) ) ) ) ) ) USM No: 75667-097 Date of Original Judgment: 10/1/2018 Date of Previous Amended Judgment: Michael W. Berdinella (Use Date of Last Amended Judgment if Any) Defendant’s Attorney

Upon motion of the court under 18 U.S.C. the Director of the Bureau of Prisons the defendant § 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 994(u), and having considered such motion, and taking into account the policy statement set forth at USSG §1B1.10 and the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), to the extent that they are applicable, IT IS ORDERED that the motion is:

GRANTED and the defendant’s previously imposed sentence of imprisonment (as reflected in months is reduced to the last judgment issued) of .

Complete Parts I and II of Page 2 when motion is granted)

Except as otherwise provided, all provisions of the judgment dated

On October 1, 2018, now retired United States District Court Judge Lawrence J. O’Neill sentenced Mr. Monson to a term of 180 months’ imprisonment;

Because Mr. Monson is eligible for a reduction in sentence, the parties request the Court enter the order lodged herewith reducing Mr. Monson’s term of imprisonment to 168 months.

On June 20, 2022, Defendant possessed a hazardous tool (a cell phone) which resulted in 100-series violation, the most serious in BOP’s rating system, and the loss of 41 days Good Conduct Time.

2 This statement is provided by the United States to give the Court a brief summary of the case history and relevant facts and is not part of the parties’ stipulation.

Stipulation and Order Re: Sentence Reduction United States v. Trenell Monson Defendant’s current projected release date is June 3, 2028.

The parties agree and stipulate, and request that the Court find the following:

Government counsel has had a significant number of case-related deadlines and other work obligations, and needs more time to prepare a thorough response.

On May 20, 2024the government contacted defense counsel regarding filing deadlines in this case.

Defense does not object to extending the government’s due date for its opposition to June 6, 2024.

The parties further stipulate to set defendant’s due date for any reply for June 20, 2024.

It is ordered that the defendant must notify the United States attorney for this district within 30 days of any change of name, residence, or mailing address until all fines, restitution, costs, and special assessments imposed by this judgment are fully paid.

as directed by the probation officer, the Bureau of Prisons, or any state sex offender registration agency in the location where you reside, work, are a student, or were convicted of a qualifying offense.

You must not own, possess, or have access to a firearm, ammunition, destructive device, or dangerous weapon (i.e., anything that was designed, or was modified for, the specific purpose of causing bodily injury or death to another person, such as nunchakus or tasers).

This payment schedule does not prohibit the United States from collecting through all available means any unpaid criminal monetary penalty at any time, as prescribed by law.

This payment schedule does not prohibit the United States from collecting through all available means any unpaid criminal monetary penalties at any time, as prescribed by law.

Finding it to be supported by good cause, the court granted the motion to withdraw as counsel of record on February 8, 2024.

On March 18, 2024, defendant York filed a motion with this court requesting that his previously appointed counsel be re-appointed to assist him “in a second attempt for compassionate release” and in an “application of my first step act credits.” (Doc. No.

Defendant York does not provide any support for his request for the re-appointment of counsel nor does he make any showing that the appointment of counsel is necessary for him to be able to pursue any of the relief he apparently wishes to seek.

Absent such a showing, the court will deny defendant’s motion without prejudice.

Accordingly, defendant’s motion for the reappointment of counsel is denied without prejudice and the Clerk of the Court is directed to again close this case.