• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
978 results

Mikhail Zemlyansky, Petitioner v. United States

Docket 18-7778, Supreme Court of the United States (Feb. 5, 2019)
Petitioner Mikhail Zemlyansky
Respondent United States
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

No. 1713 ORDER Denying Defendant's Motion to Reduce Sentence and Denying Defendant's Motion to Appoint ...

Document United States of America v. Leon et al, 3:06-cr-01243, No. 1713 (S.D.Cal. Feb. 5, 2025)
In response, the Government contends that Defendant has already litigated many of these claims and that none of them amount to “extraordinary and compelling reasons” based upon a change in the law.
1 None of Defendant’s arguments pass muster.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 1444 ORDER denying 1433 Motion to Reduce Sentence re USSC Amendment 821 as to Phuong A Nguyen (11)

Document USA v. Tran et al, 2:15-cr-00120, No. 1444 (W.D.Wash. Nov. 6, 2024)
Having considered the briefing and the relevant record, the Court DENIES the motion for the reasons explained herein.
The Court sentenced Defendant to a custodial term of 144 months for conspiracy to distribute controlled substances and possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime.
The request is based on the Sentencing Commission’s change to the calculation and application of status points to an offender’s criminal history category.
At the time of sentencing, the Court concluded that Defendant’s applicable criminal history category was VI.
(Id.) According to the career offender table for § 924(c) (firearm) offenses, this resulted in a guideline range of 262– 327 months.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 1438 ORDER denying Defendant's 1432 MOTION for Early Termination of Probation or Supervised Release ...

Document USA v. Tran et al, 2:15-cr-00120, No. 1438 (W.D.Wash. Aug. 30, 2024)
Following Defendant’s guilty plea to Conspiracy to Distribute Controlled Substances, the Court imposed a sentence of 96 months of imprisonment followed by five years of supervised release.
In deciding whether early termination is appropriate, the Court must consider several factors, including the nature and circumstances of the offense, the history and characteristics of the defendant, the need to deter criminal conduct, the need to protect the public
In support, Defendant cites his compliance with the conditions of supervision, elder care responsibilities, stable housing, and consistent work history.
(See generally id.) The United States Pretrial Services and Probation Department supports early termination, noting that Defendant requires little, if any, supervision at this point.
The Court encourages Defendant to renew his request once he has satisfactorily completed a more significant period of supervised release.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 1419

Document USA v. Tran et al, 2:15-cr-00120, No. 1419 (W.D.Wash. May. 21, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 1417

Document USA v. Tran et al, 2:15-cr-00120, No. 1417 (W.D.Wash. Apr. 8, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

USA v. Stephen Johnson

Docket 14-10113, U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit (March 18, 2014)

cite Cite Docket
Analyze

No. 1412

Document USA v. Tran et al, 2:15-cr-00120, No. 1412 (W.D.Wash. Jan. 17, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze
1 2 3 4 5 ... >>