• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
104 results

PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL

Document DELANEY VS DELANEY, CGC-97-989999, No. 08967089 (California State, San Francisco County, Superior Court Mar. 13, 2024)
DOUGLAS WAYNE DELANEY vs. REGINA DELANEY Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco Case No. CGC-97-989999 I, Juan M. Gutierrez, declare:
I am over the age of 18 and not a party to the within action; my business address is LAW OFFICES OF AARON F. GARCIA, APLC, 71-780 San Jacinto Drive, Building J, Rancho Mirage, California 92270.
On March I, 2024, I served the foregoing document(s) described as: [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ATTORNEY'S MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL — CIVIL on the interested person(s) listed below by placing a true copy thereof enclosed in a sealed envelope, with postage thereon fully prepaid, addressed as follows: Josh West, Esq.
Postal Service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepared at Rancho Mirage, California in the ordinary course of business.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above is true and correct.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER/NOTICE

Document DELANEY VS DELANEY, CGC-97-989999, No. 08815926 (California State, San Francisco County, Superior Court Nov. 20, 2023)
cITY AND zIP CODE: San Francisco, California 94102 BRANCH NAME Civic Center Courthouse, Civil Department
[BJ placed the sealed envelope for collection and processing for mailing, following this business's usual practices, with which I am readily familiar.
On the same day correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service.
The Notice of Entry of Judgment or Order was mailed: a. on (date): November 20, 2023 b. from (city and state): Santa Rosa , California 4.
Number of pages attached _3 __ _ I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

ORDER ON STIPULATION OF COUNSEL

Document DELANEY VS DELANEY, CGC-97-989999, No. 08805781 (California State, San Francisco County, Superior Court Nov. 13, 2023)
wf "Defendant oo)!s/)PREVIOUSLYSEALEDCASEFILE enes - a nets .
| nee.
ue “Ontthestipulationandagreementoftheparties 2Q19: “thatananovertidinginterestinunseatingthe afileandelectronicCourtDocumentthatare.not.
| CIOLONTyDrBO 8a le : .-24.
nee
cite Cite Document
Analyze

NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER/NOTICE

Document DELANEY VS DELANEY, CGC-97-989999, No. 08710346 (California State, San Francisco County, Superior Court Aug. 31, 2023)
[KJ placed the sealed envelope for collection and processing for mailing , following th is business's usual practices, with which I am readily familiar.
On the same day correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service.
The envelope was addressed and mailed as follows : a. Name of person served : Aaron F. Garcia/Law Offices of Aaron F. Garcia, APLC Street address:71-780 San Jacinto Drive, Building J City: Rancho Mirage State and zip code : CA 92270 c. Name of person served : Street address : City: State and zip code : b.
Number of pages attached _2 __ _ I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.
and the following documents are hereby ordered unsealed : Plaintiff DOUGLAS DELANEY'S Complaint and Answer to Cross-Complaint, and defendant REGINA DELANEY ' S Answer to Complaint and Cross-Complaint filed in the action~ motion is dcmiee as to othe1 filings , bttt-ts-wi-t-heut-prejlie-iee-h)-fort-her-reviewstrould additional records need to be unsealed in order to interpret the Judgment and issues det-ermined in said action.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO UNSEAL

Document DELANEY VS DELANEY, CGC-97-989999, No. 08701895 (California State, San Francisco County, Superior Court Aug. 25, 2023)
SEs a- no ooa 7 “AttorneysatLaw- oeaeve eeLnce tS |‘SantaRosa;California.95401.
Sanei Tee oo RUG257003 - 418 B Street, FourthFloor.
rs
Plaintiff, TWve-: “-3Ben::-|.ns‘IMOTIONTOUNSEALADDITIONAL:
“availablet0counselfordefendantREGINADELANEYandto counselforPetitioner.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 08688708

Document DELANEY VS DELANEY, CGC-97-989999, No. 08688708 (California State, San Francisco County, Superior Court Aug. 16, 2023)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 08574647

Document DELANEY VS DELANEY, CGC-97-989999, No. 08574647 (California State, San Francisco County, Superior Court May. 22, 2023)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 08967087

Document DELANEY VS DELANEY, CGC-97-989999, No. 08967087 (California State, San Francisco County, Superior Court Mar. 13, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 >>