• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
124 results

Ranir, LLC v. Split Rock Scientific, Inc.

Docket 91212373, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (Sept. 9, 2013)
Case TypeOpposition
MarksREST ASSURED READY TO WEAR, REST ASSURED EXTRA COMFORT, REST ASSURED, RESTASSURE
Applicant Split Rock Scientific, Inc.
Opposer Ranir, LLC
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Leco Corporation v. ArcSoft, Inc.

Docket 91212181, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (Aug. 27, 2013)
Case TypeOpposition
MarksLECO, LECAM
Applicant ArcSoft, Inc.
Opposer Leco Corporation
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

In re L. Perrigo Company

Docket 85157689, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (Jan. 24, 2012)
Case TypeExparte Appeal
TagsExparte Appeal, Appeal
MarksMUCUS EXTENDED-RELEASE
Applicant L. Perrigo Company
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Reckitt Benckiser Inc. v. L. Perrigo Company

Docket 91199979, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (May 25, 2011)
Case TypeOpposition
MarksMUCINEX MOISTURE SMART, MUCUS-ER, MUCUS OUT, MR. MUCUS, MUCINEX FULL FORCE, MUCINEX IN ... MUCUS OUT, MUCINEX
Applicant L. Perrigo Company
Opposer Reckitt Benckiser Inc.
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

No. 5 - Board Decision: Sustained

Document Ranir, LLC v. Split Rock Scientific, Inc., 91212373, No. 5 (T.T.A.B. Jan. 28, 2014)
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board P.O.
On November 5, 2013, the Board sent a notice of default to applicant because no answer had been filed.
The record shows no response thereto.
By the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 10 - Board Decision: Dismissed without Prejudice

Document Leco Corporation v. ArcSoft, Inc., 91212181, No. 10 (T.T.A.B. Nov. 27, 2013)
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board P.O.
On November 18, 2013, the Board approved the amendment to applicant's identification of goods in application Serial No. 85800156, and allowed opposer time in which to file a withdrawal of the opposition.
On the same day, opposer filed a withdrawal of the opposition.
Because no answer is of record, the opposition is dismissed without prejudice.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 8 - Response Due 30 Days (Due Date)

Document Leco Corporation v. ArcSoft, Inc., 91212181, No. 8 (T.T.A.B. Nov. 18, 2013)
Inasmuch as the amendment is clearly limiting in nature as required by Trademark Rule 2.71(a), and because opposer
1 Applicant’s change of correspondence address (filed October 4, 2013) is noted and made of record.
The identification of services for International Class 42 remains unchanged.
If this amendment resolves the dispute herein, opposer is allowed until THIRTY DAYS from the mailing date of this order to file a withdrawal of the opposition, failing which the opposition will go forward on the application as amended.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 4 - Notice of Default

Document Ranir, LLC v. Split Rock Scientific, Inc., 91212373, No. 4 (T.T.A.B. Nov. 5, 2013)
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board P.O.
Nicole Thier, Paralegal Specialist: Answer was due in this case on October 19, 2013.
Inasmuch as it appears that no answer has been filed, nor has applicant filed a motion to extend its time to answer, notice of default is hereby entered against applicant under Fed. R. Civ.
Applicant is allowed until thirty days from the mailing date of this order to show cause why judgment by default should not be entered against applicant in accordance with Fed. R. Civ.
cite Cite Document
Analyze
1 2 3 4 5 ... 7 8 9 >>