• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
16 results

Kokkoros et al v. Equinity Trust Company et al

Docket 3:25-cv-01853, California Northern District Court (Feb. 20, 2025)
Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim, presiding
Contract - Other
DivisionSan Francisco
Demand$1,992,000,000
Cause28:1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Case Type190 Contract - Other
Tags190 Contract, Contract, Civil, Other, 190 Contract, Contract, Civil, Other
Plaintiff Kokkoros
Defendant Equinity Trust Company
Plaintiff Fani Kokkoros
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

BloomTech Inc. v. RSUI Indemnity Company et al

Docket 4:25-cv-00815, California Northern District Court (Jan. 23, 2025)
Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu, presiding
Insurance
DivisionOakland
FlagsADRMOP
Demand$2,000,000
Cause28:1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Case Type110 Insurance
Tags110 Insurance, 110 Insurance
DeadlineService waived by Western World Insurance Company waiver sent on 2/14/2025, answer due 4/15/2025.
DeadlineInitial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Joint Case Management Statement due by 4/23/2025.
Plaintiff BloomTech Inc.
Defendant RSUI Indemnity Company
Defendant Western World Insurance Company
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

BloomTech Inc. v. RSUI Indemnity Company et al

Docket 3:25-cv-00815, California Northern District Court (Jan. 23, 2025)
Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu, presiding
Insurance
DivisionSan Francisco
FlagsADRMOP
Demand$2,000,000
Cause28:1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Case Type110 Insurance
Tags110 Insurance, 110 Insurance
DeadlineInitial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Joint Case Management Statement due by 4/23/2025.
DeadlineInitial Case Management Conference set for 4/30/2025 at 01:30 PM in Oakland - Videoconference Only.
Plaintiff BloomTech Inc.
Defendant RSUI Indemnity Company
Defendant Western World Insurance Company
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

St. Joseph Hospital of Orange v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Company et al

Docket 8:24-cv-02604, California Central District Court (Nov. 27, 2024)
Judge Fred W. Slaughter, presiding, Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick
Insurance
DivisionSanta Ana (Southern Division)
FlagsACCO, (DFMx), DISCOVERY, MANADR
Demand$200,000
Cause28:1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Case Type110 Insurance
Tags110 Insurance, 110 Insurance
Plaintiff St. Joseph Hospital of Orange
Defendant Fireman's Fund Insurance Company
Defendant Does
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Murray Colin Clarke et al v. TNSG Health Co., Ltd

Docket 3:24-cv-02950, California Northern District Court (May 15, 2024)
Judge Rita F. Lin, presiding
Trademark
DivisionSan Francisco
FlagsADRMOP, CLOSED
Cause15:1114 Trademark Infringement
Case Type840 Trademark
Tags840 Trademark, 840 Trademark
Plaintiff Murray Colin Clarke
Plaintiff Biozeal, LLC
Defendant TNSG Health Co., Ltd
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

No. 12 MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION ON NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT by Judge Fred W. ...

Document St. Joseph Hospital of Orange v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Company et al, 8:24-cv-02604, No. 12 (C.D.Cal. Feb. 19, 2025)
Case 8:24-cv-02604-FWS-DFM Document 12 Filed 02/19/25 Page 1 of 1 Page ID #:85
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.

Docket 1:16-ap-1019, New York Southern Bankruptcy Court (Feb. 3, 2016)
Judge Martin Glenn, presiding
DivisionManhattan
Flags2ndsumm, MDisCs, SealedDoc, Lead, LV2APPEAL, APPEAL, CLOSED
Plaintiff Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Defendant 1st Advantage Mortgage, L.L.C.
Defendant Affiliated Funding Corporation
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

No. 277 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Set Aside Default Re: Clerks Entry of Default (CV-37) - optional ...

Document Murray Colin Clarke et al v. TNSG Health Co., Ltd, 3:24-cv-02950, No. 277 (N.D.Cal. May. 3, 2024)
Nor can a defendant’s conduct be culpable if he “offers a credible, good faith explanation negating any intention to take advantage of the opposing party, interfere with judicial decision making, or otherwise manipulate the legal process.
Here, Plaintiffs suggest that a purportedly false declaration of use submitted to the USPTO in connection with a trademark application constitutes the requisite fraud or injustice to justify piercing the corporate veil.
TCI Group, 244 F.3d at 701, citing to Bateman v. United States Postal Service, 231 F.3d 1220 (9th Cir. 2000) (“no prejudice simply because a party loses a quick victory due to opponent's procedural default and must litigate on the merits.”).
As the Indigo America court recognized, when faced with such a significant potential financial liability, there is a compelling interest in ensuring that the defendant has an opportunity to present a defense and that the case is adjudicated based on a full consideration of the evidence.
Because Plaintiffs' alter ego claim is legally deficient for the reasons discussed in detail above, Defendants were never adequately served with the First Amended Complaint, and this request that their defaults be set aside should be granted.
cite Cite Document
Analyze
1 2 >>