• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
1,573 results

Jack Daniel's Properties, Inc., Petitioner v. VIP Products LLC

Docket 22-148, Supreme Court of the United States (Aug. 17, 2022)
Petitioner Jack Daniel's Properties, Inc.
Respondent VIP Products LLC
Other Intellectual Property Owners Association
...
cite Cite Docket

Apple Inc., Petitioner v. Qualcomm Incorporated

Docket 21-746, Supreme Court of the United States (Nov. 19, 2021)
Petitioner Apple Inc.
Respondent Qualcomm Incorporated
Other Unified Patents, LLC
...
cite Cite Docket

Minerva Surgical, Inc., Petitioner v. Hologic, Inc., et al.

Docket 20-440, Supreme Court of the United States (Oct. 6, 2020)
Petitioner Minerva Surgical, Inc.
Respondent Hologic, Inc., et al.
Other Intellectual Property Owners Association
...
cite Cite Docket

Georgia, et al., Petitioners v. Public.Resource.Org, Inc.

Docket 18-1150, Supreme Court of the United States (Mar. 5, 2019)
Petitioner State of Georgia, et al.
Respondent Public.Resource.Org, Inc.
Other Arkansas, et al.
...
cite Cite Docket

Google LLC, Petitioner v. Oracle America, Inc.

Docket 18-956, Supreme Court of the United States (Jan. 25, 2019)
Petitioner Google LLC
Respondent Oracle America, Inc.
Other Software Innovators, Startups, and Investors
...
cite Cite Docket

Alliance for Automotive Innovation v. Andrea Joy Campbell

Docket 1:20-cv-12090, Massachusetts District Court (Nov. 20, 2020)
Judge Denise J. Casper, presiding
Constitutionality of State Statute
DivisionBoston
Cause28:2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Case Type950 Constitutionality of State Statute
Tags950 Constitutionality, State Statute, 950 Constitutionality, State Statute
DeadlineRelease of Transcript Restriction set for 5/6/2025.
Plaintiff Alliance for Automotive Innovation
Defendant Andrea Joy Campbell
Amicus iFixit
...
cite Cite Docket

Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED Kagan

Document Jack Daniel's Properties, Inc., Petitioner v. VIP Products LLC, 22-148, Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED Kagan (U.S. Jun. 8, 2023)
The first part of that definition, iden- tifying the kind of things covered, is broad: It encompasses Cite as: 599 U. S. ____ (2023) Opinion of the Court words (think “Google”), graphic designs (Nike’s swoosh), and so-called trade dress, the overall appearance of a prod- uct and its packaging (a Hershey’s Kiss, in its silver wrap- per).
Consistent with trademark law’s basic purpose, the lead criterion for registration is that the mark JACK DANIEL’S PROPERTIES, INC. v. VIP PRODUCTS LLC Opinion of the Court “in fact serve as a ‘trademark’ to identify and distinguish goods.” 3 McCarthy §19:10 (listing the principal register’s eligibility standards).
Cite as: 599 U. S. ____ (2023) Opinion of the Court had produced and distributed a film by Federico Fellini ti- tled “Ginger and Fred” about two fictional Italian cabaret dancers (Pippo and Amelia) who imitated Ginger Rogers and Fred Astaire.
So, for example, when the toymaker Mattel sued a band over the song “Barbie Girl”— with lyrics including “Life in plastic, it’s fantastic” and “I’m a blond bimbo girl, in a fantasy world”—the Ninth Circuit applied Rogers.
And similarly, the Sec- ond Circuit (indeed, the judge who authored Rogers) re- jected a motorcycle mechanic’s view that his modified ver- sion of Harley Davidson’s bar-and-shield logo was an Cite as: 599 U. S. ____ (2023) Opinion of the Court expressive parody entitled to Rogers’ protection.
cite Cite Document

Hachette Book Group, Inc. et al v. Internet Archive et al

Docket 1:20-cv-04160, New York Southern District Court (June 1, 2020)
Judge John G. Koeltl, presiding
Copyright
DivisionFoley Square
FlagsCLOSED, APPEAL, ECF
Cause17:101 Copyright Infringement
Case Type820 Copyright
Tags820 Copyright, 820 Copyright
Plaintiff Hachette Book Group, Inc.
Plaintiff HarperCollins Publishers LLC
Plaintiff John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
...
cite Cite Docket
1 2 3 4 5 ... >>