• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
3,250 results

Valenzano v. Continental Aktiengesellschaft et al

Docket 5:24-rt-55010, Ohio Northern District Court (June 10, 2024)
Judge Sara Lioi(MDL3107), presiding
Anti-Trust
DivisionAkron
FlagsCat02, Knapp, MDL3107
Cause15:1 Antitrust Litigation
Case Type410 Anti-Trust
Tags410 Anti-Trust, 410 Anti-Trust
Plaintiff James Valenzano
Defendant Continental Aktiengesellschaft
Defendant Continental Tire the Americas, LLC
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

John A. Mansour v. Morgan Stanley et al

Docket 4:24-cv-00459, Texas Eastern District Court (May 17, 2024)
Chief District Judge Amos L Mazzant, presiding
Racketeer/Corrupt Organization
DivisionSherman
FlagsJURY, PROTECTIVE-ORDER
Cause18:1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Case Type470 Racketeer/Corrupt Organization
Tags470 Racketeer / Corrupt Organization, 470 Racketeer / Corrupt Organization
DeadlineDesignation of Mediator due by 4/3/2025., Discovery due by 4/3/2025.
DeadlineMotions due by 4/4/2025.
Plaintiff John A. Mansour
Defendant Morgan Stanley
Defendant Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Corrente et al v. The Charles Schwab Corporation

Docket 4:22-cv-00470, Texas Eastern District Court (June 2, 2022)
District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III, presiding
Anti-Trust
DivisionSherman
FlagsMEDIATION, PROTECTIVE-ORDER, STAYED
Cause15:25 Clayton Act
Case Type410 Anti-Trust
Tags410 Anti-Trust, 410 Anti-Trust
DeadlineThird Amended Deadline (see Dkt. No. 130) Modification Description 7/8/2024 9/7/2024 9/5/2024 11/5/2024 9/5/2024 11/5/2024 10/7/2024 12/7/2024 10/21/2024 12/21/2024 10/21/2024 12/21/2024 12/5/2024 2/4/2025 12/5/2024 2/4/2025 12/12/2024 2/11/2025 12/19/2024 2/18/2025 1/9/2025 03/11/2025 1/23/2025 3/25/2025 2/6/2025 4/8/2025 TBD TBD 3/10/2025 5/10/2025 Deadline for completion of depositions of all opening experts related to class certification.
Deadline2 Third Amended Deadline (see Dkt. No. 130) Modification Description 4/22/2025 6/22/2025 Deadline to designate all rebuttal merits experts and serve all opening merits expert reports., 2 Second Amended Deadline (see Dkt. 101) Modification Description 2/18/2025 4/22/2025 Deadline to designate all rebuttal merits experts and serve all opening merits expert reports.
Mediator Nancy Atlas
Plaintiff Jonathan Corrente
Plaintiff Charles Shaw
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Site 2020 Incorporated v. Superior Traffic Services, LLC

Docket 9:21-cv-00063, Montana District Court (May 21, 2021)
Judge Dana L. Christensen, presiding
Patent
DivisionMissoula
FlagsF/R, REFER
Cause35:271 Patent Infringement
Case Type830 Patent
Tags830 Patent, 830 Patent
Plaintiff Site 2020 Incorporated
Defendant Superior Traffic Services, LLC
Counter Claimant Superior Traffic Services, LLC
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Klein et al v. Meta Platforms, Inc.

Docket 5:20-cv-08570, California Northern District Court (Dec. 3, 2020)
Judge James Donato, presiding
Anti-Trust
DivisionSan Jose
FlagsADRMOP, CONSOL, PROTO
Cause15:2 Antitrust Litigation
Case Type410 Anti-Trust
Tags410 Anti-Trust, 410 Anti-Trust
DeadlineTHIRD AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER FOR USER PLAINTIFFS: Dispositive Motion due by 4/28/2025.
DeadlineAdvertisers Pretrial Conference set for 6/12/2025 01:30 PM in San Francisco
Plaintiff Maximilian Klein
Plaintiff Sarah Grabert
Plaintiff Deborah Dames
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Klein et al v. Meta Platforms, Inc.

Docket 3:20-cv-08570, California Northern District Court (Dec. 3, 2020)
Judge James Donato, presiding
Anti-Trust
DivisionSan Francisco
FlagsADRMOP, CONSOL, PROTO
Cause15:2 Antitrust Litigation
Case Type410 Anti-Trust
Tags410 Anti-Trust, 410 Anti-Trust
DeadlineTHIRD AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER FOR USER PLAINTIFFS: Dispositive Motion due by 4/28/2025.
DeadlineAdvertisers Pretrial Conference set for 6/12/2025 01:30 PM in San Francisco
Plaintiff Maximilian Klein
Plaintiff Sarah Grabert
Plaintiff Deborah Dames
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

No. 905 AMENDED ORDER re Dr. Nicholas Economides and User Class Certification

Document Klein et al v. Meta Platforms, Inc., 3:20-cv-08570, No. 905 (N.D.Cal. Feb. 13, 2025)
Meta also contends, without meaningful opposition by plaintiffs, that because “[Dr.] Economides’s opinions on [antitrust injury] are junk science,” if they are “properly excluded, Users necessarily fail to meet the requirements of Rule 23.” Dkt. No. 806 at 5.
To be clear, FRE 702 “does not license a court to engage in freeform factfinding, to select between competing versions of the evidence, or to determine the veracity of the expert’s conclusions at the admissibility stage.” Elosu v. Middlefork Ranch Inc., 26 F.4th 1017, 1026 (9th Cir. 2022).
Meta’s main criticism is that Dr. Economides’ antitrust injury opinion, namely that Facebook users suffered the loss of direct payments for their data that they assertedly would have received in the but-for world, is unsupported by the record.
Dr. Economides did not credibly explain why no social-media company, or firm in the PSNS market, has tried to compete by paying users, even as he maintains that Facebook would change its product structure do just that when faced with competition.
A claim of attempted monopolization requires demonstrating “(1) specific intent to control prices or destroy competition; (2) predatory or anticompetitive conduct directed at accomplishing that purpose; (3) a dangerous probability of achieving ‘monopoly power’; and (4) causal antitrust injury.” Rebel Oil Co., Inc. v. Atlantic Richfield Co., 51 F.3d 1421, 1433 (9th Cir. 1995).
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 896 THIRD AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER FOR USER PLAINTIFFS: Dispositive Motion due by 4/28/2025

Document Klein et al v. Meta Platforms, Inc., 3:20-cv-08570, No. 896 (N.D.Cal. Feb. 11, 2025)
Scheduling Order
The Court sets the following case management deadlines pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16 and Civil Local Rule 16-10.
Last day to file dispositive and Daubert motions April 28, 2025 Event Deadline Pretrial conference Jury Trial Thursday, September 25, 2025, at 1:30 p.m. Monday, November 17, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. All dates set by the Court should be regarded as firm.
Counsel may not modify these dates by stipulation without leave of court.
Requests for continuances are disfavored, and scheduling conflicts that are created subsequent to the date of this order by any party, counsel or party- controlled expert or witness will not be considered good cause for a continuance.
Sanctions may issue for a failure to follow a scheduling or other pretrial order.
cite Cite Document
Analyze
1 2 3 4 5 ... >>