• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
457 results

DC Comics v. Pacific Pictures Corporation, et al

Docket 12-57245, U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit (Dec. 12, 2012)
Copyright (Appeals)
Case Type3820 Copyright
Tags3820 Copyright, 3820 Copyright
Plaintiff - Appellee, DC COMICS
Defendant - Appellant, PACIFIC PICTURES CORPORATION
Defendant - Appellant, IP WORLDWIDE, LLC
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Microlinc, LLC v. Sony Computer Entertainment America LLC et al

Docket 2:13-cv-00520, Texas Eastern District Court ()
Judge Michael H. Schneider, presiding
Patent
DemandBoth
Cause35:271 Patent Infringement
Case Type830 Patent
Tags830 Patent, 830 Patent
Mediator David Folsom
Plaintiff Microlinc, LLC
Defendant Sony Computer Entertainment America LLC
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

DC Comics v. Pacific Pictures Corporation et al

Docket 2:10-cv-03633, California Central District Court (May 14, 2010)
Judge Otis D. Wright, II, presiding, Magistrate Judge Ralph Zarefsky
Copyright
09/20/2010
... limit to the subject matter covered in the depositions. The court expects all counsel to be cooperative, and none to be obstructive. Any further explanations of the above...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

No. 40 Filed order (STEPHEN R. REINHARDT, SIDNEY R. THOMAS and JOHN W. SEDWICK) Appellants’ request ...

Document DC Comics v. Pacific Pictures Corporation, et al, 12-57245, No. 40 (9th Cir. Dec. 18, 2013)
Case: 12-57245, 12/18/2013, ID: 8907624, DktEntry: 40, Page 1 of 1
Defendants - Appellants.
Before: REINHARDT and THOMAS, Circuit Judges, and SEDWICK, District Judge.
* Appellants’ request for publication of the disposition is DENIED.
The Honorable John W. Sedwick, District Judge for the U.S. District * Court for the District of Alaska, sitting by designation.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Allergan Inc et al v. Athena Cosmetics Inc et al

Docket 8:09-cv-00328, California Central District Court (Mar. 16, 2009)
Judge James V. Selna, presiding, Magistrate Judge Robert N. Block
Patent
DivisionSanta Ana (Southern Division)
Flags(RNBx), CLOSED, CONSOL, DISCOVERY, RELATED-G, REOPENED, STAYED
Cause28:1331 Fed. Question
Case Type830 Patent
Tags830 Patent, 830 Patent
Plaintiff Allergan Inc
Plaintiff M D Murray A. Johnstone
Plaintiff Duke University
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

No. 754 MANDATE of Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals filed re: Notice of Appeal 740 , Notice of Appeal ...

Document Joanne Siegel et al v. Warner Bros Entertainment Inc et al, 2:04-cv-08400, No. 754 (C.D.Cal. Mar. 4, 2016)
individually and as personal representative of the Estate of Joanne Siegel, AKA Joanne Siegel, Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellant, v.
individually and as personal representative of the Estate of Joanne Siegel, AKA Joanne Siegel, Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellee, v.
individually and as personal No. 13-56259 D.C. No. 2:04-cv-08776-ODW-RZ U.S. District Court for Central California, Los Angeles
The judgment of this Court, entered February 10, 2016, takes effect this
This constitutes the formal mandate of this Court issued pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 753 ORDER from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of ...

Document Joanne Siegel et al v. Warner Bros Entertainment Inc et al, 2:04-cv-08400, No. 753 (C.D.Cal. Feb. 18, 2016)
LAURA SIEGEL LARSON, individually and as personal representative of the Estate of Joanne Siegel, AKA Joanne Siegel, Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellant, v. No. 13-56244 D.C. No. 2:04-cv-08776-ODW-RZ TIME WARNER, INC., a corporation; WARNER COMMUNICATIONS, INC., a corporation; WARNER BROS.
LAURA SIEGEL LARSON, individually and as personal representative of the Estate of Joanne Siegel, AKA Joanne Siegel, Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellee, v.
Before: SCHROEDER, PREGERSON, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.
Plaintiff-Appellant’s request to designate the memorandum disposition filed on February 10, 2016 as an opinion and publish is DENIED.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 622 FINAL JUDGMENT ON REMAINING CLAIMS 621 : DCs Fourth Claim for Relief is DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE

Document DC Comics v. Pacific Pictures Corporation et al, 2:10-cv-03633, No. 622 (C.D.Cal. Nov. 26, 2014)
Motion for Judgment
an individual, MARK WARREN PEARY, as personal representative of the ESTATE OF JOSEPH SHUSTER, JEAN ADELE PEAVY, an individual, LAURA SIEGEL LARSON, an individual and as personal representative of the ESTATE OF JOANNE SIEGEL, and DOES 1-10, inclusive,
Defendants filed a petition for writ of certiorari in the U.S. Supreme Court on DC’s First Claim, and on October 6, 2014, the Supreme Court denied the petition for a writ.
Based on the foregoing, the Court hereby enters judgment on the remaining claims in this case as follows: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that DC’s Second Claim for Relief is DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, as moot.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that DC’s Fourth Claim for Relief is DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that DC’s Sixth Claim for Relief is DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, as moot.
cite Cite Document
Analyze
1 2 3 4 5 ... >>