• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
372 results

Donald J. Trump, Petitioner v. Norma Anderson, et al.

Docket 23-719, Supreme Court of the United States (Jan. 4, 2024)
Petitioner Donald J. Trump
Respondent Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold
Respondent Norma Anderson, et al.
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Lyons vs Pius Street Lofts

Docket GD-23-000525, Pennsylvania State, Court of Common Pleas, Allegheny County, Civil Division (Jan. 12, 2023)
O'Brien W. Terrence, presiding
Demand$0.00
Case TypeGeneral Docket, Against Property Owner
TagsGeneral Docket, Against Property Owner
Plaintiff Joshua Lyons
Plaintiff Joshua Lyons
Defendant Pius Street Lofts
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Lyons vs 44 Pius LP

Docket GD-21-013022, Pennsylvania State, Court of Common Pleas, Allegheny County, Civil Division (Oct. 21, 2021)
No Judge, presiding
Demand$0.00
Case TypeGeneral Docket, Against Property Owner
TagsGeneral Docket, Against Property Owner
Plaintiff Joshua Lyons
Defendant 44 Pius L.P.
Additional Defendant Pius Street Lofts a Condominium
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Judgment REVERSED The mandate shall

Document Donald J. Trump, Petitioner v. Norma Anderson, et al., 23-719, Judgment REVERSED The mandate shall (U.S. Mar. 4, 2024)
After a five-day trial, the state District Court found that former President Trump had “engaged in insurrection” within the meaning of Section 3, but nonetheless denied the respondents’ petition.
The respondents nonetheless maintain that States may enforce Section 3 against candidates for federal office.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

04-2024

Document Donald J. Trump, Petitioner v. Norma Anderson, et al., 23-719, 04-2024 (U.S. Mar. 4, 2024)
After a five-day trial, the state District Court found that former President Trump had “engaged in insurrection” within the meaning of Section 3, but nonetheless denied the respondents’ petition.
The respondents nonetheless maintain that States may enforce Section 3 against candidates for federal office.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Judgment and mandate issued ullia

Document Donald J. Trump, Petitioner v. Norma Anderson, et al., 23-719, Judgment and mandate issued ullia (U.S. Mar. 4, 2024)
After a five-day trial, the state District Court found that former President Trump had “engaged in insurrection” within the meaning of Section 3, but nonetheless denied the respondents’ petition.
The respondents nonetheless maintain that States may enforce Section 3 against candidates for federal office.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Judgment and mandate issued ullia - Main Document

Document Donald J. Trump, Petitioner v. Norma Anderson, et al., 23-719, Judgment and mandate issued ullia, Main Document (U.S. Mar. 4, 2024)
from Norma Anderson, et al., Thirty-two Thousand Four Hundred Seventy-six Dollars and Sixty-nine Cents ($32,476.69) for costs herein expended.
Supreme Court of Colorado case, NORMA ANDERSON, ET AL.,
Petitioners-Appellants/Cross-Appellees v. JENA GRISWOLD, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS COLORADO SECRETARY OF STATE, Respondent-Appellee; and COLORADO REPUBLICAN STATE CENTRAL COMMITTEE, AN UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATION, Intervenor-Appellee, DONALD J. TRUMP, Intervenor-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, No. 23SA300, was submitted to the SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES on writ of certiorari and the response thereto.
from Norma Anderson, et al., Thirty-two Thousand Four Hundred Seventy-six Dollars and Sixty-nine Cents ($32,476.69) for costs herein expended.
Witness the Honorable JOHN G. ROBERTS, JR., Chief Justice of the United States, the 4th day of March, in the year Two Thousand and Twenty-Four.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Amicus brief of Retired State Supreme - Main Document

Document Donald J. Trump, Petitioner v. Norma Anderson, et al., 23-719, Amicus brief of Retired State Supreme, Main Document (U.S. Jan. 31, 2024)
None of Baker’s final three prudential factors apply here.
None of Baker’s factors turn on the existence of factual or legal disputes, and no constitutional principle says that “harder” cases are nonjusticiable.
cite Cite Document
Analyze
1 2 3 4 5 ... >>