• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
243,232 results

Gene Company Pty Ltd v. The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New Yo...

Docket IPR2024-00313, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Dec. 20, 2023)
Tawen Chang, Tina Hulse, Zhenyu Yang, presiding
Case TypeInter Partes Review
PatentRE47045
DeadlineDUE DATE 7: March 18, 2025 Reply to opposition to motion to exclude
DeadlineDUE DATE 8: March 27, 2025 Oral argument (if requested)
Patent Owner The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York
Petitioner Gene Company Pty Ltd
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Gene Company Pty Ltd v. The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New Yo...

Docket IPR2024-00312, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Dec. 19, 2023)
Tawen Chang, Tina Hulse, Zhenyu Yang, presiding
Case TypeInter Partes Review
Patent9486432
DeadlineDUE DATE 7: March 18, 2025 Reply to opposition to motion to exclude
DeadlineDUE DATE 8: March 27, 2025 Oral argument (if requested)
Patent Owner The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York
Petitioner Gene Company Pty Ltd
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

16 Adverse judgment post institution: Adverse judgment post institution

Document IPR2024-00312, No. 16 Adverse judgment post institution - Adverse judgment post institution (P.T.A.B. Jan. 28, 2025)
Before ZHENYU YANG, TINA E. HULSE, and TAWEN CHANG, Administrative Patent Judges.
The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York (“Patent Owner”) did not file a Preliminary Response to the Petition.
We determined that Petitioner had shown a reasonable likelihood of prevailing with respect to at least one challenged claim of the ’432 Patent and instituted an inter partes review of all challenged claims on all asserted grounds.
Patent Owner then informed the Board that it “has abandoned the contest in IPR2024- 00312.” Id. at 1.
Patent 9,486,432 B2 For PETITIONER: Jad A. Mills Michael T. Rosato Matthew Bresnahan
cite Cite Document
Analyze

20 RehearingDecision on Request for Rehearing : Rehearing DECISION Denying P...

Document IPR2024-00313, No. 20 RehearingDecision on Request for Rehearing - Rehearing DECISION Denying Patent Owner’s Request for Rehearing of Decision on Institution 35 USC § 4271d (P.T.A.B....

cite Cite Document
Analyze

11 Order Other: Scheduling Order

Document IPR2024-00312, No. 11 Order Other - Scheduling Order (P.T.A.B. Jun. 24, 2024)
In stipulating to move any due dates in the scheduling order, the parties must be cognizant that the Board requires four weeks after the filing of an opposition to the motion to amend (or the due date for the opposition, if none is filed) for ...
cite Cite Document
Analyze

10 Institution Decision Grant: Decision Granting Institution of Inter Partes Review

Document IPR2024-00312, No. 10 Institution Decision Grant - Decision Granting Institution of Inter Partes Review (P.T.A.B. Jun. 24, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

13 Institution Decision Grant: Decision Granting Institution of Inter Partes Review

Document IPR2024-00313, No. 13 Institution Decision Grant - Decision Granting Institution of Inter Partes Review (P.T.A.B. Jun. 24, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

14 Order Other: Scheduling Order

Document IPR2024-00313, No. 14 Order Other - Scheduling Order (P.T.A.B. Jun. 24, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze
1 2 3 4 5 ... >>