• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
572 results

Opinion No. 282254

Document Certain Lens-Fitted Film Packages, 337-406, No. 282254-1 (U.S.I.T.C. Sep. 12, 2007)
We note that the parties generally agree that a reduction in the penalty that parallels the Court’s correction to the number of infringing LFFPs is reasonable on remand.
The parties’ positions diverge, however, on the specific application of the measure of reduction, and then W h e r when Mr. Benun claims that his liability for the penalty has been discharged by the Commission’s settlement with Jazz in November 2005.
The Estate and Anthony Cossentino (“Cossentino”) dismiss their pending appeals of the ITC’s adoption of an administrative law judge’s finding of patent infringement by the Debtor relating to the period of August 21,2001 to December 12,2003, and the imposition of civil penalties resulting therefrom.
In addition, Mr. Benun unsuccessfully argued a variation of this claim in the Federal Circuit when he challenged the Commission’s finding of his joint and several liability and noted the Commission’s settlement with Jazz.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Transmittal to Deputy Clerk, CAFC No. 264527

Document Certain Lens-Fitted Film Packages, 337-406, No. 264527-1 (U.S.I.T.C. Nov. 3, 2006)
November 3,2006 Christy Thomas, Deputy Clerk, United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 71 7 Madison Place, NW Washington, DC 20439 Re: 04-161 8 - Fuji Photo Film
Please note that the contents of the CDs include confidential business idormation that is subject to an arlministrative protective order.
Please dispose of the DVD in accordance with your procedures for destroying confidential business information and noti@ me of its destruction.
I, Marilyn R Abbott, hereby cert@r that on November 3,2006, copies of the forgoing letter and referenced CDs were served upon the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the following parties as indicated: 500 E Street, SW Washington, DC 20436
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Denying Fuji's Motion For Reconsideration Of Order No. 139 No. 231605

Document Certain Lens-Fitted Film Packages, 337-406, No. 231605-1 (U.S.I.T.C. May. 24, 2005)
Fuji, in support of Motion No. 406-206, argued that the finding and determination of the administrative law judge in issue are inconsistent with Fuii Photo Film Co. v. Int’l Trade Comm’n, 386 F.3d 1095 (Fed. Cir. 2004) (Full decision).
clearly examples of the associated accused products named in the vacating order by the Federal Circuit.” (Motion at 5 (emphasis in original).)
However, the F&i decision, the sole basis for Motion No. 406- 206, was before the Commission when it issued its Order of December 21,2004 and did not include Highway Holdings as a party to these proceedings.
I, Marilyn R. Abbott, hereby certify that the attached Order was served by hand upon Karin Norton, Esq., Rett V. Snotherly, Esq., and upon the following parties via first class mail,
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 222023-1

Document Certain Lens-Fitted Film Packages, 337-406, No. 222023-1 (U.S.I.T.C. Jan. 14, 2005)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 211486-1

Document Certain Lens-Fitted Film Packages, 337-406, No. 211486-1 (U.S.I.T.C. Aug. 2, 2004)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 210513-1

Document Certain Lens-Fitted Film Packages, 337-406, No. 210513-1 (U.S.I.T.C. Jul. 16, 2004)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 209896-1

Document Certain Lens-Fitted Film Packages, 337-406, No. 209896-1 (U.S.I.T.C. Jun. 28, 2004)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 207959-1

Document Certain Lens-Fitted Film Packages, 337-406, No. 207959-1 (U.S.I.T.C. May. 26, 2004)

cite Cite Document
Analyze
1 2 3 4 5 ... >>