• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
3,309 results

Staton Techiya, LLC et al v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al

Docket 2:21-cv-00413, Texas Eastern District Court (Nov. 5, 2021)
District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, presiding, Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne
Patent
DivisionMarshall
FlagsAPPEAL, CASREF, JRG2, JRG4, JURY, LEAD, PATENT/TRADEMARK, PROTECTIVE-ORDER
Cause35:271 Patent Infringement
Case Type830 Patent
Tags830 Patent, 830 Patent
Patent10405082; 10966015; 10979836; 8111839; 8254591; 8315400; 9124982; 9270244; 9491542; 9609424, 10405082, 10966015, 10979836, 8111839, 8254591, 8315400, 9124982, 9270244, 9491542, 9609424
Plaintiff Staton Techiya, LLC
Plaintiff Synergy IP Corporation
Defendant Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Daedalus Blue, LLC v. Microsoft Corporation

Docket 6:20-cv-01152, Texas Western District Court (Dec. 16, 2020)
Judge Alan D Albright, presiding
Patent
DivisionWaco
FlagsCLOSED, MAGAPP, PATENT, STAYED
Cause35:271 Patent Infringement
Case Type830 Patent
Tags830 Patent, 830 Patent
Patent10014450; 10616136; 7177886; 7437730; 8069141; 8381209; 8572612; 8671132; 8849469; 9037541; 9063738; 9207993; 9244615; 9450838; 9501656; 9595054; 9665432; 9678839; 9722945; 9842039; 9847918; 9858153; 9880759, 10014450, 10616136, 7177886, 7437730, 8069141, 8381209, 8572612, 8671132, 8849469, 9037541, 9063738, 9207993, 9244615, 9450838, 9501656, 9595054, 9665432, 9678839, 9722945, 9842039, 9847918, 9858153, 9880759
Plaintiff Daedalus Blue, LLC
Defendant Microsoft Corporation
Movant Dr. John Reumann
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

DAEDALUS BLUE, LLC v. MicroStrategy Incorporated

Docket 2:20-cv-00551, Virginia Eastern District Court (Nov. 4, 2020)
District Judge Roderick C. Young, presiding, Magistrate Judge Lawrence R. Leonard
Patent
DivisionNorfolk
FlagsCLOSED, PATENT
Cause35:281 Patent Infringement
Case Type830 Patent
Tags830 Patent, 830 Patent
Plaintiff DAEDALUS BLUE, LLC
Defendant MicroStrategy Incorporated
Interested Party International Business Machines Corp.
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Daedalus Blue, LLC v. Oracle Corporation et al

Docket 6:20-cv-00428, Texas Western District Court (May 26, 2020)
Judge Alan D Albright, presiding
Patent
DivisionWaco
FlagsCLOSED, PATENT
Cause35:271 Patent Infringement
Case Type830 Patent
Tags830 Patent, 830 Patent
Patent6920494; 7177886; 7693882; 8122108; 8480617; 8572612; 8671132; 8769604; 9032076; 9384103, 6920494, 7177886, 7693882, 8122108, 8480617, 8572612, 8671132, 8769604, 9032076, 9384103
Plaintiff Daedalus Blue, LLC
Defendant Oracle Corporation
Defendant Oracle America, Inc.
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Huawei Device USA Inc et al v. Harris Corporation

Docket 2:19-cv-00222, Texas Eastern District Court (June 12, 2019)
District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, presiding
Patent
DivisionMarshall
FlagsCLOSED, CONSOL, JRG4, PROTECTIVE-ORDER
Cause35:271 Patent Infringement
Case Type830 Patent
Tags830 Patent, 830 Patent
Plaintiff Huawei Device USA Inc
Plaintiff Huawei Device Co., Ltd.
Plaintiff Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

L3Harris Technologies, Inc. v. Huawei Device USA, Inc. et al

Docket 2:18-cv-00439, Texas Eastern District Court (Oct. 24, 2018)
District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, presiding
Patent
DivisionMarshall
FlagsCLOSED, JRG4, JURY, LEAD, MEDIATION, PATENT/TRADEMARK, PROTECTIVE-ORDER, STAYDDLS
Cause35:271 Patent Infringement
Case Type830 Patent
Tags830 Patent, 830 Patent
Mediator David Folsom
Plaintiff L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
Consol Plaintiff Huawei Device (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Virentem Ventures, LLC v. YouTube, LLC et al

Docket 1:18-cv-00917, Delaware District Court (June 20, 2018)
Judge Maryellen Noreika, presiding
Patent
DivisionWilmington
FlagsSTAYED, PATENT
Cause35:271 Patent Infringement
Case Type830 Patent
Tags830 Patent, 830 Patent
Plaintiff Virentem Ventures, LLC
Defendant YouTube, LLC
Defendant Google, LLC
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

No. 996 ORDER Dismissing Case

Document Staton Techiya, LLC et al v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, 2:21-cv-00413, No. 996 (E.D.Tex. Dec. 5, 2024)
Motion to Dismiss (Demurrer)Granted
In the Joint Notice, Plaintiff voluntarily dismisses all claims with prejudice and Defendants voluntarily dismiss all counterclaims in this action with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Having considered the Joint Notice, the Court ACCEPTS AND ACKNOWLEDGES that all claims by Plaintiff in the above-captioned case are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
The Court further ACCEPTS AND ACKNOWLEDGES that Defendants’ counterclaims against Plaintiff in the above-captioned case are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
All pending requests for relief in the above-captioned case not explicitly granted herein are DENIED AS MOOT.
The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the above-captioned case as no parties or claims remain.
cite Cite Document
Analyze
1 2 3 4 5 ... >>