- All Courts
- Federal Courts
- Bankruptcies
- PTAB
- ITC
ParkerVision, Inc. v. Qualcomm Incorporated
Case Type | 830 Patent |
Tags | 830 Patent, 830 Patent |
Plaintiff - Appellant | PARKERVISION, INC. |
Defendant - Appellee | QUALCOMM INCORPORATED |
Defendant - Appellee | QUALCOMM ATHEROS, INC. |
... |

- Search within this case
Analyze Judge
Analyze Party
Analyze Firm
Google LLC
Case Type | Inter Partes Review |
Patent | 10771849 |
Petitioner | Google LLC |
Assignee | WITHROW NETWORKS INC |

- Search within this case
Analyze Party
ParkerVision, Inc. v. Qualcomm Incorporated
Case Type | 830 Patent |
Tags | 830 Patent, 830 Patent |
Plaintiff - Appellant | PARKERVISION, INC. |
Defendant - Appellee | QUALCOMM INCORPORATED |
Defendant - Appellee | QUALCOMM ATHEROS, INC. |

- Search within this case
Analyze Party
Analyze Firm
Cellular South Inc v. Google, LLC
Division | Oakland |
Flags | ADRMOP |
Cause | 35:271 Patent Infringement |
Case Type | 830 Patent |
Tags | 830 Patent, 830 Patent |
Deadline | Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 5/13/2025. |
Deadline | Initial Case Management Conference set for 5/20/2025 01:30 PM in Oakland, - Videoconference Only. |
Plaintiff | Cellular South, Inc. |
Defendant | Google LLC |
Plaintiff | Cellular South Inc |
... |

- Search within this case
Analyze Judge
Analyze Party
Analyze Firm
Cellular South Inc v. Google, LLC
Division | San Francisco |
Flags | ADRMOP |
Cause | 35:271 Patent Infringement |
Case Type | 830 Patent |
Tags | 830 Patent, 830 Patent |
Deadline | Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 5/13/2025. |
Deadline | Initial Case Management Conference set for 5/20/2025 01:30 PM in Oakland, - Videoconference Only. |
Plaintiff | Cellular South, Inc. |
Defendant | Google LLC |
Plaintiff | Cellular South Inc |
... |

- Search within this case
Analyze Party
Analyze Firm
Cellular South Inc v. Google, LLC
|

Hesai Technology Co., Ltd. v. Ouster, Inc.
|

Hesai Technology Co. Ltd. v. Ouster, Inc.
|
