• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
1,928 results

IN RE LYFT RIDESHARE CASES

Docket CJC-20-005061, California State, San Francisco County, Superior Court (July 30, 2020)
Case TypeCOORDINATION
DeadlineADDED TO CALENDAR FOR JURY TRIAL (PLAINTIFFS 0001, 002, 0003) - SET PER ORDER FILED ON MAR-07-2025 - JURY TRIAL SET FOR OCT-06-2025 AT 09:00 AM IN DEPT 606
DeadlineHaving reviewedthe stipulation jointly filed by counsel for Plaintiffs and Defendant, Lyft, Inc., the Court hereby orders the following cases coordinated into JCCP 5061 andthat the cases are stayed in their homejurisdiction pursuant to CRC 3.529(b) and 3.544(d): ||caseame|__caseno.|court|FitingDate| ji.|Lyftnesevade”[POC?S610650|SF-Coungy|Nov.27,2025|1.|Lyft
Petitioner Plaintiffs
Plaintiff Plaintiffs
Plaintiff Antonio Andrea
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

United States of America ex rel. Gill, et al v. CVS Health Corp., et al

Docket 1:18-cv-06494, Illinois Northern District Court (Sept. 24, 2018)
Honorable Steven C. Seeger, presiding, Honorable Daniel P. McLaughlin
Statutory Actions - Other
DivisionChicago
FlagsCASREF, McLaughlin, PROTO
Cause28:1331 Federal Question
Case Type890 Statutory Actions - Other
Tags890 Statutory Actions, Other, 890 Statutory Actions, Other
DeadlineRolling production to be completed by 5/16/25 and a joint status report to be filed by 5/20/25.
Plaintiff Michael Gill
Plaintiff United States of America
Plaintiff State of California
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

ORDER - REFEREE'S RECOMMENDED ORDER

Document IN RE LYFT RIDESHARE CASES, CJC-20-005061, No. 09366175 (California State, San Francisco County, Superior Court Dec. 12, 2024)
Having considered all written and oral arguments the Referee recommendsthat the Court enter the following Order.
Consequently Lyft is entitled to obtain records and evidence of preexisting physical and mental injuries in order to explore alternative sources for Plaintiffs’
The Referee previously considered these issues in 2021 and implemented a procedure that counsel report has generally functioned smoothly.
For example,if a plaintiff claims ongoing depression and sleeplessness from the alleged Lyft incident, records of past treatment for an eating disorder might well not be relevant.
Recordsviolative of Plaintiffs’ rights under CCP §2017.220(a) shall not be delivered to Lyft counsel withoutstipulation or noticed motion.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 340

Document United States of America ex rel. Gill, et al v. CVS Health Corp., et al, 1:18-cv-06494, No. 340 (N.D.Ill. Aug. 26, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 09160478

Document IN RE LYFT RIDESHARE CASES, CJC-20-005061, No. 09160478 (California State, San Francisco County, Superior Court Jul. 26, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 09118312

Document IN RE LYFT RIDESHARE CASES, CJC-20-005061, No. 09118312 (California State, San Francisco County, Superior Court Jun. 27, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 329

Document United States of America ex rel. Gill, et al v. CVS Health Corp., et al, 1:18-cv-06494, No. 329 (N.D.Ill. Jun. 17, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 09082168

Document IN RE LYFT RIDESHARE CASES, CJC-20-005061, No. 09082168 (California State, San Francisco County, Superior Court Jun. 3, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze
1 2 3 4 5 ... >>