• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
75 results

Blair v. Alstom S.A. et al

Docket 1:16-cv-03391, New York Southern District Court (May 6, 2016)
Judge Paul A. Engelmayer, presiding, Magistrate Judge James L. Cott (Settlement)
Statutory Actions - Other
DivisionFoley Square
FlagsCLOSED, CASREF, ECF
Cause35:0001 Establishment of PTO
Case Type890 Statutory Actions - Other
Tags890 Statutory Actions, Other, 890 Statutory Actions, Other
Plaintiff Scott Blair
Defendant Alstom S.A.
Defendant Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Ltd.
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

On Demand Direct Response, LLC et al v. McCart-Pollak

Docket 2:15-cv-01576, Nevada District Court (Aug. 17, 2015)
Chief Judge Miranda M. Du, presiding, Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah
Trademark
10/16/2018
... on 10/16/2018 before Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe. Crtrm Administrator: A. Caytuero; Pla Counsel: None Appearing; Def Counsel: Shana Lee McCart-Pollak, Pro...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Bigben Interactive, SA v. Nintendo of America Inc.

Docket 2:15-cv-00609, Washington Western District Court (Apr. 17, 2015)
Judge Robert S. Lasnik, presiding
Patent
DivisionSeattle
DemandPlaintiff
Cause35:271 Patent Infringement
Case Type830 Patent
Tags830 Patent, 830 Patent
Plaintiff Bigben Interactive, SA
Defendant Nintendo of America Inc.
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Broadcast Music, Inc et al v. R-Lynne, LLC et al

Docket 3:15-cv-00499, Connecticut District Court (Apr. 6, 2015)
Alfred V. Covello, presiding
Copyright
DivisionNew Haven
DemandNone
Cause17:101 Copyright Infringement
Case Type820 Copyright
Tags820 Copyright, 820 Copyright
Plaintiff Broadcast Music, Inc.
Plaintiff Universal Songs of Polygram Int'l Inc
Plaintiff EMI Virgin Songs Inc
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

In re Protegrity Patent Litigation

Docket 3:15-md-02600, California Northern District Court (Feb. 20, 2015)
Judge James Donato, presiding, Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu (Settlement)
Patent
DivisionSan Francisco
FlagsCLOSED, CONSOL, REFSET-DMR
Cause35:271 Patent Infringement
Case Type830 Patent
Tags830 Patent, 830 Patent
Plaintiff Protegrity Corporation
Plaintiff Skyhigh Networks Inc
Plaintiff Square, Inc.
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Lighting Science Group Corporation v. Cooper Lighting, LLC

Docket 6:14-cv-00195, Florida Middle District Court (Feb. 6, 2014)
Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr., presiding, Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Kelly
Patent
DemandDefendant
Cause35:183 Patent Infringement
Case Type830 Patent
Tags830 Patent, 830 Patent
Plaintiff Lighting Science Group Corporation
Defendant Cooper Lighting, LLC
Counter Claimant Cooper Lighting, LLC
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Protegrity Corp v. Epicor Software Corp

Docket 3:13-cv-01781, Connecticut District Court (Dec. 2, 2013)
Judge Victor A. Bolden, presiding, Judge Joan G. Margolis
Patent
DemandBoth
Cause35:271 Patent Infringement
Case Type830 Patent
Tags830 Patent, 830 Patent
Plaintiff Protegrity Corp
Defendant Epicor Software Corp
Counter Claimant Epicor Software Corp
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

No. 100 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on: 99 STATUS REPORT

Document Blair v. Alstom S.A. et al, 1:16-cv-03391, No. 100 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 7, 2019)
The Federal Circuit affimted the PTAB’s Final Written Decision in the First lPR on Angust 8, 2019, and issued the mandate to the United States Patent and Trademark Office on September 16, 2019.
Defendants” proposed “exceptional” claim under 35 U.S.C. § 285 is A'lLANlA AUSTIN BANGKOK BEIJING BOSTON BRUSSELS CHARLOTTE DALLAS DUBAI HOUSTON LONDON LOSANGELES
Accordingly, the parties respectfully request the Court to lift the stay in this case so that disputed issues relating to the form of dismissal and recovery of costs and fees can be resolved.
The Court directs the parties to meet and confer again to see if the disputed issues relating to the form of dismissal and recovery of costs and fees can be resolved without motion practice.
If the issues cannot be so resolved, the Court directs the parties jointly to submit by November 18, 2019, a proposed expedited briefing schedule for the anticipated motions.
cite Cite Document
Analyze
1 2 3 4 5 6 >>