ltd. P’ship v. Winghouse of Fla., Inc., 451 F.3d 1300, 1302 (11th Cir. 2006).
USCA11 Case: 22-12512 Document: 27-1 Date Filed: 03/21/2023 Page: 4 of 5 Opinion of the Court sufficiency of the evidence on appeal, she seems to think that one can preserve that right by making no insufficiency motions at all.
“An appellant’s brief must include an argument containing ‘appellant’s contentions and the reasons for them, with citations to the author- ities and parts of the record on which the appellant relies.’” Singh v. U.S. Atty.
USCA11 Case: 22-12512 Document: 27-1 Date Filed: 03/21/2023 Page: 5 of 5 Opinion of the Court not fully briefed (let alone not presented at all) to the Circuit Court, evaluating its merits would be improper both because the appel- lants may control the issues they raise on appeal, and because the appellee would have no opportunity to respond to it.” Access Now, Inc. v. Sw. Airlines Co., 385 F.3d 1324, 1330 (11th Cir. 2004).
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 14 Appellant's brief filed by Kebe Studios LLC and Latasha Transrina Kebe

Document Belcalis Almanzar v. Latasha Kebe, et al, 22-12512, No. 14 (11th Cir. Aug. 29, 2022)
4 R214 is a Transcript of Jury Trial, Volume VII of X. USCA11 Case: 22-12512 Document: 14 Date Filed: 08/29/2022 Page: 16 of 45 via social media to notify her that Jones was lying about living with Plaintiff.
Dr. Blake titled that report Therapeutic Coaching Summary and noted, in the first paragraph, that sessions were conducted to determine barriers that may interfere with Plaintiff achieving her career goals.
Because the evidence showed the Defendants did not act with a reckless disregard for the truth, Plaintiff should not have recovered damages for USCA11 Case: 22-12512 Document: 14 Date Filed: 08/29/2022 Page: 30 of 45 defamation or false light invasion of privacy.
There was no evidence that any of Ms. Kebe’s stories about Plaintiff were fabricated by Ms. Kebe, a product of Ms. Kebe’s imagination, based wholly on an unverified anonymous call, or so inherently improbable that only a reckless person would have put them in circulation.
Emotional distress includes all highly unpleasant mental reactions such as fright, horror, grief, shame, humiliation, embarrassment, anger, chagrin, disappointment, worry, and nausea.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Authors Guild, Inc. v. Hathitrust

Docket 12-4547, U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit (Nov. 14, 2012)
Copyright (Appeals)
Case Type3820 Copyright
Tags3820 Copyright, 3820 Copyright
Plaintiff - Appellant Authors Guild, Inc.
Plaintiff - Appellant Australian Society Of Authors Limited
Plaintiff - Appellant Australian Society Of Authors Limited
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Luvdarts LLC, et al v. AT&T Mobility, LLC, et al

Docket 11-55497, U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit (March 28, 2011)
Copyright (Appeals)

cite Cite Docket
Analyze
1 2 3 4 5 ... 11 12 13 >>